While I haven't purchased a complete PSA rifle, I've built several AR's using PSA parts, including lowers, barrels, BCG's & uppers. They all work great & are some of my favorite AR's.
@@11C1P That has been our experience too. There seems to be a lot of people that think they are junk due to the affordability but I bet they never shot one. Thanks for supporting our channel!
I've used there lowers on all my builds never had a problem with them I put plenty of rounds through them I have done some upgrades still psa lower I put a 2 stage geissele trigger and a hammer forge barrel on it and ran a BCM receiver and bolt carrier group still a PSA charging handle still the PSA lower I would trust this rifle shoots fantastic all the PSA parts still work fine I can find nothing wrong with their stuff you can throw upgrades on it as you go if you desire mine's a great rifle I wouldn't change a thing
PSA is amazing. The reason the price is low is because they market directly to the purchaser (like you stated). No middle man means lower costs. I think PSA, if sold at gun stores, would cost 30% more. Gun snobs might laught at PSA, but I'm sure happy with mine! And yes, I do own a $3500 Daniel build and I've shot both flawlessly! Great video brother!
If I am mistaken on that, and it is the standard one, it is pretty good for sure. It is much smoother than the milspec one I got on my Sig M400 (which I replaced with a Triggertech). I am pretty sure when I bought it, it listed the EPT though. But I can be mistaken
@@BlackBearOutdoors no worries at all I have both from psa and they are both better than any other parts kit fire control group I’ve personally shot the ept is as good as mil spec can get in my personal experience
