কেন সুভাষচন্দ্রের বিয়ে নিয়ে মুখ খোলেননি শরতচন্দ্র বসু? 

ধন্যবাদ! 🙏

ধন্যবাদ! 🙏

Thank you!

Dhonyobad!

Thank you!

Thank you!

Thank you!

জয়ন্ত চৌধুরী হবে

Seta jokhon kotha bolchhen, tokhonkar situation, aager o na, porer o na 😔

Uni mithyebadi toh non ee, borong uni asole kee, seta bujhte sadharon manushher koyek jonmo lagbe ,😔

If we agree with Anita , then NETAJI is a liar !!!! What can be more HUMILIATING to NETAJI ?????

We want all files related to Netaji be disclosed .

প্রশ্নটা 'মনে হওয়া'র নয়। আমার বা আপনার কি মনে হয় তাতে সত্যিটা বদলে যাবে না। আমার সিদ্ধান্ত প্রমাণ ও তথ্যভিত্তিক। পরের এপিসোডগুলো দেখুন।

@@chandrachurg এই মতের বিপক্ষে ও কিছু মত আছে। যাইহোক, আপনি নিশ্চয়ই আপনার কথা বলবেন, শুনবো।

@@cmasusantakumarsaha9067 I agree with you .

@@cmasusantakumarsaha9067 আপনি কি বাংলা বোঝেন না । প্রমাণ ও তথ্যভিত্তিক কথা বলতে হয় বলুন । কি মনে হয় কি না মনে হয় এই সব মত দেওয়া আর মত পোষণ করা বন্ধ করুন

That is a possibility, but he didn't know where Subhas was and when he will come back. Possibly he wanted to wait for some time and unfortunately his death intervened.

Exactly, this could have been a good reason for keeping silent. His untimely death created all the confusions, lies etc. As for Bose family, being the descendants of that parivaar, does not give them an authority on the subject. They shiw themselves to be highly confused lot. Uf they cared about their Uncle/Grand Uncle, why didn't they investigate on their part about Baghwanji too. Did they really want him to return, did they really like the idea of him having a family?? Because that would lead to his wife & daughter be the sole heir to Netaji's property, belongings & legacy. Probably the descendants did not want to let go of this opportunity.

@@grandcanyon1000 This might be unfairly harsh on the descendants. The line of descendants who did not believe in the crash theory, and they seem to far outnumber the ones who believe in the crash, certainly should explore the Gumnami theory seriously, and they seem not to do so, judging from their public responses. But it is also to some extent understandable where they are coming from. At least reading Conundrum, I get the impression that Bhagwanji was making many tall claims, being involved in important global affairs like Indo-China war, the war in Vietnam, the Bangladesh war of liberation, his other works for his `horizon' etc etc. But, there is nothing that comes close to being called an evidence, except as far as I can recall, a letter bearing the insignia of the GOI in which GB claims he was in the high seas in and around Bangladesh during the liberation war. But that is, I'd say, a weak evidence. In the end, one cannot but wonder if GB was just daydreaming at that stage. To have lived thirty years of his life in India, when the country went through myriad of problems, entirely daydreaming is strange, not to say that it's unthinkable for someone like SB. Now it's possible that towards the end of the INA days Subhas may have grown more inclined towards mysticism (the book Breakthrough in Burma by Dr. Ba Maw has him saying that as soon as India wins freedom he'd retire into spiritualism, in one of his speeches during the INA days, addressed to Gandhi he does say, 'many of us would retire after the liberation of India is achieved', etc etc). Maybe as a response to that call he gave up everything. But again, would Subhas feel that all that had to be done was done around mid 1950's/60's... Bhagwanji himself says India is in a real mess! Of course, he was much older then, had suffered possibly torture at the hands of the Soviet, was disillusioned by Indian politics etc. To sum it up, I'd sympathize with the initial fear of family members that the pre-1945 fiery image of Subhas would be tarnished. But, of course, I cannot understand by now, when initial fear should have been replaced by rational thoughts, why they don't investigate this matter honestly and seriously when Conundrum has presented several strong evidences. Somehow, they are not able to overcome that initial impression and fear. It is worth mentioning that one grand-niece of Subhas, Jayanti Rakshit, who is much more open to the Gumnami theory, in an interview with Kunal Bose (available on youtube), does explain the response of the children of Amiya Nath Bose in a similar fashion.

grandcanyon1000 absolutely.

Not only did she support him in his pursuit of India's liberation, much later in 1951 she scribbled the following note to a visiting correspondent of Ananda Bazar Patrika in Vienna: `May God give him many more years to live and fulfil his sacred oath' (source: Conundrum, page 742, where they credit it to National Archives, New Delhi). So even in 1951, much after Subhas left the family behind and was not traceable, Emilie had only affection and respect for him, and no bitterness.

Agreed

I agree 👍 💯 p cent .

I wish I could. It takes a lot of time and effort to prepare each episode.

@@chandrachurg agree sir, and thanks for your reply

ABP is financially supported by Congress

You can share your information, at least parts of it through FB messenger

@@chandrachurg at least can you share your email id ? Mine is deyabhik@gmail.com . At least I can type some parts to first give you this much idea that I am.NOT folling around or that this is not a fake id or something

Pallab ji , everyone can marry . But to show an unmarried man married , is very very Insulting !!!

@@anglobhodaighosh6472 Your comment is controversial. No comment.

Only a mad can rely upon Anita's words , who knows nothing new about NETAJI'S SACRIFICE . Anita's knowledge is bookish knowledge . The British are laughing at our foolishness !

দাদা আমি একটা কথা বুঝতে পারছি না যে অনেক জায়গায় পড়েছি যে অনেক সাধু বলেছেন সুভাষচন্দ্র বসু বিয়ে করতে পরেন না তার হস্ত রেখা অনুযায়ী তিনি বিয়ে করতে পারেন না। তিনি সাধু হতে পারেন এবং যদি তিনি বেচে থাকেন তাহলে তিনি কোথায় আছেন নিজের দেশে নিজেকে কেন নিজেকে সামনে প্রকাশ করছেন না কেন ? আমরা বাঙালি সত্যী সুভাষ চন্দ্র বসু স্রধ্যা করি এবং ভালবাসি। আজকের ভারত বর্ষ তে খুব দরকার। কারন দেশের মানুষ খুব দুর্ভোগ এ আছে ।

Je ja khushi bolte pare - ke bolchhe setake gurutto na diye proman ar jukti dekhun. Jini bolchhen passport e onyo nam lekha achhe tini nishchoi passport dekhechhen? Apnakeo dekhate bolun. Ar sob i jodi sobai janen tobe court e giye kono subidha keno korte paren na?

@@chandrachurg Ashes dhanyobad Dada tomer uttorer jonno tobe 1ta baper tomera ja details diyecho seta jathesto r Ami tomar r Anujdar upore kau akaron r illogical katha bolle chere katha boli na but ara 1ta katha bole j kau naki Bhagabanjir shobdah dekhenni r uposthito chilen na ata court sakhio diyechen tobe ki oner oi dineko mretyu hoyni r aber kau bolen j Netaji naki Gayanganj achen atao ki aduo somvob?? R ata tomer r Anujda k niyeo nanan katha bole k naki baba bhandari ache jini naki court sakhi diyechen r ara Balok bramhocharir ashrom lok ara Mahakal namer Boier reference tane r Shradhayo Lila royer nam ullekh kore.. Tomara please tomader timemoto mukherjee commission report kara kara ki bolechilo r Oi maha manob ase bole j boita ache ter upore 1ta video baniyo tomara 1ta single point bad rakhoni kintu Ami ader sathe ai 1ta jaygay giye atake jai ara amay bole tui oder dalal ro jata bole agulo shunte valo lage na r amino Anujda thiki boleche Kolkatatei Netajir shotru r ahetuk baje katha charanor lok beshi royeche... Amay khama koro ai language baboher korer jonno...

Uni to script writer of marriage STORY .

@@anglobhodaighosh6472 tate kintu chobi ache 🙂

Your turn first.

Thank you :-)

No clinching evidence , only sentimental talk about Marriage (?) .

It can't be believed. Rather It should be strongly opposed all over the country. It is nothing but a rumour spread by Gandhi-Nehru alliance group for political advantage.

Who are you?

Hyan. Sob evidence theke etai dekha jachhe je onader bhalobasar somporko chhilo, hoyto ekta chhoto onushthan kore biyeo korechhilen, kintu seta registered hoyni.

@@chandrachurg r sontan

SUJIT GHOSH onader-i

@@chandrachurg Thnq sir amar doubts clear er jonno r somjer samne sotti ta uposthapon korar jonno.🙂🙂

@@chandrachurg But sir Anita Paff to manen j onar pita mane amader Netaji planecrash a mara gechen

Marriage is no crime , but presentation of unmarried person as married is a big crime obviously !

Nirad C Chaudhuri the great British lover was the Father of Krishna Chaudhuri Bose , who is the best script writer of MARRIAGE STORY !! WHAT A SHAME !!!

Bhramachorjyo is appropriate for the adolescent and young men who are still not ready to establish their family life. It is much better than suppressing the natural passion and lust for the females. But if all adults were to follow that practice as a "Dharma", then the human race and their civilization would collapse. Subhas Chandra Bose committed himself to marriage only after his 35 years of age. That was also important and useful for conducting his patriotic mission from a faraway country in the midst of a devastating raging war. He never for a moment flinched from his total commitment to the mission of freeing his motherland. His wife Emile did not stop him, nor stood in his way with tearful eyes to hold him back. And through the next several years when he was forming and conducting the battle of the Azad Hind Fauz, he never spoke or regretted about his own wife and little child left back in Austria. That was a time when thousands of youngmen over the world were leaving their families, parents and wives, and siblings to throw themselves on to the fire of the war; -not a time for looking back.