മാർത്താണ്ഡ വർമ്മയുടെ കഥ | Marthanda Varma History | travancore | Psc-upsc| malayalam |full episode 

Sir, The sovereign of Kerala (Malabar) was titled as ‘Keralaputhra’ in Sanskrit since the 3rd Century B.C therefore the south Indian invaders from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka etc have also referred to the Kerala (Malabar) kings as 'Sera, Serala, Chera, Cherama etc' in their Dravidian languages and as 'Kerala' in Sanskrit until the 12th century C.E For Example: "Kerala is not only the country, but also the Kshathriya-Jaathi inhabiting the country" - Vaarthika of Kaathyayana pre-3rd Century B.C The Kupaka royal family of Kerala (Malabar) as comprising of Venadu aka Jayasimhanadu, Trippappur aka Attingal, Chirava aka Chirayinkeezhil, Thiruvankur aka Thiruvithankur etc were several Matrilineal branches as related to one and another by inter-adoptation, marriage etc in Kerala (Malabar) history hence the Invaders from Tamil Nadu such as the 'Pandi king and Chola king' in their own inscriptions until the 12th Century C.E have referred to 'Kollam, Vizhinjam, Kottar etc' as belonging to the Kerala (Malabar) kings titled as 'Kupaka' in Indian history. For Example: The 7th century to 12th century C.E inscriptions of Tamil Nadu refers to multiple Pandya kings and Chola kings as having invaded the region of “Malainadu or Kerala” and the Tamil Nadu king Raja Raja Chola (985 C.E -1014 C.E) in his inscriptions on the conquest of Kerala claims that his army invaded the country which was the Creation Of Parashurama (Kerala) and plundered the town of Vizhinjam, Kollam, Kodungallur etc which itself shows that the land of Kerala was known as the Parashurama Kshetra (i.e creation of parashurama) among even the non-keralites in history. The Vrishni branch of Yadava kings or Kupakas, the southernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala and the Haihaya branch of Yadava kings or Mushakas, the northernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala as found in the historical accounts and in the literary works of Kerala are fabricated to be the successors of the various unhistorical hill-chieftains by pseudo-historians (Ex. Kari, the unhistorical chieftain of Kollimalai (namakkal district) in Tamil Nadu or Pari, the unhistorical chieftain of Parampumalai (sivaganga district) in Tamil Nadu etc) and similarly, it is only a traditional mythological history of Tamil Nadu (ex. purananuru) in which the Vedic sage Agasthya Muni is believed to have brought various Velirs including Ay-Vel from Dwaraka (i.e thuvarai in tamil) to the various hills of Tamil Nadu including Pothiyilmalai (tirunelveli district) and not part of Kerala history The Ayar or the 'Aioi tribe' as mentioned by the Greek traveler Ptolemy as situated south of Kerobothras (Keralaputhra) in the 2nd century C.E were an agro-pastoral community of Kerala whereas the Kareioi (Karaiyar tribe) and Battoi (Vedar tribe) as mentioned by Ptolemy as situated East of Komari (Kanyakumari) are the fishing and hunting community of Tamil Nadu and not a separate Kingdom. The term 'Ayar or Konar or Edayar or Edasheri etc' were common caste-names of Kerala and Tamil Nadu in the past as denoting the agro-pastoralists whose common occupation was raising cows, selling milk etc in history just as the caste-name Channar (Ezhava), Chaliyar (weavers), Panar (singers) etc in history and not a seperate kingdom. For Example: “Evoor itta thengum panaiyum Ezhavar era peraadaagavum” - Leiden plates of Raja Raja Chola - 10th century C.E : Translation - “The Ezhavas should not climb the Coconut trees and Palmyra trees planted in this village.' The Earliest extant Kerala literary works refers to Kerala as the Crown of Bharata (i.e Indian subcontinent) in which the Keralites from Kolavishaya (Kolathunadu) to Velavishaya (Venadu) as conducting trade among the Foreign Traders from abroad and south India referred to as Cheenas (Chinese), Yonakas (Middle-Easterners), Thulukkas (Thurukshas), Kannadas (Karnata), Chozhiyas (Chola), Pandiyas (Pandya) etc in the marketplace of the prominent cities of the Kerala-Country (i.e Keraladesha) referred to as 'Male or Malabar' by the Foreign Travelers since the 6th Century C.E in the historical accounts or as 'Kerala' in the various Sanskrit literary works of ancient India. For Example: Raghuvamsha - Kalidasa - 5th Century C.E - "....Kerala yoshitham alakeshu... - meaning - "the locks of curled hair of the Kerala women The land of 'Kerala or Keralajanapadha or Keralaputhra' in Indian history since the 3rd Century B.C to 12th Century C.E referred to as Malayalam, Malanadu, Malamandalam etc in Kerala history after the Sanskrit word 'Malaya' as denoting the western ghats did not consist of any region east of the Ghats or the region of Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history hence the people of Tamil Nadu irrespective of caste (Ex. Parppan (Brahmin), Vellalan, Kammalan, Paraiyan, Pulaiyan, Kuravan, Kallan etc) now known as 'Tamilans' were collectively referred to as a Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history until the 12th Century C.E and thereafter in Kerala (Malabar) history.

ആനന്ദ പദ്മൻ നാടാർ ഉള്ളത് ആണോ...?

Sir, The Malayali Brahmin king of Porca (i.e Purakkad in Kerala) had an army of 30,000 soldiers as consisting mostly of Chegos (i.e Chekon) as the native Malayali caste-group designated as ‘Panchamas or Avarnas’ in Kerala (Malabar) history such as the caste-group Tiar (Thiyya), Elava (Ezhava) etc were also bound to accompany the Malayali Kings at his behest in war as according to the Foreign travelers themselves whereas the caste-group 'Nadars (Shanars)' aka 'Pandi Ezhava' are not Malayalis but Tamil speaking immigrants like the caste-group 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Paraya etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history and the Earliest publication on Nadars (Shanars) known as 'The Thirunelveli Shanars' by the Bishop Robert Caldwell vividly describe their social condition in the 19th Century C.E in relation to the other Tamil speaking castes of Tamil Nadu. The land of Kerala (Malabar) was consisting of several kings from Cannonor (Kannur) to Travancore (Thiruvithankur) as attested by the Foreign Travelers themselves and the Malayali kings of Kawlam (Kollam) and his relative the king of Travancore (Thiruvithankur) were protecting vast area of Tamil speaking region referred to as 'Coromandel' up to Cayal (Kayalpattanam) from invaders including the Vijayanagara kings in the 16th Century C.E and various Tamil speaking immigrants irrespective of caste were given asylum in Kerala (Malabar) between the 14th Century C.E and 18th Century C.E when Tamil Nadu was occupied by 'Delhi Sultanate, Vijayanagara kings, Telugu Nayaks etc' in Indian history. For Example: Duarte Barbosa (1480 - 1521) - "In this land of Coromandel (Tamil Nadu), they speak a different language from that of Malabar (Kerala) which they call Tamul (Tamil). The term 'Channan' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E as denoting the 'Malayali Ezhavas' had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking caste-group 'Shanar' (Sandran in Tamil) who have changed their caste name to 'Nadar' in the early 20th Century and it is these Tamil-speaking immigrant Nadar (Pandi Ezhava aka Shanar) majority as situated in Travancore from Neyyattinkara to Kanyakumari in Kerala (Malabar) history who campaigned for its inclusion in the Tamil-speaking Madras State (Tamil Nadu) instead of the Malayalam-speaking Kerala state. For Example: Duarte Barbosa (1480-1521) - “In this land of Malabar (Kerala) from cumbla (kasaragod district) to cape comorin (kanyakumari district), all men use one tongue only which they call Maliama” (i.e Malayalam) . The caste-group of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava, Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrants of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishwakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history. For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901

Da pillai nee veruthe nayanmaare thottu kalikanda

​@@Uglyfacer athe ullath aanu😊

Dutch kaare തോൽപിച്ച് പക്ഷേ വെറും ചെറ്റവർമ്മ

@@jeevanjohn6190 Ninte valiammachiyod vallathum cheytho?

@@ranjithc4762 എന്തോന്ന്😌 ഇവൻ നന്മ മരം ആണ് എന്ന 2 ആഴ്‌ച മുന്നേ വരെ കരുതിയത്

Villan aayirinnu

👍

മാർത്താണ്ഡ വർമ്മ ചരിത്രം സി .വി. രാമൻപിള്ളയുടെ നോവൽ ഉണ്ട് മാർത്താണ്ഡവർമ്മ സിനിമയും ഉണ്ട്.

പുതിയ ഒരു സിനിമ ഇറങ്ങണമെന്ന് അതിയായ ആഗ്രഹമുണ്ട്.

ഇത് സായിപ്പ് എഴുതിയ കഥയാണ്

കഥ വളച്ചൊടിച്ച് എഴുതി നല്‍കിയtha

If you are interested to make the true story of Marthandavarma .never read or heard this false story manipulated by an immature person to protect the invaders of our country

Old style drawing

W

🤣

ഗോൾഡ് ഫിഷിന്റെ കണ്ണുപോലെ ഉണ്ട് 🤣🤣

മാർത്താണ്ടവർമ്മ നിർമിച്ച ക്ഷേത്രത്തിലെ ചുമർചിത്രങ്ങൾ കണ്ടിട്ട് അങ്ങനെ തോന്നുന്നില്ല

Other south kerala kingdoms against him 😂

Ayin ​@@keralanaturelover196

​@@keralanaturelover196 Hey chovvu Spammer No kings support each other Just for temporary adjustments they support and they're targets. U chovvus pretty much don't like Arya kings of Kerala Hence Barking

​@@aadithyanc.kchovvus meaning??

correct

നായർ..

@@sankarramachandran1468 ഒരിക്കലും ആകാൻ സാധ്യതയില്ല അത് കൊട്ടാരത്തിൽ ശങ്കുണ്ണിയുടെ ഐതിഹ്യ മാലയിലും CV രാമൻ പിള്ളയുടെ കൊട്ടാരം പുകഴ്ത്തൽ ഒരു ചരിത്രമാണ് എന്ന് എങ്ങനെ സമർഥിക്കാൻ കഴിയും പ്രശസ്ത ചരിത്രകാരൻ എംജി ശശിഭുഷൻ അദ്ദേഹത്തിൻ്റെ ഗഹനമായ പഠനത്തിൽ പറയുന്നു travancore kings are ballabas or nadaars എന്ന് പോരാത്തതിന് അന്നത്തെ തിരുവിതാകൂർ തലസ്ഥാനമായി രാജ്യം സ്ഥിതി ചെയ്തിരുന്ന തക്കല കൊട്ടാരവും. തയ് കൊട്ടാരമായ ഇരണിയൽ കൊട്ടാരവും ആ പ്രദേശവും അവിടെ കൂടുതൽ താമസിക്കുന്ന ആൾക്കാരും അന്നത്തെ അവരുടെ സാമൂഹിക സ്ഥാനവും കണ്ടാൽ അത് തെളിയിക്കും സത്യം

@@sankarramachandran1468 no he was kshatriya. venad swaroopi was chera and Ay dynasty merged with them. Ay is mentioned in mahabharatha as noble kshatriya. Even cheras also kshatriya. Ravi varma of venad conquered tamil nadu in 1313 and declared himself emperor at kanchi. nayar are shudras. ezhavas, dalits like pulayas were outcaste and chandala unfortunately.

സങ്കരവർഗ ചരിത്രകാരന്മാരുടെ കപട ചരിത്ര രചന.

സൂദ്രൻ

😂other soith kingdom against him

When the ailment is increased surgery is reqd. Medicine will not work. Saktan Thampuran of kochi sworoopam also did same.

Sir, The sovereign of Kerala (Malabar) was titled as ‘Keralaputhra’ in Sanskrit since the 3rd Century B.C therefore the south Indian invaders from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka etc have also referred to the Kerala (Malabar) kings as 'Sera, Serala, Chera, Cherama etc' in their Dravidian languages and as 'Kerala' in Sanskrit until the 12th century C.E For Example: "Kerala is not only the country, but also the Kshathriya-Jaathi inhabiting the country" - Vaarthika of Kaathyayana pre-3rd Century B.C The Kupaka royal family of Kerala (Malabar) as comprising of Venadu aka Jayasimhanadu, Trippappur aka Attingal, Chirava aka Chirayinkeezhil, Thiruvankur aka Thiruvithankur etc were several Matrilineal branches as related to one and another by inter-adoptation, marriage etc in Kerala (Malabar) history hence the Invaders from Tamil Nadu such as the 'Pandi king and Chola king' in their own inscriptions until the 12th Century C.E have referred to 'Kollam, Vizhinjam, Kottar etc' as belonging to the Kerala (Malabar) kings titled as 'Kupaka' in Indian history. For Example: The 7th century to 12th century C.E inscriptions of Tamil Nadu refers to multiple Pandya kings and Chola kings as having invaded the region of “Malainadu or Kerala” and the Tamil Nadu king Raja Raja Chola (985 C.E -1014 C.E) in his inscriptions on the conquest of Kerala claims that his army invaded the country which was the Creation Of Parashurama (Kerala) and plundered the town of Vizhinjam, Kollam, Kodungallur etc which itself shows that the land of Kerala was known as the Parashurama Kshetra (i.e creation of parashurama) among even the non-keralites in history. The Vrishni branch of Yadava kings or Kupakas, the southernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala and the Haihaya branch of Yadava kings or Mushakas, the northernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala as found in the historical accounts and in the literary works of Kerala are fabricated to be the successors of the various unhistorical hill-chieftains by pseudo-historians (Ex. Kari, the unhistorical chieftain of Kollimalai (namakkal district) in Tamil Nadu or Pari, the unhistorical chieftain of Parampumalai (sivaganga district) in Tamil Nadu etc) and similarly, it is only a traditional mythological history of Tamil Nadu (ex. purananuru) in which the Vedic sage Agasthya Muni is believed to have brought various Velirs including Ay-Vel from Dwaraka (i.e thuvarai in tamil) to the various hills of Tamil Nadu including Pothiyilmalai (tirunelveli district) and not part of Kerala history The Ayar or the 'Aioi tribe' as mentioned by the Greek traveler Ptolemy as situated south of Kerobothras (Keralaputhra) in the 2nd century C.E were an agro-pastoral community of Kerala whereas the Kareioi (Karaiyar tribe) and Battoi (Vedar tribe) as mentioned by Ptolemy as situated East of Komari (Kanyakumari) are the fishing and hunting community of Tamil Nadu and not a separate Kingdom. The term 'Ayar or Konar or Edayar or Edasheri etc' were common caste-names of Kerala and Tamil Nadu in the past as denoting the agro-pastoralists whose common occupation was raising cows, selling milk etc in history just as the caste-name Channar (Ezhava), Chaliyar (weavers), Panar (singers) etc in history and not a seperate kingdom. For Example: “Evoor itta thengum panaiyum Ezhavar era peraadaagavum” - Leiden plates of Raja Raja Chola - 10th century C.E : Translation - “The Ezhavas should not climb the Coconut trees and Palmyra trees planted in this village.' The Earliest extant Kerala literary works refers to Kerala as the Crown of Bharata (i.e Indian subcontinent) in which the Keralites from Kolavishaya (Kolathunadu) to Velavishaya (Venadu) as conducting trade among the Foreign Traders from abroad and south India referred to as Cheenas (Chinese), Yonakas (Middle-Easterners), Thulukkas (Thurukshas), Kannadas (Karnata), Chozhiyas (Chola), Pandiyas (Pandya) etc in the marketplace of the prominent cities of the Kerala-Country (i.e Keraladesha) referred to as 'Male or Malabar' by the Foreign Travelers since the 6th Century C.E in the historical accounts or as 'Kerala' in the various Sanskrit literary works of ancient India. For Example: Raghuvamsha - Kalidasa - 5th Century C.E - "....Kerala yoshitham alakeshu... - meaning - "the locks of curled hair of the Kerala women The land of 'Kerala or Keralajanapadha or Keralaputhra' in Indian history since the 3rd Century B.C to 12th Century C.E referred to as Malayalam, Malanadu, Malamandalam etc in Kerala history after the Sanskrit word 'Malaya' as denoting the western ghats did not consist of any region east of the Ghats or the region of Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history hence the people of Tamil Nadu irrespective of caste (Ex. Parppan (Brahmin), Vellalan, Kammalan, Paraiyan, Pulaiyan, Kuravan, Kallan etc) now known as 'Tamilans' were collectively referred to as a Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history until the 12th Century C.E and thereafter in Kerala (Malabar) history.

Other south kerala kings were against him

Yes destroyed kottayam

@@keralanaturelover196 ഏത് കോട്ടയം പറ? കോട്ടയം നാട്ടുരാജ്യമാണോ അതയോ?

അപ്പോ ഇയാളോ 🙄

Poda. That's why other south kingdom supported dutch against him

Vivaham okke kazhicharunnu pakshe marumakhtaya vevasthayanu follow cheyyunnathu

❤️❤️

❤️❤️❤️

Valara seriyanu

Vaikunta Swami Swathi thirunal ne ann karinechan enn vilichath. You're 80 percentage wrong 20 percentage right

Mail idu ❤️

Mail id parayu

ukmalayalam777@gmail.com

❤️

കേരളത്തിൽ ഉണ്ടായിരുന്ന എല്ലാ രാജാക്കന്മാരും നായന്മാർ തന്നെ ആയിരുന്നു

So?

One of the Earliest references to 'Hiranyagarbha' in South India is accredited to the 7th Century Pandi King of Tamil Nadu known as Sendan (i.e Jayanthan in Sanskrit) as attested by the Tamil Nadu historians themselves. These Tamilans and Malayalam speakers of Pandi ancestry such as Nadars (Shanars) are only here to cause confusion among ignorant Malayalis while their Tamilan historians can uninterruptedly teach a grand fraud history as based on their local Tamil Nadu mythology now called as 'Sangam Literatures' and Post-Sangam Literatures' in schools all over India. "Oh Uthiyan Seralathan, Even if the day loses its lustre, and the Four Vedas fail to propagate the truth, you will reign gloriously forever" - Sangam Literature (purananuru) Please don't support the dishonest historians sir. The kings of Kerala are referred to as 'Kerala, Keralaputhra, Keraladhinatha, Keralakularaja, Keralavarma etc' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works. The south Indian invaders from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka etc have referred to the Kerala (Malabar) kings as 'Sera, Serala, Chera, Cherama etc' in their Dravidian languages and as 'Kerala' in Sanskrit until the 12th century C.E in Indian history as it is the Malayali kings alone in the historical accounts of Kerala since the 9th Century C.E as consisting of the chieftain Kolathiri of Kolathunadu, Kurumpiyathiri of Kurumpranadu, Eralathiri of Eranadu, Vellathiri of Valluvanadu, Onathiri of Odanadu, Venathiri of Venadu etc who were the rulers of Kerala (Malabar) until the 18th Century C.E in Kerala history. : For Example: The 15th century inscription of Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu refers to the Kerala king 'Jayasimha Deva' of Kollam (i.e Kolambhapuri in Sanskrit) as the 'Crowned Monarch' of the 'Chera Lineage' in Matrilineal succession whereas the 16th century inscription of Chidambaram in Tamil Nadu refers to the Kerala king 'Ramavarma Maharaja' of Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Srianjanakhalam in Sanskrit) as the 'Royal Descent' of the mythological king 'Seraman Perumal Nayanar' in Matrilineal succession hence even the foreign traveler Ibn battuta in the 14th Century C.E have also stated that "In Malabar (Kerala), the Kings transmit their sovereignty only to their sisters Son". : The origin of Marumakkathayam (i.e Mathruparamparya in Sanskrit) or the matrilineal inheritance is attributed to the mandate of 'Parashurama' in an epoch known as 'Treta Yuga' in the Kerala tradition thereby as per the traditional Kerala history, a King of Kerala or 'Cheraman' known as 'Ramavarma' had once ruled the entire land from Gokarnam to Kanyakumari after Lord Parashurama in an epoch known as 'KalI Yuga' and he divided the land among the nobles and his throne among his nephew (i.e mahodhayapattanam king) and his crown among his son (i.e kolambhapattanam king) with Kodungallur (i.e thiruvanchikulam) and Kollam (i.e thenvanchi) as their capital within the Kerala-Kingdom (i.e Keraladesha) hence even the foreign traveler Friar Jordanus in the 14th Century have also stated that “In this India (Kerala) never do even the sons of great kings or nobles inherit the goods of their parents, but only the sons of their sisters" : Duarte Barbosa (1480-1521) - “In this land of Malabar (Kerala) from cumbla (kasaragod district) to cape comorin (kanyakumari district), all men use one tongue only which they call Maliama” (i.e Malayalam) : The literary works as found from tamil nadu and sri lanka now called as 'sangam literature's' by modern scholars which refers to the kings and regions of Kerala (i.e sera) are not historical documents but a collection of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist mythology as written in Tamil language between 8th century C.E and 13th century C.E. (ex. pattitrupattu, purananuru, agananuru, silapathikaram, manimegalai etc) as per several historians whereas the oldest Kannada literature is dated to the 9th century C.E , and the oldest Telugu literature is dated to the 11th century C.E, and the oldest Malayalam literature is dated to the 12th century C.E : For Example: 'Ilango Adikal' was the brother of 'Senguttuvan', who is said to have became angry without an enemy worthy to fight and besieged the sea with his spear and their father was 'Nedumseralathan', who is said to have conquered all of India until the Himalayas (i.e Imayamalai) and his father 'Uthiyanseralathan' is said to have fed the armies in the Mahabharata war from Kuttanadu in Kerala (i.e sera nadu in tamil). : There existed no 'illango adikal, senguttuvan, nedumserlaathan, uthiyanseralaathan etc' in Kerala history or Indian history during the period of Ptolemy, Pliny or Ashoka's time when the sovereign of Kerala was titled as 'Keralaputhra' in Sanskrit. (Ex.Kerobothros by Ptolemy or Keprobotros by the author of the Periplus or Kaelobothras in Pliny's text or Ketalaputho in the Ashoka Edicts of 3rd century B.C). : The terms ''sangam chera' and 'second chera chera' are made up by historians to create an 'historical time period' for the occurrence of the mythological events and kings as relating to the hindu, jain, buddhist mythology of Tamil Nadu hence the Kerala Kings such as 'Rama Rajashekharan' and 'Sthanu Ravi Kulashekharan' in Kerala History are falsely assumed to be the 'Seraman perumal nayanar', a Hindu shaivite king and 'Kulashekhara Azhwar', a Hindu vaishnavite king' of Hindu mythology in Tamil. (i.e divya prabandham, periyapuranam) : For Example: In the traditional Hindu mythology, The Chera aka Kerala king 'Maharaja Kulashekhara' was born in Kerala to 'Maharaja Dridhavratha' more than 5000 years ago when the territory as ruled by the Chera aka Kerala king covered the largest portion of Dravidadesha (dravida region) including vast regions of modern Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history. : The literary works of tamil nadu now called as 'sangam literature's' by modern scholars as found written in a mixture of Tamil script, Grantha script and Telugu script which refers to the kings and regions of Kerala (i.e sera-nadu in tamil) and numerous other chieftains of the mountainous tracts and elsewhere in Tamil Nadu region such as Andiran, Nandan, Pekan, Nalli, Ori, Kari etc are not historical documents or historical figures but a collection of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist mythology of Tamil Nadu as written in Tamil language between 8th century C.E and 13th century C.E. (ex. pattitrupattu, purananuru, agananuru, silapathikaram, manimegalai etc) as per several historians whereas the oldest Kannada literature is dated to the 9th century C.E , and the oldest Telugu literature is dated to the 11th century C.E, and the oldest Malayalam literature is dated to the 12th century C.E. : For Example: The characters of 'Kannagi and Kovalan' in the Jain prequel 'Silapathikaram' and the Buddhist sequel 'Manimegalai' of Tamil Nadu is 'Kanyavu and Balakan' in the native Old Malayalam ballad of Kerala known as 'Thottam Paattu' in which 'Kanyavu' killed the Pandian king and burned down Madurai and Lord Shiva established her abode at Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Kodungallur) in the Kerala tradition. : The Jain prequel 'Silapathikaram' and the Buddhist sequel 'Manimegalai' of Tamil Nadu are abounded in the references to Brahmanas, Vedic Yajnas and even the art forms of Kerala as present to this very day but the story and the pseudonym or the characters of Ilango adikal, Kannagi, Kovalan, Senguttuvan, Nedumchezhiyan etc are neither historical figures nor historical documents but fictional characters of the traditional mythology of Tamil Nadu and not part of Kerala tradition.

@@Nithin90 kuttanad is not the lake kuttanad of alapuzha. It is somowhere in palkad eg kootanadu., land of chenguttavan

@@Nithin90 Wow ..... You typed this 😂😂😂😂😂 You need to Get a Job Man 😂😂😂😂😂😂

നാടാര് നസ്രാണികൾ അല്ലേ

ശൂദ്രൻ മാർഗം കൂടി കക്ഷത്രിയൻ ആയതാണ്

മാർത്താണ്ട വർമ്മ വള്ളുവൻ ആണ്

@@jayeshtech354 what's that?

​​@@syhuhjk വള്ളുവൻ എന്നാൽ പുഴയിൽ നിന്നും മീൻ പിടിച്ചു ഉപജീവനം നടത്തുന്ന ആൾ.അത് കടലിൽ ആവുമ്പോൾ മുക്കുവൻ.

A person can't be kshatriya by birth. Many non-kshatriyas became kshtriya because of their warrior qualities.

Poda 😂

👍

1 QQ w

2

W

Ww

Q

Atop ❤😊

😂poda

But the kerala history is totally manipulated.If some one knows the real history don't fear to write it

Nilam uzuvan pinne alla simple analo😂

😁 ഇടാം

Tipu sultan പോലെ മുസ്ലിം ആയിരുന്നെങ്കിൽ "മികച്ച രാജാവ്" ആകുമായിരുന്നു അല്ലേ 🤦

@@sarants4488 വിട്ടേക്ക് ബ്രോ...മതം നോക്കി ബഹുമാനിക്കുന്നവനാ..

അവരു ചെയ്തത് വംശീയ ഹത്യ ആണ്, നിരപരാധികളായ സാധാരണ ജനങ്ങളെ അവരു കൊന്നു കൂട്ടി. മാർത്താണ്ഡ വർമ്മ പോരാടിയത് അദ്ദേഹത്തെ കൊല്ലാൻ തീരുമാനിച്ച രാജ്യത്തെ നശിപ്പിക്കാൻ തീരുമാനിച്ച ശത്രുക്കളോട് ആണ്.

@@sarants4488 മതം നോക്കി ആണോ ബഹുമാനിക്കുന്ന എൻ്റെ പൊന്നു ബ്രോ എത്രയോ നല്ല kerela rajaknmanar ഉണ്ട് .ഈചെറ്റ മണ്ടനെ oke pokkano എനിക്കും ഇഷ്ടം ആയിരുന്നു പിന്നിട് സത്യം മനസ്സിൽ Aayyappol ഇല്ലാ. റിയൽ story മനസ്സിൽ Aakkukka

@kmjaleel7910 : നിന്റെ വലിയുമ്മയുടെ പിടിച്ചുവെയ്പ്പുകാരൻ ടിപ്പു സുൽത്താൻ ബല്യ മഹാനായിരുന്നു കാണും!

❤️❤️

❤️❤️❤️

പണ്ഡിതൻ ആണെന്ന് തോന്നുന്നു

​@@kshathriyanñ

❤️❤️

താങ്കൾ കേട്ട കഥ തെറ്റായിരിക്കാം. ഇതാണ് orginal Story .ജന്മിമാരായ എട്ടുവീട്ടിൽ പിള്ളമാരുടെ യും മാടമ്പി മാരുടെയും സാമ്രാജ്യം തകരാതെ ഇരിക്കുന്നതിന് വേണ്ടി. രാജകുമാരനെ നശിപ്പിക്കാൻ ശ്രമിച്ച കഥ . തന്നെയും രാജ്യത്തെയും നശിപ്പിക്കാൻ ശ്രമിക്കുന്ന ഒരു സമൂഹത്തെ തിരിച്ചറിഞ്ഞ രാജാവ് സർച്ച ശക്തിയും സംഭരിച്ച് തിരിച്ചടിച്ച് വിജയം കൊയ്ത കഥ . അവസാന നിമിഷം അദ്ദേഹത്തിൻറെ മന്ത്രിയും വലംകൈയും ദളവ രാമയ്യയുടെ മരണം അദ്ദേഹത്തെ മാനസികമായും ശാരീരികമായും തളർത്തി കളഞ്ഞു. ഇന്ന് നമ്മുടെ രാജ്യത്തിന് ഒരു അനിഴം തിരുനാൾ മാർത്താണ്ഡ വർമ്മ ഉണ്ട്. ഒരു നാണയത്തിന് രണ്ട് വശങ്ങൾ എന്നതു പോലെ രാജ്യത്തിനും ജനങ്ങൾക്കും വേണ്ടി സ്വയം സമർപ്പിക്കുന്ന നേതാവ് മാർത്താണ്ഡവർമ്മ മഹാരാജാവിന്റെ അതേ നാളിൽ ജന്മം കൊണ്ട നമ്മുടെ പ്രധാനമന്ത്രി നരേന്ദ്ര ദാമോദർദാസ് മോദി.❤❤❤❤❤❤🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡

Cant say so... Ay dynasty ruled over Venad in ancient times. This dynasty is mentioned in mahabharata . Ays were kshatriya. Later cheras (also kshatriya) moved to desinganad(kollam). Kollam cheras and Ays merged to form Venad swarupam. Ravi Varma of Venad conquered tamil nadu in 1313 and declared himself emperor at kancheepuram. However in 18th century his kshatriyahood was questioned and marthanda varma did perform hiranyagarbham to get acceptance of namboodiries of central kerala

@@erdogan123erdogan4 You are wrong. Except aryans no one is shatriya. To become shatriya south Indians have to undergo some ritual.

@@southtechie The origins of Chera, Chola and pandya is not known. However they were treated as kshatriyas from the time of Asoka the mauryan. They could be tamils but by the time of asoka they had already become kshatriya. Read mahavamsam in pali . This work written in srilanka talks about kshatriya prince Vijaya from bengal coming to Lanka in 540 BC and establishing aryan kingdom. He did not marry yaksha princess kuveni instead married pandya princess . do you know why? becuase she was kshatriya. Read wiki page of Ellalan. this chola prince was Hindu and conquered lanka around 150 BC? to establish hinduism. he is also called manuneedhi cholan. i have read purananuru, tholkappiyam, thirukkural, silappathikaram - all talks about vedas, sanskrit, Brahmins. these kings may be eclectic. mahabharata consider chera, chola, pandya kshatriya. Go and read . data in net.

there is no kshatriyas in kerala and tamil nadu

@@pappipappi14 the rajas of kilimanoor, cochin rajahs etc are tirupads. And they wear sacred thread perform upanayana etc by Odikkans/vydikas etc

മക്കത്തായം ആരംഭിക്കുന്ന അസുലഭ ചരിത്ര മുഹൂർത്തമാണ് നഷ്ടമായത് അന്ന് മക്കൾ ഭരണത്തിൽ വന്നിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ മരുമക്കത്തായം അവിടെ അവസാനിക്കുമായിരുന്നു

എല്ലാം പഠിച്ചു വച്ചിരിക്കുന്ന താങ്കളും അറിയാത്തവർക്കായി ഒരു വീഡിയോ ചെയ്യുക

@@jayaprakash6774 ഞാൻ വീഡിയോ ചെയ്യാനല്ല ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്നത്.... ഞാൻ civil service aspirant ആണ്

Sir, The Invaders from Tamil Nadu such as the Chola king in his Sanskrit inscription has stated that "he had crossed the sahya mountains (western ghats) and destroyed the Kerala king and his country (Kerala) protected by the chief of the Brigus (i.e Lord Parashurama - Ex. "Jithva Kerala Bhupathim Brigupatheschithva thapo rakshitham prithvim") which itself shows that the land of Kerala was known as the Parashurama Kshetra (i.e creation of parashurama) among even the non-keralites in history. The Matrilineal system of inheritance or 'Marumakkathayam' in Malayalam is referred to as 'Mathruparamparya' in the Sanskrit works of ancient India. The pseudo-historians of Kerala have successfully brainwashed us into believing that the kings of Kerala (Malabar) in our native Kerala literary works and Inscriptions (Ex. Eralanattudayavar (Eralathiri), Venattudayavar (Venathiri) etc) since the 9th Century C.E were following the Patrilineal system of inheritance (i.e Makkathayam) like the kings of Tamil Nadu until the 12th Century C.E as it is important for the people of Tamil Nadu or 'Tamilans' irrespective of caste referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in Indian history to teach that the Kings of Kerala (Malabar) as well as the caste-group referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava (Channar), Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in our Kerala (Malabar) history since the 9th Century C.E were following their 'Tamilan culture' rather than our 'Malayali culture' like the Tamil speaking immigrants referred to as ''Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishvakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Shanar aka Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in our Kerala (Malabar) history until the 20th Century C.E For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901 Even the Hill-Tribals on the Western side of the Ghats (Kerala) did not speak Tamil or practice the Tribal customs of the Eastern side of the Ghats (Tamil Nadu) until the 20th Century C.E as attested by the Christian missionaries themselves. For Example: "The 'Hill-Tribals' are also found on the Eastern side of the ghats; but they speak Tamil and do not have the same customs as the 'Hill-Tribals' on the Western side of the Ghats" - Henry Baker

Poda. Other south kerala kings were against him😂😂😂

Poda ponnuthamburan vere level ❤

🤮🤮

Modi😂

😂😂😂

❤️❤️

ഞാൻ കുറെ വർഷങ്ങളായി പറയുന്നു, ഇദ്ദേഹത്തിന് അത്‌ ചെയ്യാൻ ഉള്ള കഴിവുണ്ട്

😂😂❤️❤️

Vazhappally..templumYi.marthandavermmskenthanu.bandham

Marthanda varmma's uncle Rama Varma was the king of venad.

@@sindhu8532 but just distant relative na not own uncle

He was considered as prince of neyatinkara at a point of instance it's a title like of prince of Wales or Duke of Sussex. He born into attingal region .

അല്ല, നിന്റെ ഉമ്മ ഉസ്താദുമാരെ നക്കാൻ തുടങ്ങി ഒരു നൂറ്റാണ്ടുകഴിഞ്ഞാണ് ഇവർ തുടങ്ങിയത്!

​@@ranjithc4762തിരുവിതം കൂർ, നിസാം സുൽത്താൻ എല്ലാം സായിപ്പ് മാർക്ക്‌ support ആരുന്നു

❤️❤️❤️

ശരിയാ മാർത്താണ്ഡൻ പുലയൻ എന്നായിരുന്നു അദ്ദേഹത്തിന്റെ ചെറുപ്പത്തിലെ പേര്

@@lalmohancr1590 jathi oke thozhilinanusarich mariyitndavum

All south Indians originated from pulayas ( the community which is genetically closer to AASI)

ഔറങ്കസീബിനെ പോലെ... അച്ചൻ ഷാജഹാനെയും സഹോദരിയെയും തുറങ്കലിൽ അടച്ച് കൊന്നു, മകനെ ഓടിച്ച് നാട് കടത്തി , കൊല്ലാൻ ശ്രമിച്ചു , സഹോദരൻമാരെ കൊന്നു... അങ്ങിനെ പോവുന്നു അയാളുടെ കാര്യം...

മുഹമ്മദ് ചെയ്ത പോലെ

പാരവെക്കാൻ വരുന്നവരെ മുഖം നോക്കാതെ ശിക്ഷിച്ചു . അപ്പോൾ ക്രൂരൻ . സ്വന്തം അണികൾ ഗുണ്ടായിസം നടത്തുമ്പോൾ കേസ് എടുക്കാതെയോ ശിക്ഷിക്കാതെ ഇരുന്നാലും അപ്പോഴും പറയും ഭരണാധികാരി ശരിയല്ല . ഇതിൽ ഏതാണ് ശരി?

​@@jainibrm1 ഹിന്ദുക്കളെ കൊന്നു.. അപ്പൊ ഹിന്ദു ഒന്നല്ലേ...

​@@jainibrm1 അപ്പൊ ഒരേ വിശ്വാസം ഉള്ളവരെ കൊന്നു. എന്തിനു. ബ്രിട്ടീഷുകാരെ ഓക്കേ.. പക്ഷെ ഒരേ ദൈവങ്ങളെ വിളിക്കുന്ന നാട്ടുരാജാക്കന്മാർ എന്തിനു തമ്മിൽ വെട്ടി. ഇതിൽ എന്ത് ധർമം കുല തടയാൻ ഒരു പ്രമാണം ഹിന്ദുധര്മത്തിൽ ഇല്ല എന്നാണോ..

😂😂😂

മാർത്താണ്ഡ വർമ്മ മീൻ പിടിത്തക്കാരൻ ആയിരുന്നോ

@@lalmohancr1590 മാർത്താണ്ട വർമ രാജാവായിരുന്നു,അനന്ത പത്പനാഭൻ നാടാർ അതേഹത്തിന്റ പടത്തലവൻ ആയിരുന്നു...

Sir, The character 'Anantha Padmanabhan' who disguises himself as a 'Channan' in the novel 'Marthanda Varma' is not associated with any of the Tamil speaking caste-group referred to as 'Cantar' (shanar) in Sri Lanka or as 'Sandran' (shanar) in Tamil Nadu who have changed their caste name to 'Nadar' and campaigned for their inclusion of Travancore (Malabar) in the Tamil-speaking Madras State (Tamil Nadu) instead of the Malayalam-speaking Kerala state in the 20th Century. There are various references to Tamil speaking Vellalas, Maravas etc as attacking the Tamil speaking Shanars aka Nadars since the 18th Century C.E. The Early Christian missionaries including Robert Caldwell since the 19th Century have referred to Shanars (Nadars) as "very dirty, ignorant and deceitful" and their homeland where they teem in large population as Thirunelveli and these Tamil-speaking immigrant 'Shanars' aka Nadars were referred to as 'Pandi Ezhavas' in Kerala (Malabar) history until the 20th Century C.E. Duarte Barbosa (1480-1521) - “In this land of Malabar (Kerala) from cumbla (kasaragod district) to cape comorin (kanyakumari district), all men use one tongue only which they call Maliama” (i.e Malayalam) . The term 'Channan' in the inscriptions of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E as denoting the 'Malayali Ezhavas' had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrant 'Shanar' (Pandi Ezhava aka Nadar) majority as situated in Travancore from Neyyattinkara to Kanyakumari in Kerala (Malabar) history who campaigned for their inclusion in the Tamil-speaking Madras State (Tamil Nadu) instead of the Malayalam-speaking Kerala state in the 20th Century C.E Duarte Barbosa (1480 - 1521) - "In this land of Coromandel (Tamil Nadu), they speak a different language from that of Malabar (Kerala) which they call Tamul (Tamil). The caste-group of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava (Channan), Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrants of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishwakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Shanar aka Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history until the 20th Century C.E. For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901

You mean OBC 😮

ഉണ്ട്

Dutch east India