Woke people label this transphobic, I call out this nonsense as being ridiculous . It’s a pity our media doesn’t criticise this delusional stupidity more effectively Instead of giving it a platform to promote their ideology.
because she just told you what you wanted to hear??? (you can't deny the fact that gender identity exist -- and that is separate from sex. read an article or two from WHO or something.) this woman is extremely biased and she never even acknowledged what the other party had to say. is this how a discussion works? i fear tf not.
@@okaywtf2607 No, because what she said was fact. We hear from “the other party” constantly. We hear their attempts to hijack our language and to change the definitions of words. All done in an effort to repeat lies so often that they become truth. The constant misinformation and downright lies. The emotional blackmail around certain statistics relating to the ending of lives. There are (at most) 3 genders. Male, female and intersex and even with intersex there will be a dominant sex. Male and female are determined in nature. No amount of surgical intervention can make a boy a girl or vice versus. It can make you appear as the opposite sex but that appearance is deceptive. You do not become a sex because you choose it. There are masculine girls and feminine boys and that is absolutely beautiful. There is nothing wrong with that! The idea that there’s something wrong and that you need hormone treatments and surgery is outrageous.
Those people are to be protected and respected, I've met humble and genuine salt of the earth gay/bi people in my life, been to pride events back when they were events. Loved every interaction I ever had with them. I do feel truly sorry for them because they are stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Pay attention to what type of "trans" are causing the divide. it's transvestites/cross dressers. Trouble is, all government establishments are too stupid to tell the difference between the trans types, and they're giving trans privileges to those that don't deserve them.
11 Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others-and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.” Matthew 19:11-12 It’s now being censored to read something else.
Maybe, but in addition to the global resetters who have a far reaching agenda and who have at least up until recently been very direct and explicit about their societal-wide intentions accordingly to the point where at least the last I checked, which admittedly was a while back, were still broadcasting their aims online, who would likely benefit both indirectly and directly, it's merely a matter of following the money insofar who supplies products and services to fulfill the perceived wants and needs of those who have decided to modify their bodies in pursuit of their feelings accordingly as well children's bodies insofar as medications and surgeries, etc. People don't need to be in the shadows to collude with one another, especially if they both have the money and patience to play the long game and have access to shape children's education curricula.
@@J_The_Colossal_Squid Agreed, it is not so in-the-shadows anymore for those, such as yourself, that take a look. I think that if you believe their is a hierarchy of power, control and access to resources, those at the very top benefit from societies that are more "inclusive" (of everything) so that mass migration illegal and illegal can continue into western countries so the declining populations can be countered so the economies don't shrink and the banking, food and energy industries can continue to grow profits. Something like that.
Sexual reassignment surgery is to reassign your sexual organs. I know you don’t care about this because you just wanna shit on people who are different but I just wanted to let you know that you’re ignorant and need to find an outlet that helps you mind your own fucking business ❤❤😂🎉❤
These are the liberal white women who are at the bottom of all the chaos that has occurred in the last 60 years. They are so deeply lost in trying to make all the correct pieces fit into the puzzle, for two reasons I can identify. One they have no idea what they believe and why. They have grabbed into the moving river of left thinking without realizing it is a constant dynamic movement which has to adjust itself to fit the situation. There is no stability here. This has enormous impact on their lives. We all operate within a framework of belief and when those beliefs are constantly changing and often in conflict it is mentally destabilizing and they must work so hard to maintain structure in their life. Exhausting. Two, they are so caught living in this false dynamic that they will not admit they are unhappy with the choices they have made as woman. They got so caught up in the struggle for rights they just won’t let go of it because their lives are vapid and empty. They have to have purpose and they walked away from the basic biological purpose. They are lost souls with too much time on their hands. If we could repurpose these women and tell them that yes they have a right to choose how to live their lives and they have a right to equality but much of what feminists told them was a blanket lie, life in this country would be very different. They do not recognize how much they have been used, like so many other groups that have been fed this victim mentality. Feminism in all its forms is at the root of so many problems. The right has been so demonized in their eyes they refuse to hear women who find purpose and happiness and success inside and outside the family home, they look at them like three headed dogs. Yet all you have to do to prove the point of their unhappiness is look at the prescriptions. And back in the day the average housewife burning their bras just wanted to have the freedom to choose how to live their life. Crazy.
She comes across as articulate and well-reasoned, but really she's using strawman arguments, misusing terms intentionally to misrepresent other arguments, and appealing to intuition rather than evidence.
Yes because she is mentally stable and mature unlike the narcissistic "they/them", who whenever make statement on RU-vid, talk like kids in nursery, when they have need to belittle someone. You know that kind of "heheee you don't haveeee, what I haveeee, heheeee" and make grimace along that "statement"
@@ExpendableRedshirt You don’t know what I think. I just praised her for stating the facts and doing it calmly. Whether I agree or not is totally irrelevant. As a member of the LGBTQ community, I am tired of emotional lobbyists highjacking the movement and talking in every media in the name of everybody. Those people will set our community back 75 years.
@@ktfitz4604 but none of the trans people whom are trying to put their message out there also don't have anyone screaming in their face when they do it on their channel, yet they still can't talk with maturity and calmness in their voice.
They also want to break healthcare, including their own healthcare. I once had a patient who REFUSED to be educated on how to catheterize himself because we couldn't educate someone with a penis on how to clean his labial folds. They'll try to get themselves scheduled for the wrong health screenings, won't consider that they (suppose, a "woman") could have a certain diagnosis (say, "prostate cancer").
She intentionally misused terminology in order to dismiss any points she disagrees with, and appealed to intuition rather than evidence. That's a pretty bad way of going about describing what's really happening, but a good way of reinforcing the beliefs of those who already agree with you and won't critically analyse what you've said.
@@hazelnut975Well for one she said “sex” when she should’ve said “gender”. No trans person thinks they can change their sex, they want to change their gender, or rather change their body to more closely match their gender. But sex is biological, literally everyone agrees on that. It’s just that one side deliberately claims sex and gender are the same thing for the sake of the culture war (hint: it’s the conservatives). Also the whole “allies deny that there are only 2 sexes” thing. Biologically there are more than 2 sexes. Like that’s a fundamental truth, intersex people, people with XXY chromosomes, XXX chromosomes, ect. They all exist, the more accurate statement is “sex is bimodal, most people are XY or XX, although some small deviations exist”. Like at a fundamental level this video is intellectual junk food. There’s no empirical data or interviews, she’s just running on her feelings. Im so sick of snowflakes like her crying all the time because they get triggered that 0.5% of the population is trans. Like get over it lmfao, trans people exist and facts don’t care about your feelings.
I worry about how gay rights may be affected because of everything that is going on that has nothing to do with us, and yet we get lumped in. Please recognize that most of us are not looking to invade women’s spaces or deny biology. We just want to live normally and non-intrusively just like everyone else.
What a silly comparison. They couldn’t accept themselves because of their mental instability and gender dysphoria. But You couldn’t accept them because You are a bigot and arrogant. This is the difference between You and Them.
Exactly!! They want us to except them BECAUSE they can’t except themselves! A person who is comfortable with who they are will never care what other people think and will never force it.
Do you mean transgender people? You should just accept that they can't align with their sex and move on. Why rage about it and get all angry and try to obstruct their rights? The principle behind it isn't harmful.
Helen Joyce is a joy to listen to! Organized ideas, civilized arguments and polite unwillingness to budge on what matters! 🍀💪🏽😻 I wish more people like her!
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic As a clinical geneticist, Paul James is accustomed to discussing some of the most delicate issues with his patients. But in early 2010, he found himself having a particularly awkward conversation about sex. A 46-year-old pregnant woman had visited his clinic at the Royal Melbourne Hospital in Australia to hear the results of an amniocentesis test to screen her baby's chromosomes for abnormalities. The baby was fine-but follow-up tests had revealed something astonishing about the mother. Her body was built of cells from two individuals, probably from twin embryos that had merged in her own mother's womb. And there was more. One set of cells carried two X chromosomes, the complement that typically makes a person female; the other had an X and a Y. Halfway through her fifth decade and pregnant with her third child, the woman learned for the first time that a large part of her body was chromosomally male. “That's kind of science-fiction material for someone who just came in for an amniocentesis,” says James. Sex can be much more complicated than it at first seems. According to the simple scenario, the presence or absence of a Y chromosome is what counts: with it, you are male, and without it, you are female. But doctors have long known that some people straddle the boundary-their sex chromosomes say one thing, but their gonads (ovaries or testes) or sexual anatomy say another. Parents of children with these kinds of conditions-known as intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs)-often face difficult decisions about whether to bring up their child as a boy or a girl. Some researchers now say that as many as 1 person in 100 has some form of DSD. Could you be a Chimera? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8WsF9Z4B7T8.html
@@sugar4522 She wrote a book called Trans, when ideology meets reality. She has been doing talks and interviews which I have listened to in RU-vid. For instance with unherd.
@@ClannCholmain that's a really fascinating story! Intersex people do exist and are not very rare but most of them are clearly one of the sexes and have some change in development or hormonal profile which makes some features ambiguous. Most of them are not a third sex nor a mixture. The case you shared is fascinating because it belongs to the extreme rare natural events of a mix. Like hermafrodite. I don't accept the exception should let us stop believing there are two sexes. It just means there are generally two sexes and some people with different than usual development or genetics
If someone feels like the opposite gender and wants to present that way I have no problem with them ❤ the problem indeed is when people demand we restructure society to cater to their every want
@@cyrenedomogalla5127when it comes to our speech?? Or how about letting them ruin women’s sports and spaces. Oh and I know all the teachers who lose their jobs across the US who simply won’t lie to their students or keep vital information from parents. 🙄🙄 it’s all disgusting.
I am LGBT and totally agree with what she's saying. People have fought hard for their rights and now this gender ideology is ruining it as the people are now beginning to lose respect for LGBT and people who truly are trans because its now being viewed as a label or a fad that a person can change on a whim.
If you are LGB and not T, or even if you are T, I suggest working to drop the T from the group. It's a category error. The inclusion of T is not in the best interest of LGB.
@@aranisles8292 I get what you are saying from a logical perspective, however even when I came out 20 years ago (late 90s) there was already a movement in the community to be open and inclusive with the intention of preventing minorities ( such as trans or intersex people) from feeling vilified and excluded which they were ar the time. However even at that point I noiticed that there were certain trans activists who were more 'militant' with regard to pushing their political agenda.
@@aranisles8292 To be honest the ultra militant political stuff really turned me off and is part of the reason I slowly distanced myself from the community as a same sex attracted female who mostly clicked with gay men but had next to nothing in common with most lesbians who tended to be more masculine oriented. I also had no interest in feminist politics and have never really been involved in the community other than trying to reach out and make social connections when I was single. Now that I am in my 40s I have more important priorities and don't even have time to engage with people socially due to study and work commitments. However I have now come to understand why the 'queer' community will probably never be accepted by the mainstream and its because of these ultra radical political people who have hijacked the movement and will continue to do so. They have created a quagmire due to their fd up ideology that the majority of people just can't relate to.
@@elasroczynski5987 Thank you for replying. Trans people definitely deserve full rights. The problem is not trans people, it's trans or gender ideology, which has an agenda that results in violations of LGB rights and women's rights, men's too. It's the conflation of sex and gender that leads to discrimination against all those groups.
I think it's also important to point out that these "allies" are also destroying trans rights. The radicalisation of the politicisation of this issue comes as a direct push back from these people.
She is so clear and succinct in this argument and so phenomenally well spoken she brings sanity back into these issues. Keep fighting for women Helen… thank you!!!
@@cyrenedomogalla5127She was perfectly clear and succinct in her points which I agree. The word bimodal was not used by her nor is it a word anyone uses to describe anything pertaining to the human body and it’s attributes. Bimodal, as in to have two modes. My dear, I think you need to unplug and go outside and take a walk on the grass barefoot… 🤦♀️
Very well put and entirely without hatred. Anyone who sees hatred in her perfectly sensible and reasoned argument is irrational. And my patience for irrational people is quite thin.
@@PhylaetraWell, yes. It is not hatred. She’s just stating a fact. Saying what is the root of the problem here so you all can hopefully do something about it and fix it.
@@Drud so - you believe that _everyone_ who disagrees with her wants to 'destroy everything'. Get rid of civil rights for gay people, eliminate public schools? But - that's not being hateful, that is just 'stating the root of the problem'... You actually believe that one can say such hateful things about those they disagree with but not actually hate them?
this is quite possibly the most articulate and socially appropriate explanation of the undercurrent of the transgender conversation that exists. This Woman should be on every show to communicate this point clearly so that everyone can be on the same page to start the conversation again
@@user-pi5xo4og9d so they just got up and started passing laws gratuitously? Oh I know what you'll say. "It was their plan from the start, they're [x]phobic and [slur], and the poor trans "community" " It's backlash you're facing, but you'll only ever interpret it as undeserved aggression.
@@el7284 the people with hate and fear in their hearts never come out on the right side of history. Yes, gratuitously. Without medical data to back any of it. Because cruelty is the point.
@@cyrenedomogalla5127 this victim mentality will get you nowhere. The use of terms like "target" and "cruelty" are mere hyperbole, meant to paint a picture that isn't true. Why does the left make it sound like trans people are feeble amoeba ready to explode at the drop of a hat? I believe otherwise. On the point of medical data: John Money and Kenneth Zucker.
This is an opinion through and through, this is not logic. There are no facts here other than we dont like the way this group lives and therefore we must regulate them to be more like the whole.
@@chrisknowles6582 sex is not binary in humans.. Have you ever heard of intersex people?? There's a lot female and male traits combinations... not even chromosomes are reliable, you can have physical female traits and "male" chromosomes... Reproduction is binary, you need the two reproductive systems, yes...sex is not, sex englobes a lot more than only your genitals, and even speaking about genitals intersex people exist
You can argue with the premise that she put in. For example her definition of sex and gender is not very good, and her assumption about motivation is bad, so her implied conclusions are wrong.
You just made my day.... Genuine trans women & trans men are suffering resentment caused by radical trans people (I call them Me-Me's), I am not one of those selfish, narcissistic kind. I'm a 'genuine' trans woman who understands I was born male and will always be male. I will never fully transition to a woman because I physically can never be an adult biological female. I don't use pronouns, I don't expect special treatment, I don't use women's spaces unless invited to by women, I totally disagree with biological males participating in women's sports, etc... For the above, and because I can define a 'woman', I am outcast from the, now, radicalised LBTQA+/Pride/'woke society' as a transphobe. I will never be a woman, and I will not steal a woman's identity to selfishly make myself feel better. I am proud to be a trans woman, and I really appreciate being able to live as a trans woman in today's society 😘
@@sbethbaker I genuinely don't. This person says that they're a trans women, so I would assume they go by "she/her" if they consider themself to be a woman, but they explicitly say they don't use pronouns. If they're offended by people using any terms other than their name then I'm sorry for using pronouns in this post, if not then I simply don't understand what they mean. Either way, I feel like there's something I'm missing and welcome the education so as not to cause offense.
@lawrencebates8172 my apologies, Lawrence... good example of how it's difficult sometimes to know another's true meaning when discussing/debating in writing. I fell into the trap I know exists... I'm sorry, please forgive me. 🙏🏼
“Fanaticism can often be a normalized phenomenon, and the unwritten recipe suggests that it starts and ends with absolute certainty. If you are always certain about everything, you might just live in an echo chamber, or there might be a lack of ideological diversity among your sources and friends. Only, there is no size limit to this echo chamber as long as there is consensus: and the bigger the chamber the more solidified the fanaticism, and the more solidified the fanaticism the more the outlier will be seen the liar and the fanatic.” ― Criss Jami, Healology
As a gay man you’re someone who formed very obviously with some cross sex functions.The way you feel attraction has feminized yet your genital flash and other sex characteristics masculinized,few years ago you where the one persecuted ,the vileness to persecute others.
This is put perfectly. My sister is an "ally" which I believe is largely due to her poor mental health and her need to be loved by everyone but mostly strangers. She knows our love is guaranteed so she doesn't need to try for us, but friends and strangers she'd take a bullet for.
Please read Eric Hoffer’s magnum opus The True Believer for a brilliant profile of these people and the psychological underpinnings that drive them to escape from themselves through fanatic adherence to mass movements like the trans agenda.
Extremely well summarised. Reality does not fit their emotional state so they want to break reality to make it conform with that emotional state. That is why we are being told to ignore reality!
The only people ignoring reality are the ones that insist there are only two sexes 😂😂 take a quick look at genetics why don't you. Trans people don't deny their sex, none of them, they are painfully aware of it. This shit is made up, propaganda bullshit. No one denies their sex, there are more than two sexes, and most importantly SEX DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. You can be gay by being in love with the same gender, to say that being gay depends on biological sex is in fact the homophobic viewpoint. This woman is saying that if a man dates a trans man he is not gay, how is that not homophobic. Women's rights are completely unaffected by trans women and children's education is woefully devoid of gender discussions.
I graduated highschool in 2016. I *loved* my highschool biology classes, and frankly they gave me a better "sex education" than anything else in the whole public system just by exploring in detail the male and female reproduction systems (including pregnancy and lactation). Now just eight years later, I wonder if it is still even possible to teach these courses and what kind of attack my wonderful biology teachers might be facing. All because a vocal minority has decided that the very reality of the human body should be considered "offensive" and "exclusionary." Honestly, I sometimes think that the whole woke and trans agenda is ssatanic. I believe that we were made in God's image and made explicitly male or female, and this movement is hell bent on confusing us about our own bodies and encouraging mentally unwell people to sterilize and mutilate themselves.
"Honestly, I sometimes think that the whole woke and trans agenda is ssatanic." OK, honestly, is this a *parody?* :D :D :D It's so hard to tell anymore. :D :D (Cut to something about--- "mentally unwell people"... :D :D :D) "Now just eight years later, I wonder if it is still even possible to teach these courses and what kind of attack my wonderful biology teachers might be facing." *Teacher* here. I KNOW EXACTLY who's trying to attack me and my profession in *my country.* I know exactly who's trying to make my job harder. And it ain't drag queens, trans people, or trans activists, whomever or wherever they might be. (I haven't heard one of them try to THREATEN me.) "All because a vocal minority has decided that the very reality of the human body should be considered 'offensive' and 'exclusionary.'" That is literally what *Bible-thumping right-wingers* have been doing in America--- since before the Eighties. No, seriously, is this a parody account, or--- are things really that different in Europe?? :D :D Anyhoo, nothing says rock-solid mental health like obsessively PARROTING the idea that some "woke people" are SATANISTS out ta get ya...!!! :D :D :D
I genuinely don't think it's productive to discuss sex in the context of gender identity, but I'm curious what you think God is getting up to every time a person is born intersex...
@@sosimple3585 from what i saw in the video i expect her book to be the same unsubstantiated drivel of a transphobe. I think i’ll listen to actual experts and not her, a mathematician who became a journalist who thinks she’s somehow educated enough to talk on this subject. She’s clearly not.
@@feanedhell If you're mind's made up then you've got nothing to lose by giving it a try. The worst that can happen is you fail to escape a regressive, misogynistic, and homophobic cult.
I listened carefully to two gay colleagues a while ago. They really are ‘upset’ by the tensions caused by this trans movement and think schools are sending the wrong messages to kids.
I was hospitalized recently and my name on the white board was “Mr Fox”. I told them to erase the “Mr” because I didn’t play the pronoun game. If visitors couldn’t figure me out with my gray hair, heavy beard and a deep voice - whether I was a male or female fox then that was their problem. They asked me if I wanted to use a custom introduction and I said “yes”. My name is “the soon to be discharged and enjoy home once again” Fox.
@@techyn8502 Not sure what you mean but a day after I declared myself “soon to be discharged and enjoying the comforts of home again” I was, indeed, discharged home. Ah, to again enjoy the creature comforts of home following a 3.5 week hospital stay - ecstatic! As to “woke” - I’ve been awake for well > 60 years in a Constitutionally conservative manner. I still don’t play the silly pronoun game. It’s about the stupidest waste of taxpayers time and money I think I’ve heard of in all my years on this earth. We are very fortunate to have a very secure and widely transmissible language with standards that everyone agrees upon. If someone decides to deny agreed upon standards of communication, then, to hell with them when someone else refuses to play along.
@@slypperyfox "Mr." and "Mrs." are titles. They are not pronouns. They have been in use for centuries, since long before this "gender" nonsense started, and they are as much a part of the English language as anything else. What is your objection to them?
Calm, rational and full of common sense Well laid out points …. That are unfortunately true And ‘allies’ of groups can often be far more vicious than anybody else
Calm? Perhaps. Reasonable? Clearly not. This woman is actively implying that pointing out that the six different biological features by which we determine sex typing occur on a spectrum/are entirely non-binary. So, it is not like we can say that, people with a higher average level of estrogen and progesterone, than testosterone are obviously female. It's not like we can definitively say that all those with XX are female and all those with XY are male. All of the markers occur on a spectrum, which means you'd have an easier time building a case to suggest, "well, after a battery of scientific tests we have conclusively decided that this person is 73% female, 19% male, and 8% uncertain/hermaphroditic.
@@frankleeseaux naw. it's easy to tell. we've been able to do so for all of human history. it's only in the last metaphoric 15 minutes of civilization that we've allowed a problematic group of people to deny reality and try to force that on others. that's about to end. she's 100% correct.
@@Talk2WandaVision You have clearly spent zero time talking to an actual biologist about any part of it. You are willfully ignorant of the facts at this point, so who gives a flying fuck what your opinion is, and why should anyone care?
This woman is completely misinformed… or purposely using language incorrectly. Trans people are not arguing their SEX… that’s a biological fact. They’re arguing that their sex should not determine their gender. No one is offended by the idea of binary sexes (even though the existence of naturally born intersexed children would contest this). The argument is that the gender spectrum does not always reflect and correlate with a person’s biological sex (genitals, chromosomes, secondary sex characteristics, etc.). It’s not a difficult argument to fathom, unless you’re bigoted, uneducated, or willfully ignorant.
Why is this politics though? I know it is, but why? Who created this culture war? Also, am I the only 'don't know or care' left when it comes to this issue? Can we not just fix the economy, interest rates inflation etc?
And more than one animal that can change their sex depending on whats going on in the environment. Other animals are gay. Its in nature but we like to like like we're apart.
@@Serpent0fEden reality is not transphobic. Reality just is. But some people may be reality-phobic and strive to drag everyone into their delusional phobic world.
@@aydinbiber7616You are confusing sex and gender. They are the same thing. And you fall for this pseudo gender knowledge which basically render gender as a behavior.
Except that she used the wrong terminology and accused "allies" of denying that we have bimodal sexes. Except they aren't. Sex isn't binary. But it is bimodal. Lot of mojo Jojo talk that sounds nice for reinforcing biases here
@@cyrenedomogalla5127 Reproduction is based on the presence of enough functioning males and functioning females to ensure the survival of a population. The survival of a population doesn't hinge on how any specific individual feels about his or her sexuality or gender identitly. It survives on reproduction. In order to function reproductively, there must be males and there must be females, and that is literally all that is required.
@@janegardener1662 Do you honestly think that the 0.1% to 0.6% of people who identify as trans are making any sort of dent on the human breeding population?
@@voodoominerman What's that got to do with anything? I literally don't care about how they perceive themselves. It's none of my business, but they're making it my business by telling me how I must refer to them in emails. They're humans, their grammatical number is "one" and therefore they will get singular pronouns from me.
@@janegardener1662 "Reproduction is based on the presence of enough functioning males and functioning females to ensure the survival of a population." This is the point *you* chose to start with. This is what you decided was the most important thing to mention. If it's not important, why did you mention it in the first place? "They're humans, their grammatical number is "one" and therefore they will get singular pronouns from me." The terms they/them are *already* used to refer to singular people of indeterminate gender. Have you honestly never heard someone say something along the lines of "I'd love to meet your friend, I've heard so much about *them*"? They are clearly talking about a singular entity in this sentence, one whose gender has not been specified. That being the case, it seems perfectly sensible to use they/them as a pronoun for people whose gender is essentially "no".
What bothers me most is when they ask what is a woman there is only one answer to that all the people on this planet have a mother and that is the answer
What a remarkably silly comment. To say that people have mothers obviously doesn't answer the question at all. "Woman" and "mother" are not synonyms. There are lots of women who are not mothers. I think you know that, really.
@@omp199 The fact that there are women who don't have children is irrelevant. What is relevant is that every single person on Earth *has* a mother. There is no person on Earth who doesn't have a mother, or a father for that matter. The male parent is a man and the female parent is a woman. Women are people who are biologically designed to have children. Whether they have them or not makes no difference.
@@janegardener1662 If the question is, "What is a woman?" then the fact that every single person on Earth has a mother is *obviously* irrelevant. You as good as admit it in your last sentence: "Whether [women] have [children] or not makes no difference." That's what I'm saying. Your own final sentence is the point that I was making.
@@omp199 your logic can be just as easily refuted by saying that not all women are mothers, but all mothers are biological women. The reality is sex is not a spectrum and mammalian sexual dimorphism means that you produce, and your body is shaped for the production of either a large or small gamete (ova/sperm). There is no third gamete , and masculine/feminine behavior is in no way exclusive to either sex, but there are patterns whether you like it or not on the behavioral and personality differences between male and female. The very argument you’re making undermines homosexuality, because if im a bigot/wrong for not being attracted to a trans man ( biological woman ) then by your logic, conversion therapy is absolutely plausible
We need more people like you, please stay strong. I am with you and there are many more l am sure of it we just don't want to get involved, because these people are scary.
I've yet to hear an intelligent person who has been able to articulate the truth and the facts with reality of the current situation this has placed on our country as a whole that has vastly hindred so many unions, by laying out the hard truth and and reality in such a forn of civil dialog as this woman. We need to hear her and more people like her everyday in this world because it has embarrassingly fallen apart because of this deeply.
No, we don't need that... We need to put the record straight on this radical and disruptive movements, that want to brake everything! Start for not give them air time, boicote merchandise, forbid pride parades, don't let them change history or education programs, penalize politicians that are "allies" to this agenda full of BS... gender and biology rubbish, race stigma, rewrite history, rewrite books and so on... This people are insane, artificial, autoritarium and want to force disruption... Who is behind this movements? What is the real agenda? Disrupt western society's and divide us all... Divided we are weaker, disruption is conducive to chaos...
its odd to think that people think that trans people are destroying the rights of the Lgbt community and not the people that are actively calling for their eradication.