太平洋機動作戦(Operation Pacific) - part1 

Propaganda, but NOT History, has led us to believe that the Empire of Japan began its territorial expansion in the 1930’s, invading China, creating the puppet State of Manchukuo and “Provoking” the war with the Western Powers. But, Was this really, how events happened? Did Japan invade China and South East Asia? It seems so. However, the Propaganda does NOT say that for centuries, all Asia was invaded by Western Powers. England occupied India, Burma (Myanmar); Singapore, Malaysia and China (Hong Kong, Nanking, Shanghai, etc). France dominated all Indochina. The Netherlands intervened by the Force of its Arms, to all of Indonesia. And Belgium, Germany, Portugal, Spain, and of course, also the United States were in South East Asia cuz, for example this country, the US, occupied the Philippines since 1898. (Spanish-American War). Thus the panorama in the 30's, the Empire of Japan, when defeating to the Tsarist Russian Empire, it also decided to "Grow" by invading its neighbors. In those years, all European nations had colonies in Africa, India, the Middle East, Asia and America. (England came to occupy almost ¼ part of the planet). For its part, the US, in 113 years of existence as a nation in those years, had "Grown" 711 the size of its territory from its original 13 colonies. Now is the picture clear? Japan for its part, had fought on the side of the winners in World War I (1914-1918), and they, the Japanese, not awarded any "Gain". The western victors of WWI divided the world. Japan was excluded. Thus, Japan's motives for attacking and expanding as the Europeans and the US did seem clearer, right? Then they, the Japanese, attacked China in 30’s, which was occupied by 6 Western Powers for almost a century. None of the Western Powers occupying China at this time, OPPOSED or fought Japan for Invading China. NONE! Then, 11 years later after having occupied the territory of China and coexisted without any problem with the Western Powers within China, they, the Japanese, attacked Hawaii, which in turn, this Island had been occupied and annexed by the US in 1898. (In 1900-01, Hawaii became US territory and Hawaii ceased to be an independent nation after more than 630 years of sovereignty. By the time Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, the United States had just completed the 40th anniversary of the military occupation and annexation of Hawaii). They, the Japanese, attacked Singapore, which was then a Colony of England. They, the Japanese, attacked the Philippines, which were occupied by the US and whose Gov’r, Douglas MacArthur reined as Emperor. Yup… Truly like an Absolute Autocrat. Therefore, the Japanese did NOT attack (In the 40’s), Singapore, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Borneo, Timor, the Philippines, etc. In reality, the Japanese attacked England, France, Belgium, Holland, the US, etc. That is, the Japanese attacked the Western Powers invading all of Asia. That is the verifiable truth. But, Propaganda has made us believe that the good guys were us, the US. And of course… Nanking was a horrendous Genocide committed by Japan, but, it was no more horrendous than the 12 Genocides committed by the United States in his History and all over the world. Nor was it less horrendous than the Genocide committed by King Leopold II of Belgium, in Central Africa. Nor was Nanking more or less horrendous than the Genocides that the British Empire committed in America, Africa, Australia, Middle East, India and also in China too. And now, the Japanese are our friends and allies... Yup… But, to fight against China, AGAIN!!! Well… No More. No More British Malaya nor British Borneo nor British wherever. No More French Indochina. No more Dutch Indies. No More Portugese Domains. No More US Domain here. Asia is for Asians and “The China Sea” belongs to CHINA. Westerns powers have nothing to do in Asia.

we became friends the Jews will always hate the Arabs.

How can we see part 2?

First ya have to watch pt#1

Let’s not forget “In Harms Way”. That too, was a good pairing for Wayne and Neal.😉

that would be great

Fuc... democrats screw you ever time

The congressman was Andrew Jackson May and after a briefing at Pearl Harbor spouted off at a press conference to show off and several US newspapers published the info. Adm Lockwood credited him with sinking 10 subs. The other problem was our bad torpedo detonator's.

Probably the greater loss of subs were due to the BUORD torpedoes, and poor ❤training.

@@tross9972 Perhaps in the long term but within 6 weeks after that "Loose lips sink ships" idiot press release 10 US subs were lost. Lets not continue to cover for stupidity. BTW, I went back to check and - 2 - comments have been deleted about "who it was" and confirmation of my comment. (someone covering up)

@tross9972 There are only two known instances of sinking resulting from circular runs by our own torpedoes. Our torpedo problems stemmed from improper realistic testing of not only the Mk 14 submarine torpedo, but the Mk 15 destroyer torpedo before the war. No live warshots were conducted due to costs prior to the war. This resulted in unknown torpedo performance. BUORD never fixed the problem themselves; ComSubPac ordered tests conducted when BUORD refused to take action. Admiral Nimitz backed Admiral Lockwood's actions and Admiral King backed Nimitz and ordered BUORD to conduct their own tests. Mk 14/15 torpedoes were running 10 ft deeper than set, magnetic exploder didn't work, and contact firing pin was being crushed on contact. By fall 1943, these problems had been fixed and torpedo performance dramatically improved. 60% of all Japanese vessels during the war were sunk by the U.S Submarine Service, most of these between Oct 1943 and Aug 1945.

William Campbell

he was in a Star Trek show way back.

"The Squire of Gothos" (1967) - Trelane. "The Trouble with Tribbles" (1967) - Koloth. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: "Blood Oath" (1994) - Koloth

William Campbell, 1954 The High and the Mighty , also with John Wayne.

@@mc152938 also in Cannon Ball 1958 series where he starred

..and hey suffered a disastrous defeat in the first days of war, no wonder they renounced and let the U.S. Navy fight alone in the Pacific…

@@mc152938 What defeat was that? They actually had more men , planes, ships at sea in direct contact with the enemy than the USA in ALL THEARTRES of the war, up until the very last 6 months.

@@mc152938. Ignoramus… The British navy was front and centre in the pacific, the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean, the Mediterranean, the Caribbean and other places the US navy never went. British aircraft carriers went everywhere the US carriers went. And what disastrous defeat was that you talk about?

@@mc152938 I ALSO need to make you aware, because you are ignorant, until the very last 6 months of WW2 the British had more men, more ships, more panes, in actualy combat agaisnt the enemy in ALL the theartres of war!

The British navy retreated from the Pacific in early 1942 and did not return until May 1945. The defeat being talked about was the loss of much of their fleet in the Indian Ocean at the hands of the Japanese air attack. Look up HMS Prince of Wales ww2. The US was the principal force in the Pacific theatre.

Why would you make such a stupid comment?

I agree with you completely.

Just switch the "cc" to English and you have English. Asian will also show part of the time.

Actually it was FDR and the secretary of state that stayed up all night, the day before thinking the attack would be December 6, not the 7th. The USN had enough information that Pearl Harbor and other places should have been on war alert.

he was 3A,,sole provider for his family.Dont be an a$$ hat and try to deminish his accomplishments.How bout you go off on ppl that need it like Biden,Pelosi,Schumer,etc.Pull your head out of your duffle bag .

That's not correct. He was deemed to be too old and the military didn't want him to die.

liar...his college football knee injury @ USC kept him out. Just like it kept him off of the football team the rest of his college days. Nice try commie.

@@gmonsen BULLSHIT! Due to the demand for more soldiers they advanced the age and he could have served but the coward did not!

As usual someone get an stupid idea in their little head and ALL the nut jobs come out to support it. Wayne was deemed and the sole provider for his family. Wayne never enlisted and even filed for a 3-A draft deferment, which meant that if the sole provider for a family of four were drafted, it would cause his family undue hardship.

He wasn't a draft dodger. He was rated 4-F and could not serve. He tore up a knee in college playing football and could not pass the physical.

Some people dont have the sense that God gave a goose. Medical refusal!

He was ineligible for the draft, being married with dependant children.

@@glenholman3612 Not true...he was medically unfit Due to a knee injury from football at USC.

What have you done peckerwood