🇧🇸 Peter Nygard | BOEING 727-17/ Super 27| CRAZY TAKEOFF | Bahamas |VP-BPZ(Retired and Scrapped) 

Your not telling the truth you would not fly that

+Milan Cruz (PanAm747) Drivel. That's a series 100 with dash 17 or even dash 10 JT-8s That's a seriously over-powered machine and fantastically airworthy. Try to learn from triplanelover.

+triplanelover I was a wrenchbender and hoping to be a loadmaster on the "2-7", and agree, top tier A-1 aircraft. I worked on FedEx and Morningstar Express aircraft before going on the 310. VERY forgiving airplane, you could MEL everything and it was all flaps! Loved it!

TriPlaner-Maybe you can answer a question for me. I had 330,000 on Western Airlines with another 160,000 onto the combined account with Delta. I don't know if the Tri-Star was the only triple or if DA had the 727 before they inherited a bundle from WA, but if you flew Western it was the 737-200 or the 727-200 and if you got lucky the DC-10. I didn't care for the fireplug 37 , but I loved the late night half empty take offs in the 727, they could pin you to the seat which I loved. I flew on Easterns 727s and it was a very different experience the takeoffs were so shallow, for a minute or two you thought you might be going down. It was that way every time and believe me these aircraft were not loaded, it was after they began hubbing in Kansas City. Do you have any idea why their climb outs were so shallow?

One of the best MFF jumps I've ever made is referred to as the D.B. Cooper...down the stairs for an awesome N/CE/O2

But this is like... really short, even for a 727. Nothing in widespread service now could achieve the takeoff in this video.

Thats a lot of pitch for an airliner, my dear.

And under age girls!

He’s also a sick Pervert

The engines are JT8Ds actually.

The silver twin is actually a Beech 18 expeditor

Graeme Williams Engines number one and three are the engines seen on the MD-80s, most likely something like JT8D-200+ whilst engine number 2 remains the classic, possibly, JT8D-9.. On the number 2 engine the thrust reverser clamshells operate internally rather than externally so you cant see them when they are activated.

+tom211t #2 actually has the reverser removed on the Valsan / Super 27 conversions with the JT8D-200 series engines for #1 and #3.

+tom211t Looks like someone already corrected your statement. I helped mod some of these, and indeed, the #2 TR is completely removed. The #1 and #3 engines were 200 series, and in some, #2 engine was a -15.

Eric Slifkin I think it's got less than full fuel and not much load on. Thrust to weight is very good. Notice also that he pulls up to a pretty high departure angle. I think the reason is he's trying to hold and manage the airspeed, while the gear is coming up and before the flaps and stuff are clean. Once he's got it clean, he lets the nose drop a bit and starts to let it accelerate. Want to see an impressive departure? I play with FlightGear simulator, on the computer. Select a 777 200LR, choose no passengers or load, min fuel, and firewall it. It rolls and rotates and climbs out like a fighter.

how or where would I see this?

+Eric Slifkin The Super 727 with two JT8D-217 or 219s has a 20% shorter take off roll than a 727-200. In a lightly loaded executive configuration, the take off roll can be very short. www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2001/2001%20-%202632.html

they were designed to operate from/to short runways.

The engines are level with each other.You just see the intake for the middle engine on top.

+Raphael Web It's power Raphael. The short series 100 body, standard wing and P+W JT-8-19 upgrades for motors makes for a quick take-off.

It's an MD80 engine conversion.

The middle engine has internal reversers.

merc340sr: Most likely a wing conversion. Those models weren't equipped with those.

I think you'd only worry bout deep stalls on landing.

If it's weight configuration is way below MTOW, then it's really not a big problem.

@@terryboyer1342 U don't know much

@@TheTimeDetective42 Do too pyramid boy.

I was waiting for someone to mention that. I agree!

dont forget the under aged girls from south america

+Guest0072 homosexual

+Guest0072 www.google.com

+Guest0072 he is a canadian business man

+Guest0072 Peter J. Nygård is a Finnish-Canadian executive, founder and chairman of Nygård International. He was rated the 70th richest Canadian by Canadian Business Magazine in 2009 with a net worth of $817 million. Wikipedia

The Gay Pope

Waste of my time as well.

Short takeoff I guess.

It was a very steep departure, a regular airline would never pull a stunt like that!

NoWayGirlTV Q

Watch a normal 727-200 takeoff and you will see. This -100 has more power than the standard -200 because the #1 and 3 engines are replaced with stronger versions AND it has winglets. Short flight plus all that= less than 3000 foot takeoff roll(typically a 727 takes almost 8000 feet).

More like a human trafficking drop off and pick up.

and does anyone actually want the eventfull?

what take-off rules?

Let him "waste" his money. In his bank account, it's doing nobody any good. Spending it supports the people who do the work, pay taxes, etc...

+realulli I know, to each his own but I do understand weather wise in winter in Canada this baby gives you mobility!

+TWTR4EVER nope, that's not what I'm trying to say. What I'm trying to say is, most people don't like just giving money away. If someone is extremely rich, how do you separate him from his money? Get him to spend it, preferably on something that occupies a lot of people. If that is called wasting money, so be it. If it is showing off, so what? A lot of the old great works of art were created because some people wanted to show off! I'm sure a lot more crap was also created but discarded long ago...

light but the climb angle was pretty crazy...nothing a commercial would do except maybe in st Maarten

aerlial360 lmgtfy.com/?q=Peter+Nygard