🇰🇷 The History of Korea: Every Year 

디테일 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

심지어 강화도 간척되는 것도 나옴 ㄷㄷ

@@user-fl3dw4fv9i 지해나 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@@regiecadiang2182 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

Sea of japan 왜 아무도 지적안함

Hugs to South Korea from the USA! 🇺🇸❤️🇰🇷 I do a Korean martial arts sport and enjoyed watching a Korean do a ballet!! ^_^

여기도 디테일 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

Because China was the shit back in the days. Unlike what China has become right now, there was a sense of 'give and take' amongst the ancient, medieval Chinese empires. The reason why Koreans, especially from the Joseon era, were crazy about sending tribute (to Ming) was because the 'take' part was much more in quality and quantity than the 'give' part. This is why Koreans insisted on sending tribute four times a year when the Chinese initially had them do so once. Meanwhile, the Ryukuans and Japanese didn't get much incentives from Ming China in terms of trade. It would be a pardon to compare the tributary system to modern day China's expansionist, fuxxed up One Road policies that leaves every single state involved bankrupt.

@@yyyymmddhhmm Dunno what made the Ryukyu not emulate the Joseon Koreans, but the feudal Japanese just keep embroiling themselves into civil wars, nationwide and provincewide. Not even bustling cities would get some rest when samurai would brawl amidst marketplaces and that wokou pirates linger along pirate havens all over the Japanese shorelines. This was a low point in Chinese-Japanese trade histories when the Ashikaga shoguns cannot have the power to prevent trade losses due to feuding warrior elites. Turns out that modern day Silk and Belt Roads are just one way trips into unreliable, unwanted disasters

@@yyyymmddhhmm lmao kid your logic is from which universe, the ancient "giving away money" policy is bad, so the modern "making other states bankrupt" bad. lmaoooooooooooo

@@Dou_Y Sup, Jinping Junior.

only worked during Ming dynasty. Joseon paid because Qing won the war

You're right that would be a very interesting video

Bro jeju is part of korea lol

Nice! 👍🏼

사기치고 있다.. 한사군의 한반도 주둔설은 조선총독부가 만들어낸 거짓 역사다.

아님

The original Turkic people are East Asian. Human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup Studies show: east asia people are C, N, O+（DQ）. Among them，the original turkic people N are very similar to O (chinese，korean，japanese), they came from the same gene haplogroup NO but absolutely different from J（J1+J2/Turkey） Type of east Mediterranean people. J1 is Arabic haplogroup J2 is Native Anatolian haplogroup,from hittite， Canaanites E1B is ancient greek,albanian and sub-saharan African haplogroup G-M201 is most commonly found in Georgia; it is found at even higher levels among many other regional and minority populations, such as the Ossetians, Turkish →60%-70%JGER1b，the Near/Middle East and southern Europe R1a+Q→Central Asian/Paleo-Siberians CNO→Proto-Altaic/Neo-Siberians Turks from Anatolia (the Turkish Republic) are not related to any of those people. A very small minority of people in Turkey carry genetic markers that are also found in Mongolia, Korean，Janpanese and elsewhere in Central Asia. This has to do with the fact that the Turkic invasion of Anatolia in the Middle Ages was mostly a cultural and religious one. Byzantines changed their language from Greek, Armenian or Assyrian to Turkic and their religion from Christianity to Islam.

The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria (northeastern China). They were partially agriculturalists but adopted a nomadic life. Than they started their journey to the West. (The Turkic migration). During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans/R1a). All Neo-Siberians have origins in Northeast Asia including Korea（hg K2a/NO+C2）. They split from common ancestors from Northeast Asians before migrating to absorb Paleo-Siberians K2b/Q+R1a Most Siberian have the N haplogroup. The people of this haplogroup came from the territory of modern China， Haplogroup NO split to haplogroup N and haplogroup O in south China . . Haplogroup N is dominant among East Siberians .. Its closest relative is haplogroup O which is the most common male haplogroup in East Asia and Southeast Asia It’s the haplogroup N that gives Siberia Sakha the East Asian looks. So it is not surprising some Yakut look Asian ‘East Asian DNA’ includes haplogroups CNO+DQ . These are the same haplogroups shared with Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Mongols, Tungusic etc. The first Turks (around 500 ce) were a mix of NOC just like the Han. Many either integrated into Chinese society or moved further west into Central Asia and eventually the Middle East JGE and East Europe R1aR1bI， Turkish males on average carry Haplogroup J2 as their main Y-DNA. This is the indigenous Haplogroup of the Middle East where it originated. Turks are closely related to the people of the Levant, Iranians, Caucasus people and Southern Europeans. That's why most modern Turks don’t look like Asians The ancient Turkic people are Mongoloid. They are from a region between northern China and Manchuria. The Xinglongwa culture is often regarded as the original homeland of the proto-Turks. Genetical, linguistical and cultural evidence strongly support a northern Mongoloid origin for Turks, close to the homeland of Mongolians and Tungusic peoples. The Tatars are a Turkic people, belonging to the Kipchak branchs. Modern Tatars have mixed with Slavic groups (Russians) but also with Iranian groups. Thus most Tatars have N and R1a The ancestors of the Hungarians were also a mixture of East Slavs/old european(Ydna R1a I2) and Ural-Altaic/Siberian(Ydna N-M231) The N hg has appeared various times in Eurasian history: Xinglongwa culture> major Y-DNA: N The ancient Finn-Uralians perhaps may represent the first wave of migrants from the east long ago (maybe 5-12kya). The Finnish-Uralic are the result of the mixture of I (old populations of Europe) and N (Uralic)

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e baseless claims without any single solid academic evidence

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e hmmm While Afro-Asiatic peoples usually carry E and it is known that J2 is of central Asian origin and even among Timur's descendants, it shows how ignorant you are to call J1 Arab and J2 Canaanite😅(the funny part is that the Canaanites must also be E since they are also part of Afro-Asiatic peoples)😂

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e Did the Greeks, Albanians and Sub Saharans have a common ancestor?😂😂😂 Hmmm Niger-Congo, Nilo-Saharan and Indo-European languages ​​have a common origin so 😅😅😅😅 I've never come across so much pseudo science in my life you make me laugh so much

발해부흥운동 지도자 연파(燕頗)가 부여부를 점령했다가 올야국 또는 정안국에 귀순한 것을 묘사한 것입니다. 「한편, 발해 유민국가인 정안국(定安國)이 981년 송나라에 보낸 글에 의하면 “부여부가 잠시 거란에 반기를 들었다가 모두 정안국에 들어왔다.”고 하였는데, 여기서 거란에 반기를 들었다는 것은 연파가 거란에 항거한 사실을 의미하며, 모두 정안국에 들어왔다는 것은 연파가 올야성으로 피신한 것을 지칭하는 것으로서, 이 때 정안국의 세력이 오사국에까지 미쳤던 것을 알 수 있다.」 출처: encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0036950

Thanks! Like I did with Korea this past year, I'm thinking about making some videos about individual dynasties first and then making my way towards a remake of "The History of China."

인천의 크기가 커진건 강화도를 간척하여 강화도의 면적이 넓어진 것 입니다.

@@Stir-fried_udon 감사합니다!

1. 산도깨비 2. 중광지곡 군악 2-4 3. Wind leaves, yet the moon stays 4. 도라지타령 해금 연주 5. Suyang’s play 6. 강강술래

Kênh này làm r

We would be great friend today if it wasn't for the 20th century

맞아

비교적 자료가 많은 그 당시 중국 해안선을 보면 큰 강에서의 퇴적물이 쌓이기 전이라 지금보다 해수면이 5-10m정도 높았다는 것을 확인할 수 있습니다. 안타깝게도 BrakeCoach님이 말씀하신 대로 한반도 해안선에 대한 자료는 별로 없어서, 사실 그냥 중국쪽 자료를 참고해 개인적으로 추측한 것에 가깝습니다 (floodmap.net이라는 사이트를 이용해 원하는 해수면을 입력하여 지도를 바꿔볼 수 있습니다). 또한 과거 김해만처럼 확실한 정보가 있는 경우나 강화도처럼 간척 기록이 있는 곳은 그 기록을 따랐습니다.

@@TheDragonHistorian 아하 알겠습니다. 제가 지금 원삼국시대 지도를 제작하고 있는데 해안선 자료를 뭐를 써야할지 몰라서 물어봤습니다. 답변 감사합니다!

거의 10년전 중학생 시절에 corea359님의 한국사 역사지도 영상을 보고 언젠가 나도 이런 영상을 만들어보겠다고 생각했는데, 이렇게 봐주셔서 정말 영광입니다.

그러게요 ㅋㅋ

The hilarious thing is that since Goryeo (originally Taebong before Wang Gun took it over) was a resurrected Goguryeo (and not even for the first or the last time: Balhae was the first, and Balhae would itself resurrect itself as Jeongan and Later Balhae), Goguryeo did actually end up taking over the entire peninsula in the end.

這傢伙偷你的歷史，你跟他們說謝謝？你是傻嗎，韓國人的直系祖先O1b2根本就不是來自遼河文明紅山文化，他們不過是要東北的政治權利，萬不得已可以擴大領土，因為南中國離他們真的太遠，那裡才是韓國人真正來源

Its okay we are very long time heard about chinese trolling That culture has been around for a long time not joke for real

Gija Joseon/Kija Choson is now largely considered a myth because of the lack of archaeological evidence for a cultural shift at that time, or for an organized government at all. Kija is also first mentioned in Han dynasty sources, after the Han dynasty conquered Gojoseon. Historian Andrew Logie has argued that "the Jizi [Kija] story is thus explainable as Han period political propaganda developed to legitimize the punitive conquest and imposition of commandery rule" (www.academia.edu/42841640/Diagnosing_and_Debunking_Korean_Pseudohistory). This is especially notable because the paper is generally critical of Korean nationalist historiography. I wish I could have included Yan on the map as well, but the exact year of the invasion is unknown, so I decided to just skip over it.

예전에 만들어두신게 있어요

Isn't Joseon a Myth?

@@MROEnglishLessons joseon is not a myth. It's real history

@@talkjian5281 Oh, didn't now, thanks. Actually I meant Gojoseon, I mistyped.

@@user-fd8ev2yv8r Oh right. If you were to say when did Korea Begin. When It was?

@@MROEnglishLessons depends how you define country. people were there even 10,000BC. usually it has to be historic era. there are Gojoseon in history book in China and oldest relic of Gojoseon was from 2333BC. so it is considered to be around 2000BC to 500BC. no one is sure

해족(奚族)입니다. 본래 고막해(庫莫奚)였는데 당나라 기록에서부턴 그냥 해라고만 나옵니다.

@@TheDragonHistorian 감사합니다

Thanks! I am planning to do a remake of the China video within the next year, but it'll be split into at least 3 parts.

@@TheDragonHistorian Thx for your reply, I'm looking forward to this masterpiece! Happy Korean national foundation day!

@@yujiang6004 That would be pretty cool. The Influx of Chinese immigrants into the Korean states has long been a thing noted in historical texts. Beginning with Qin (秦) and Han (漢) refugees fleeing to Jinhan (辰韓), Northern Yan (北燕) refugees emigrating to Goguryeo during King Jangsu's conquests, and hundreds of thousands of Ming (明) elites and soldiers settling in Joseon Korea (朝鮮) of whom their Korean descendants make up a considerable portion up to the time. Meanwhile, Koreans from Goguryeo and Baekje, and especially Silla (who actually build the first Korea Towns known as Sillabang everywhere on the shorelines of Tang), settled in China too. It would be cool to see these events noted throughout.

@@yyyymmddhhmm I never learn about these historical knowledge before you tell me. Thx for your addition.

@@yujiang6004 Being Korean myself, I'm also an advocate of your idea where I can see cultural, historical exchanges and ties between neighbouring states. As far as I know, Koreans like me would have something called the Jokbo, the family book, where we can track our ancestors both maternal and paternal. My ancestors mainly come from Goguryeo and Silla, but I've also happened to find that some of my ancestors from the female line were Chinese emigreés from the Song and Ming Dynasty.

임둔군은 서기전 82년에 철폐되었지만 완전히 철수한 것이 아니라 '동부도위'라고 해서 낙랑군에 편입되었습니다. 옛 임둔군 속현들이 완전히 폐지되어 옥저, 동예 등에 넘어간 것은 서기 30년 왕조(王調)의 반란이 광무제에 의해 진압된 이후입니다.

gongu.copyright.or.kr/gongu/wrt/wrt/view.do?wrtSn=13300012&menuNo=200020

@@TheDragonHistorian Thanks a lot

도라지 타령이라고 왼쪽아래 제목 나오네

@@xzxzxzxz9892 감사합니다

타임라인도1919

지금이야 구분을 하지만 당시에 의미가 있었을까요?

초반 부분에서 한국계라는 개념이 존재했을까요? 그냥 독립적이었던 여러 나라의 민족이 합쳐지면서 우리 민족이 형성된 것 같네요

@@user-un5qv3dc9n같네요가 아니라 맞아요 세계어디든 한나라에 원래주터 하나의 민족이었던 나라가 있기나 할까요

Han : Destroys Gojoseon. Tang : Destroys Baekje and Goguryeo Liao : Destroys Balhae and war with goryeo Yuan : Made Goryeo a vassal state. Jurchens : It is incorporated into this Song : War with yuan Ming : A country where King Sejong's 4 armies and 6 bases were originally located in one place. Qing : Manchu War(ByungJa war)

@@히스토리가크 don't understand what you mean

It means that many foreign dynasties emerged for that reason​@@kinkin7194

It only shows countries that were in war with korean countries

@@kinkin7194 song ming qing didnt do much about defining korean territory.

Hello! I'm glad you enjoyed the video and I appreciate the feedback. You can find my business email address in the "about" tab of my channel page (I can't give it out here due to security reasons).

5세기부터 고구려의 정식 국호는 고려입니다.

이건 한국사 시간에 배우지 않아서 문제야 진짜..

고구려 시대에 이미 다 고려라고 불렀어요. 그시절 중국 역사책에도 다 고려라고 적지 고구려 이름은 이미 그때부터 옛날 이름. 주몽의 고구려도 고려, 발해도 고려, 궁예의 후고구려도 고려, 왕건의 고려도 고려임. 우리나라 역사는 조선-고려-남북국(고려/신라)-고려-조선임.

it was not particularly n . korean state. Old Joseon was the origin of the most of korea states, including Buyeo, Koguryo in the north and Mahan, Shilla in the south.

他們祖先的更像是源自云南-緬甸，大江大河，平原陸地（長江）附近

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e and who was living in yunan and myanmar at the time? the austroasiatics. the wa people are an austro asiatic people native to yunan and myanmar

@@cambodianpleasuresquad1753 and who was living in yunan and myanmar at the time? 1，Ydna C1b+D1a+M-The first settlers/ aboriginal，Vietnam/Hoabinhian,Andamanese peoples，Melanesians 2，Ydna O1a+O1b+O2-The second group of settlers/Mongoloid Austronesian O1a/Austroasiatic O1b/Sino-Tibetan O2a MtDNA M与安达曼人有关 雲南緬甸人母語叫做漢藏語族-藏緬分支

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e why does OLD chinese sound like the khmer language? listened to it and it has the same sounds as modern khmer. sounds totally different from modern chinese

@@cambodianpleasuresquad1753 可能高棉人祖先來自南中國，古代柬埔寨南部是海，東邊是海，西邊也是海，他們只能來自北方，不就是中國南方雲南緬甸

Actually, South Korea should be South Korea and North Korea should be North Korea.

That is north korea flag

Jeez, are you kidding me?

bruh

BASED

원래 중국이 백두산 전역을 실효지배하고 있었는데 1964년 조중변경조약으로 인해 북한이 백두산의 절반 이상을 관활하게 되었습니다.