I believe the L is responsible for the player that violated in Play #1. The T has the shooter and the players in the top two marked lane spaces furthest from him.
So on play #3 at 16:46 if you were to call a foul on white, would that be a shooting foul correct? (So 1 free throw for the lane violation and two for the shooting foul?)
Not a shooting foul. The foul was for displacement after release. Not an airborne shooter. Common foul with added delayed lane violation! Thanks for that timestamp!
haha this is an interesting scenario i can see the way you see it as the violation first but infact its still the goal tending is the issue. let better official give you a response but for now .. in Australia it would be goal tending point counts and a tech given, here its one shot no line up and continue from point of interruption since score counts from the goal tending (as one) defending team to throw in from baseline (as if made free throw)
Well I guess you can’t really……delayed foul, see if the try is good……which it can’t be. So score the goal tend, 2 more shots for someone on shooting team, then award the ball to same?
@@sctnabt not sure what you mean by delayed foul see if try is good.. it is a goal tending scenario so you cant see if the try is good it automatically counts.. so yes count one point and then... depends where you are what your tech rule is.. are you in usa Australia or where? So it could be one of either .. 2 shots and possession, 1 shot and possession, or 2 shots continue from point of interruption so other team would throw in or 2 shots and continue from point of interruption as I said depends on what your tech rule is in your country/area. Hope that helps mate.. better official?
