💪 How to Write a High-Quality Literature Review Like a Pro: A 4-Step Guide 🎓 

Your videos are solution based. Thank you a lot. They are already making difference in the 2024

Great Work! خیلی لذت بردم از ویدئو هاتون. ممنون

Absolutely useful and precise ! Thank you Dr Saeed

Excellent,highly organized and informative.

Thank Dr Saeed, your videos are top notch, I always like your presentation, I took your presentation as a class study.

Another superb video with clear an concise guidance -- deeply grateful for this content!

You are always my best, Dear!

Thank you very much for guiding

Dr. Pahlewan your content is too good and very useful Thanks and God bless u always

Excellent information for new researchers thanks sir

Beautifully crafted.

thank you so much dr saeed really its amazing

This video solved almost all my problems regarding research literature .Thank you❤

Thank you Prof. Saeed

8:52 Indeed, it is widely held...On the other hand, ...However, ... ... are mixed too. While most of studies ... Among them, ... These phrases are useful to foreground the author's voices in the writing (not backgrounding the author's voices).The author leads the readers to understand the storyline.

best video respected sir

The best video ever

Interesting❤

Dear Sir, it was amazing

thank you...prof...

thank you DR Saeed for the videos, what is the difference between the Gaps in the introduction /background and the gaps to be addressed from the literature review ?

Thank you, Dr Saeed, for the helpful videos. Can you guide me on how to write a book chapter or a narrative review? Your approach to actionable steps is really helpful. Thank you.

This video just save my thesis form failure

فوق العاده هستش.من تمامی محتوا رو نگاه میکنم .برای من فوق‌العاده هستش

Excellent video. Can you please post a sample of literature research based on this approach. Thanks

Thank you for all that you do. I cant find the attached link of the paper?

Hi, Dr. Saeed. Thanks for this very intersting lecture. As my research field is creativity, I wish for upcoming lecture to introdcue crrative mehods for build structure not just pick one from exiting anchor papers, another point, what are the type of content we can pull from review paper, bools, article i.e. for definitions we can use books ...etc. I saw many vedios about LR, I consider this one the best vedios, wish you belss us with such vedios.

thank you

Thank you for this valuable content sir 🫡

Good job

Hi, Dr. Saeed. I am Lydia, very glad to watch your latest video. Because I just finished the revision of my chapter two LR. I can clearly understand your four steps and I am happy I followed the right track. At the beginning of preparing the proposal, I had the habits of summarizing the literature map based on the themes, research questions, methods and findings. Then, based on the snowballing, I found many good qualities of the literature in my field. I save the PDF files into my endnote and classified based on the themes. Next, I am organizing the titles and subtitles of chapter 2. Of course, I reordered many times. In the process writing, i need to reread the related the literature. The most difficult thing, i think is how to reorganize the the selected ideas. I think i still need to improve the Step 4. I have also have a question, dr. Sometimes, the benchmark literature includes several points to the section of LR, such as the participants, the research themes and the theoretical framework, I need to mention it sevral times. Maybe the first time i need to state sb did sth and the results. In the following, i only need to select the most related part, right? Your example in the article is clear, summerize one idea with several references. But, i noticed some PHd thethis use one paragraph to state one literature. All in all, your explanation is detailed and valuble. I bear in mind that the fuction of LR is to show you are well understood the good literature in your field, and your critical review of these literature. Most importantly, you can find the gaps and state the significance of your research. Thanks a lot for your sharing. Your are an great researcher and professor.

Thanks Dr. can you make a video about the application of AI in the literature review

Here is my support sir :)

Thank you Prof. We need to more details and examples for Step 4. This is because it's really hard to implement it.

Thanks prof

Thank you Prof. Sharif for this helpful video. I have struggle that sometimes I find a citation in a paper interesting that I want to cite too. Can I cite it directly or do I need to go back to the original work and read the entire article? Because I feel it seems unethical to apply directly, but exhausting to trace the original works just to confirm a short sentence.

hello how to adress in practical steps the research gap of a study

Much more useful. If anybody is going research on the green economy ?

🙏❤️🙏

one more suggestion - please discuss how to develop a theoretical framework which is also a sub-heading in Chapter 2. Normally, few theories/established framework are integrated/extended in PhD level. TQ.

Dear Prof., Can you please make a detailed video about how we can use mind maps like Miro in this process?

6:50 Critical LR is all about "relevance" and "significance". What do you mean by "significance"? How to showcase the "significance" in our write-up?

Hi Sir, Step 1 and 2 are not so tough. For step 2, we may find theses that similar to our research field. For example, if our research is on mobile payment adoption, we may search theses on online banking adoption to structure our headings and sub-headings. i think that Step 3 and Step 4 are the most difficult. Could you please make more videos on how to conduct these steps like a pro by providing various published examples.

I want to ask if I select the Scopus Dataset and sciencedirect during query phase, Is it this true? Or, i have to select one of them.

11:11 what is the reason for not using some theories that you don't want to use. Should the "reason(s) for no using" be supported by previous studies?

10:44 Highlight the research gaps. Do we only show the gaps in the final sub-heading of the Chapter2LitReview? Should we just highlight the gaps as stated in the Problem Statement in Chapter1 Introduction?

11:11 How does your work contribute to the body of knowledge. Since we already show the "contributions" in Chapter1, why do we repeat it in Chapter 2? Where do we insert the "contributions" in Chapter2?

10:31 "if you find ... , you need to explain "why" and justify it". Could you show us some published examples in which how the authors explained "why" and justify it? TQ

Can someone include conceptual clarification in the literature review,what is the differences between conceptual clarification and theoretical framework

locate the shared articles you written.

You are speaking very fast, I might need to slow it down so I take notes and follow. Like some of your videos, eg, the one on Systematic review was very good.