🥇 Jessica Gadirova FX EF British Championships 2022 14.600 

Honestly she did score 14.600 i would give her 14.200 but her start score is 15.6 so thats massive

@@rollercoasterlou8070 her D score is 5.6 actually and a 14.2 for this routine is still high.

@@mustawgym no that was a good routine i would give a 14.250 from expecting it again

@@rollercoasterlou8070 I didn’t say it wasn’t a good routine. I just have sense. oh right, you’d give a 14.250… who cares??? ur lack of knowledge about gymnastics scoring is ur problem, but don’t act like u know she’d get a 8.5+ E score for this when everyone who has a little sense and knowledge knows she absolutely WOULDN’T

@@mustawgym Ok First of all shut the f up stop trying to be smart with me ive been watching gymnastics since i was two and i know what good routines look like so shut up

This was exactly what came to mind. How on earth did she manage that

nonsense and bad judging 🤷‍♂️

This routine has bad execution, too high

That's slightly generous, but not a lot. I think 14.4 would be a more reasonable score for this performance, as I had it at 8.6ish myself (hard to see certain things in the video so I deducted anyway, just to see what a tough score would be).

ALL domestic scores are inflactioned...

No we won't stop complaining about domestic scoring.

Lenient is about 0,3 0 ,4 difference this is closer to a full point

@@rafaelteixeira7961 Actually Jess has consistently scored around 14 nationally & internationally throughout 2021-22. So the actual difference is in fact 0.6. To say it's almost a full point difference is over exaggerating.

@@liukin95 i think she gan go 14, but not with this video today, her first double double was even difficult to define what was the pass and around 1:10 i would not consider her 2nd pass on the D score

@@bluepanther1013 Crossed feet -0.1, flexed feet -0.1, leg separation -0.1, exactness of the tuck position 0.1 or -0.3 (for me it was definately -0.3), low chest -0.1 and the step on the landing -0.1 = -0.6 or -0.8 just for the first pass alone !

@@gaodrob7938 and the bent knees??

@@rafaelteixeira7961 well it’s a Silivas so bent knees should be allowed without deductions. Her problem is she does it like a piked twisting salto where they start laid out but that’s only allowed for pike not tuck saltos. She should get deductions both for two different body positions (-.3) AND even the tuck she does do in the second salto has insufficient knee bend (-.1 or -.3). Those deductions would disappear if she did a moors plus the extra tenth of difficulty. And she obviously has the height for it so I bet the landing on the moors wouldn’t otherwise be worse than the Silivas. The only reason I can’t think of why she hadn’t upgraded to the moors yet is because her coaches are cautious of how tinkler’s career ended after doing the moors once. But Jessica had much more amplitude on her tumbling than amy ever did

@@Plaspos The code doesn't state that insufficient body position in a double salto should recieve .3 in form deductions. The judges also can't take two different deductions for two separate instances of insufficient tuck position in the same skill.

@@gaodrob7938 She definitely doesn't recieve .6 in deductions for form. Her international scores would be way lower if that was the case.

Incompetence on the judging side is how she got that score.

The one that got a 14.05 did not have better landings she took a 0.5 landing on her lass pass

Respectfully, I disagree. We know this routine / that pass scored well in big competition (the Olympics), and if you play it in slow motion it’s honestly not that messy at all. She just has a different technique on it but it’s one of my favorite double doubles at the moment

@@Elitegymnasticsfan26 It scores well (as you can see here 14.6. Is a bit questionable of a score) but her Silivas is her biggest form deduction in her routine and it’s an easy fix so that’s why I was suggesting she changes it, but I get what you’re saying.

I think a moors is better that a sillivas, her form is better like moors

She would pull off a Moors well, as would Jennifer (because I hated the Chuso she did at the Olympics) but they're clearly pacing them both atm.

Her passes after 1:10 are even a bigger place for deduction, the 2nd pass after the jump probably would not actually be counted on D score

For double saltos or saltos with L.A. turn, no deduction for insufficient exactness of tuck or pike position. So her open position is okay. The other usual deductions would apply - certainly leg separation and a small step, possibly foot form (hard to see in this video). So -0.3 maybe.

Jade also cannot dance or emote, or have anything other than tumbling... This girl has more charisma in her hand poses than Jade does in her entire body! But yes this score is high. lmao but using Robotic Poser Jade. gurl bye!

@@lalareal180 totally disagree - jade won fair and square.

@@lalareal180 jade can do triple the tumbling that Jessica can do

@@lalareal180 yeah, but this is so overrated, look at the silivas, for the body shape -0.3, -0.1 step, -0.1 crossed legs, -0.1 low chest, is -0.5 only for the first pass and she got 8.8E score...

@@d00f60 yeah but it's not just about the tumbling tho is it, tumbling is impressive and this routine shouldn't have beaten jades score probably, however jess is kinda more enjoyable to watch

They don’t want to do that.

Let's let them enjoy their elite careers before shoving them into a lame NCAA program.

Not everyone wants to give up a professional career and move to another country alone instead of going to university at home

Holy! I don’t recall saying I wanting them to do any of that. Leave their elite careers or not continue their gymnastics goals. They can do whatever they want and they’re still appreciated. So try not to take my comment so negatively or rank all over NCAA. There so many British, Canadian, French and German gymnasts in it and they’re very good. So why don’t you all just chill or stay off my comment. No one needs your negativity.

Yea, chill everyone 😘

Double double tucked.

DEFINITELY tucked. The second salto is plenty tucked to get credit for the tucked element, not laidout. And for double saltos or saltos with L.A. turn, no deduction for insufficient exactness of tuck or pike position.

Neither do I 😅

Too high, her execution is bad

It was better in the all-around

I think is .2 deduction

This would have never scored above 14 at the Olympics lol

That first double double is so difficult to even score/categorize. Its form break/s are just.... ugh.

@@jeyemangobravo it looks like she’s almost trying to lay it out

@@jamesmaxson2306 EXACTLY!! I was like "wtf was that" was that even a Moors or Silivas or Chuso ugggh

@@jeyemangobravo it's a silivas. She gets like half a point deduction each time during international competitions.

Actually a 14.6...

It was a 14.600.

@@anikokoren3417 Nah there's no way... lmaoooo that's crazy

@@liukin95 Bruh this is actually not good... giving the illusion to gymnasts that they will get that high of a score internationally as well.

@@bagelized Jess has been scoring around 14 quite consistently in 2021-22, I am sure she knows that the score is higher than what she expected but but that says more about the judging than her imo.

No, 14.600 is what she actually scored. Eyebrow raising for sure.

BB also have the 0.2 bonus for D dismount

@@rafaelteixeira7961 Ik UB has that it’s just the connection value is much lower usually. Which is why gymnasts won’t score as high.

LMAOOOO

Lmaooo pls😭

@@Matthew-jh6oh I’m glad someone understood my sarcasm 😂😂😂

@@hydroflask8992 if it wasn’t sarcasm I’d be concerned😂

in terms of choreography and understanding that there's music playing, absolutely :)

@@_padfoot Yeah well judges also judge based off of difficulty, execution, etc., and when you combine all of that together, Jade is clearly the better floor worker