Тёмный

10 Facts about the Battle of Midway everyone should know 

WW2TV
Подписаться 84 тыс.
Просмотров 40 тыс.
50% 1

10 Facts about the Battle of Midway everyone should know
With Henry J. James
Battles at Sea and Naval History on WW2TV
• Battles at Sea and Nav...
If you liked this video please consider leaving us a thank you donation. To the right of the up and down thumbs and share button is the heart shaped Thanks button - it helps us to keep on producing content.
Henry J. James is the author of The Man Who Won World War II which cane out in April 2022. He is a political scientist and author. Henry's book promo • Video
USA www.amazon.com...
In today's show we go through 10 interesting points about the Battle of Midway, but more from where the battle sits in context.
(1) What Japan planned to do at Midway
(2) But that's not what happened...(short version of the Battle of Midway)
(3) The many reasons Japan was defeated
(4) Yamamoto criticisms
(5) The Aleutian "Feint"?
(6) The Doolittle Raid?
(7) If Japan Had Won
(8) The Manhattan Project
(9) Biggest Beneficiary of the victory at Midway was...Germany First
(10) You'd think after Midway Rochefort would have hailed the hero.
You can become a RU-vid Member and support us here / @ww2tv
You can become a Patron here / ww2tv
Please click subscribe for updates
Social Media links -
/ ww2tv
/ ww2tv
/ ww2tv
WW2TV Bookshop - where you can purchase copies of books featured in my RU-vid shows. Any book listed here comes with the personal recommendation of Paul Woodadge, the host of WW2TV. For full disclosure, if you do buy a book through a link from this page WW2TV will earn a commission.
UK - uk.bookshop.or...
USA - bookshop.org/s...

Опубликовано:

 

6 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 218   
@nudziciemnie
@nudziciemnie 2 года назад
I am from Poland. I spent about two years to explore and understand the subject of the war in the Pacific. I've seen everything possible on RU-vid and read a lot of books. It was worth it. Whenever I hear about new threats and the growing power of other nations, I remember what wonderful and sometimes unbelievable things the Americans did at Midway and throughout the entire war. It reassures me then that, however it may be, in the end things will take the same turn again and all the efforts of the little dwarfs will fail.
@PaulJohnson-su3mv
@PaulJohnson-su3mv Год назад
57 yr old from US (Dallas, Texas) here - What concerns me about the next 10 critical years is the lack of US factory production. We are back to 1932 levels of anemic dissolution. But what is worse is the laziness and confusion of our culture, our terrible politics which borders on a social civil war. We rely on China for our comfort, which is the core focus of a very high % of citizens, especially those under 30 years old. If it comes down to a real infantry fight, or any sustained production contest, I must warn you that the good old days of the USA are over. Of course we have lots of food and money, plus technology. Maybe hope for AI troops from space.
@thatguy22441
@thatguy22441 Год назад
A friend of mine's grandparents all came from Poland. He tracks what's going on in that part of the world. While we both agree the crimes of the Nazis were reprehensible (to say the least), we're also annoyed that the USSR's war crimes are not mentioned. Despite having a higher body count than Hitler, Stalin's crimes barely rate a footnote, if even that. Fly the Swastika, and you'll be censured (as you well should be), but fly the Hammer and Sickle and you're a goddamn hero to SJWs.
@jameshannagan4256
@jameshannagan4256 Год назад
I sure hope so and i am grateful for all the great Polish delis in NJ.
@ppumpkin3282
@ppumpkin3282 Год назад
@@thatguy22441 The million dollar question, is should FDR and Churchill joined forces with the Russians or should they have let them beat Hitler and then go clean up the mess. The problem is if he didn't join forces with Stalin, all of Europe and parts of Asia might be under Russian control today.
@ppumpkin3282
@ppumpkin3282 Год назад
Whatever you think about Midway, the whole battle hinged on one pilot McClosky, following the lagging destroyer, far beyond the range of the gas tanks of most of his pilots. It was four minutes that made the difference. Fact is the US bungled so many things at Midway, and the had the advantage of land planes, radar, and knew the enemies plans. The US also had the advantage that the one Japanese search plane that would have detected them was an hour late getting started.
@talktidy7523
@talktidy7523 2 года назад
Interesting stuff. I knew Yorktown was turned around super quick by repair workcrews at Pearl Harbor so that she could join the other carriers at Midway. I did not know that the engineers had blueprints in hand for her & were crafting replacement parts while she was steaming in to port. Kind of explains how they managed it in three days.
@morningstar9233
@morningstar9233 2 года назад
Same. I did know they had Yorktown's blueprints but not that were crafting parts ahead of her arrival and they flew engineers out to assess the damage en route to port. Was always in wonder of how they turned her around so fast. This explained a lot. Interesting analysis of the battle moreover and especially the consequences had the U.S. lost. Generally not one for counterfactuals but when they're based in the reality of the situation and real possibilities then they're worth considering, as is the case here i believe.
@IosifStalin2
@IosifStalin2 2 года назад
This is why this channel glows!!
@DanielMulloy-bg6gw
@DanielMulloy-bg6gw 2 года назад
She also sailed with construction crew on board.... it was amazing!
@thatguy22441
@thatguy22441 Год назад
Another reason it was accomplished in 3 days is Nimitz personally cut a lot of red tape. The actual work of repairs/upgrades doesn't take very long. What takes so much time is getting all the paperwork in order and other administrative SNAFUs. Frankly, what Nimitz accomplished was nothing short of miraculous.
@jnstonbely5215
@jnstonbely5215 3 месяца назад
@@thatguy22441 Yes, That Guy, Excellent Post ! You’re absolutely right about Admiral Chester Nimitz ! I know that he’d instructed his top commanders to “throw out the book “; when they needed to to cut through red tape; - but he also wedded them to his “ Doctrine of “Calculated Risk” , in which he advised them not to take a risk at attacking the enemy without not having absolute certainty of coming out with superior results than the enemy “ Surely, he was the right man, in the right place, at the right time . Thank goodness. At the same time, Nimitz was offered the Command at Pearl Harbor by FDR ,but he humbly declined as he felt that several dozen Admirals senior to him would have felt they were “passed over” for a younger man , and this may have invited some unwanted tensions in the aftermath of the Japanese attack. But about two weeks before Christmas, FDR sent a message to Admiral Ernest J. King CNO ( chief of naval operations, Washington DC, which was , “ tell Chester Nimitz to get out to Pearl Harbor and not come back until the war is won”.
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 2 года назад
Rochfort’s treatment is an example of a good deed not going unpunished. He was smarter than is bosses.
@thatguy22441
@thatguy22441 Год назад
Subordinates being smarter than their bosses is endemic to the US Army, and I understand the other branches and the militaries of other countries have the same problem.
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 Год назад
@@covertops19Z …with the air force the higher in rank I got. Started attending meetings where E9’s and Colonels spoke. My overall impression was how little critical thinking went on. How much it was a system without a necessary feedback loop to right itself. How much it was simply a self reinforcing echo chamber
@fredpierce9363
@fredpierce9363 Год назад
What one has to realize that dull bosses is a problem, not only in the military, but throughout the world. What bosses are good at is becoming bosses, they do all what we think of as the negative things that ingratiate themselves to their bosses so they finally get promoted into a boss position. Then they find themselves trying to lead people who actually excelled in a meritocracy where critical thinking and hard work are what actually solves the problems. If bosses are smart they just supply the tools needed and then get the hell out of the way.
@thatguy22441
@thatguy22441 Год назад
@@covertops19Z Read "This Kind Of War" by T.R. Fehrenbach. Or read about the inter-war period the world wars. In both cases, the military had gotten soft, and they paid dearly for it. When we're finally attacked (and drawn into WW3), our casualties are going to be horrendous at first.
@thatguy22441
@thatguy22441 Год назад
@@Idahoguy10157 "Self-reinforcing echo chamber." You nailed it. Nothing ever changes because everyone tells the O-grades what they want to hear. I've even had senior NCOs tell me not to tell any field grade officer what's really going on, to make them happy and get them out of our AO as quickly as possible. What kind of Army does that? The answer: one that won't win a war until it un-fucks itself. I predict we'll be attacked, and suffer massive casualties initially. It'll take at least a year for the US military to extirpate "woke" ideology and get to the business of fighting and winning wars. At least I hope so.
@BK-uf6qr
@BK-uf6qr 3 месяца назад
I really appreciate this Guest. His view of the war in particular is fantastic. Someone who looks at the the full scope of the war and battles. But also looks at the vast tentacles…where ever it may lead. Amazing effort.
@jonrettich4579
@jonrettich4579 Год назад
Another enlightening presentation. Mahan understood the value of international trade and ports for a successful battle fleet. Japan is very complex. After 350 years of internal strife they realized they had to work something out. From the late 16th into the 17th the warfare gradually centralized power until the Tokugawa clan gained ascendancy. Throughout Japan’s history they had accepted Chinese artisans and philosophers frequently fleeing from invasion or internal wars. The Portuguese landed there in the 16th century the Dutch a trading station by the early 18th century at least. The Japanese had tried to redirect the enumerable fighting men left after unification to take Korea which failed and also moved into the Philippines for awhile. All this to say every major clan had access to international activities and resident experts. Though an extreme exclusionary policy was adopted, higher circles remained informed. Perry was there about whalers who had been killed or mistreated American military capacity prompting Japan to enter contemporary history. Japan was supported by Theodore Roosevelt considering them modern compared to Russia and who helped end that war before Russia could muster all its might. All this to say Japanese decision makers had known always far more than we assume about the rest of the world. It’s modern growth was awesome but did not exist in a vacuum . Again thank you so much for this presentaion
@kclcmdrkai1085
@kclcmdrkai1085 2 года назад
at 38:38 , those three IJN CVs were burning for longer than six hours and once dusk was reached, those three were either scuttled or torpedo'd by their own IJN DDs when the surviving crews were rescued and likewise the Hiyru also suffer the same fate hours later
@73Trident
@73Trident 2 года назад
Correct
@dennisweidner288
@dennisweidner288 Год назад
Yes. This is important. Now it is true that the three carriers were left burning pyres in 6 minutes, bt they were not sunk in 6 minutes. This is important because most of the pilots were saved. It is commonly thought that a huge part of the pilot corps was killed at Midway. This was not the case.
@Chiller01
@Chiller01 2 года назад
Its not unusual in the military for the wrong people to get credit for the actions or accomplishments of their subordinates.
@mathewkelly9968
@mathewkelly9968 2 года назад
Got to be up there as the biggest military intelligence success of all time .
@AnthonyBrown12324
@AnthonyBrown12324 Год назад
Despite all the bigger picture issues . It was a handful of Dauntless dive bomber crews ; using their skill and initative that decided the battle . Dick Best in particular got 2 bombs on target during the 2 missions that day . Only a few bombs did all that damage , to the four Japanese carriers . You always need a bit of luck .
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
Not "despite" but "because of". Those aviators were incredibly skilled, courageous and dedicated; I am in awe of them. But it was all those staff guys, sigint guys, Nimitz, aircraft carrier crews, etc who got them there so they could drop those bombs.
@KevinJones-yh2jb
@KevinJones-yh2jb 2 года назад
What an insight into Midway etc, so much I didn’t know. An excellent talk by Henry. Thank you both, bring Henry back again, as an ETO guy, this has opened my mind to the Pacific theatre. Thank you
@ericflagg80
@ericflagg80 2 года назад
A most detailed and informative briefing on the background leading up to the Midway Battle, well done!
@step4024
@step4024 2 года назад
Excellent Paul. Another great guest in Henry. So informative and interesting. It's great People like Rochefort eventually got the recognition they deserve. Like Turing, and all the rest....belated, but now more remembered than many of the brass who denied them what they deserved more than anyone really.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Many thanks!
@jimwatts5192
@jimwatts5192 2 года назад
Hello folks. Tremendous telling of the Midway story with great insights. One of the best, don’t miss it.
@christopherridle7670
@christopherridle7670 2 года назад
Great show Gentlemen, I'd love to see a show on Lend-Lease.
@reiniergroeneveld7801
@reiniergroeneveld7801 2 года назад
Very interesting discussion on the broader impact of Midway, even on the European Theater.
@richardbono5540
@richardbono5540 2 года назад
One of the best episodes on one of the best channels, what a eye opener, really interesting perspective beyond the battle!
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 2 года назад
I’ve never before heard General Leslie Grove as “subtle”. Grove stepped on so many people making the Manhattan Project after the war he was dressed down by General of the Army Eisenhower. Essentially told to put in his retirement papers.
@jamesdavis8021
@jamesdavis8021 Год назад
Thank you for this video. I always believed Rochfort never got the credit he deserved but, I didn’t understand why
@JakeCole1453
@JakeCole1453 2 года назад
More Pacific theater shows please, Paul. This one was terrific. 👍
@TheVigilant109
@TheVigilant109 2 года назад
Great presentation by Henry. Thought provoking and fascinating. Great, in depth research. Look forward to Henry's return
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 2 года назад
Admiral Nimitz was responsible for the war in the entire Pacific basin. The largest battlefield in earth.
@lewistrott417
@lewistrott417 Год назад
Great episode, thoroughly enjoyed it as a companion to the Shattered Sword episode. Thanks.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
Glad to hear it!
@randallreed9048
@randallreed9048 Год назад
Wow, great stuff! My Dad was a merchant seaman aboard Esso oil tankers going back and forth between the Americas and Europe. In 1943, is made some very scary trips to Europe dodging U-boats. I am proud of his service. At the end of the war, my uncle, who was in the Army, got the GI government
@labla8940
@labla8940 9 месяцев назад
Do you know his rout and dates by ay chance my Dad was on a DE escorting a lot of fuel tankers in 43
@randallreed9048
@randallreed9048 8 месяцев назад
@@labla8940 No. He really never explained any of that to me. Most of what I know I got from going through a box of his WW2 memorabilia when I was a young kid. The box disappeared after I found a swastika flag in that box, tacked it to a 2x4, and went running around the neighborhood with it. I was VERY young.
@gordonbutler5142
@gordonbutler5142 2 года назад
Another great lecture and discussion.
@philbosworth3789
@philbosworth3789 11 месяцев назад
Every time I think I've watched almost every episode in the WW2TV back catalogue, more pop up. All such good episodes.
@jammininthepast
@jammininthepast 2 года назад
Thank you Paul. Superb piece. Just when you think Midway....I have read a ton on it! Surprise! Excellent show.....
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it
@philbosworth3789
@philbosworth3789 11 месяцев назад
Very interesting point from Henry here. Adds another layer/dimension to this action.
@robertdendooven7258
@robertdendooven7258 2 года назад
When people say what would have happened if the US Navy had lost the battle, I always want to ask them right away is what is the definition of lost to you. I don't even think if we has lost all three carriers at Midway that Hawaii was in danger of being invaded. Attacked by air again yes, but not invaded. Japan did not have the sealift capabilities to bring a large enough invasion force.
@jefffreeman8905
@jefffreeman8905 2 года назад
If we lose the carriers we can't do offensive actions for probably 2 years. Guadalcanal gets taken and fortified and Australia and New Zealand are cut off. Supplies to China are endangered too. It would probably have taken until 1947 to get within atomic bombing range of Japan at that point. We can't LOSE WW2 unless we give up. But winning can be a LOT more expensive.
@MrNicoJac
@MrNicoJac 2 года назад
Was Hawaii FULLY self-dependent, for food? Did Hawaii have the planes, ammo, and spare parts (and fuel!) to keep Japanese battleships at bay? If either of these is not a Solid Yes, then you'd get a naval blockade, and eventually a naval bombardment. You'd get fishing boats being blown out of the water, exacerbating starvation. The result would be a full surrender, or food riots and then a full surrender. So you don't even need an invasion force. Just a small garrison, and some patience...
@robertdendooven7258
@robertdendooven7258 2 года назад
@@MrNicoJac You are assuming that the Japanese could sustain a blockading force around Hawaii. I don't think the Japanese had enough oilers to do that. One opinion against another.
@MrNicoJac
@MrNicoJac 2 года назад
@@robertdendooven7258 Well, a traditional blockade (like Germany in WW1) is based on the idea that you're containing the entire enemy navy in its home port. You would indeed need a lot of ships for that. But if the US had lost at Midway, its naval assets would not have been in Pearl Harbor, seeing if they can sortie out every single day. So the Japanese didn't need to maintain their full fleet. In fact, once you've bombed the airfields out of operation, what would stop the Japanese from dropping anchor just off the coast? 🤔 A handful of US submarines, with faulty torpedoes? 😅 It would take months before any surface fleet could assemble and get through the Panama Canal, and form an actual relief task force, right? So, I think your point about oilers is spot on, and I hadn't fully considered that yet. But I also think that air strikes against the air fields, followed up by shore bombardment, might have settled the matter quite quickly 🤔 (like, potentially, and of course utterly dependent on how many planes and pilots the Japanese would have lost in their hypothetical win) What's your view on the above? 🙃
@robertdendooven7258
@robertdendooven7258 2 года назад
@@MrNicoJac I think there were enough planes on Hawaii to both defend the island against an air attack and maybe attack the Japanese fleet. Would they be as ineffective as the B-17s at Midway is the question. The defenses on Hawaii were built up after the attack on Pearl Harbor with many more troops and planes being brought in. I also believe a credible US Navy force could be assembled with ships already in the Pacific and US West Coast with reinforcements brought from the Atlantic by mid-July 1942. Saratoga, Wasp, and Ranger along with North Carolina, Washington, and South Dakota and the needed cruisers and destroyers would be part of this. But, as the guest mentioned, the Germany first strategy would suffer greatly. As far as food and supplies, any ship bringing supplies to Hawaii could in turn take back civilians not needed to the West Coast so as to not be a drain on supplies. I really think that the Japanese could only raid Pearl Harbor and not have a fleet staying off of it for too long. Logistics again is the enemy of the Japanese.
@alancranford3398
@alancranford3398 2 года назад
Midway used every Yorktown-class carrier (CV-5, CV-6 and CV-8), the most modern in the US Navy until USS Essex/CV-9 made it into service.
@thomasmadden8412
@thomasmadden8412 Год назад
Great Episode, really made me think about how much WW2 could have changed if the outcome of Midway was different.
@Wolf-yt5de
@Wolf-yt5de 4 месяца назад
I just got to this and it is one of the best Midway videos I've seen!
@TheGaryartgood
@TheGaryartgood 2 года назад
Glad to meet you on my RU-vid!!😎👍🏾🔥💪🏽
@WilliamClodius
@WilliamClodius Месяц назад
The plane from the Tome, that spotted the American carriers, spotted them on its return leg. Because it left late it cut its outbound leg short, and, as a result, spotted the carriers earlier than it would have if it had left on time. The attack on the Aleutians was intended to occur on the same day as the attack on Midway, but the departure for Midway was delayed a day.
@dennishughes4089
@dennishughes4089 2 года назад
Another great presentation on this channel. Wonderful job, Woody!
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Thank you kindly!
@bradleyjuelfs954
@bradleyjuelfs954 Год назад
Adding Henry's book to my summer reading list. Thanks for the great presentation!!
@mhsvz6735
@mhsvz6735 Год назад
Excellent, thank you!
@dmitryshusterman9494
@dmitryshusterman9494 2 года назад
Great show. Lots of solid info
@Digmen1
@Digmen1 10 дней назад
When I was young I used to read Roskill's books on the War at sea, and I always wondered how Admiral Cunningham turned up at the right place to sink half the Italian navy. And it was due to Ultra of course, which they could not write about till much later.
@GlennJDickinson
@GlennJDickinson 15 дней назад
Really interesting point: a loss at Midway could have changed the Germany First policy, in which case the US support for Britain would have decreased, even to the degree that D-Day could have been delayed or even never happened, in which case the Soviets (probably) would have defeated Nazi Germany on their own, and, as Mr. James says, they wouldn’t have stopped until they got their feet wet on the beach in France-and what a different post-war world that would have been!
@MrNicoJac
@MrNicoJac 2 года назад
That political fall out for Germany First is something NEW I learned. Thanks! ^^
@michaeltelson9798
@michaeltelson9798 9 месяцев назад
There was a second prong to the attack that included the Doolittle Raid, this was scrubbed with a squadron of B-24’s that were going to operate from China simultaneously. When the mission was scrubbed and the squadron remained in India some of the staff officers were sent on the way to support Chennault in preparation to include into the USAAF. Robert Scott (God is my Copilot), Meriam Cooper and others became staff to Chennault that quickened the process of including the Flying Tigers into our armed forces.
@labla8940
@labla8940 9 месяцев назад
Well done Ive been saturated with the Midway videos and watch most in the capacity of reruns. This was a fresh perspective for sure and filled in the broad strokes for me. A book mentioned about the detail being that of Yamamoto"s candle color in his washroom sounds even better. If there is a video where you are in control and not affected by audience requests please let me know. I have the exact same sentiments as you I do believe Cmdr Rochford was the Hugh Dowding of Midway. If you have any suggestions on Battle of Britain lectures please let me know. PS. you were going to discus's broad strokes of the King Cabal, I am ignorant on that topic
@Mike-im5bo
@Mike-im5bo 2 года назад
The "War and Remembrance" Midway episode was better than both Midway movies.
@davewalter1216
@davewalter1216 2 года назад
Excellent overview of the battle and inner view to the political effects before and after and fun counterfactuals. Speaking as an Australian and not in defence of Admiral King, but arrogant pommy bastards are very hard to get along with. I think King felt the same, but was quite happy to work with the few poms who were more interested in winning the war than in displaying their innate superiority. Maybe King just got along with people who were good at what they did and had no time for the bulk of both service hierarchies who were more interested in their careers than winning the war. Very good points on Lend-Lease too.
@bobkonradi1027
@bobkonradi1027 Год назад
There is a story out there about Admiral King. One day he went on a tour of a naval base on the East Coast of the U.S. and at one point went in to either a mess hall or class room filled with ensigns and other lower ranking, younger officers. He introduced himself as, "I'm Admiral King. I'm the son of a bitch you've been hearing about." And he was.
@fredpierce9363
@fredpierce9363 Год назад
So much to think about. I knew what had happened but I didn't know why, who, and how it came about. Thank you. Very interesting.
@ericflagg80
@ericflagg80 Год назад
Admiral Nimitz did visit the Commanding Officer at Midway island in early April to assess situation
@Conn30Mtenor
@Conn30Mtenor Год назад
Japanese Navy strategic planning officer: "Here is the provisional plans for the AF operation". Japanese Command: "Not complicated enough. Take this back, make it more complicated and come back next week". There are a couple of important points that your guest omitted. First, the second IJN attack on Pearl Harbor using the Emily flying boats: Operation K- led the the USN correctly deduce that the flying boats had been refueled at French Frigate Shoal and dispatched the USS Thornton and USS Preble- two Clemson Class AVD's to the Shoals which denied the IJN's use of French Frigate Shoal in any future reconaissance operations that would have been based there. Second: Japanese carrier air groups would not spare any of their aircraft for scouting- the entire air group would have been saved for the strike package. This was a false economy- the Japanese could have spared aircraft for scouting operations and the lack of those extra eyes in the sky left the IJN carriers effectively blind until Tone's scout plane made its report. The Japanese could have made better use of their resources.
@robertbaker6928
@robertbaker6928 2 года назад
That was great would like to hear more about Lend Lease (can't believe I'm saying that).
@73Trident
@73Trident 2 года назад
Three I didn't know, but a lot you don't know or understand completely. So I give you a half like.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Okay, well thanks for commenting. Which points did Henry fail to understand in your opinion?
@marktuffield6519
@marktuffield6519 Год назад
Superb presentation, very thought provoking on a geo-political scale, thank you.
@lewiswestfall2687
@lewiswestfall2687 8 месяцев назад
Thanks WW2TV
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 8 месяцев назад
You're welcome
@garymiller_85
@garymiller_85 2 года назад
Just caught up... amazing seeing what looks like your viewing figures rise. 1,400 views in 12hours, good effort!
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Thanks!
@rsrocket1
@rsrocket1 4 месяца назад
Good interview. I’m sorry you can’t get enjoyment from movies that are not historically accurate. Personally I grew up despising “In Harm’s Way”. Recently I appreciated that it was first entertainment, and secondly based only loosely on events of WW2. Midway 76 was supposed to be a sequel to “Tora Tora Tora” but like “The Big Red One” was hamstrung by budget and the studios. It did portray the best part of WW2 carrier operations with the importance of search, the fog of war, striking first and scraping the bottom of the barrel after just a couple of exchanges.
@kendallturnage9058
@kendallturnage9058 2 года назад
Great discussion.
@korbendallas5318
@korbendallas5318 5 месяцев назад
I'm unconvinced about the consequences. He mentions twice that O'ahu would fall next, but only that: He mentions it. Why? The Japanese considered at least three times to invade O'ahu, twice before Operation Z and once before Operation MI. They considered it unfeasible even against unsuspecting defenders. Kido Butai was also exhausted even before Midway. Operational losses would climb rapidly if they pressed on against the main islands. I'm not even sure the war would've been longer, that would indeed depend on the Allies' focus. If Europe First is kept up and the Soviet Union is continued to be supplied, the Manchurian Operation would still happen in August 1945.
@tomhoefling
@tomhoefling Год назад
Excellent.
@seanbrady6731
@seanbrady6731 2 года назад
Enjoyed this. Now wonder what would have been the implications of Singapore holding out two weeks and attriting the Japanese army.
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
Good question. Singapore was a disgrace. Had they held on ever another week or two, who know what would have happened. The japanese were not in good shape.
@petestorz172
@petestorz172 Год назад
1. The IJN's plan depended on the USN doing what the IJN intended them to do. The possibility of the USN showing up before they should and where they should not be was excluded from the planning wargame. 2. Because the Americans were supposed to be unprepared, the bombers from Midway that didn't hit a ship in Kido Butai and shot down few planes (did "nothing") injected chaos that Nagumo was unprepared to work through. 3. The unplanned waves of attacks, from Midway and the torpedo squadrons, kept the Japanese flight decks occupied with servicing CAP fighters and got lookouts' and CAP pilots' focus low, so the US dive bombers were not spotted in time for the CAP to interfere.
@ppumpkin3282
@ppumpkin3282 Год назад
The more I listen to these stories about WWII, what I realize is that what made America different is the "ground up" perspective of it's people, as opposed to those people who came from "top down", imperial, or dictatorial countries. Americans are by nature self starters. They do not blindly follow orders. It also explains why people like Roachefort, will violate the chain of command to make sure Nimitz gets the information he needs to get the job done. It also explains why the US weapons technology continuously improved during the war (despite the bad torpedoes - eventually the word got through). The world is changing, and other countries are also learning how innovate from the bottom up.
@morganhale3434
@morganhale3434 2 года назад
Great point at the one hundred and first minute about the political capital gained by the Europe first movement in the war effort of the United States. That makes me think that Operation Shoestring is the real prime mover for the Nazi Germany first because the American public was seeing in real time the prosecution of the Japan first movement starting in August 1942. Operation Torch wasn't till November 1942 and by that time the Guadalcanal/New Guinea Campaign had already delivered the poison dagger of attrition to the elite Imperial Japanese forces with the grinding victories of the Solomons and New Guinea Air, Land, and Sea campaigns of the United States and British Commonwealth.
@GlobalDrifter1000
@GlobalDrifter1000 Год назад
Why did the US have to relocate the fleet to the West Coast if midway island was taken by the Japanese? Or if carriers were lost??
@stevehofer3482
@stevehofer3482 Год назад
I think if Midway Atoll was taken, but the. US carriers weren’t destroyed, they might have reversed that decision and kept the fleet at Midway. On the other hand, if the US carriers were destroyed, they would have temporarily located the fleet. To the West Coast, because there wasn’t enough fleet left to really strike from Pearl Harbor anyway.
@dennisweidner288
@dennisweidner288 Год назад
A question. Henry suggests that Nagumo got a message from Tamanagua explaining why a second strike was needed. [35:35] My understanding is that Tananagua's radio was damaged making it impossible for him to send a detailed report. And what Nagumo got was simply that a second strike was needed. In fact, the Midway air groups were not destroyed on Midway --they were not on Midway when the Japanese arrived. They were off Miday attacking Nagum's carriers. What Tanafagua was experiencing was massive anti-aircraft fire from Midway which he was unable to knock out. The result which Henry explains of all the material Nimitz crammed onto the island. Also, is it true that the first three carriers sank within 6 minutes? That is not my understanding. They took hours to sink. I think Henry is poorly informed about the U.S. Navy in the North Atlantic [48:00] Adm King was not fully onboard with the Europe First doctrine. The U.S. Navy did pull ships from the Atlantic. President Roosevelt after the Atlantic Charter meeting with Churchill (August 1941), launched an undeclared naval war with Germany in the North Atlantic. After Pearl Harbor, however. the U.S., Navy pulled back from convoy escorts and until late 1943 this was almost entirely conducted by Britain and Canada. American air assets were involved but very few U.S., Navy fleet asserts. If you look at the big convoy battles in 1942 and 43, American escorts are rarely involved--Tom Hanks 'Greyhound movie is misleading. Henry is dead right about American politics and this is a valuable addition to the Pacific War story. but some of the other comments are questionable. He is also correct about 'Yorktown' and how she was made ready. Something not often mentioned. And he is right about the Redmans. His comments about the Manhattan Project are thought-provoking. And absolutely correct about President Roosevelt. The matters he is wrong about are details, the thrust of his presentation on American politics he is right about and an important contribution. But I take strong issue with his suggestion that the Soviets paid in blood and the demeaning comment that the Americans paid in Spam. He is basically undervaluing the importance of War in the West which was vital to the defeat of NAZI Germany. Now it is true that it was the Soviet Red Army that tore the heart out of the Wehrmacht. But they were able to do that not just because of Lend Lease, but because over half of German industrial output was used to fight the War in the West. One of the reasons that the great bulk of the Ostheer moved east on foot with horse0-drawn carts. The diversion of resources to the West meant that the Ostheer was poorly equipped and supplied.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
I don't know if Henry will read this and reply, I hope so
@helloicanseeu2
@helloicanseeu2 Год назад
tyty very good discussion
@danielbackley9301
@danielbackley9301 Год назад
The most important items supplied to the Russians was the machine tools that were shipped. There is an old joke that you could have walked the entire way to Russia on all of the Carba-tech lathes and Van Norman mills that ended up on the bottom of the Atlanic never mind the ones that got thru.
@Digmen1
@Digmen1 9 дней назад
Yes, thats a good point, we never see Russian videos with American or British tanks etc
@joeatwood1346
@joeatwood1346 Месяц назад
Losing the Battle of Midway would not have resulted in the loss of Hawaii. The IJN and IJA had already looked at it and determined they did not have the shipping to support possession of the islands. Hawaii was food dependent on the mainland even in 1941, and Imperial Japan went 8 million tons shipping-negative just by going to war. Similarly, the IJA vetoed invading Australia because they didn’t have the logistics capacity. Not to mention the IJA’s obsession with the USSR and their reluctance to support the Navy’s operations. Even attempting to sever Australia’s communications was going to stretch IJN logistics. A quick look at Pacific geography; the IJN’s limited fleet train that only barely supported the Pearl Harbor raid; and the staggering drain on the IJN’s oil supply (about the equivalent of 6 months normal ops IIRC; about 25% of their 2-year reserve) that mounting Operations MI and AL imposed; and the best the IJN will manage is limited raids to the east of Hawaii, and certainly not to the West Coast. It will cost too much fuel. By June 1942, Oahu is already too tough of a nut to crack…and Midway is insupportable as a forward base for the IJN. B-17s from Oahu are going to pound Midway continuously, neutralizing it…especially given that the IJN couldn’t keep it in supply in the first place. All losing the battle would do is enforce Plan Dog and the Germany first/defense of the Eastern Pacific strategy that King reversed courtesy of the win to implement Watchtower. Nothing happens to the Manhattan Project. The assets needed for the Pacific aren’t impinging on it, and they are impossible to build in less than two years anyway…a fact the USN knew from its Fleet Problems. So Saratoga, Ranger, and Wasp maintain communications with Oahu, and the US gets serious about the European theatre. Germany falls a little sooner and perhaps without Russian boots in Berlin. And if offensive operations in he Pacific were delayed two years to November 1945…Tarawa gets nuked. As does Wotje or Kwajalein…and probably Truk (with the fleet there) and Saipan. If the Japanese get sane, maybe they capitulate before Japanese cities burn.
@petestorz172
@petestorz172 Год назад
From a history reader's (crazy's?) POV, it's frustrating to realize that books written a couple of decades or more ago are almost certainly incomplete. The role of intelligence being one such omission. "Shattered Sword" and Anthony Tully's "Battle of Surigao Strait" point out another, lack of research in the past into Japanese records and accounts.
@MarkloopRAF
@MarkloopRAF 2 года назад
Really looking forward to NZ at war week. I really hope Sqn Ldr Phil Lamason gets a mention. An absolute legend. Two of my Grandads crew were with him in Buchenwald.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Yep, we have a show coming up on Lamason
@icewaterslim7260
@icewaterslim7260 Год назад
This presentation is very stimulating in provoking out-of-the-proverbial-box thinking in what-ifs. I don't know that I agree with all the speculations but only because I'm in the phase of giving it thought. A pretty good show in which to glean significant details I think the immediate post Doolittle Raid where the IJN was looking for the carriers that launched the raid was an information bonus for the Pacific code breakers. . For what it's worth from the cheap seats, I would've never shared that much confidence in Admiral King for his slow start in the Atlantic against the U boat campaign. Granted there were supply problems with resources being split between two fronts., I don't think well of his ignoring intelligence from the British Admiralty, after they took the risk in providing it,, of being found out about that code breaking. It seems to me a bad sense of priorities in letting personal prejudices over-rule what it takes to run a war with Allies that have something substantial to contribute. I will second the requests to bring this guest on again at some time in the future.
@Digmen1
@Digmen1 10 дней назад
Sadly this book seems to be out of print, and unavailable on ebay or abe books. If anyone has a copy, I'd love to buy it
@craigplatel813
@craigplatel813 Год назад
Admiral Yamamoto knew he had to deal with the US fleet before Coral Sea. The debate between the combined fleet staff and Navy general staff was over where to do it. Fleet general staff wanted to move south from the Solomons which would be in keeping with Japanese being able to cut supply lines to Australia and would be something the US couldn't ignore. Yamamoto didn't see it that way he felt the threat to Midway and possible threat to Pearl Harbor would draw out the US fleet. Yamamoto won out but coral sea was allowed to go ahead support the the port Moresby operation.
@Dennis-dn4wt
@Dennis-dn4wt 5 месяцев назад
my Dad had a front row seat at Coral sea and Midway as he was on anti aircraft guns and once said the japanese planes attacking the yorktown were sometimes close enough they could see the pilots eyes and at Midway the crew of the Yorktown got to go swimming in the pacific compliments of the japenese sinking their ship but before the yorktown was sunk the yorktown planes were in on the sinking of 4 japenese carriers even though it was not the beginning of the end of japenese conquest it was the end of the beginning of japenese conquest in the pacific and ended 8/6 -8/9 over japan complients of 2 B29's
@bobsmith4185
@bobsmith4185 Год назад
We won midway but I believe that the pacific war turned to the US after taking Guadalcanal ..unlike what most history documentaries to midway being the turning point..
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
I've never liked pinning success to any single turning point. There were always lots of important days and events
@xflyingtiger
@xflyingtiger 5 месяцев назад
I have not found this book anywhere. Amazon doesn't have it. Neither does Barnes & Noble.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 5 месяцев назад
I think it is out of print. This one is available though The Man Who Won World War II a.co/d/dWRMlsn
@henrysledge645
@henrysledge645 2 года назад
Great show Woody.
@bobkonradi1027
@bobkonradi1027 Год назад
At about the 3:00 point in the video, the guest expert is explaining why the battle of Midway was in large part a political decision. He forgets that the Japanese Navy's actions were not affected by American politics. The Japanese wanted to use their possession of Midway Island to force out the American aircraft carriers and then destroy them as they tried to defend the island. In fact, the U.S. Navy HQ in Washington thought the attack would come elsewhere at one of several points. The Battle of Midway occurred because that's where the Japanese were, and not due to politics. Regarding the attack on Pearl Harbor (the 13:00 point in the video) it was remarked that the Alfred Mahan book (Effect of Sea Power on History) he advocates wiping out the adversary's fleet as soon as possible, and that's what the Japanese did to the Russian Pacific Fleet in 1905. It should have been obvious to the American Naval Planners that in view of the Mahan Book, which the Japanese followed religiously, combined with their sneak attack on the Russian Fleet, that the Japanese would very closely consider at attack on the American fleet as well. And their Pacific Fleet was as big as, or bigger than ours. It was only the unjustifiable arrogance of the American Naval planners that kept pooh-pooing that notion. Our planners didn't think they could pull it off. The problem was, the Japanese didn't seem to grasp that they couldn't pull it off, so they just went ahead and did it. They had 10 carriers to our 3 or 4. They had as many battleships as we had, as many cruisers and destroyers, not even counting that they'd built several tankers as well. Why did they need tankers other than for long distance missions.? Throw in the elements of surprise and our overconfidence and we should always have assumed it was possible.
@markprange2430
@markprange2430 5 месяцев назад
Russian Baltic Fleet
@4OHz
@4OHz Год назад
Felt Winter Boots and almost every single truck in their logistical supply line
@dannieholland9926
@dannieholland9926 Год назад
Thank you
@MrLemonbaby
@MrLemonbaby Год назад
Paul, it's almost criminal that you only have 42K subs. Other channels remind people to subscribe and to be sure to comment. Please try it, it can't hurt and might be a growth factor for your very deserving channel.
@michaelhorning6014
@michaelhorning6014 2 года назад
Don't say air assault when you mean air attack. Air assault is a landing of troops by parachute and glider in an enemy held area. Air attack is the releasing of ordnance by aircraft on enemy targets.
@gregbailey1753
@gregbailey1753 2 года назад
Or helicopter! AIR ASSAULT!
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
Strictly speaking "Air assault" does not include parachute forces. That's an Airborne operation.
@michaelhorning6014
@michaelhorning6014 Год назад
@@executivedirector7467 If we are being pedantic about our US military jargon, yes. But I'm wearing my military historian hat. And to my mind any time you are inserting troops by air into enemy controlled territory, be it by parachute, glider, helicopter, hot air balloon, giant intelligent eagles, etc., that's an air assault. (Full disclosure, I was in the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and completed Air Assault School in 1988.)
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
@@michaelhorning6014 I was Airborne. And yes I am using the terms the way the US Army uses them.
@labla8940
@labla8940 9 месяцев назад
Is there an email or contact info for Henry? Great channel just discovered, looking to expand my solid understanding of major WW2 events
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 9 месяцев назад
I will direct him to this comment
@labla8940
@labla8940 9 месяцев назад
@@WW2TV Thank you sometimes authors have an email that they publish I was just hoping he had one
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 9 месяцев назад
No, not published
@dennisweidner288
@dennisweidner288 Год назад
I think the most poorly understood aspect today of World War II is the importance of the War in the West. There are several reasons for this, but I want to focus here on the simple fact that the idea that the War in the West was a sideshow is not born out by any real assessment. Of course, it is true that something like 80 percent of the German casualties were sustained in the East. People who have not studied military history just assume that 80 percent of German war production went East with the Ostheer. But this is not what happened and the diversion West of the equipment and supplies was a major factor in the Red Army's victory. (I say a part because I do not mean to any way denigrated the monumental achievement of the Red Army.) But it is important to understand that while the Soviets were supplying the NAZIs with the oil they needed during the battle for France and the Battle of Britain, the Royal Navy was preventing the Germans from obtaining oil from the very beginning. And oil was just one small part of the pressure that forced the Germans to use more than half of their industrial output to fight the war in the West. The exact proportion is not clear to discern, but any assessment shows that it was substantially more than half.
@dennisweidner288
@dennisweidner288 Год назад
Station Hypo/Richefort had proved itself a month earlier with the intelligence provided on the Coral Sea.
@hendrickotto103
@hendrickotto103 2 месяца назад
I remember reading a book by a Ladislas Farago about cryptology.....
@petestorz172
@petestorz172 Год назад
Alt-History is not exactly my thing, but I doubt that Japan had the resources to make Midway enough of a thorn in the USN's side to drive the USN from Hawaii. Japanese-Midway's logistics tether was long, and getting planes, people, fuel, ordnance, food, and construction equipment/materials there in great enough scale just wasn't within Japan's capability. OTOH, post-PH attack, the USN and USA had rebuilt and fortified Hawaii into a fortress. Hawaii could defend itself. Also, while IJN submarine bases were far from Hawaii and the West Coast, USN submarines had their base in Hawaii, close to Midway. Midway-bound Japanese convoys would have been steadily whittled down till the Japanese base became starvation station. While a threat, Japanese I-boats would have been much less successful, and between escorts and patrol planes, their numbers would have dwindled. IOW, not unlike what did happen in the Aleutians, except without the crazy weather and with greater resources/effort by the USN. Midway probably would have become an albatross about the IJN's and Japanese merchant fleet's neck, and pretty quickly.
@GlobalDrifter1000
@GlobalDrifter1000 Год назад
Midway is, in fact,, a lonely island out in the middle of the Pacific. The Japanese would’ve found it impossible to keep the islands supplied. Had they taken it? They did not have an aircraft that had the range to bomb the Hawaiian islands from midway… US k chose to fight there because they were aggressive, and had the intelligence information by code breaking..k
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
The Japanese Emily, Mavis and Betty all had the range to bomb Pearl Harbor from Midway.
@denroy3
@denroy3 9 месяцев назад
I think the purpose was to cause the US to come and fight...after they took it.
@jamesdavis8021
@jamesdavis8021 Год назад
I want that book
@KeithRanker
@KeithRanker Месяц назад
I don’t think that the Japanese could have conquered the Hawaiian Islands. Oahu had far more aircraft and troops than Japan could have brought to such a fight. Jon Parshall has said the same thing.
@jameshannagan4256
@jameshannagan4256 Год назад
I always wonder how many of those dock workers died when Yorktown was hit then hit again and sunk in their own way they were all heroes.
@billygibson9393
@billygibson9393 Год назад
WW2 couldn't have occured before WW1. WW2 started in essence after the treaty of Versailles after WW1.
@petestorz172
@petestorz172 Год назад
Ironically, just as HMS Dreadnought to some degree obsoleted the RN's own older battleships, the IJN success in the PH attack obsoleted in some degree not only USN battleships, but the IJN's own battleships.
@Rusty_Gold85
@Rusty_Gold85 8 месяцев назад
The Dooolittle raid was done for News paper headlines but caused the japanese to kill 250,000 Chinese peasants and their villages where they crashed and or parachuted onto
@jwjohnson9547
@jwjohnson9547 2 года назад
There were a lot of good tidbits, but there were times where James went into counterfactual overdrive.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 2 года назад
Sure, and there's room for that type of discussion
@vicmclaglen1631
@vicmclaglen1631 2 года назад
When the Japanese took delivery of the Mikasa, Battle of Tsushima flagship, from Britain, the sailors had to be bulked up with a special diet because the men were too small and not powerful enough to efficiently operate the ship's guns/equipment. Interesting how the Japanese were able to jump straight in and catch up with the western world, while certain other "civilizations" introduced to it...didn't.
@jameswentzkershawn001
@jameswentzkershawn001 Год назад
Really???
@timbrown1481
@timbrown1481 5 месяцев назад
This book is out of print? Can’t find on Amazon or other sellers. What gives?
@WW2TV
@WW2TV 5 месяцев назад
It happens to books unfortantely. There are copies on Abebooks
@Rusty_Gold85
@Rusty_Gold85 8 месяцев назад
Pity about the non combat Dockside Workers from pearl harbour who went down with the Yorktown. A sad story every one doesnt expand on .They all try to brush over it .
@rodrigogoncalves6165
@rodrigogoncalves6165 Год назад
I read that the japanese never intended to go after Australia, contrary to what the host of this video claims
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
This is down to interpretation, of course the Japanese drew up plans to invade Australia. But just like with the Germans and Sealion, whether it was ever likely to happen or indeed succeed is another matter. But they definitely considered it
@Rusty_Gold85
@Rusty_Gold85 8 месяцев назад
Ive read the same . The Australians thought they did . Thats why 7th and 9Th Divisions were pulled from Africa prior to 2nd BBattle of El Alamein back to Australia and the AIF bought 250 Grant Tanks ( that most never left the country ). MaCarthur dropped a few US divisions on Queensland as well. But that invasion was a threat to late 43 . In Hindsight it wasnt going to happen by the JIA
@dancolley4208
@dancolley4208 Год назад
I suspect that the following question is 99% baloney but I'm going to ask it anyway. About 4 months ago, I watched a "documentary" about The Battle of Midway. During that piece of schlock, the "expert historian" (whose name I have forgotten) said in clear language that the Japanese Occupation Force had put Japanese infantry boots on the sand at Midway. Is this, as I suspect, a load of manure or is there anything in writing that says the Japanese had actually had troops on the islands of Midway? This guy also said that the USMC troops ran them off while inflicting serious damage to the Japaneses' ability to fight.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
I've not heard this version
@dancolley4208
@dancolley4208 Год назад
@@WW2TV it was a first for me too. I vave read books and watched videos about Midway and have never got even a glimpse of ground action on Midway. I'll stick with my first guess. I hope you have a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year. You do outstanding work. Thanks.
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
Absolutely false, but i suspect the person who said that was mixing up Midway and Wake.
@larrytestmi5976
@larrytestmi5976 2 года назад
If we lose and FDR has to fight to get what he wants, what about his health.
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
There is a plentiful supply of soviet footage and still photography of lend lease equipment.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
Yes, although I'm not sure what point you are making
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
@@WW2TV There is a statement in the video that it is difficult to find documentation, photos or videos of lend lease equipment in red army use. That is a common misconception. It's not hard at all to find such footage.
@WW2TV
@WW2TV Год назад
@@executivedirector7467 Ah I see, but if you check, there definitely are more photos of the lend-lease equipment arriving and in supply areas than there are of it in use. But you're right it was used widely
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
@@WW2TV I respectfully disagree. I have seen hundreds of phots and plenty of video of it in use. I won't clog your page with links but they are there. There are entire books devoted to this subject with an awful lot of photos. The USSR wasn't well-managed enough to deliberately suppress this information anyway. It's not as if their cameramen knew the difference between an M4 and a T-34 and avoided filming the M4s. They just saw tanks, just like most journalists would.
@executivedirector7467
@executivedirector7467 Год назад
Here's a sample: www.google.com/search?q=M%24+sherman+red+army+ww2&source=hp&ei=bRgjZJK_CaaCwbkP9oCdoAo&iflsig=AOEireoAAAAAZCMmfZmWCZPShYgc4ZBKKYwMyh06oer-&ved=0ahUKEwjSqd6biP_9AhUmQTABHXZAB6QQ4dUDCAw&uact=5&oq=M%24+sherman+red+army+ww2&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBQghEKABMgUIIRCgATIFCCEQoAE6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOgUIABCABDoLCAAQigUQsQMQgwE6CwguEIAEEMcBENEDOgsILhCKBRCxAxCDAToOCC4QgAQQsQMQxwEQ0QM6EQguEIoFELEDEIMBEMcBENEDOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoFCC4QgAQ6DQguEIAEEMcBENEDEAo6BggAEBYQHjoICAAQFhAeEA86CgghEBYQHhAPEB06CAghEBYQHhAdOgUIIRCrAlAAWNEaYI4baABwAHgBgAGkAYgB3xGSAQQxMy45mAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:2db4df91,vid:E35RqZCmgAY
Далее
The Battle of the Coral Sea - With Craig Symonds
1:17:01
10 Facts about Operation Husky Everyone should know
50:18
Pacific Progression: Peleliu September 1944
1:15:14
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.
Smashing Hitler's Panzers - The Battle of the Bulge
1:24:12
10 Facts about the Holocaust everyone should know
1:46:58