10 Most Prestigious Universities in USA 🇺🇸 

None.

West Coast... UCLA, Stanford & Cal... Better Weather.

Caltec

@@Hermit-Crab Touche' (smile)

1. MIT 2. Stanford 3. Harvard 4. Princeton 5. Yale 6. Cornell 7. UC Berkeley 8. Columbia 9. Georgia tech 10. Michigan Ann Arbor

Including suicide rate

Hi how are you doing?

uh...no. i won't recruit at/from certain schools and i'll throw resumes in the trash if the person went to a school that isn't on our list from which we recruit

nope ,. u are wrong .

@@RobertMJohnsonwhich schools do you recruit?

Replace Stanford and CalTech over UCLA and Columbia.

@@thanhdang2546 Columbia is ivy

@@thanhdang2546 Stanford is listed as # 3

@@thanhdang2546 If you believe Stanford shouldn't be there, let me remind you of what Stanford produced. To name the founders of some industrial conglomerates, Hewlett Packard, Cisco, Google, Nvidia, TSMC, etc. I am sure that I missed many more companies. California Institute of Technology is perhaps the best in science and engineering but that is all they have. If the rating is about science and engineering, CalTech should be #1. Besides, the student population at CalTech is minuscule compared to the schools mentioned in this video.

Nope

Yup

The proof is in the pudding not the the buildings

Swarthmore is a college, not a university.

I don't think that your comment is completely accurate. Cornell does have certain publicly supported "contract" (or "statutory") colleges which means that those colleges (e.g., Agriculture & Life Sciences, Ecology.) receive regular public funding. Those colleges are also accountable to SUNY (State University of New York) trustees. However those contract colleges are not officially part of the SUNY and, moreover, the private colleges of Cornell (e.g., College Arts & Sciences, College of Engineering, College of Architecture, Art, and Planning) are definitely not part of SUNY.

Cornell is NOT part of the SUNY system. it's a private university and is part of the Ivy League and what samuelweir wrote....

@arnewhouse Yes, you're right!!! However, it is only for Cornell's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

@@andregide5528 the others are state schools as well there used to be a nursing school but it moved to NY cornell weill there was also a graduate school of nutrition when i was there

@@arnewhouse Oh, really? I didn't know that. I thought it is private, for the most part, except for the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. I'm a Cornell dad! My daughter is a sophomore with an English major.

Oh no! Thanks for watcing 😊

@@Top10DailyWildlife mimko, llllllp Mm ,mm,.

Value for your money: the four service acadamies.

service academies aren't really first rate academically - and Julliard clearly doesn't fit the list

i wouldn't put the service academies at the top. they are great at what THEY do: produce military officers. but in terms of recruiting for business? I would choose graduates from other schools almost 100% of the time. the academy grads almost are never the smartest and they certainly are never the most creative. a lot of them actually have a very hard time with nebulous situations and challenges and have trouble adjusting to life outside the military. and before you think "i'm crazy", ask yourself: imagine at 28 or 30 being thrown into a war zone in Iraq, given an M4 carbine, and asked to report to your platoon after having had ZERO MILITARY EXPERIENCE your entire life.

You probably had no college education!!!

I don't know what metrics were used to rank these top 10 in the US, but I would put University of Chicage at 10.

​@@tdhanasekaran3536 or CalTech

Cause they suck

LOL... Edit: Sorry, I'm guessing you meant this as being humorous.

that’s great 🎉

My daughter is a sophomore with an English major at Cornell.

Dont beleive them either.

garbage , never heard of it..

Uh....La Sorbonne (the University of Paris) is in Paris. (France, not Texas). Take another look at the title of this video, and you will likely see why La Sorbonne does not qualify for this list. ?Comment bon est votre francais?

@@roberthenry9319is just a comment not a statement against the postulates of the video.

Dartmouth is a college, not a university. I don't think that they have a graduate program.

Because the guy is a total fraud, liar, criminal and scumbag who - by the way - transferred into Penn under dubious circumstances. It is likely he didn't get in on his own merits.

I love SFSU! I was going to UC Santa Barbara and my gf was going to school up there. Plenty of time spent

You are right.

But you have no problem putting UCB above both? You're obviously old school; you see Berkeley as being ranked near the top and UCLA being a lot farther back and just being a university which is good at sports, basketball, etc. Times have changed: UCLA is the harder school in which to gain admission; it's effectively the first public university to have < 10% acceptance rate; cross-admits to both are more likely to choose UCLA; and UCLA pays its professors more. I'm not trying to denigrate UCB; it's just that UCLA has caught up, and in many ways surpassed it, some of which is related to academics. Additionally, both UCB and UCLA draw well from the international-student set, UCB a little better because of its international ranking; and both draw well from the other 49 states, with UCLA doing better with that cohort, because some national rankings have UCLA higher. In addition UCLA is more appealing to prospective students in living conditions, food, sports, surrounding area, as well as having a hotter, more appealing student body. The latter may not be important to you, but you did go to Stanford.

Putting UCLA above USC is nonsense to me. Private schools like Stanford, Caltech and USC are infinitely better on the West Coast, just like private schools like the Ivy League are on the East Coast…

@@sandramiller1988 Which of the three doesn't belong? Your placing USC next to Caltech is a true juxtaposition; they are at opposite poles.

ucla is garbage, anybody can transfer there with a tag program...

@@jehehdjdjdjdjdj9772 The average gpa of transfers to UCLA is > 3.8, and even those who xfer from other UCs have a 3.8+ average. There is currently no TAG program at UCLA, neither for UCB and UCSD.

As a UCLA grad, I agree that the top publics are amazing. But they are not equivalents of the top private universities in terms of resources. Princeton has a campus on par with UCLA's but for 8,000 students instead of 45,000. Princeton has an endowment equal to $4.6M per student, none of it subject to the political whims of the state. Most of the students are undergrads so they get most of the research opportunities. Etc. At Berkeley and most of the UCs, you aren't even guaranteed housing and some UC students are literally homeless and food insecure. Not an issue at the top privates. At Michigan, some of the students live in windowless rooms. The core educations and quality of students is comparable, but there are many more benefits at the top privates. Of course the publics are a great economic deal for in-state residents.

@@cranburydad no strong disagreement on that.

Princeton is best

@@___Anakin.Skywalker Read the info on the web about rating UC Berkeley in those disciplines. Which University in the country has most Nobel laureate in Chemistry and Physics? The answer is - UC Berkeley!!! You can definitely rate university overall, but if you in certain disciplines it’s all different.

​@@___Anakin.Skywalker at what

Berkeley, Univ of Cal is not in San Francisco, it locates in Town of Berkeley, about 30 min driving distance to San Francisco

Congratulations. Can you guide me how I can get admission in Master course in any good college in America.

@@anjanabharati4066 Anjana Bharathi will four address of my daughters who are in USA you can contact them for your guidance

@@davidz7858 no traffic it's more like 10-12 minutes

I had no money nor connections and managed to transfer to UC Berkeley (math) after attending a community college.

@@jaycee9153 that must be just an aberration😉

LOLOLOLOLOL. spoken like a fool

@@RobertMJohnson truth hurts

The greatest leader in the world is SYNGMAN RHEE,the founder and first president of Korea,who graduated from HARVARD with Masters degree and PRINCETON with Ph. Degree when WOODRAW WILSON was the president of PRINCETON.

The fact that all those people graduated from Harvard is reason enough not to have it qualify as one of the best universities…

really analytical, sandra @@sandramiller1988

That's some serious misinformation. Is that deliberate? Harvard was founded in 1636 as a college for training Puritan ministers. They added a small department for educating Indians which lasted for a couple of decades, but it was not the main Harvard.

U Penn added its medical school in 1765. I do not know where you are getting the date of 1746. It did not officially call itself a "university" until 1779. The Massachusetts Constitution of 1779 already refers to Harvard as a university, using the term "The University at Cambridge" at least 5 times and also using the term "Harvard-College". Harvard used the term "University" to refer to itself in the honorary degree awarded to George Washington in 1776.

@@jy7213 Did Harvard grant the Ph.D degree as the Main Terminal post graduate degree during the time period u defined? There is a real difference btwn an Univ. College and a full blown Univ. Did Harvard even have Doctoral programs then? Univ Colleges r not usu accredited to grant Doctoral degrees. If they r it is an extremely short list, btwn 6-8 Degree types!

@@anansi1641 You are talking nonsense. You can say whatever you want but at least have the decency not to make up false information.

@@jy7213 Listen, everything u say about dates of founding and name changing may be factual. However, I don't care what date Mass. Const names Havard as an UNIV. U obviously don't know what a Ph.D is, the process of attaining one, nor the priveleges/dutes, and the implied powers! I am a Ph.D. If u r a Ph.D u must have gotten it "ONLINE". I stick to what I say' An Inst of Higher Learning cannot be accredited as an University if the Main Terminal Graduate Degree is not the Ph.D. The Primary Graduate Programs must confer a Doctoral Degree! This is one reason y some Univ lose accreditation. Law, Medical, Business School degrees and others such, r not University Graduate School degrees. They do not require the research and completion of a Doctoral Thesis. Every step of the Ph.D process is a "One Shot Deal". There is no 2nd chance! Let's just agree to disagree

Cause they want to make kids who can't get into USC feel important. A lot of this top 10 list is kind of suspect.

Because atleast Socal chicks are hot, unlike Berkeley.

@@WhoBeSilly Uhh, 8.6% acceptance rate at UCLA; USC, what, 12%

and the very wealthy who get in are very, very few and far between

you do not know what you are talking about

He said it's #1

Old Blue '75 here and I disagree with you. Cal is way overrated. Housing is expensive and sucks. Berkeley is unsafe. People's Park is a 50 year travesty. Too many foreigners go there who don't assimilate or contribute anything of value to campus life. Full of foreign technology spies.The football team is pathetic. There is NO free speech. Horrible politics. Over-sized classes. Very few attractive women, if any. The worst government employees come from Cal. Berkeley is next to crime ridden Oakland. Tuition is ridiculous for an overcrowded campus. Class sizes are too large. Homeless beggars everywhere. The city of Berkeley sucks big time. Not a fun place to be. Way too many administrators who are overpaid. Leadership is weird and hypocritical.

Would love to attend Harvard university

Is any scholarship opportunities available there?

@@clemgeorge9552 FYI -- ARE any, not is any

@@clemgeorge9552yes, Stanford has a full scholarship

For what, basketball? It's a smaller school. Even if it had a top notch education, like Washington University St. Louis ( And you ALWAYS have to say the St. Louis part so people don't think you are talking about UW.) It is smaller.

lol you mean University of Michigan?

there is no such thing as Michigan University

Uhhhh......OK.

i would. they are brilliant. you just have to know how to recruit and stay away from the undesirables.

@@RobertMJohnson so brilliant they have screwed up our country. I will take common sense over your ‘brilliant’ students.

Depends on one's concern over the self-importance index of prospective employees.

@@RobertMJohnson they may have once been but not now. The government is filled with Ivy League graduates absolutely ruining our economy. Just interviewed a Harvard grad who apologized for going to school there. She said she was the only conservative out of 140 classmates and had to hide her orientation.

我聽過李登輝用英文演講，真的不明白他怎麼可以畢業，那一個教授能聽懂他的英文？蔡英文假博士的英文也比他好。

@@lchansocal 農業經濟博士的學問不是口語能力而已。真博士也好假博士也罷，你只能在這裡放屁而她在治理一個國家。

@@charlestsai3708 既然是美國一流學府的博士生，要拿博士，一定要present your thesis. 與指導教授一定要交流，英文如此程度，怎樣交流？李登輝拿日本大學的博士我覺得他的日文沒問題，拿美國的博士則令人懷疑，我不喜歡蔡英文是一回事，但她的英文起碼我聽來是沒問題的，馬英九也可以，就算蔡正元台語口音重一點，他說英語也可以聽明白，但是李登輝，我不知誰會聽懂？