16. IRAC with cases - example 

Subscribed. My professor was so terrible at explaining CREAC. She had to add, delete and reorganize her notes on blackboard so that everyone could understand what she was trying to teach. The worst part was that this experimentation was going on in real time as the semester rolled along. I'm looking forward to having a new legal analysis and writing professor when I transfer.

So many videos talking about IRAC, but this video is excellent a sit gives you a real world example

I appreciate your style of teaching! It has truly helped me. Thanks!

Professor Kim, thank you so much for all the videos you posted!

Thank you, Professor Kim, for this great class!. It helped me a lot and i like the simplicity of it.

Excellent breakdown Mr. Kim

very useful lesson, thanks a lot mr. Kim.

김 선생님 감사합니다

You are too good sir........

Hey great video, thank you for your contribution!

Thanks man, was a really informative video! Will help with my law exam today (:

This is more helpful than my actual tutorial class!! haha Thank you!

In the rule of the IRAC method, why didn't we insert the elements of negligence

Thank you very much.

Professor Kim, may I please know if I should put all issues in the Issue paragraph as there may be more than one issue in one question? And then put all the rules in the Rule paragraph? Or I should state the issues like below: The first issue R A C The second issue R A C And so on?

thank you very helpful for my coming final exam

Print is too small for use on mobile device

Thanks for watching, Michael. Where are you attending law school?

Nice breakdown of the ISSUE using the under - does/is- when - concept for this case. But, here the RULE states "A driver who is suddenly stricken by an illness that renders it impossible for him to control the car, and which he had no reason to anticipate would occur while driving is not chargeable with negligence." However, Cohen v Petty’s rule states: injury resulted from a sudden, unforeseeable illness…Therefore, there is a measure of negligence because the D-Keegan knew that it would occur and did have reason to anticipate a narcolepsy episode could/would occur during any driving event. D-Keegan did have reason to believe it would occur again. There are more relevant facts for this argument and issue questions to be considered before making such a broad prediction regarding this conclusion in my opinion.

Thank you, great video. What software are you using as your blackboard in the video?

Not sure if you are open to request, but I would like to request a video on IRAC briefing appeals cases.

Keep it

I am business student. I have commercial law subject and inside have one question need to answer with IRAC format. I don't know how to answer it. It is possible to help me to explain . Here is my question " John a seventeen year old school boy , woke up late one morning, showered and rushed to the main road whereupon he flagged a taxi, and directed the taxi to his school . Upon arriving, he found he hand no money for his fare. What can the driver do? In any case, is John liable for the taxi fare?

Why do you think the fact that Keegan was a cab driver not relevant? To me, the fact Matt drove a cab is crucial.

Auckland University, New Zealand.