Pastor Steve Waldron, New Life of Albany - Albany, Ga 2 historic English Bibles compared, the 1611 Holy Bible and the Geneva Bible. To contribute to New Life, please click the link below and press donate. God bless! newlifeofalbany...
@@joshportie❌ The laws tells you, ‘protects’ you, relatively ‘rewards’ and pays you daily in disorder to break & disobey GOD’s Laws. 🚫You guys care, fear and obey laws SIGNIFICANTLY MORE, if not totally, than you ever obey GOD’s Laws. GOD’s Laws is NOT ‘supreme’: it is the one and only laws, incomparably and immutably. GOD’s Laws is ABSOLUTE. 🛎️I will never be a ‘law abiding citizen’ because I am a Born-Again Bible-Obeying Christian belonging to The Kingdom of Jesus ChrisT i.e. GOD: 🎯I am “in this world” but I am not “of this world”.
@godislord3377 (Psalm 112:1) World English Bible [Praise Yah! Blessed is the man who fears Yahweh, who delights greatly in his commandments.] Young's Literal Translation [Praise ye Jah! O the happiness of one fearing Jehovah, In His commands he hath delighted greatly.] The One True Almighty God, Jah the Father- Yahweh (English-Jehovah) The Almighty God of the 66 inspired canonical books of God's Word the Holy Scriptures. -Isaiah 45:5- WEB [I am Yahweh, and there is (no one else.) Besides me, there is (no God). I will strengthen you, though you have not known me,] [YHWH ] 4 consonants form of the divine name occurring nearly 7000 in Bible .... Reference King David 1100 times Yeshua/Jesus around 330 times. The 66 canonical books of God's inspired word the Holy Scriptures. which biblical scholars to say it means "he causes become", "he becomes anything" "i am anything" - necessary to achieve his will or purpose.. Which indicates His Godly wisdom, power to move events toward his divine will. YHWH, YAH, JAH, YAHWEH, YAHOVAH. [Jehovah- English] Hebrew/ Aramaic words have meaning. Found in hebrew theo-phoric names- Elijah, Adonijah, Yeho-shua, King Yəhōšafat and Prophet Isiah-Yəšaʿyāhū - King Yəhōšafat ("Yahweh has judged") Elijah's name means “Yahweh is my God” John-Jehonathan or Yehōnātān means (Yahweh has given) Jesus name in Hebrew/ Aramaic- Yeshua (Salvation) Yeho-shua ["Joshua"- English] meaning -(Yahweh is Salvation) Jesus name brings glory to the One true Almighty God. ( Exodus 6:3) (Psalm 83:18 ) biblehub.com/psalms/83-18.htm Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ Hallelujah- Praise Almighty Jah you people.
@dennisbrandt8517 The Messianic law is fulfilled in Yeshua Hamashiach (Ps 118:22) [The stone that the builders rejected Has become the chief cornerstone. ] Love the truth. Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ Hallelujah-Praise Almighty Jah, you people.
@GolfnMoreclips "if you love Me then obey My commandments " is pretty clear. No one would obey to be saved but rather because we're saved by His sweet merciful Grace. The law is eternal as He is.
Because in the KJV it says to obey your master, and that is likely a wrong translation. I always suspected that someone like the Free Masons got a hold of things and did a few adjustments. I think 1560 Geneva would be my choice. After all, a king doesnt want to lose his seat.
@@philindeblanc It is untrue, and heretical, that Holy King James didn't like the way THE BIBLE calls Kings tyrants. There are whole books in THE BIBLE for Kings, Jésus-Christ i.e. God HIMSELF either appointed, or favoured Kings. Holy David was a King, Holy Solomon was a King, Saul was a King, and Esther was a Queen, to list a few. Jesus ChrisT is "The King of Kings", and "The Lord of Lords" . Do not be deceived: sola scriptura. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
I can read the Geneva yet the 1611 KJV still is hard for me to read. Even told that I'm not saved because of it. Called the Son of the devil. Yes I know that I'm saved.
The 1500 Mathew version is the best in my opinion. Because it's the most hated version there is. You can't even find it's translation when merely googling it. Because it says flat earth in it in Samuel 2nd. I have a vid on it myself. ❤ The flat earth literally opened my eyes to Gods existence. He showed me his creations in way's I can't deny his intelligent design. The pure symmetries of everything. How molecules & even scaling up to whole designs like a human. Pure symmetry through & through. Perfect shapes & even mathematics to reference the side's of all things. Example like how everything just about has 2 eyes. 2 hands. 2 Feet. & Even beyond that the star constellations the way they're set like a clock in the skies never changing even from ancient cultures till modern day. Psalms 19.1 the heavens declare the glory of God & the firmament showeth his handiwork. Frequencies creating the same geometries as molecule collections with breathtaking Precision. As though God Spoke everything into existence with Frequencies. The subject on Symmetries of creation can no doubt be proof of a creator. God almighty does indeed exist. & The way all laws of physics & frequency & vibration & electromagnetism work in unison like a machine suggests the world is a complex computer a mechanism made up of different elements come together to create a machine set with specific Boundaries & rules to it's design. As though this could really be a simulation. But not in the sense that everyone & everything is a digital rendering. It's far more complex then that. Every electron & atom & molecule work's perfectly in unison together almost as though they're Sentient & intelligent & come together to create silicon based life forms & beyond. I'm not saying we live in the matrix but I'm not saying we're not in it either. God's designs can't be summed up in a context made by men. Not myself nor any scholar. Job 38:4-11 King James Version (KJV) - Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding. I feel absolutely Humbled by his handiwork. God's unfathomably awesome. Can't people see the forest for the trees anymore. Are so many so lost they can't see when God created this world it was Good. It was corrupted by the fallen & their children whom are still in charge of the world today. As in the day's of Noah So shall it be again. The world can't be fixed by apathetic behavior. Every individual must account for his or her own situation in life. For any scenario imaginable. A solution must be drawn. Where would human advancement be without investigation & discovery through hard diligent passion for their trade. God's grace & mercy are boundless. For the wickedness this world has seen & continues to see while seeking knowledge can't be measured. All lifeforms are energy. Energy can't be destroyed it can only transform. Is not the spirit the same. It being like an energy changes from clinging to it's flesh to ascension or descension. These words are the conclusion to over a decade of consistent research into well pretty much everything. Namely the truth & what aligns itself with biblical scriptures. This subject can not be articulated precisely. God's creation is beyond any mortal mind's comprehension.
KJV is 7th ♥️ Translated into English. Psalms 12 kJV 6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. KJV is perfect ♥️ Hebrews 5 KJV 9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
Yes, even after having been allowed to SEE the events taking form and the movement of life shaping our time-line, I still can't comprehend it all. Absolutely the most amazing journey ❤️
Both Bibles are from the same line of manuscripts, uncorrupted Antioch manuscripts. Different than the corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts most new bibles today come from.
I don't believe there is anything that isn't corrupted. Perhaps the manuscripts are better than the English translations, but it's very naive to think there's a perfect version as they've all been tampered with for whatever agendas.
@@stevethompson9615Love the brilliant NIV. Much stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. No matter what blasphemous idolatrous trash the KJV only cult say
How are the Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted? How are the manuscripts from Antioch uncorrupted? Usual unsubstantiated accusations with no evidence. Alexandria where the deity of Christ and the doctrine of the trinity was defended. Antioch where the Arianism heresies were taught. That Jesus was a created being. Just had the Jehovah Witnesses teach. One of the traits of the KJV only cult is wilful ignorance and double standards.
Guys, here is The True Savior HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE - Ancient Semitic Cuneiform of Moshe (Moses) - Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah) Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols. Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me. Isaiah 45:5 I am YaH, and there is none else.
Thank you for this.. I have been doing my own studies in the scriptures and the different bibles that are translations and I am very interested in The Geneva Bible, that is how I found your video. Thank you very much.
The Geneva Bible was influnced by John Calvin. Notes were placed in the Geneva Bible. Predestination,unconditional election,total depravity, etc. go back to Augustine, who influnced Whycliff and Calvin. Calvin had fifty five people burned at the stake in Geneva. For disagreement of his doctrine.
@@FisherKot They’re both excellent translations, I would just say the KJV is better translated. It had far more time and translators involved with it for instance.
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9. Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.” So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version! What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages. King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.” In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas. It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
@@FireShine-ss4sb It is a poetic shortened form of Jehovah, the name of the Most High God. (Ex 15:1, 2) This abbreviated form is represented by the first half of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH), that is, the letters yohdh (י) and heʼ (ה), the tenth and fifth letters of the Hebrew alphabet respectively. Jah occurs 50 times in the Hebrew Scriptures, 26 times alone, and 24 times in the expression “Hallelujah,” which is, literally, a command to a number of people to “praise Jah.” However, the presence of “Jah” in the original is completely ignored by certain popular versions. (Dy, Mo, RS) The King James Version and An American Translation have it only once, as “Jah” and “Yah” respectively. (Ps 68:4) In the English Revised Version it appears twice in the body of the text (Ps 68:4; 89:8), and in the American Standard Version the full form, Jehovah, is substituted throughout, but these latter two translations in practically every occurrence of the contracted form call it to our attention in footnotes. The New World Translation preserves for the reader all 50 occurrences of Jah, or Yah; and Rotherham’s Emphasised Bible, 49 of them.
@@FireShine-ss4sb Do a bit more research. It was iesus before anything. Iesus H Christos. Never what you said. "Jews" is a made-up word by the Guyym (Gentiles) also. Descendants from the Royal Tribe of Yahudah (my Tribe) are called Yahudym, for the plural. Yahudy for a singular male, and Yahudyth for a singular female. Jah/Yah points to the actual Name of the Creator. YaHUaH. The word switched out for "god" was AL, in some cases, ALuah in others, or ALahym most times & even ALuahym at times. I implore you to dig deeper & pray for byna (understanding). Shalum alykam (Peace be upon you)
What a difference even just "should" being taken out for the meaning. I've always been taught "Ye though I WALK.." as if we are doing it rather it before said "Ye though I SHOULD walk" as more of and 'if' or 'when you do'. Because one seems to refer to constantly being in the shadow of death and one seems to refer to it not being a constant thing.
I grew up on the 1984 NWT ... Then read the 1984 NIV Zondervan ... Now I use the Doubleday ... But my Grandparents were once Mormon .. Then became Jehovah Witnesses .. I left the JW In 2013 ... And have a Cambridge ... I am here to learn ...
Guys, here is The True Savior HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE - Ancient Semitic Cuneiform of Moshe (Moses) - Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah) Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols. Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me. Isaiah 45:5 I am YaH, and there is none else.
I too was raised JW from 3 yrs old and left at 16 and believed just couldn’t do it and thought God was mean. Now I know better and found Jesus Christ and the truth definitely set me free. I have both king James 1611 and Geneva Bible, at one time I had every Bible I could get to compare scripture with scripture, when I was learning my faith was an occult and wrong, n now I got rid of them all except the KJB 1611 and Geneva. Anyway glad you not a JW anymore also. God bless
Do you know of the verse in the Geneva bible mentioning "governours", saying something to the effect of, they are not good? I have a Geneva bible and had read that verse a while back and cannot find it again. Someone online mentioned this and I neglected to write it down or mark it in my Bible. Thank you for any help!
Amend your ways being more accurate simply requires one to understand that, according to the Bible, salvation is three-fold: 1. Jesus saves us 2. Preachers save us 3. We save ourselves All through the process of "repentance" which most believers think means feeling bad and asking forgiveness. It means changing your mind about something. Repenting of sin means changing one's mind about the desirability of being ruled by sin, or forsaking that terrible task master for the blessing of being a slave of Christ! :o) So far, so good! I'm loving it, and looking forward to getting the Geneva Bible as soon as possible.
The repentance that Jesus commanded is simply changing what you believe. Whatever you trust in now, stop trusting in that and trust in me. Matthew 21:31-32 implies that repentance leads to belief. Hebrews 6:1 says that repentance from dead works is a foundational doctrine of the faith, so it’s safe to say that this is the same repentance Jesus commanded. Jesus commanded the Jews, who trusted in their works of the law, to stop trusting in those dead works, and trust in Him. Repentance of sin for salvation is not required, because that would be works of the law (You turn from lying by obeying the law, you turn from fornication by obeying the law), and we know that we are not saved by our works of the law. God bless brother.
@@thegoodgift Repentance from sin is absolutely, essentially, and foundationally essential to salvation. To repent because the law says so, and you want to earn God's favor, is doing a work of the law. To repent because Jesus Christ commanded it is not a work of the law. Christians are to obey the commandments of Jesus Christ, even when they parallel the commands of the law. Jesus says to love God with all your heart. Is that a work of the law? God forbid! We are not saved by our works, and we cannot be saved without them.
@@busker153 How to be saved and have eternal life: 1. Realize that you, like everybody else, is a wicked sinner. (1 John 1:8) "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." 2. The penalty for sin is death. (Romans 6:23) "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." 3. Everybody's flesh will die, but our soul has to pay for our sins too. Because of this we all deserve to go to hell, and on the day of judgement, hell will be tossed into the eternal lake of fire. This is the second death. (Revelation 20:14) "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." 4. But God loves us so much, that he doesn't want us to go through this, He wants us to live with Him for eternity. So He sent Jesus Christ, the perfect image of God, to save us. (John 3:16) "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." 5. Jesus Christ lived a perfect life with no sin. Because of this, and the fact that He is God in the flesh, He was the perfect sacrifice to pay for the sins of the whole world; past, present, and future. When He died on the cross, this is exactly what He did. After He died He was buried, and on the third day He rose again, proving that He was the messiah. This is THE GOSPEL. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) 6. This is God's free gift to us. The gift of eternal life, and of escape from hell and the second death. All we have to do to receive this gift is BELIEVE THE GOSPEL. We DO NOT get into heaven by our own merit. The only thing that justifies us before God is our faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ. (Ephesians 2:8-9) "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast." 7. Jesus promises that whosoever believes on Him will never come into condemnation. This means that once you believe the gospel, you are forever secured in Him. There is nothing you can do to lose your salvation. (John 5:24) "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life." This is how to get saved according to the bible. Works (i.e. turning from sin, good deeds, etc.) DO NOT play a part in your salvation. Our righteousness is as filthy rags to the Lord (Isaiah 64:6), so we have to depend on the righteousness of Jesus. His righteousness is the only righteousness that pleases God. This is His free gift to us all why not just accept it right now by faith? What do you have to lose? This life is temporary but there are eternal consequences at stake. God bless you.
Amend and repent are two different words with two different meanings.... I do not like the kjv. It has some cool stuff, but also some misleading stuff. There are much better modern versions I like much better. NLT NIV ESV AND MORE.......
Fun FACT : the 1611 kjv and the Geneva bible have scriptural references to the apocrypha. Like Jesus referencing Matthew 24:37, Hebrew 1135 references to the people tortured and waiting for a better resurrection.
Whoa whoa whoa whoa why would something holy come out of the place where Antipas was killed the home of the devil Geneva Switzerland why is there a Bible from from there you can argue that this isn't where Antipas was killed or that the devil isn't around but in Revelations that clearly says Revelation 2:13 13 I know where you live-where Satan has his throne. Yet you remain true to my name. You did not renounce your faith in me, not even in the days of Antipas, my faithful witness, who was put to death in your city-where Satan lives. If you beg to differ then where is CERN and what is CERN why are there so many things in the town of Geneva the hint to a large possibility have you even seen the parade for the Large hadron collider or will you ask me what it is Google or RU-vid it why were we translating from something that came from the home of the devil anyway
Romans 9:5(Geneva bible)Of whom are the fathers, and of whom concerning the flesh, Christ came, who is God over all, blessed forever, Amen. Rom 9:5 KJV Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9. Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.” So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version! What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages. King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.” In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas. It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
A very interesting difference I found in the 1599 Geneva Bible (first printed in 2006 by Tolle Legge Press, with modern lettering and spelling) is that where Jesus said to call no man rabbi, He said to call no man doctor.
@@carmencampeanu7810 No, it's not. If the Mandela effect has any truth in it (which I doubt), it would NOT be able to change God's Word unless HE wanted to change it -- and He has stated that His Word does NOT change. However I looked again and saw that I had not read it correctly. What He said was, Matthew 23 (1599 Geneva): 8 But be not ye called, Rabbi: for one is your doctor, to wit, Christ, and all ye are brethren. 9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for there is but one, your father which is in heaven. 10 Be not called doctors: for one is your doctor, even Christ. 11 But he that is greatest among you, let him be your servant. I find it interesting that actually Jesus said basically, "Don't YOU have others call you Rabbi, or doctor or father. The "father" one to me is tricky, since He obviously didn't mean we should not call our biological father our father -- but look what the "Catholic church" did: they have people call ALL of their many thousands of priests "Father this" and "Father that" and "the Father." DIRECT DISOBEDIENCE TO CHRIST all day long. Just that one thing alone should be enough for people to realize they must get OUT of that apostate institution, but there are many other reasons that don't take a whole lot of effort to learn once you ALLOW yourself to look at that institution critically.
@@carmencampeanu7810 No. It is misunderstandings. Those who want to deceive the whole world have subtly and slowly caused it to SEEM that way. Look into the history and you will find it NEVER said the lion will lay with the lamb, BUT and artist (using "artistic license" drew it that way and it became a famous painting) plus someone wrote a hymn for churches saying the same thing. Both the artist and the hymn writer may easily have been like so many today who DO NOT READ their Bibles but just believe what people TELL them is in the Bible. Lions and lambs are BOTH mentioned in that same paragraph or chapter, just never as "lion and the lamb" (and if it is, it is a bad translation).
They interchanged i and j depending on how the word was used in the sentence. The j sound always existed in Old English. It was around the 14th Century, and I can't remember the guy's name who put a little hook on the i to stipulate he wanted the j sound, and that stuck. People began to do the same. The Holy Ghost is not a separate person. (Mark 12:29-31). If you see Jesus; you see God. John 14:6-7; John 1:1-5; John 4:24; John 5;43; John 8:23; John 8:58; Matt. 28:18-20; Col. 1:15-20; Rev.1: 8,18, Rev. 22 AKJVNT
But Christ did say he would send us the Holy Spirit to be a comforter to us. So how can they be the same? The trinity teaching is a gentile teaching that was not reckognized by the Apostles and the early church. It came through the Greco Roman teachings much later, nearly a century a.d. Also, Christ was black. That’s why the Bible says the apostles (Peter, John, and James) were first called “niger” at Antioch. Niger means black, and that’s where we get the “N” word today. So if Christ’s disciples were black men, what color was Christ? Black. I hope this helps you Sir. God Speed
@@Staystrong4Life1111 You probably need to re-read that Scripture reference. There's Only One God = Jesus. And No, the Apostles never recognized a trinity teaching. Oh, and John 1:1-5; John 4:24; John 14:6-7; Rev. 1:8,18. Acts 2:38 saves. AKJVNT I hope this helps you, Sir. 😄
I just subscribed...I used to live in Moultrie...I live in Oregon now as the tech director for my church. I love this, and find this stuff fascinating. Great video!!!
1599 geneva is tainted. they removed key commentary in it. stick with 1560. for instance rev 20:8 removes who gog and magog were according to the authors of 1560. it was the turks, saracens and other enemies of the true church. there are many more instances
Bad. Revelation 13 16 in the new geneva replaces IN the right hand to ON the right hand. IN SPECIFICALLY MEANS SOMETHING INSIDE YOUR HAND UNDER THE SKIN! On could be a tattoo or something.
The name appears 6828 times in scripture but you will never see it. All those that call upon the name of the LORD shall be saved,,, but lord is NOT a name. HIS name is YEHOVAH.
49yr old southern Baptist preachers LAST child.... Recently found God(49) and realized that MOST of the 'truths' I thought I knew as fact were NOT facts! Jesus is the answer! The rest is noise or history. Still learning what the TRUTH actually is!
In my opinion kingdoms changed it due to the ephesians scripture,He removed the part about the kings and rulers of this world..and changed it to, We wrestle not against flesh and blood but against spiritual darkness in high places.i know im not exact but I hope 2 see that comparison in this video.
I have both bibles and the same context is there. Yes there is one word missing, well not missing but a different word put in, which means the same thing. I went thru scripture with scripture and the KJB1611 is accurate and even states they used the Geneva Bible but made it easier for people to read. I had every translation and I kept both the kjb1611 and the Geneva. Geneva is very hard to read so I do primarily use the KJB 1611 the newer Kjb and NKJB bibles are definitely messed with and context is changed.
@@lisaromano9086 The geneva Bible has more than 1 word change, it took out worldly Governors line in KJV that is a fact. Anyone can look it up and clearly see its different. The original verses weren't talking about other worldly beings it was talking about Govs and rulers of this world working for the dark
I find the Geneva Bible very exciting! It's a piece of history, and I find it fascinating to observe how the old English was spelled in that version as well as the Tyndale version. I'm also curious how much England still uses some of what we call old spellings and how much of it is even an old spelling for them?
I heard that people in the UK Or in the British Colones (used to be) stil use enlightened... the Canada National Anthem still has the thee's. we still sing hymns with the old english :) saith and says sound the same if you read it :)
Thank you for your video im looking forward to getting a Geneva bible, I think of rev 22:18-19 when I think of changing words or removing things so I'd like to stay close to the orginal as possible. One fault I found is Jesus is certainly not his original name, it was Yeshua which means Savior in Hebrew. That would have been how everyone addressed him and the name he went by. Jesus is an English term so probably best not to infer that your audience doesn't understand English
In Greek it was Iesous so Jesus is a English form if that. If you see the Greek its not that far. People get saved in Jesus name all the time. My name is Sarah but if someone in spanish calls me Sada I understand they are still speaking to me.
Demons run when I call on Jesus name. I know his name is Yeshua in Hebrew and everyone spoke Hebrew before Nirmrod got everyone building the tower of Babel so no matter what when Father God had to confuse everyone's language as the were disobediant and trying to make war again heaven, Father God still created all the languages everywhere when He had to split mankind apart so they would spread out across the earth and be fruitful and multiply as He has had commanded in the begining. X
I hate to tell you pastor but that is not the only difference or reason. Geneva is filled with Calvinist notes in the margin. The Geneva has as its namesake the city in which Calvin established rule of law that oversaw every aspect of life. Enforcing “his” laws even to the killing of a child for taking back to its parents, the torture and imprisonment for things that should have been minor offenses. He also oversaw the death of more than one by burning at the stake and beheading, again for what should have been minor offenses. I’ll stop there and not mention the connection with the Roman Catholic Church.
I think John 3:36 has a very interesting difference. In the Geneva (1599 Tolle Lege) one MUST obey Jesus; in the KJV obedience is not even mentioned in this verse: Geneva 1599: "He that believeth in the Son, hath everlasting life, and he that obeyeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him." King James: He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. (In my studies of scripture I have come to believe that the two most important things followers of Jesus must do are TRUST and OBEY him.)
Yes indeed. I looked up and compared these verses, and it is absolutely so written. I have a 1560 Geneva Bible and it is basically not hard to read. I am definitely not a KJV only believer. There seems to be a pattern, I've noticed the newer the translations, the more is changed, rewritten, or just removed entirely. Hmm?
@@kinnonmoss- Yes there was scripture removed entirely from the Bible. Some scriptures that were removed are brought back to us in the book of Mormon, it's part of the restoration. A lot of people really don't understand what that book is about. I know what the testimony of the two witnesses will be, rather soon too imo. If you or anyone cares to know, I've posted my first two videos explaining their testimony. I also explain the witness/prophet like Moses in greater detail as well. I do not however support the LDS church, with their false prophet and false doctrines surrounding the book of Mormon. God bless
Since the word Hell was not created before 705 AD it is not in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek. It's base language is German and Old English and means a hidden place. In the Old Testament the Jewish nation calls the KJV and it use of the word Hell, Stupid. The Grave is not hell it is the place where bodies are placed. Get a few and you have a graveyard. In the Old Testament so often it mentions unbelievers being consumed by fire like the chaff from the wheat which was burned up. It did not burn forever. It is just like the people who state the smoke from Sodom and Gomorra will rise up forever. Not in human terms because we can go and see where the cites were and there is no smoke rising. Jesus made it clear in the Greek language. Do not fear the man who can destroy the body but not the soul, but rather fear Him who can destroy body and soul in the Gehenna Fire not the Gehenna Hell but the Gehenna Fire. Destroy as in consumed by fire. Yes Jesus made it clear but the watered down version and the lies about Hell should not be believed.
There is no Literal Hell, The original words translated as “hell” in some older Bible translations (Hebrew, “Sheol”; Greek, “Hades”) basically refer to “the Grave,” that is, the common grave of mankind. The Bible shows that people in “the Grave” are in a state of nonexistence. ● The dead are unconscious and so cannot feel pain. “Neither work, nor reason, nor wisdom, nor knowledge, shall be in hell.” (Ecclesiastes 9:10, Douay-Rheims Version) Hell is not filled with sounds of pain. Instead, the Bible says: “Let the wicked be ashamed, and let them be silent in the grave [hell, Douay-Rheims].”-Psalm 31:17; King James Version (30:18, Douay-Rheims); Psalm 115:17. ● God has set death, not torment in a fiery hell, as the penalty for sin. God told the first man, Adam, that the penalty for breaking God’s law would be death. (Genesis 2:17) He said nothing about eternal torment in hell. Later, after Adam sinned, God told him what his punishment would be: “Dust you are and to dust you will return.” (Genesis 3:19) He would pass out of existence. If God were actually sending Adam to a fiery hell, He surely would have mentioned it. God has not changed the punishment for defying his laws. Long after Adam sinned, God inspired a Bible writer to say: “The wages sin pays is death.” (Romans 6:23) No further penalty is justified, because “the one who has died has been acquitted from his sin.”-Romans 6:7. ● The idea of eternal torment is repugnant to God. (Jeremiah 32:35) Such an idea is contrary to the Bible’s teaching that “God is love.” (1 John 4:8) He wants us to worship him out of love, not fear of eternal torment.-Matthew 22:36-38. ● Good people went to hell. The Bibles that use the word “hell” indicate that faithful men, such as Jacob and Job, expected to go to hell. (Genesis 37:35; Job 14:13) Even Jesus Christ is spoken of as being in hell between the time of his death and his resurrection. (Acts 2:31, 32) Obviously, then, when “hell” is used in these Bibles, it simply refers to the Grave.
We cannot be spreading false doctrine without the proper knowledge in the scriptures, the lake of fire is a symbol of eternal destruction. It is the same as Gehenna, but it is different from hell, which is the common grave of mankind. Not a literal lake The five Bible verses that mention “the lake of fire” show it to be a symbol rather than a literal lake. (Revelation 19:20; 20:10, 14, 15; 21:8) The following are cast into the lake of fire: • The Devil. (Revelation 20:10) As a spirit creature, the Devil cannot be harmed by literal fire.-Exodus 3:2; Judges 13:20. • Death. (Revelation 20:14) This is not a literal entity but represents a state of inactivity, the absence of life. (Ecclesiastes 9:10) Death cannot literally be burned. • “The wild beast” and “the false prophet.” (Revelation 19:20) Since these are symbols, doesn’t it seem reasonable to conclude that the lake they are thrown into is also a symbol?-Revelation 13:11, 12; 16:13. A symbol of eternal destruction The Bible says that the lake of fire “means the second death.” (Revelation 20:14; 21:8) The first kind of death mentioned in the Bible resulted from Adam’s sin. This death can be reversed by resurrection and will eventually be eliminated by God.-1 Corinthians 15:21, 22, 26. There is no release from the symbolic lake of fire The lake of fire represents a different, or second, kind of death. Although it too represents a state of total inactivity, it is different in that the Bible says nothing about a resurrection from the second death. For example, the Bible says that Jesus has “the keys of hell and of death,” showing that he has the authority to release people from the death brought by Adam’s sin. (Revelation 1:18; 20:13, King James Version) However, neither Jesus nor anyone else has a key to the lake of fire. That symbolic lake represents eternal punishment in the form of permanent destruction.-2 Thessalonians 1:9. Identical to Gehenna, the Valley of Hinnom Gehenna (Greek geʹen•na) is mentioned 12 times in the Bible. Like the lake of fire, it is a symbol of eternal destruction. Although some translations render this word as “hell,” Gehenna is different from hell (Hebrew sheʼohlʹ, Greek haiʹdes). The Valley of Hinnom The word “Gehenna” literally means “Valley of Hinnom,” referring to a valley just outside Jerusalem. In Bible times, the city residents used this valley as a garbage dump. They kept a fire constantly burning there to destroy refuse; maggots consumed anything that the fire did not reach. Jesus used Gehenna as a symbol of everlasting destruction. (Matthew 23:33) He said that in Gehenna “the maggot does not die and the fire is not put out.” (Mark 9:47, 48) He thus alluded to the conditions in the Valley of Hinnom and also to the prophecy at Isaiah 66:24, which says: “They will go out and look on the carcasses of the men who rebelled against me; for the worms on them will not die, and their fire will not be extinguished.” Jesus’ illustration describes, not torture, but complete annihilation. The worms and fire consume carcasses, or dead bodies, not living people. The Bible gives no indication of any return from Gehenna. “The lake of fire” and “the fiery Gehenna” both represent permanent, everlasting destruction.-Revelation 20:14, 15; 21:8; Matthew 18:9. How “tormented day and night forever and ever”? If the lake of fire is a symbol of destruction, why does the Bible say that in it the Devil, the wild beast, and the false prophet “will be tormented day and night forever and ever”? (Revelation 20:10) Consider four reasons why this torment does not refer to literal torture: 1. For the Devil to be tortured eternally, he would have to be kept alive forever. However, the Bible says that he will be brought to nothing, or put out of existence.-Hebrews 2:14. 2. Everlasting life is a gift from God, not a punishment.-Romans 6:23. 3. The wild beast and the false prophet are symbols and cannot experience literal torture. 4. The context of the Bible indicates that the torment of the Devil is everlasting restraint or destruction. The word used for “torment” in the Bible can also mean “a condition of restraint.” For example, the Greek word for “tormentors” used at Matthew 18:34 is rendered as “jailers” in many translations, showing the connection between the words “torment” and “restraint.” Likewise, the parallel accounts at Matthew 8:29 and Luke 8:30, 31 equate “torment” with “the abyss,” a figurative place of complete inactivity or death. (Romans 10:7; Revelation 20:1, 3) In fact, several times the book of Revelation uses the word “torment” in a symbolic sense.-Revelation 9:5; 11:10; 18:7, 10.
I have a parallel Bible....it has 4 versions in it. Kjv, Rsv, the living bible, and the modern language Bible. Guidepost 1973. Love the kjv for the poetic flow. Helps to read the others sometimes.
I have both.in the Geneva ( I have the Patriots edition) I don't read the comments on the verses.i want God's inspired verses only.id feal the same way if my King James had commentary.
The King James corrects some of the errors and biases of the Geneva Bible, but it is only a Partial Correction. The Geneva Bible went out of print for 400+ years for a reason, I suspect because of the effort to harmonize it with Calvin's Institutes instead of attempting to find out what Scripture really said. I note that the gradual removal of the Deuterocanonical Books, initiated by Luther but later more actively pursued by Calvin and the Calvinists, helped to remove Scripture adverse to Calvin's Doctrines. Also noteworthy is the preference of the Masoretic Texts (especially from Jews hostile to Christianity) over the Septuagint originally used by the Apostles. The Triumph of the KJV (commissioned by the morally bankrupt King James) over the Geneva Bible is mostly due to Man's natural inclination towards products of superior quality.
Pal if you Think God's Son's Name was Jesus Christ Your hoodwinked bad.. by Constantine The Emporio he was The First Christian yes I meant Not a follower of YHWHs Son But pagan as The New religion called (Christianity) I won't even bother you again
The size of the Bible means absolutely nothing, there is NO where in scripture that commands us to have a 1611 King James or a Geneva translation of the WORD of GOD. GOD IS THE SAME TODAY, YESTERDAY & FOREVER.
Christians people please read). Jesus said; "If u love Me keep My Commandments", so read this; We have to obey God's Ten Commandments, and keep the Sabbath Day Holy, not Sunday (day) but Sabbath Day on Saturday it's on the Seventh Day of the week amen amen and amen ❤. The Sabbath Day for the people of God, so if you not belong to God then you don't need to keep the Sabbath Day Holy). Wait judgment Day and u will see what happen next. 😢 ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .....
If you were under the Sabbath you would be able to judge someone but you're not able to judge no one about the Sabbath. It's not a salvation issue you didn't rightly divided.
People spend their entire lives studying and nitpicking every verse, every word, in the Bible, and not really get the providential meanings that are in the Bible.
@@DiscernmentNow The Jews during Jesus time did the same thing. That's a reason they rejected the messiah because they didn't understand the providence at that time.
If it's a replica then you don't know what your truly getting so we just read from our kjv Bible because it teaches the blood atonement of Jesus christ our lord and savior Jesus christ who raised from the dead on the third and a half day and we will make it to heaven having full faith in the blood shed of Jesus christ and that we believe in his name whole heartedly in faith as apostle paul tells us because he preaches to us the gentiles amen and hallelujah and keep up the amazing work for the lord our savior savior Jesus christ 🙏 ❤️ 👑🙏
I was hoping you covered John 1:3-5 how the king James version changed it to him when speaking about the word. When I found that out, it blew my mind and confirmed to me how the Bible does not teach the Trinity nor deifies Jesus as God.
The trinity is three Gods as one and that is a lie. They are each separate and there own person God they Father God the Son bc He came to earth and born of a virgin, and was God in the flesh Holy Spirit Jesus called the Holy Spirit a He, He will bring all things into remembrance.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Please help me, I'm looking for the oldest English translation possible. This is the age the great book of Revelation spoke of where even GOD'S own elect would be decieved if not for HIS return. I'm just a lowly sinner so image my plight.
I have a 1611 edition KJV Bible. It's a fascinating piece of history and reading God's word through the lense of Christians from that time has a powerful punch to it.
ya boi king james was a flamer and a catholic, NOT a christian. he was giving all his butt buddies their own kingdoms (like george buckingham, u ever heard of buckingham palace?? alot of ungodly things happened there) the only reason he had the bible made for the english folk was to get them off his azz bc they knew he was corrupt. He also took much of the bible out. I WOULDNT BE TALKIN TO HIGHLY OF KING JAMES, HE WAS OPPOSITE OF A CHRISTIAN, OH WELL I AINT CASTIN STONES , JUST CALLIN IT LIKE IT IS
The sad thing : The law was fulfilled from I AM ….. Before a word was written, and they took his name away and replaced it. 😢 ACTs 4: 12 ‘’There are those who think they know God, than there are those who know truth and the ultimatum GOD issued to all people of him who are bright enough to figure it out, and yes you’re path is narrow. And if you don’t understand why,, this is a fault from you. 🙏
"I always wondered why my mom licked her fingers. Now I know." That literally cracked me up! A true blast from the past. I remember seeing people do that, and wondered the same thing. LOL
We cannot be spreading false doctrine without the proper knowledge in the scriptures, the lake of fire is a symbol of eternal destruction. It is the same as Gehenna, but it is different from hell, which is the common grave of mankind. Not a literal lake The five Bible verses that mention “the lake of fire” show it to be a symbol rather than a literal lake. (Revelation 19:20; 20:10, 14, 15; 21:8) The following are cast into the lake of fire: • The Devil. (Revelation 20:10) As a spirit creature, the Devil cannot be harmed by literal fire.-Exodus 3:2; Judges 13:20. • Death. (Revelation 20:14) This is not a literal entity but represents a state of inactivity, the absence of life. (Ecclesiastes 9:10) Death cannot literally be burned. • “The wild beast” and “the false prophet.” (Revelation 19:20) Since these are symbols, doesn’t it seem reasonable to conclude that the lake they are thrown into is also a symbol?-Revelation 13:11, 12; 16:13. A symbol of eternal destruction The Bible says that the lake of fire “means the second death.” (Revelation 20:14; 21:8) The first kind of death mentioned in the Bible resulted from Adam’s sin. This death can be reversed by resurrection and will eventually be eliminated by God.-1 Corinthians 15:21, 22, 26. There is no release from the symbolic lake of fire The lake of fire represents a different, or second, kind of death. Although it too represents a state of total inactivity, it is different in that the Bible says nothing about a resurrection from the second death. For example, the Bible says that Jesus has “the keys of hell and of death,” showing that he has the authority to release people from the death brought by Adam’s sin. (Revelation 1:18; 20:13, King James Version) However, neither Jesus nor anyone else has a key to the lake of fire. That symbolic lake represents eternal punishment in the form of permanent destruction.-2 Thessalonians 1:9. Identical to Gehenna, the Valley of Hinnom Gehenna (Greek geʹen•na) is mentioned 12 times in the Bible. Like the lake of fire, it is a symbol of eternal destruction. Although some translations render this word as “hell,” Gehenna is different from hell (Hebrew sheʼohlʹ, Greek haiʹdes). The Valley of Hinnom The word “Gehenna” literally means “Valley of Hinnom,” referring to a valley just outside Jerusalem. In Bible times, the city residents used this valley as a garbage dump. They kept a fire constantly burning there to destroy refuse; maggots consumed anything that the fire did not reach. Jesus used Gehenna as a symbol of everlasting destruction. (Matthew 23:33) He said that in Gehenna “the maggot does not die and the fire is not put out.” (Mark 9:47, 48) He thus alluded to the conditions in the Valley of Hinnom and also to the prophecy at Isaiah 66:24, which says: “They will go out and look on the carcasses of the men who rebelled against me; for the worms on them will not die, and their fire will not be extinguished.” Jesus’ illustration describes, not torture, but complete annihilation. The worms and fire consume carcasses, or dead bodies, not living people. The Bible gives no indication of any return from Gehenna. “The lake of fire” and “the fiery Gehenna” both represent permanent, everlasting destruction.-Revelation 20:14, 15; 21:8; Matthew 18:9. How “tormented day and night forever and ever”? If the lake of fire is a symbol of destruction, why does the Bible say that in it the Devil, the wild beast, and the false prophet “will be tormented day and night forever and ever”? (Revelation 20:10) Consider four reasons why this torment does not refer to literal torture: 1. For the Devil to be tortured eternally, he would have to be kept alive forever. However, the Bible says that he will be brought to nothing, or put out of existence.-Hebrews 2:14. 2. Everlasting life is a gift from God, not a punishment.-Romans 6:23. 3. The wild beast and the false prophet are symbols and cannot experience literal torture. 4. The context of the Bible indicates that the torment of the Devil is everlasting restraint or destruction. The word used for “torment” in the Bible can also mean “a condition of restraint.” For example, the Greek word for “tormentors” used at Matthew 18:34 is rendered as “jailers” in many translations, showing the connection between the words “torment” and “restraint.” Likewise, the parallel accounts at Matthew 8:29 and Luke 8:30, 31 equate “torment” with “the abyss,” a figurative place of complete inactivity or death. (Romans 10:7; Revelation 20:1, 3) In fact, several times the book of Revelation uses the word “torment” in a symbolic sense.-Revelation 9:5; 11:10; 18:7, 10.
THERE IS NO OTHER NAME Rev. Steve Marlowe “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it” (Matthew 7:13-14). For there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12), and saved for what? Eternal life in Paradise is the answer in Christ. The revealed name of Christ is a must for our salvation. This is emphatic language! Where would this exacting language come from? Answer, it is the Gospel, found in the New Testament. What is the name of salvation? Most people would say, “Jesus,” after all, the modern English versions of the Bible all have the name “Jesus.” And yet few know that this name in its present form has only existed since the 17th century. The 1611 English King James Bible does not have the name Jesus (gee-sus). The name found there is Iesus (ee-sus). Iesus is the transformation of Iesous (ee-ay-sous). Iesous is a transliteration of the Aramaic name Yeshua. In our search for the one name revealed from the LORD, a name by which we must be saved, we look to the prophet Isaiah, and there we find: “Behold, God is my salvation, I will trust and not be afraid; ‘For Yah, the Lord, is my strength and song; He also has become my salvation’” (Isaiah 12:2 NKJV). Sing to God, sing praises to His name; Extol Him who rides on the clouds, By His name Yah, And rejoice before Him” (Psalm 68:4 NKJV). YAH is the revealed essential name for all believers’ salvation in Christ. YAH is “the name which is above every name.” Where did the name YAH come from? In Exodus 3:13 Then Moses said to God, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say to them?” 14 And God said to Moses, “HaYAH Ashar HaYAH”, {meaning: “I AM WHO I AM.”} And He said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM {YAH} has sent me to you.’ ” 15 Moreover God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘The Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. This is My name forever, and this is My memorial to all generations.’” One may object and say, “But He has many names.” Not according to Him, “And God spoke to Moses and said to him: “I am the Lord {YHWH}. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as El Shaddai {God Almighty}, but by My name Lord {YAH} I was not known to them” (Exodus 6:2-3). LORD in all caps stands for YHWH known as the Tetragrammaton. Between the Hebrew consonants Yod and Hey is the Hebrew vowel Qamets, with the ‘a’ sound, as in yacht. YAH is the essential name, which precludes Yeh, Jeh, or Ieh, as prefixes for the name YHWH. YAH is the name, and the name is His memorial to be remembered by all generations. This is found in the Hebrew exaltation “Halleluyah,” meaning: “Praise YAH!” What does the name YAH have to do with Christ? It is believed by most, that Christ’s true name is Yeshua. Christ, a title that means anointed in Greek, told the people that He is YAH, the I AM (HaYAH). He said, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM” (John 8:58). “I AM” is YAH. Christ told them that He is YAH. When the Jews heard Him identify Himself as YAH, they knew what this meant. He just told them that He is their God, so what did they do? “Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but YAHSHUA hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by” (John 8:59). YAHSHUA means, YAH=I AM, shua= “my help, savior, salvation.” This is what the angel meant, “And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name YAHSHUA, for He will save His people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21). The angel gave the commandment, “...you shall call His name YAHSHUA.” One may say, “But I speak English, so I say, ‘Jesus.’ In Acts 4:8-12, Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers of the people and elders of Israel: If we this day are judged for a good deed done to a helpless man, by what means he has been made well, let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of YAHSHUA the Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before you whole. This is the ‘stone which was rejected by you builders, which has become the chief cornerstone.’ Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” No other name, and yet three centuries from the resurrection of Christ, we have the revealed name YAHSHUA heard as Yeshua, and Yeshua transliterated to Iesous, Iesous transformed into Iesus, and by the 17th century, this linguistic evolution ends with the name of Jesus, and except the name YAHSHUA, were revealed name from the Lord, but names evolved solely by the tongue of mankind. The apostle Paul hears the name which is above every name in the name of Christ. Here is the apostle Paul’s testimony: “While thus occupied, as I journeyed to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests, at midday, O king, along the road I saw a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, shining around me and those who journeyed with me. And when we all had fallen to the ground, I heard a voice speaking to me and saying in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ So I said, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said, ‘I am YAHSHUA, whom you are persecuting. But rise and stand on your feet; for I have appeared to you for this purpose, to make you a minister and a witness both of the things which you have seen and of the things which I will yet reveal to you” (Acts 26:12-16). Why the name Jesus is not the name of the Savior revealed to the apostle Paul. The name Jesus is not a Hebrew name. The name Jesus has only existed since the 17th century. Historian Ernest Renan acknowledged that the Savior was never in His lifetime known as Jesus (The Life of Jesus, p. 90). Scholars maintain that Yeshua is the actual name of Christ. There is no intrinsic meaning in the name of Jesus regarding salvation. The angel never revealed the name of Jesus to Mary or Joseph. The name Jesus lacks “the name which is above every name,” “YAH.” How do we know that the apostle Paul heard YAH, “the name which is above every name”? Answer, he obviously heard “the name which is above every name,” because He acknowledged that Christ’s name has “the name which is above every name.” “Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him ‘the name which is above every name,’ that at the name of YAHSHUA every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that YAHSHUA the Christ is LORD, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:9-11). Every tongue, every language, is to know this one name by which we must be saved. Pastor, you are fudging it with the lingo to keep your tradition.
@@bigtobacco1098 ESV, and almost all modern Bibles use the Gnostic gospels and texts of Alexandria Egypt. I'd stick with God's WORD, the Authorized KJB. Textus Receptus or RECEIVED TEXT. They were FIRST called CHRISTIANS at ANTIOCH, NOT ALEXANDRIA EGYPT, home of Gnosticism and Luciferianism.
Explain if the scriptures say “no other name” how can one be saved or baptized in another translated name? Is the name the angels, his mother and the name the apostles baptized in to hard to say? I have a name I was given at birth. If you go to the bank or anywhere else that will only except my birth name and try to use a nickname they not going to except it? Acts 2: 12Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other NAME under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. Matt 1: 21And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call HIS NAME ( the angel called Him Yeshua: Yah is Salvation). JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Proverbs 30: 4Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is HIS NAME and what is HIS SON’S NAME, if thou canst tell?
Yes? YET? Compare scriptures is 1 thing but the Geneva Bible lacks in scriptures as well" verses missed to paragraphs? The Geneva Bible lacked in scholars an? In translation!( 1611) Translated OF King James had( 48 to 53 scholars yet said? 50' King James had the ability an? Work force of scholars to obtain an? Translate! Where Geneva Bible lacked in? Yes a Good Bible to compare an? Read yet? Story's to verses fall short"( that ye did not say or bring to light
I like the way you say people just don't understand English. It was not harsh or accusatory; simply factual, and presented as a natural part of the explaination. Very skillful presentation of a harsh fact with gentle speech; most impressive. The use of capital letters for things like the word Name are clearly interpretive, as the original Greek and Hebrew texts did not have any lowercase letters. A little known fact that cracks me up, to be honest. So, I never get hung up on caps verses lowercase. I have decided to read the Geneva Bible next, but am not sure which version to buy. Should I get a 1560 because it is the best (I do not know if it is or not at this point), or the 1599 for the same potential reason? If readability of language and type font are not an issue (I love the language of the KJV -- or is it the K I V ? Couldn't resist!), would you have an opinion as to which one I should buy first?
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa I have a feeling I am going to like it, too! Thank you for your reply. I am probably going to get a 1599 first, but I do feel a desire to read that olde english.
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9. Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.” So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version! What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages. King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.” In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas. It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
No you're wrong, Yashua was pronounced just as it is written, not Jesus which nobody used in those days. Jesus is Greek and Yashua is Hebrew for Ya or YHWH saves. Just like Joshua.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Taking the "Ya" out of his real name is like taking the Ya out of JeremiYA and ObidiYA, ZachariYA, etc etc. Jesus was not his name therefore it makes no difference if the "i" was pronounced as a "j" in this case (and the case you made). In this instance, it is immense that the J sound is not used as it was many many years later projected to do. Greek and Hebrew were phonetic languages with phonetic alphabets. One letter did not have to totally different sounds. It was later that the J sound was used . This is all intertwined with the word "Jew" which had nothing to do with Yehudah, it's nothing but deception and twist speak. Iudea was pronounced Yudea. Now all we have to do is distinguish Iudeans from Yehudah like Caiaphas and Herod for instance were Iudeans, but not Yahudim. Yes it goes right where you will never go.
I speak Hebrew. There is no "J" in that language. The letter J was the last letter added to the Aleph Bet (alphabet). His name was definitely Yashua (Joshua). Jesus in Latin means "earth pig". Everyone stops at the translation of Jesus on Greek which is Zeus, but its deeper than what YOU BELIEVE.
God is the genuine and sole author of this Book we call the Bible. Because only one who knows the end from the beginning could have foretold those things that came to pass, exactly as the prophets had predicted.
One point of significant difference is in Romans 3:23. (There is a slight difference in the verse division) Geneva: For there is no difference: for all have sinned, and are deprived of the glory of God, KJV: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; It seems that there is a shift in the translation in the KJV with the various pre-KJV translation expressing some sort of barrier to the glory of God.
The 1st act Congress did was to hire a translator to print the 1st American Bible. That Bible is The Aitkens Bible based off The Geneva not King James. They are very similar but The Founders hated King James and The Monarchy which was burning Geneva’s in the days of the Colonies. The Aitkens September 12th 1782 is known as The Revolutionary War Bible.The only thing is,Aitkens took the Apocrypha out which should be in there. The Geneva was present at the signing of the Deceleration of Independence and Constitution . King James thought he and his bloodline were to reign over man. He killed so many Christians that didn’t believe his way. He was a mass murderer. As far as the People escaping England for Religious freedom....They had no Love for King James. There were no printing presses like we have today. All hand written. They had King James Versions for referring to ,to show differences.
@@sergioortiz1839 Order a Geneva online. Aitkens would be nice too. A 1599 Geneva is small print but has a lot of material George Washington wrote in there. Has a lot of laws passed down from England we kept. It does not have the apocrypha in it. A 1556 Geneva in Old English does. It’s a little harder to read but you should catch on how some of the letters were used differently
@@sergioortiz1839 That is the copy of the original and in Chauncers English with The Apocrypha. I have both. The Patriots edition. It’s small lettering in the Patriots which is 1599. Go with the original because it has the Marginal notes all the translators wrote in there. Queen Mary Tudor married King Philips of Spain and was bringing Catholicism back by beheading if you didn’t convert. Sound like another Religion to you? The translators were hunted by the King and Queen and that’s where a few wrote they Bible was in Geneva. John Calvin hated living there due to the men were allowed to have mistresses by law. Very immoral place back then. The Geneva was written for the plough boy. Referring to the common folk. Poor. Like most of us now. Because no one was allowed to read or write or recite the Bible in anything but Latin back then or you would get your tongue cut out. English was known as the Vulgar tongue then. If you read about the Marian exiles you will understand why this Bible was written. Don’t get the 2 lines of Bible mixed up. The Latin Vulgate was the Catholic Bible and Martin Luther and Geneva are the same just different languages derived from the Greek and Hebrew. They based it off The Subtuagint if I’m not mistaken, The New Testament that is. The drink Bloody Mary got its name from her. She was responsible for murdering close to 300 translators of the Geneva Bible. They wanted all men to know what God had said for them not a King or Church that kept you under rule by keeping you ignorant.
@@vanseventy I currently have the NKJV and a ESV version. Both were handed down to me by coworkers. I had a feeling there was more to it with all this confusion. My family is catholic and pray to the Virgin Mary. Ever since I became Christian my life has been improving in all areas. I am having a hard time finding the 1556 Geneva Bible. Do you know which sites I could use to purchase one?
@@code5829 not the Great Bible, as it was commissioned by the Church of England. I mean the best way to go would be to get the textus receptus and translate it to english yourself i suppose. Holy Roman Empire is under the Antichrist, per 1560 Geneva Bible.
‼️I’ve also noticed some changes by a (certain group of people you’re not allowed to criticize) to make them look innocent in the latter part of that book 😉
