Yea I think one on how it fits into the world we know already. Any issues it has with known cannon or if it changes cannon in any way. How characters, such as the keepers and Ranrok, fit into the world and impact it. Also a theory on where they would rank against other powerful wizards we know. And a theory on how your character and accomplishments will be viewed, seeing this would be a major event in wizarding history.
I wonder how the broom wood works is it like the wand type of wood or how do brooms work do they also have a core like a wand or they have a crystal or potion that the broom has its ability to fly im curious also how come only brooms why not staffs.
Topic: What are some spells that can't be used without a wand and what happens if you still do it? For example, let's say someone wants to use the wand-lighting charm without a wand. Will it simply fail or maybe light up a finger or a wand-like object nearby or create an external light source? We know Harry did this and it lit up his wand because it was nearby, but what if the user doesn't have a wand?
What about Snape's Levicorpus? Lupin and Sirius said that was really popular when they were in school. And it doesn't really count since it's a potion, but Lockhart also created an Occamy egg shampoo that guaranteed "locks of lustrous luminosity". (It never took off b/c Occamy eggs are expensive and dangerous to procure) And what about Delphina Crimp, who created the severing charm "Diffindo"?
Video idea for you to do: What additional effects do spells have that are not seen in the movies? For instance, what else can the patronus charm do besides ward off dementors?
Sectumsempra is borderline unforgivable 😂 the fact that Snape created it shows just how powerful he could have been had he really wanted to. In a death duel my money would be on Snape in most match ups
7:40 So youre telling me that in all those centuries of wizards making new spells only 100 years before voldemort somebody had the idea to make a spell to illuminate stuff.
Have you done a video based on how muggle born students parents keep the secret of the wizarding world? Or like, do theyre parents know? If you havent, could you?
Im just hearing of the muffiato curse.. but it may answer a question thats been bugging me. Why does the sound muffle in fantastic beasts secrets of Dumbledore when the lady says her last name?
Controversial theory: Harry's Quidditch skills are overrated. In all his matches at Hogwarts but one he had a superior broom to everybody else, and that advantage bailed him out more than once. The one match he didn't have the superior broom was against Slytherin in second year where Malfoy was too busy taunting him to notice the snitch right beside him
His flying abilities were good enough to impress the greatest seeker in the world and a former quidditch player whose job involves watching professional matches. So it's safe to say that Harry is pretty good.
@@DaPhantomThief I said it would be controversial. POA: Malfoy outflies him, prevents Harry from getting the snitch once, spots it first later, Harry only beats him to it because he got the Firebolt. Speed. Against Ravenclaw, Cho has a freaking Comet Two Sixty, Harry still has to catch up to her from behind to beat her to it. Speed again. That's two in one book. Oliver Wood admits Cedric beat him to the snitch fair and square despite the dementors and declines his offer of a rematch. He only played three more games in the rest of the books total because there was no Quidditch in GOF, and he got his dumb ass thrown off the team two years in a row after that and needed Ron to save Gryffindor's season both times. (Ron actually played in more Quidditch Cup winning performances than Harry did, let that sink in). His final game was a disastrous loss to Hufflepuff where he got into an argument with McLaggen and got knocked out by his own teammate.
You should try actually reading the books. Even with his firebolt he couldn’t get a good grasp on the snitch because of Cho staying on him. It’s also said multiple times how good he was on a broom. Doesn’t matter if you’re on the best broom if you can’t play.
@@hpos1086 I didn't say he wasn't good. I said he is overrated. There is a difference. I finally realized on my last read through of the books that not only is he no Viktor Krum, he ain't even his wife or several of his brother in laws when it comes to Quidditch. And realized that realization would piss some people off which made it even more fun to post as a semi-troll theory that is pretty much true when you think about it
I always found it hard to believe that Levicorpus is a newer spell that would have been created by Snape. It really seems like a spell that should have been one of the first ones ever created.
Considering he lived around 1000 years or so before the Books I'd wager he died of Old Age if nothing else. Which would possibly make reviving via Horcrux....... slightly difficult.
I've always wondered if the Philosopher's stone and it's elixir could have saved Dumbledore from the deadly ring curse. Nicolas Flamel had destroyed the original stone and accepted that he could now experience death, but the story never specifically mentioned whether he and his wife would die immediately or years in the future...
The elixir doesn't do anything about physical ailments or being killed by curses, it essentially pauses aging indefinitely. Dumbledores issue had little to do with that
5:22 Dumbeldore didn't actually die cause of the Avada Kedavra Spell, that didn't have a realy big effect on him, he died cause of the fall from the building...
Can someone conjure a spell, saying his name but instead waving his wand to produce another spell? It's like? Do we need to speech the name of the spell? There's even the possibility of use spells by hand like Voldemort did with the big fire snake
I've always thought Dumbledore could have prevented hundreds of lives and years of turmoil and suffering by having a simple, honest, two-way, hour-long conversation with Harry at the start of third year ..
Totally unrelated but what if a witch or wizard used the wood from the cross of Christ or the wood from the shaft of the spear of Longinus and used a hair from Christ or from one of the saints?
"HIS GOING TO MILO THE DESTROYER SAYS HIS GOING TO COMPLETE DELETE AND PURGE ALL MAGIC SPELLS ON EARTH... JUST YOU WAIT WAIT AND SEE..." THE+WORLD SAID AND+AMEN MY FRIEND
I have a theory I don't know if you have already thought about this or not but in the last fight the elder wand belonged to Voldemort not Harry cuz Voldemort killed Harry
Hey hey I was wondering if you have a theory about the absence of (sentient) paintings of the 4 founders of Hogwarts in the wizarding school or elsewhere
I have always wondered, what would happen to Harry and Voldemort, if Harry, being a horcrux, was killed by any other person or means. Would he be unkillable? Would he die but the horcrux inside his dead body turn Voldemort indestroyable given that only voldemort could destroy a horcrux inside Harry? I can see even more different directions in which answers could go. A video on this subject could be interesting
You should make a video on how somone would come back to life with a horcrux, they explain it good in the goblet of fire, but how did Tom come back in chamber of secrets? Idk maybe it’s just me.
It was stated that the horrocrux syphoned Ginny's life, the book being the anchor while that process was completed Harry destroying the book broke the whole thing and let Ginny getting her life back
He was the first to create a horcrux and breed a basilisk. 😮On the Harry Potter wiki, all it says is that Avada Kedavra, Imperio, and Crucio were all invented during the early Middle Ages. 🤔So….it is possible. 🤔Herpo the Foul from what I’ve read on Harry Potter Wiki was certainly nasty enough.🤔
