The team was built in such a way that both batsmen and bowlers had each others backs. Bowlers had a bad day, batsmen stepped up and chased the total ruthlessly. Batsmen had a bad day, bowlers were ready to defend even a total of less than 150. It was this assurance that led them to win so many matches.
@@arunmohanan4328 australia as they were the one to lift the trophy. we had Atapattu Jayasuriya Mahela Sanga Arnold TM dilshan Kulasekara Vaas Malinga Murali but the rain and dark with momentum worked in their favour. we batted in the darkness, all wicket gone bowled ball didnt bounce
@@SamareDoTelke in those days when Australia batted it looked batting pitch and when bowl it's bowling pitch... They were far superior team than anyone one in those days
@@divyansh2579South Africa also lost against Netherlands doesn't mean that this south africa is worse. 🤡🤡. Use some basic sense then comment. + That wi has gone 2 world cup with no loss similar to this Australia in 2003 and 2007.
@@TarunJain-dc9yn That's because in 1999 teams were more competitive, look at Zimbabwe. After 1999 the quality of other teams fell and many big ones were knocked out of the group stages itself like Pak, SA, Eng...
@@SlayBotYTshut up. its very weak these days, all glamour guys in there. compare this team to 2015 team then comment. cricket as a whole became very boring and glamorous after 2019. the world cup used to be so good in 2015 , only world cup used to be the talk of the town then.
I remember this era although the national Australian team was scary ... even when touring team feared playing against State teams = that's how strong the Australian cricketwas back then and still is.
Michael Bevan was on the peak form at that time(around 2003 world)I feared this guy,he played 3 miracle innings that was impossible to win like what maxi did against Afghanistan,all members of Aussie was match winner,but Bevan was too dangerous for me
2003 - BEST TEAM OF AUSTRALIA 2023 - WORST TEAM OF AUSTRALIA BUT AGAIN WON WORLD CUP THATS NOT MIRACLE THATS HARD WORK AGAINST ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL SQUAD OF INDIA
You missed LORD ANDY BICHEL, who singlehandedly scored alongside MATCHWINNER BEVAN against NZ from 84/7 vs best ever BOND 🥵😭😫 Had WARNE played instead of HOGG, then teams would've lost by 200+ runs everytime 😭😫 Even getting to play in front of this team is like WINNING THE WORLD FOREVER 😭😫 Actually winning is out of syllabus thing 😭😭😫😫😫
@@dilaraakter5709 Yes ofcourse. I've simply used LORD, only because of the matchwinner crucial innings played by BICHEL vs NZ and many such incredible contributions by players exactly at times of team need. No title worship intended there ☺️ Cheers, keep smiling, bye 😊👋
India unfortunately never had any such lethal dominance decade in ALL-CONDITIONS like invincibles 2003 AUS, who even won series here in India in 2004 !!! ☹️🙄😊
@@anandkishore3898 Actually Westindies had even more lethal dominance. Their bowlers didn't care where they were bowling at all and their batsman were ruthless. They played the game at their own pace, didn't care about the opponent. Compared to That, Aussy team were more flexible which helped them in modern era. I mean I am talking about Micheal Bevan. That's the flexibility Aussies had. Without bevan, aussie top order would have approached the game differently. Westindies just didn't care. If they were to lose, they would still play their own game at their own pace.
@@hereticsign Actually in terms of balance and dominating depth & allround abilities in batting bowling fielding, 2003 AUSTRALIA is simply the blessing. Otherwise obviously, Windies is the ONLY team in cricket history (apart from 1990s PAK & SA, had they played honestly to their potential) who can defeat that AUSTRALIA !!! 🙄☹️😊
