2010: Odyssey Two - The Forgotten Sequel

Подписаться 92 тыс.

Просмотров 352 тыс.

50% 1

2010: Odyssey Two - The Year We Make Contact. (Contains Spoilers)
The Forgotten Sequel
Starring: Roy Scheider
A joint U.S.-Soviet expedition is sent to Jupiter to learn what happened to the Discovery, and H.A.L.
I don't know why I wanted to make this.
I find this a forgotten sequel, or people avoid it thinking it was a bad sequel. I find it very fine even if nothing can reach 2001.
Music:
Ligeti Requiem II Kyrie
Ligeti Atmosphères
Gayane Gayane's Adagio
Strauss Also sprach Zarathustra, Op. 30
All Rights Reserved to their own Owners.
Edited by Sxdementia. 2020.

Кино

Опубликовано:

27 ноя 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,3 тыс.

@S.Thomas_7 3 года назад

Dont forget to like, if you liked

@michaelfrankel8082 3 года назад

I liked.

@thomasheisler 3 года назад

i thought there was a third movie that followed

@alexisantonakis8897 3 года назад

@@thomasheisler there was a third book 3001 but not made into a film..in fact.cannot even remember the plot

@crazy_sea0147 3 года назад

I'm afraid I can't do that Dave.

@darrenhawkes598 3 года назад

@@alexisantonakis8897 That was the fourth book, 2061 was the third, all of them brilliant.

@lukefallon8276 3 года назад

The one thing that made this movie so underappreciated was that it was a sequel to a film directed by the great Stanley Kubrick. Peter Hyams had some enormous shoes to fill. This film is a classic in its own right.

@pcuimac 3 года назад

It's utter trash. "It's full of STARs(R)". Boy this was the worst film ever until Gravity cane around. Now Clokney produced 'The Midnight Sky'. It's even worse! WTF!?

@Discrimination_is_not_a_right 3 года назад

@@pcuimac I disagree. I saw this movie before I saw 2001 and was enraptured through all of it. When I finally got around to seeing 2001, I was disappointed that it wasn't more like this one, and that it was much harder to follow. However, I eventually came to appreciate it for what it is.

@demorcef 3 года назад

@@Discrimination_is_not_a_right Yes very different films. 2001 is almost like a 2.5 hour performance art piece, and 2010 has a lot more action and pacing. Both great in their own way.

@deanroddey2881 3 года назад

At first I was a little disappointed. But, having seen it a few more times since then, I've come to appreciate it. It has some nice, tingly moments as well.

@Discrimination_is_not_a_right 3 года назад

@@deanroddey2881 'Look behind you'. That one got me.

@cornfilledscreamer614 2 года назад

If you ever watch 2001 & 2010 back to back, you'll witness a masterpiece. 2010 was an absolutely awesome movie. Did a great job of explaining 2001, and the acting was supreme!

@Durwood71 Год назад

_2001_ didn't need explaining.

@cornfilledscreamer614 Год назад

@@Durwood71 It did to many people. I first saw it when I was 7, and it made sense to me.

@Durwood71 Год назад

@@cornfilledscreamer614 Too many people want simple, obvious explanations rather than using their intuition and imagination to fill in the blanks in a story.

@cornfilledscreamer614 Год назад

@@Durwood71 Yep. I've had a number of people say - "I didn't really get 2001". For them - I just tell them to watch 2010.

@cesare_1302 Год назад

Do it with the books, you won't regret it

@jeffdube6016 3 года назад

Hal: "look behind you," Me: goosebumps.

@Brad772006 3 года назад

Truly an intense scene.

@youreale 3 года назад

Indeed. Freeks me out.

@mbignell1 3 года назад

Possibly my favourite moment in any movie ever.

@FelixIsMyName 3 года назад

@@youreale How he looked so young between the films is what made that scene freak me out when I first saw it as a teen

@airspeedmph 3 года назад

Hello Doctor Floyd.

@decab8292 3 года назад

“Perhaps one day the children of the old sun will meet the children of the new.” What a line...

@alexanbreizh6337 3 года назад

And the children of the old continent will screw the children of the new world ... Bringing smallpox.

@mendelovitch 3 года назад

@@alexanbreizh6337 The new worlders brought syphilis and tobaco to the old worlders. It all evens out.

@hgwells1899 3 года назад

Deca B welcome to the internet

@decab8292 3 года назад

@@hgwells1899 Thank you & Greetings to you also. May your story be heard.

@RanaRandom 3 года назад

To all *New Millenials* , from *Child of Old* , *"WELCOME to EARTH"* .

@Hydrogenblonde 3 года назад

This is a massively underrated and underappreciated film. It is a fitting sequel to 2001.

@Clay3613 3 года назад

Better in my opinion, less meaningless filler.

@scottpoerschke8807 3 года назад

I agree, however it is dated by the cold war aspects, they should have used China instead of Russia and tried not to include aspects that dated the film - like Kubrick did. It was/is a better story.

@Clay3613 3 года назад

@@scottpoerschke8807 Russia has been attacking us via cyber warfare for the past 10 years.

@Hydrogenblonde 3 года назад

@@scottpoerschke8807 there was a 1950's nuclear war film called "On the beach" where China and the U.S went to war. It was remade in 2000. In the 50's a China U.S war was plausible but in 2000 the idea seemed silly. Now the idea seems very plausible again. These world politics things go one way then the other like changes in the wind. I don't think it distracts from the 2010 story.

@jean-jacquescortes9500 3 года назад

I saw this movie in a theater at Caracas in 1984. I went two times.

@bernardoconnor1502 3 года назад

Seeing this in the theatre when it came out was an experience. I saw it at a Theatre in Times Square on a Saturday afternoon, and there was a full house. When HAL was reactivated and spoke again there was a great round of applause.. This was a good effort, the visuals were Oscar nominated, great cast, and a good story that moved well. Peter Hyams did a nice job as director, with Kubrick's blessing and while not as monumental as 2001 it makes a worthy companion piece.

@jamesfrench7299 3 года назад

Peter should have made it in one of the legendary British studios where the best quality sci fi is traditionally made.

@sid2112 3 года назад

@@jamesfrench7299 Hard to argue with that, some of the absolute best science fiction came from British studios.

@pcuimac 3 года назад

The film is utter garbage. Reactivating HAL was scarilege. The scene when the new garbage collector ship came up against the 2001 ship was gold! You could easily see that 2010 was a trash can movie compared to 2001.

@shawnmctaggart8807 3 года назад

I'd pay good money to see this in a theater! I grew up on this movie, never seen it on a big screen. An absolute masterpiece, in my opinion.

@jamesfrench7299 3 года назад

As a teen who found home video exciting in the 80s, I enjoyed it plenty on a CRT television screen (very appropriate in this case if you get the reference). I was positively spellbound and chilled by the probe investigating chlorophyll scene and loved the intensity of the aerobraking sequence and the kiss by that doll of a young Russky! Who could forget the panicked breathing of the engineer doing his maiden space walk.

@msh6865 3 года назад

If you enjoyed this film, I highly suggest reading the book. There are some elements there that don't make it into the film. There is also a final bit that propels the reader far into the future for a very interesting reveal.

@theharbinger2573 3 года назад

I agree - 2010 is a great book. it got a bit goofy in the later books with Clark pulling a Duncan Idaho with Dave Bowman. I would like to know where Clark intended to go with the sinister alien plot.

@markc7955 3 года назад

@@theharbinger2573 What was the story with Clark again? Been a while since Iv read them. Edit. I see. Arthur c. Clark lol How do you mean about the aliens? Is it about the message sent back to kill us all. I thought when they mention seeing a star/planet going super nova and the possibility of this being aliens was interesting and I wanted to know more.

@YZFHornet 3 года назад

I read the book as a kid.. got about 4/5 done.. I wish the Chinese side-story was in the film..that I was disappointed..

@hawkdsl 3 года назад

Just about all of A.C. Clarks books are incredible... he is a sc-fi legend after all. 2010 the book, is way better then the movie of course, but the movie did a good job adapting the story for the screen. "They became farmers in the fields of stars; they sowed, and sometimes they reaped. And sometimes, dispassionately, they had to weed.” RIP ACC. You are missed.

@Gainn 3 года назад

I think the omitted parts from the book are what stops me from really enjoying this film. They focussed more on the mechanics of getting there and less on the mystery.

@ephraimfink9010 Год назад

I miss Roy Schieder. I was 10 when this came out in 1984. Loved it.

@adamhockley8334 8 месяцев назад

I was 11!!!!! My dad was a 2001 nut! I remember we saw a trailer for this in the theater and I looked at my dad like..... whaaaaaa? My dad also had no idea that a sequel had been made. Great memory.

@phillipchallis966 Год назад

2001 is a visual masterpiece and quite thought-provoking, but i love the message of hope that runs through 2010.

@stonefree1911 3 года назад

Great movie. It's a shame so many feel the need to directly compare it to 2001. It complimentary to 2001, not a REMAKE.

@LynwoodHines1 2 года назад

I have never forgotten this film. I've loved it since it first came out. I've seen it about 50 times. It's in my top ten movies of all time.

@masterandservant8021 Год назад

I've seen it so many times, that my name should be in the ending credits

@newwavepop 2 года назад

dont get me wrong 2001 is an absolute masterpiece and classic, but i LOVE 2010 and i find it more rewatchable. and it stirs an enormous well emotions in me.

@stancooper5436 Год назад

Couldn't agree more.

@richarddecredico6098 Год назад

Low brow film for low brow folk

@stancooper5436 Год назад

@@richarddecredico6098 Haven't you got something better to be doing, like hanging out at a modern 'art' gallery drinking overpriced wine?

@cdybft9050 3 года назад

The scene, “turn around”, that always got me.

@davidjoe3368 Год назад

I saw this in the theater in 1984, and I still have the original VHS. How can you go wrong with Roy Scheider, John Lithgow, and Helen Mirren! This is a very very well done Sequel!

@johnscott6481 Год назад

Me too. In one of the old theatres in center city. Soundtrack was intimidating..I remember. good Year. Saw witness and met Harrison ford while shooting on callow hill street..and Beverly hills cop..which stops projecting in middle then resumed after Ten minutes...memories

@cameronpickard7456 Год назад

easy to go wrong with lithgow hes a buffoon

@antonysimpson6288 3 года назад

There's a moment when HAL says "look behind you" or something like that to Dr Floyd. Still gives me the creeps! A hugely underrated film.

@proadmin1 2 года назад

It's the delivery. Hal's awesome but needs to work on his social queues. I think I MASSIVELY enjoyed Bomb 20, from Dark Star - who's got ridiculous personality and is easily one of the happiest people aboard the Dark Star, although why you would make a thermostellar bomb with an enthusiasm for solipism is my big question - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qjGRySVyTDk.html

@philr5367 Год назад

Same! That moment always gave me chills!

@robertgraziano Год назад

Same here.

@KRAFTWERK2K6 Год назад

I never understand why they dropped the line "Look behind you" in the german dub. When i saw the movie on DVD for the very first time in summer of 2000, being able to see it in it's english original for the first time, i was baffled.

@robertgraziano Год назад

@@KRAFTWERK2K6 Scariest part in the whole movie!

@sw-ww4bb 3 года назад

"my god its full of star" goosebumps!

@heatherstarling1653 3 года назад

I could listen to that on a loop all day. It rings different each time-chills, awe, deal, wonder, dread, hope. Brilliant.

@mohanicus 3 года назад

one of the best sequels ever made.

@cloudstreets1396 Год назад

Better than Tron Legacy?

@XanAxDdu Год назад

@@cloudstreets1396 legacy is as good as the 1st one with same narrative weirdo and not a movie for all not so simple to approach

@DCHurlford1 Год назад

This and Blade Runner 2049 were two outstanding follow ups to classic originals.

@XanAxDdu Год назад

@@DCHurlford1 yeah i may agree but blade runner movie is not 2001 it cannot be it is brilliant as alien for example or some few other nothing to compare to 2001 i hope it can be easily understood as in jazz rock music you have mahavishnu orchestra and the rest or frank zappa and the rest. the rest can be cool fixed hot brilliant but never like those Kubrick is Kubrick as john mclaughlin on gtr clear ?

@pocok5000 Год назад

@@cloudstreets1396 tron legacy is a tech demo with no plot and characters

@caturdaynite7217 3 года назад

All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landing there. Use them together. Use them in peace.

@darrenhawkes598 3 года назад

I remember getting all watery eyed upon seeing those words, isn't it strange how things like that can effect you!

@mrb.5610 3 года назад

I just wonder how long before someone had a quick look ....

@RM-pf3wd 3 года назад

Goosebumps everytime

@swrennie 3 года назад

Earthlings would be like my younger brother: "I'm not on your moon. I'm just orbiting it..."

@fourthhorseman4531 3 года назад

Humans: attempt multiple landings anyway.

@bobblum5973 Год назад

Something that tends to be overlooked in _2010_ is the character of SAL 9000, the counterpoint to HAL. The actress chosen to voice SAL had a burden of providing a performance to echo that of HAL's without being a simple copy, and as we can see it worked. If you check the credits for SAL 9000 you'll see "Olga Mallsnerd", but that's actually Candice Bergen. (Her father, Edgar Bergen, was a famous ventriloquist, with one of his characters being Mortimer Snerd.)

@paulberks5609 8 месяцев назад

I loved SAL's soothing voice.

@bobblum5973 8 месяцев назад

@@paulberks5609 Yes. Both HAL and SAL needed to sound _like_ a human being yet very paced, methodical, like a machine. Partly due to the time frame in which they were filmed, to convey the expectations of the viewer, but also in the unemotional calculating way required to make HAL's part in the story work. "Nothing personal, Dave, I just need to do these things to fulfill the mission objectives." That's something I was glad they were able to explain in _2010,_ the why behind HAL's actions.

@jumpingman8160 3 года назад

A depiction of a panic atack in space gave this film an extra layer of unexpected realism.

@cinilaknedalm 3 года назад

Awesome underrated sci-fi movie. Explains why Hal acted the way he did. Only wish they included the Chinese landing on Europa which was in the book as it was an awesome moment.

@CosmicCleric 3 года назад

It wound have been great to see this scene.

@YZFHornet 3 года назад

I want that also..

@piotrd.4850 3 года назад

I'm afraid it would screw the pacing, though subplot was badass.

@JimAllen-Persona Год назад

They could’ve left out the whole geopolitical subplot.

@pumancat 3 года назад

This movie was good enough to be it's own story instead of a sequel. Love it still.

@BellsCuriosityShop 3 года назад

My God. It's full of stars!

@Nine-Signs 3 года назад

You can really see what inspired the design of Babylon 5's omega class destroyers.

@npatil85 3 года назад

Agamemnon

@darrenhawkes598 3 года назад

Very true, I remember seeing them in B5 & shouting " HEY, 2010" at the tv.

@Volgan16666 3 года назад

Awwww Babylon 5. Best space opera EVER.... I even bought the model space ships.

@Nine-Signs 3 года назад

@@Volgan16666 "WHAT DO YOU WANT! YOU MOONFACED ASSASSIN OF JOY!" - The Wisdom Of Londo Mollari.

@digital_crickets Год назад

Actually, this is a movie that I rewatch maybe once or twice a year. It has it's own feeling about it, it has brief moments of humor. A FANTASTIC cast was assembled for this movie, and they deliver.

@huskerjpg 3 года назад

When Floyd is talking on the park bench in front of the White House, Arthur C. Clark is sitting on other bench to our left.

@airfiero4772 3 года назад

At 1:30 of the video

@winternow2242 3 года назад

Also, didn't they use Kubrick's face on the cover of Time Magazine to depict the Soviet leader?

@airfiero4772 3 года назад

@@winternow2242 That’s what I’ve heard

@huskerjpg 3 года назад

@@winternow2242 Yes. And I should have added that Clark is on the same cover when I noted his appearance(s) in the movie.

@winternow2242 3 года назад

@@huskerjpg so the reactionary president who quotes Lincoln while having his finger ON the button (but at least treating his cabinet ro a decent lunch) they used ACC for that guy's face? Now I really have to re-watch 2010.

@TLabsLLC-AI-Development Год назад

Never once forgot this. 2001 was it's own Star Wars event though. Changed everything and paved the way from what I've read.

@adambazso9207 Год назад

Beautifully made visuals, you can see the craft behind this picture. The actors are really good too. The whole film gives me such a warm and adventurous feeling. 🙂☺

@umbongonights Год назад

HALs self sacrifice was one of the most moving movie scenes I have ever watched. I didn't see a computer coming to a logical conclusion, I saw a sentient being making a choice for the benefit of other sentient beings. I don't mind admitting that it brought a silent tear to my eye.

@XanAxDdu Год назад

on this path you may also consider picard TNG season 1 finale i refer to last meet between picard and commander data

@JnEricsonx Год назад

@@XanAxDdu Oh, I teared up at that.

@damians6690 Год назад

Ditto , the childlike Hal asking 'Will I dream'(is there life for me after death) , was a profoundly moving existential statement. Is this all that I am or is there more?

@sillyone52062 Год назад

I saw it as HAL making amends for his misdeeds.

@umbongonights Год назад

@@sillyone52062 Dr Chandra had used what he termed a 'tapeworm' to erase HALS memory of those events in order to allow him to function again. I suspect that HAL had no awareness of such deeds at the time.

@cocoabutt1711 3 года назад

"Type in nine nines, take the square root, press the interchange."

@marksolarz3756 3 года назад

Integers

@cocoabutt1711 3 года назад

@@marksolarz3756 Thank you! I knew I had misheard it. But I wanted to type what I remember hearing as a child (born in 76'). I would go on to get BS degree in physics and I never got around to looking up the script for that film.

@fatarsemonkey 3 года назад

@@cocoabutt1711 You can edit it.

@theivory1 2 года назад

It always amazes me how when a piece of art that is remarkable on it's own is called forgotten because of an association to something related that was more popular. It's not forgotten. Just not as popular and well known. Thanks for making this just the same. I'm sure there are people out there that wouldn't have known about it otherwise.

@bobwood856 3 года назад

The original film 2001- A Space Odyssey was based on a short story "The Sentinel", written by A.C.C. many years before. He re-wrote and expanded it for the film. 2010 was a long-awaited sequel, and was definitely worth the wait.

@andrewburton5910 3 года назад

Man on the bench feeding pigeons in front of The White House, early in this clip, is Arthur C Clarke

@cinemaunitestheworld 3 года назад

Absolutely stunning work! Well done! I dare say I'm a little misty-eyed right now. This fantastic short montage gave me what we all need right now: Hope. Thank you.

@kirkgroeneveld3191 Год назад

Excellent promotional piece. Nicely assembled. One of my favorite movies. I missed hearing John Lithow scream "It's shrinking! IT'S SHRINKING!" and then Floyd yelling, "Grab something! NOW!"

@johnmontague6588 3 года назад

The scenes between Bob Balaban and HAL still give me a lump in the throat, as do the scenes with Bowman and HAL. Superb film....in fact, you got me, going to watch the Blu-Ray now! !!

@kudude48 3 года назад

2010 is a great movie! i've watched it tons of times.

@Bayan1905 3 года назад

I wish someone had finished the story and made movies on the rest of the series, 2061 and 3001, not to mention Rendezvous with Rama.

@S.Thomas_7 3 года назад

Rendez vous with Rama was a project with David Fincher and Morgan Freeman

@iasimov5960 3 года назад

There's a TON of great Clarke novels that should be made into movies.

@FiveSigma72 3 года назад

The Fountains of Paradise, the Rama series, Childhoods End and A Fall of Moondust would be my picks.

@vintageb8 3 года назад

it’s only a matter of time. They WILL get made

@tvs5941 Год назад

Villeneuve is making Rama

@johnstevens1000 Год назад

Songs of Distant Earth

@pocok5000 Год назад

The problem is, making quality scifi is expensive, but studios don't take risks with expensive movies, they rather aim them at the intelligence level of general idiots. Best we can hope for is hbo miniseries adaptations when quality cgi becomes cheap enough.

@bernbsy 2 года назад

Hugely underrated movie! Hyams deserves a lot of credit and showed massive guts for taking this on. Who would have wanted to take this on after Kubrick's masterpiece? It no doubt helped immensely having Clarke around for advice but still.....Hyams delivered! Well written, directed, and acted with some fantastic SFX.

@lukeschreur Год назад

Pretty sure that the person on the left at 1:30 feeding the birds is Authur C. Clarke.

@sullybiker6520 Год назад

I saw 2010 first. I always adored it. I thought the tone was closer to Clarke's writing (much less metaphorical and visual than 2001) which some people _really_ dislike. I thought the film had a fantastic atmosphere that really pulled on my young imagination.

@CarnorJast1138 3 года назад

Still love this movie! Wonderfully made, fantastic acting, and superb special FX! One of the best sequels made.

@rickc2102 Год назад

And the first laptop computer, and the Ford Probe IV, and Roy Goddamn Scheider.

@CarnorJast1138 Год назад

@@rickc2102 Any time I watch this movie, it brings back memories of that time. I was in High School. 1984 was such a great time for me! I miss the 80's and the movies that came out then!

@thereisnosanctuary6184 Год назад

In 1985 as a kid, I remember a small theater saying 2010 on marquis. In 2010, I frequented that same theater as an adult.

@TheRealOtakuJoe 3 года назад

I've never forgotten this. One of my favorite sci-fi movies as a kid.

@crushedrgb 3 года назад

I remember seeing the miniatures on the MGM lot when they were shooting it.

@kevinpogue7294 3 года назад

The Russian ship miniature was part of the studio tour when I went there.

@kennethwelber4140 3 года назад

I saw this in a Theater, I remember the Breaking sequence was so loud the screen cover on the Speaker fell off. New Jersey

@CosmicCleric 3 года назад

Was waiting in the lobby in a line for this movie's next showing, and when the scene where the Odyssey's rockets are started the whole lobby shook.

@Stephen-wb3wf 2 месяца назад

I love the BOOMs. Every one of them. Somehow gets the scale and importance of how big this all would be better than just the scenes themselves.

@bradhendershott 3 года назад

This is beautifully edited. I found 2010 deeply moving when it came out, a time when our culture was steeped in cold war anxieties and legitimately-based fears of a nuclear conflict.

@davidpartridge8484 2 года назад

Fascinating that Clarke thought that the USSR would still be a country and a threat by 2010, showing that even visionaries cannot imagine everything!

@XanAxDdu Год назад

@@davidpartridge8484 what soviet country was is still not solved by history it seems to be today.... may we say it is a conflictual country

@oddsandwindsocks5905 3 года назад

I was always a fan of Roy Schneider.

@Scuba72Chris 3 года назад

Scheider, not Schneider.

@oddsandwindsocks5905 3 года назад

@@Scuba72Chris Thanks

@mikaelbiilmann6826 3 года назад

Helen Mirren as a Russian. 😊

@mikaelbiilmann6826 3 года назад

@Philip Gomez Oh, that's why she was so good at russian in the movie.

@edwardgiovannelli5191 Год назад

Scheider is a great actor, but not for this film. Kubrick had it right when he used nobodies in the first film. He didn't want actors to distract from the story. Hyams needed big names to fill seats, so...

@waroftheworlds3173 3 года назад

Never thought I would see an edit so good. I watched the movie once as a teenager in 2002. I remember key details for sure and other stuff time just took away but my opinion is that the pacing and some key elements are just plain wrong. Fortunately this edit fixed everything and gave me goosebumps. Will make my wife watch it. She won’t like that much I know. I can’t consider 2001 hard sci fi as 2010 is and people who isn’t into sci-fi just tend to say nah to these movies.

@Leartech81 Год назад

Never forgotten!! I watch 2001 then 2010 at least once a month!

@marleneanderssonlundin2056 6 месяцев назад

One of my favorite movies. Watch it at least once a year!

@trevorbrown6654 3 года назад

As an addendum to my post of two years ago, the impressive (by 1984 standards) laptop that Roy Scheider is seen using wasn't a prop. It was a real working prototype developed by Apple. Amazing how far ahead of the game they were even then, although I can't vouch for the battery life!

@MattMcIrvin Год назад

It was a commercially released product--an Apple IIc with a flat-panel display that was sold separately (I was unclear on whether the flat panel got a commercial release or was just a prototype, but apparently they did sell some). The IIc didn't have an internal battery at all, it was intended as a portable desktop computer, but you could buy third-party external packs.

@kennieg Год назад

As I recall, in the film it could also communicate wirelessly- years before WiFi was a thing.

@trevorbrown6654 Год назад

@@kennieg I remember him using it on a beach. I know LCD portables did exist back then as the Husky was taken aboard the space shuttle around that time , but nothing as sophisticated as the one we see in the film.

@just_one_opinion Год назад

Read a bit more, GUI and mouse's and portrait displays were there before DOS.

@shawnmctaggart8807 3 года назад

I'm of that small minority of people that prefer 2010 to 2001. I think this is one of the best science fiction masterpieces of all time, in a small circle of near perfect greats that includes Contact and the Martian. Hopeful, Hard sci-fi. Gravity and Interstellar would be lesser (but still good!) entries on this list.

@kudude48 3 года назад

i am one of those people. I certainly enjoy 2010 more than 2001

@Argumemnon 3 года назад

Same. I like 2001 but the first 15 and last 15 minutes are more trippy than entertaining. That said the middle part on the Discovery is very good. But 2010's the good one for me. I saw it as a child and even though I hadn't seen 2001 the intro does a great job of summarizing the first movie. It's just a great movie all around. "Will I dream?" is such a gut punch of a line from Hal.

@shawnmctaggart8807 3 года назад

@@Argumemnon Such a great line!! Such a great movie!!1

@CosmicCleric 3 года назад

You're not alone.

@Clay3613 3 года назад

Same, Kier Duella was a great lead utterly wasted by meaningless filler scenes with nothing happening in 2001. Heywod bought a much needed human element to the sequel.

@MusicLover-dg3wg 4 месяца назад

This is a great edit! Really shows how impactful 2001's soundtrack is.

@jamieanderson6786 3 года назад

A nice edit capturing many highlights of this great film. This was my favorite film as a teen and I believe I saw it about 6 times in the cinema and purchased a copy as soon it was released on VHS.

@richardmckinnon8791 3 года назад

You needed to see this in a theater. IMAX would have been awesome. The high quality of actors was fantastic 2061 with 3001 should have been done. The rumor was Tom Hanks was involved in a research effort to get this made.

@masterandservant8021 Год назад

He was indeed...!

@sandal_thong8631 Год назад

I've seen this twice: once either when it came out or on video. And again about 10 years ago from Netflix DVD in the mail. I don't know if I'd pay to see it if it returned to theaters for an anniversary or something, like I did _Aliens._

@richardmckinnon8791 Год назад

@Sandal_Thong Loved Aliens but needed to see the Directors cut on ABC Sunday night movie to see whole thing an extra 17 minutes. It gives the whole story and a scene chopped out that was needed in the time-line

@sandal_thong8631 Год назад

@@richardmckinnon8791 Right. I was hoping to see the Laserdisc version of _Aliens_ again with the extra scenes, so it was a bit of a letdown. Still, it did have a lot of great lines that I had in my memory that I wasn't entirely sure came from that movie.

@heatherstarling1653 3 года назад

I was 16 the first time I saw both 2001 and 2010. I was browsing the sci-if aisle and the titles just called me. I am so glad they did. I watch both regularly and always recommend them. Nothing really compares. They are a big part of my life and a huge influence on my art and writing.

@edwardgiovannelli5191 Год назад

If you ever get the chance, try to see 2001 in an IMAX theater. I don't say this lightly, it is a religious experience. I've seen the film maybe 2 dozen timesor more on everything from a 13" black and white TV i had when I was a kid, to a 70" big screen to a full movie theater screen, and nothing - nothing - compares to seeing it on IMAX.

@masterandservant8021 Год назад

I saw 2010 in 1985 when a theatre in my town was re-opened, I was overwhelmingly impacted by such an idea of a whole planet transformed into a sun by a superior intelligence. Years later in 1989, I rented 2001, so that was the first time I watched it. Today I got both in blu-ray, those are my most appreciated jewels

@mattm597 Месяц назад

"It is important that you believe me. Look behind you." Gives me goosebumps every time!! The best line in the whole movie, and they cut it out of this clip. 🙁

@shauntbarry Год назад

Masterpiece of a movie and a superb edit. Thank you

@jeffccan4464 3 года назад

This film is almost the most underrated sequel of all time. A very good film and fills in plot holes left from the original.

@XanAxDdu Год назад

plot holes of the original LOL hahahahahahaha

@DCHurlford1 Год назад

@@XanAxDdu ........or maybe pot holes.

@XanAxDdu Год назад

@@DCHurlford1 that would be more real hehehe

@sandal_thong8631 Год назад

The term "underrated" is overused and usually wrong. Who's "underrating" it? How and why? They never say.

@richarddecredico6098 Год назад

Condolences on your idiocy

@stewsretroreviews 3 года назад

Didn't know there was a sequel, got to give this look.

@CosmicCleric 3 года назад

To be blunt, if you watched this video, you just watched the condensed version of this movie.

@douglaskingsman2565 Год назад

This reminder just reduced me to tears. I must see the whole thing again immeidately!

@mlunaID 3 года назад

I've never seen this sequel. This video was so well arranged/edited. Great work!

@da1otta 3 года назад

I watch it at least once a year. Though not as artistic as its prequel, it has quality written all over it. An excellent film through and through!

@adamkhan7736 3 года назад

My God. They're gonna need a bigger spaceship.

@Willpower-74205 Год назад

Just when you thought it was safe to go into space.... 😁

@panniballecter6430 Год назад

The edit approaching to the end of this video did justice to this sequal. Thank you!

@baxterboy23 5 месяцев назад

This movie is up in the top 3 of my favourite sci-fi movies.. And since I watched it, every time I'm the first to pull away from the traffic lights I always think to myself.. "ignition, full thrust" 😂

@DJAYPAZ Год назад

2010 is a masterpiece both in story telling and movie making. The intricate plot is intriguing and accessible.

@michaelwhiles5282 3 года назад

An excellent film which I have seen on a number of occasions, I recall the red colour always used to bleed badly on VHS ! This is a minor classic in the dark deep shadow of a masterpiece. Well worth checking out - and remember its back to the days of the Cold Wars people.....

@charleslaine Год назад

This was an excellent vid. Very well edited!

@JanErikRnningen Год назад

Thank you for a wonderful cut on a great movie! 2010 is in deed a forgotten masterpiece!

@trevorbrown6654 3 года назад

Actually this is a rather good film and the storyline makes perfect sense, tying up a lot of loose ends. The effects still look really good for a film made in 1984, there's a young Helen Mirren in it, the director went to a lot of effort to recreate the ship from the original film and you get to see one of the first ever modern looking laptop computers years before most people saw them.

@deckard2665 Год назад

The Apple IIc.

@trevorbrown6654 Год назад

@@deckard2665 It must have been an experimental model as I don't think anyone had seen one that looks like that before.

@deckard2665 Год назад

@@trevorbrown6654 So I went and looked this one up. The Apple IIc was released April 24 1984. The film came out December 7 1984. In the film the IIc could have been a prototype. It did have the short lived small LCD screen attached to it. Not sure when filming took place, so it might have been a prototype, but it basically looked exactly like the IIc that was released.

@trevorbrown6654 Год назад

@@deckard2665 I'm surprised that it was available that far back. Shows how far ahead of the curve apple were

@johngore5127 3 года назад

Tony Banks, the keyboardist of the band Genesis, was originally hired to create music for this movie. They changed their minds as time went on, but he has since recorded the music he made for it.

@shepardbook 3 года назад

Is there a place where one can hear it? I found David Shire’s work wanting. Really didn’t care for it...

@johngore5127 3 года назад

@@shepardbook I saw it on Amazon a while ago on CD. Don't know if it's available anywhere else. Haven't heard it myself. Maybe I should. Tony definitely has the chops for orchestral arrangements.

@dr.noir27 2 года назад

Hal had the most comfortable voice I ever heard in my whole life probably forever, i tried to find the actor voice if he might done some audiobooks but nothing!.

@eamonnca1 Год назад

I would have been 7 when I saw this in the cinema. My mother took me in the train to see it in Belfast. I bought the magazine that came with it, I don’t think they do that for movies anymore. It had a profound effect on me, and I still get goosebumps even when I see clips from it. Thank you for producing this and posting.

@aliman3229 3 года назад

I watched it six times at the cinema in 1984 and bought the DVD 📀.

@ElectoneGuy 3 года назад

I watch this movie all the time. It's wonderful Science Fiction.

@RyanPerrella Год назад

Fantastic editing, bravo. A great 7 minute synopsis of a relatively underwhelming sequel to an incredible film concept.

@SatelliteLily Месяц назад

WOW! It makes me want to see this movie, which is something since I've already seen it like a hundred times! Amazing!

@robb2047 3 года назад

This is a great film in its own right. It addresses all of the ideas in 2001 and moves the story forward with a fascinating conclusion. Well acted and directed, this film deserves a lot of love from the sci-fi communities. I have always held it in great regard. It was definitely of its time, drawing on the political narrative of the 80's, but I think its well handled. Great to see it getting some mention now. Well worth a watch!

@suitandtieguy 3 года назад

it's nice to see someone show this much love for 2010. it's a sequel to Clarke's version of 2001, which is a very interesting idea, and the only way to do a sequel to 2001 properly was to make it a wildly different kind of movie. I love both, but if i were to pull one of them out to watch right now it would be 2010.

@MattMcIrvin 10 месяцев назад

Continuity-wise, it's in an odd place. In a sense, it's a sequel to a version of "2001" that never existed: one whose broad plot details (the location of the big monolith, the design of the ship, the struggle between Dave and HAL) are more in line with Kubrick's film, but which in tone and intent is more like Clarke's novel. That "2001" is the novelization Clarke would have written if he'd given his book one more rewrite after the movie was complete. And in the novel of "2010" you can see him actually doing some bits of that rewrite.

@jasonsgroovemachine Год назад

Fantastic film. Absolutely perfect follow up to the original. Touched on everything that needed to, established the new ideas that would go on to show up in the follow up novels as well.

@KRAFTWERK2K6 Год назад

My god... goosebumps!! I know and loved this amazing movie since my earliest childhood (was the first Hyams i ever watched) and this abridged cut really REALLY does an amazing job both explaining what it's about and also making you wanna watch the movie. Back then i saw "2010" before i watched "2001" and was always curious about what happened prior to the events of "2010". Two very different movies and they yet belong together. It still is an absolutely masterful sequel. Still worth watching.

@darrenhawkes598 3 года назад

For me, this was never a forgotten sequel, I remember seeing it at the cinema, I also remember buying it on DVD (one of my first) & also as 1080P HD digital download. A very very underated film.

@DrWowFL Год назад

Where did you download the 1080p format?

@TMS5100 3 года назад

This was a good movie. I think Peter Hyams did a good job. Definitely underrated

@johannpopper1493 Год назад

Holy shit, this looks great. It's so forgotten, I didn't even know it existed.

@soda989 Год назад

Good work. Thank you. Never noticed the CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND influences… *until now*

@joeomalley2835 3 года назад

I loved 2001: A Space Odyssey, both the book and the film. Probably my favorite science fiction of all time. Both the book and the film 2010 were worthy sequels to those great works.

@jokerace8227 3 года назад

It's unfortunate the other novels weren't made as movies, especially 3001.

@sparrowlt 2 года назад

2061 is not as good and 3001 is quite worst

@mariop8101 2 года назад

@@sparrowlt 3001 is a masterpiece.

@davedahl4461 3 года назад

I LOVED this movie. I saw it when I was in High School and saw it three more times in the theatre.

@HLR4th Год назад

I remember reading the book my freshman year in college, one weekend in February when we were all snowed in the dorm during a blizzard. The movie was great!

@fatarsemonkey 3 года назад

Not forgotten, one of my favorites. When ever I have to wake someone up I always say "Dr Floyd, Dr Floyd "

@keepinmindthat 3 года назад

i wished more sci-fi sequels movies are like this, specially how they manage to explain the first movie, to my feeling it was almost as good if not on par with the original.

@XanAxDdu Год назад

explain the first movie ?!?

@keepinmindthat Год назад

@@XanAxDdu Seriously! Re-watch the scene where Balaban explains to Scheider exactly how HAL turned into a killer (early in the movie). Sure there is no real explanation for the blocks and their origin but would that be fun? Would it not ruin our imagination of it.

@XanAxDdu Год назад

@@keepinmindthat explanations into philosophical are for an average kind. 2010 is a good normal movie trying to talk with an average style. nothing to compare with other things nor with 2001 and for several other reasons. it is not something watching Beyond but trying to propose and explain itself as any other normal title

@Jowanoofy_ZO Год назад

@@XanAxDdu 56 years ago?

@XanAxDdu Год назад

@@Jowanoofy_ZO that is science fiction doing its job at its best

@Theatre_Of_Noise Год назад

Not forgotten, one of my favorites! The scene where he has the big chunky laptop on the beach and is reading Omni magazine reminds me of my teenage years.

@douglaskingsman2565 Год назад

Wow, you reconnected my memories!

@arthousecouch 2 года назад

Both 2010 and Doctor Sleep are both fantastic sequels that are completely overshadowed by the Kubrick masterpieces. The filmmakers behind these sequels perfectly understood that they were not to try and replicate the prior films, but rather tell their own stories and respect what came before.