Oh Man I begin to hate all the cars with the Cross word in the name....🤣🤣🤣🤣 i really like the Tipo although I haven't tested this engine. Good test Joe!!
@@JiafeiProducts6969 It is an Italian car, but it is produced and exported in Turkey. Exported models are produced as Fiat Tipo. In Turkey, it is produced as Fiat Egea.
Gdyby wciąż mogli do niego wkładać 1.4 T-Jet'a, a jakość wykonania wnętrza była na poziomie fiatów z lat 2005-2010 (Bravo, Croma, czy choćby Grande Punto) to można by się zastanowić. Jeśli potwierdzą się plotki, że w tym roku dojdzie jednostka 1.5 FireFly 150KM z automatem DCT w opcji - to może zainteresowanie będzie. A tak, to te Tipo może być jedynie (droższą) alternatywą dla Dacii. Szkoda, bo jak w 2009 kupowałem Grande Punto 1.4 95KM, to osiągami, wyposażeniem i ceną nie ustępowało Fabii, Ibizie, czy nawet Peugotowi 207. Dziś między tymi markami, a Fiatem jest przepaść. Choć z drugiej strony, to celowa polityka wdrożona jeszcze przez Marchionne - odpuszczenie segmentów, gdzie jest duża konkurencja. Fiat znów jest prostym wozidełkiem, tylko już nie takim tanim...
Why do you show the fuel consumption if you aren't able to shift gears correctly and why do you drive in city mode on the highway at high speeds!? Thanks for the video tho, I appreciate the production quality ;)
All car manufacturers declare underestimate consumption. This depends on the unreliable of the approval cycles, an old problem of the world of cars. It's not a novelty.
Thanks for the drive, was wondering how the small engine would be. I just wish they added the 4X4 from the Panda, then it made sense to be a Cross LOL !
no city car, consumption 7l/100 km, overall he doesn't like driving in the city, manual. I have this car and since the beginning I have a combined consumption of exactly 6l/100 km. 50% highway, 30% outside the city and 20% city. It doesn't really matter if it's summer, winter, air conditioning, etc. It feels best outside the city, consumption 4-5 liters and on the highway, of course it depends on the surface and speed, wind, but the average is from 5.5-6.5 liters if I step on the gas. Overall, I am very satisfied, a large, functional, reliable, sophisticated, cheap car with a small but mature and powerful engine for its category.
Está estupidamente caro agora (pós face-lift), provávelmente não seria grande sucesso... aqui em portugal é um carro de mais de 30 000€ (cerca de 160 00 Reais). Pessoalmente acho que não é grande carro pelo preço...
On the quality of the interiors I totally agree but the reliability I can assure you that is very good, mechanically is very reliable. The only problems might be some stupid sensor of the ADAS that don’t work properly, but for the rest it holds up very well.
Non è male ..ho avuto la tipo digitale 2.0 dei tempi divertentissima ma ho rivisto in questa tipo la 127 sport 1 serie rifatta ..plancia cruscotto un'ariata..🤗
Ten silnik ma jeszcze wersję 120hp (choćby w 500x). Wydaje się naturalnym, aby taka odmiana była również częścią Tipo. Sam z chęcią kupiłbym 1.0/120 6 biegów. 1.0/ 100 5 biegów, nie ma dla mnie racji bytu
@@michaanio4809 Takich klientów jak ty jest pewnie garstka, większość po prostu kupi 500X, bo jest modnym SUVem, a nie "przestarzałym" hatchbackiem/sedanem
Ah so this is what the Argo Trekking is supposed to be... Here half the buttons come without function, and probably doesnt follow even half of the safety requirements... It looks so gorgeous there
Its a confusion with logos.... this interferes with the visual identity of the brand... Only brazilian Fiat has the new logo inside and outside the cars
Odnośnie spalania, to Fiat ma jakieś głupie jednostki ustawione fabrycznie i pokazuje km/l zamiast l/100km. Więc po przeliczeniu wychodzi realnie ok 9l :)
@@sokol_33 No i´m not! You say it sucks, but that's too vague. What determines the quality of an engine is not the number of cylinders. The quality of the materials used, the quality in the machining of the engine parts, etc. If you don't like three cylinders, I understand, but saying they're all bullshit, I don't agree. There are bad engines of all sizes.
I had experience in driving this car with 1.4 non-turbo engine. I didn't like this version, it has no torque at low rpm (even in comparison with other non-turbo engines). This engine is looking better in this case, but reliability of 1.0 turbo engine can be worse.
Which other non turbo engines do you mean? I'm curious, because I daily a 2005 Astra G with Z14XEP, which has 90hp and 125 Nm, basically the same as Tipo
@@КонстантинСПб-г1ю Cobalt's engine has 10 more hp and 7 more Nms, which is definitely noticeable itself, and combined with most likely much newer architecture of GM engines (FIRE family was introduced in 1985, while that 1.4 Tipo uses debuted in 2005) it makes sense that Tipo would feel sluggish.
![2022 Fiat Tipo Cross [1.0 T3 100 HP] | POV Test Drive](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
