2024 Chevy Traverse LT Review - Is It BETTER Than A Tahoe? 

It's refreshing to see someone actually review a lower trim on a new vehicle. Overall Chevy designed a very good looking SUV.

The new Chevy Traverse looks AWESOME, wow! Thanks for the review. Please keep up the great work on your channel Zack, and greetings from Germany!

I really like the way it looks I just don't think it's a good idea to put a small Engine in a big vehicle 😔

The best looking Traverse to date. Furthermore, I'm impressed with Chevrolet's latest design language

I am amazed you are finally reviewing what is possibly the most overlooked family SUV of all time. Proud of you! Apparently all of the other car reviewers for the most part seem to totally forget that these, and the Acaida and Enclave ever exist at all.

Cool video bro I hope you have a good weekend take care this is from new Zealand 💯💯

I've always liked the way these look, & the interior looks pretty classy as well.

The Traverse went from bland to weird to quite cool with these new lines during it's existence.. seems to makes duty well, carry people and stuff around with some comfort and safety without being too show-off

Nice review, and great K5 pictures!

Great review. I hope a lot cheaper than competitors like GH and Pilot

How is the ride comfort when comparing it with Tahoe air suspension? Air suspension is missing in this.

328HP and 326 pounds of torque

Thanks for the review . I have a 2020 Traverse . Recently teenagers crash into the back of it at a stop sign . I'm thinking on getting a new one, but I'm still skeptical about the 4 cylinder engine🤔

I want an RS in Stardust metallic

2024 Traverse can tow 5000lbs when equipped. The 2.5T offers an increase in both HP (18) and TrQ (60) from it's predecessor V6. Its also very closely related to their new 2.7T used in Trucks just modified for trans-verse applications.

I’m thinking of ordering this trim but with supercruise, pano roof and the evotex seats. However that jacks the price up to 49k

The Traverse used to have really similar total interior space in cubic feet compared to the previous gen Tahoe because of the live rear axle. In fact the 3rd row had more leg room and depending on how you measured, more cargo space. FWD unibody versus RWD body on frame just offers better packaging. I dunno about this current gen, and quite frankly, if that matters (and towing doesn't) - a minivan is the way to go. Would I buy a Traverse? No, but when I go to rent, I'd take a Traverse over a Tahoe or Expedition most likely, unless it was snowing and one had 4WD and one didn't.

I think the Z71 or RS trim looks better. But Chevy did a good job with the change in style of the New Traverse

Don't get me wrong, I really like how it looks and this will manage to work for anybody interested in buying it and maybe be more reliable than the awful 3.6 V6 every GM vehicle had...not saying I'd like it to equal the Tahoe but it's just that I will always be against the idea of somewhat large, front wheel drive SUVs with very small engines.

They did the 2.7t in the Silverado it will be fine

Finally Traverse looks smashing. Btw what is the "L button" on the cruise controls??

Got my wife the CX90 and only reason I’m considering this in the RS is because of comfort. Engine wise the cX90 is a joy 🤩 but the interior is a little rough. Depending on how the family fits if not I will be getting the new Tahoe instead. That said it’s a nice ride. Motor wise of course ford kicks it in the nuts but honestly for a city car and everyday not too bad.

Why captain seats? A family suv should have a bench. Put 5 people in 2 rows and rest for the cargo.

Theres no button to lock the back Windows anymore? Hopefully its available on the touch screen as an option, and something thag should have neber been altered tbh

Overall styling is good. Why did GM move the headlights @ wiper functions & move them to the stupid info screen?? 2 very important items & you have to search for these items all while your trying to drive this $40 ,000 + vehicle 😮😮😮😮

is that the same 4 cylinder they are using in the colorado and other trucks?

This IS A NICE NICE CHEVY SUVs 😮😮😮😮😮❤❤❤❤GOOD JOB GENERAL MOTORS 😮😮😮😮😮❤❤❤

they so badly needed to keep the 3.6 V6 in this.

Can you customize the LT models for Leather Seats instead?

Can't wait to rent this one

Did the traverse have a moon roof?

Would you pick this over cx90?

i judge cars by what's under the hood. and i would feel much at ease with a N/A engine than an unproven turbo concept beta-test. i hope it is better than the 3.6 timing chain eating failure. but i won't hold my breath but why compare truck to a car? it's no way a tahoe its a crossover competitor

Is this going to be one of those vehicles to go 200,000 + trouble free miles?

For a SUV designed for 6-7 people plus cargo, it needs a bigger engine.

No fog lights on all models.

Bring back the 6 cyl.

It's not a naturally aspirated 4 cylinder. engine. It needs a turbo to have the power it has. You are not really raising any Hell with the powertrain. To save yourself $10 stacks. LT would be better than the RS especially for daily driver. GM probably is going to change some of the stuff for the 2025 traverse. Imma wait and see.

Hey, it's a chebby!

السيارة الامريكيه أصبحت احسن من اليابانيه أخيرا ؟

5:16

I think is lame how weak all the unibody suv engines from gm are. I really liked the traverse for its V6, such a shame they got rid of it.

I’m convinced the only reason gm is still making these turds is for rental car companies and leases.

Not a fan of all the blacked out trim and wheels

Chevrolet totally f***ed up the Traverse with this redesign it’s awful.

Turbo engines The majority of the driving public do not know enough about engines, turbos, cubic inches, torque and horsepower to care. Just like an air compressor, the higher the pressure you run it the shorter the life of the pump, a car engine is a pump. Turbos pressurize the engine to falsely make it put out more power. The 4 cylinders lose power as they get more miles on them, there is no substitute for cubic inches, horsepower and torque. I have built engines and turbo's boost the pressure into the small engines creating more power at the expense of the life of the engine. Your maintenance cost will exponentially increase with a turbo when it fails. Any economy you may have gotten from the turbo will be totally lost on the replacement cost of the turbo. This vehicle is way too large/heavy for a 4 cylinder. A long list of gadgets will not negate the lack of power from a 4 cylinder, not to mention the turbo lag when you need all the power from the small 4 cylinder. GM has lost this customer. We have a 2017 ACADIA V-6, 34 MPG highway.

GM : Make everything look like a Camaro. It has a good look to it. Also GM : Cancel the Camaro. If you haven't driven a 6G Camaro, do yourself a favor and try one. Excellent driving & looking car.

So since the 2.7L is a joke now the 2.5L will follow! GM all vehicles look alike now great job

I still can't forgive GM for 2008, they hold out one hand, grasping for a bailout from the public cause they're "Too big to fail". And the other hand is behind their back actively covering up an ignition failure that is killing their custormers. ....

First!

If you gave me one I would drive it to the nearest Toyota dealership and trade it.

Chevy lol

3.6 engine is a leaky one, buddy that works at gm is always replacing valve cover, timing chain cover and head gaskets on any 3.6 suv, gm is dead

Overpriced!

200,000 mile car not very good

The SUV one sholudn't buy at all according to Car Wizard.

gm is for poor people

Planned obsolescence. Wont last 100000 miles

It looks good. I'd rather go Japanese or Korean though. I'd take a Grand Highlander Hybrid any day over this.

If it’s got the 3.6 it’s still trash. Even then I still wouldn’t buy it

If a dude buys one of these over a Tahoe by law they are required to get the vanity plate “low T” or “mpb life”. Mpb = male pattern baldness.

Overpriced disposable trash

Wooooow, I'm between this one and the new Land Cruise from Toyota