3D artist reviews Luma AI Dream Machine (Sora AI competitor) 

that's what they said last year, the technology needs like 10-15 years

@@theloniuspoon Not sure about that. Could be. But I'm a filmmaker and see me using models like this in combination with real filming within a year.

@@dennislubbers4614 maybe for some backgrounds visuals or stock footage or something, this version is just as bad as kaiber honestly. for full 3d artists this again is zero control

@@theloniuspoon I understand and you are right about control. But the choice our/your client will make is money based. A little less control for a a bit of more money. But lets see.

@@dennislubbers4614 Okay so I've just spent the last year trying to give AI videos to clients and the complaint rate is probably at least 95% unless they already knew what it was. Then they would come back and ask me just to do it using traditional 3d so they can actually get some control despite it costing way more. This was my personal experience doing this full time for the last 12 months as a 3d artist. Until AI can deliver at least like 80-90% clean deliverable control which might be never to be honest based on how this technology actually works. I'm sure real artists who have actual skills will be fine. I use topaz anyways which uses machine learning. Here is one example of the requests I get from clients that the AI might never be able to do or take at least 15-20 years - increase the length of her fingernails in motion by 5% then add diamonds on her finger nails - man even something as simple as remove the birth mark on her face and remove all the glitches and six fingers the AI can't even do that via prompt these days I've tried that was a real client revision lol. these things are tech company marketing toys

When it comes to client work they don't really play that way, they want precision and accuracy not just what the machine can whip them up