5 Photo Myths BUSTED 

wait, can we have a contest between chelsea and tony where the community chooses between their photos? but don't tell us who took each photo

Photography - keep your head up. Golf - keep your head down.

i shoot with auto exposure (just set aperture and shutter speed), ignore the rule of thirds (if it looks good to me, then that's all that matters), i use my a6100 w/my sony 1.8 11mm (16.5) more than my sony a7iii with a 16-35 2.8 (the former is more compact, lighter and inexpensive - i worry less about them), i love minimalist landscapes, yet i love sunsets with massive waves and deeply textured clouds. i hate photoshop and generative AI. the only AI i use is denoise in LR. as usual, i love your vids and thanks for always keeping it real.

some kit lenses are pretty good - Nikon Z 24-70 f/4, Fuji 16-55 f/2.8-4....

I remember I once had a bride that didn’t dye her blonde hair before the engagement photos. Think reverse skunk with the reversed roots. I was in no way technically able or patient enough to fix that in post.

If you are talking about Nikon or Sony sensors, then yes bigger sensors are better for photography. A few years back Canon sensors were behind. Nikon and Sony had a few APSC sensors that were better than some of the Canon FF sensors but that has changed Canon is doing much better now.

Hey Tony and Chelsea, been years that I've stepped away from photography but lately I was asked to volunteer shoot for a good cause and it reminded me about what I missed about photography. So after ten years, I tuned back to your channel and one thing struck me, Father time has changed you in only one way but has had no effect on the energy and love you both carry as a couple and despite your channel being a photography channel i remember always enjoying your dynamic together, it's a rare and beautiful thing. ❤

I Photoshop a lot of things too because I can. I've been using Photoshop since the mid 90's when it only had four tool for film separation. I had several expert level certificates. Sadly I don't do subscriptions but I am perfectly fine with using the older version which I own.

Many things can be effectively learned on RU-vid but golf is not one of them. Take lessons -- assuming you haven't already.

I have a full frame camera and a crop sensor camera. Except for the effect on the lenses, I am not sophisticated enough to tell the difference. And I'm ok with that.

I use a full frame camera but I've started shooting with F4 lenses. I generally prefer a deeper depth of field these days for 2 reasons. 1. It forces me to consider the background and not just lazily obliterate it. If I wanted no background, I'd just shoot in a studio. 2. When I shot portraits of my daughter with my $3k F1.2, her response to the natural bokeh was "ew, why did you take these in 'portrait mode', that's so lame". A humbling moment

While I don’t follow the rule of thirds consciously, I find that the pictures I do take that stand out as the better photos have a strong rule of thirds layout.

Right place...right time........that's better than sensor type 🤙😎🤙

I started shouting in 1970. Full manual everything, there were no other choices. As automation entered the scene many of us used as much of it as actually worked for our style of work. Gear never matters until it does. Anymore I’ll take better lenses over a newer body. I‘ve always thought that with sensor size there was a point of diminishing returns. The sensor size has way more to do with how you use the final image. Showing things on social media doesn’t need a 50+ megapixel sensor. I had a person who always made fantastic prints tell me that 12 megapixels was more than enough for up to 11x14 prints. Since I rarely make prints over that I’m more than happy with my 24 megapixel cameras. Oh, and I don’t care if it’s crop, full frame or medium format, which isn’t even 6x4.5 in film camera size. As for the “rules of composition” you really need to know the rules before you can break them. That said though you should know why you are breaking them

??? m43 has not enough or not the right lenses? First, m43 has the largest choices of native lenses of any camera system. Second, you can adapt any lens to m43 given that doubled focal length/increased DoF is what one wants. Third, there are some lenses for m43 that do not exist for other formats. Fourth, if m43 lenses are to cheap, go for a 25k$ Rodenstock cine lens.

It’s not the size of the sensor, it’s the motion of the IBIS.

Photography is subjective. What's regarded as "no good" by one can also been seen as "absolutely gold" to others. Same goes for the topic you are talking about here. It's not about specs or whatever. It's about the user, the situation, the environment, your surroundings and how you adapt to them at the time. By all means if you have the budget go for that ultra high end camera. It does not matter. Bottom line is YOU YOURSELF be HAPPY. You must also remember that 100% of the time you will mostly struggle to get what you really want.

"Unfortunately the answer is much more complex than that and would take an hour tutorial to cover" And then they'll take away the same 30 second conclusion that bigger sensors are better 🤣

My point of confusion is why do my mixed lighting, at night, run and gun photos need soooo much Photoshop while I see my friends iphone's doing a great job. I hope to see Ai playing out in cameras. My dream is small camera, interchangeable lenses and a Xperia 'brain". I want Fuji to buy the rights to the Nikon 1 mount...and go from there !

I feel like bigger is better but money exists 😂 covering and experimenting all focal lenses in ff is very very expensive. Probably better for everyone to start with micro four thirds, because that small camera and lens combo will be used again at some point, even after buying full frame. You can get all focal lengths and a camera with tons of features for way under 1k usd. Then it’s easier to make the decision of what ff lens and camera to buy.

Chelsea's website wins. Sorry, Tony.

Guys, really? The one thing you need to get right with a video like this is the audio! You can do better than this! Love the channel though

So sell your 50.000$ gear and use your phone. Sensor size does not matter right? :)

At 4:27 you can observe the phenomenon where the photographer only smiles at an aperture of less than 2

It's not a myth at all, bigger sensor tend to have a certain look, often attributed to bigger bit depth. I compared the R10 with the R8 using precise aperture equivalency, and yes, the R8 picture looked more colorful, organic and smooth, even though the depth of field was exactly the same on both.

Keep dof and noise aside, tell me whether apsc can give same “FEEL" as FF or not. What do i ask is dynamic range, colour depth, micro contrast etc.

Full frame is better than MFT because it's much easier to design 50mm f/1.2 FF than a 25mm f/0.6 MFT. It's just physics. Plus, FF will always have higher dynamic range. I'm not saying that FF is better for every genre of photography, but for most of people FF is better.

I've actually never used any of the zoom kit lenses I have. Mostly because I prefer to use manual prime lenses but are kit zooms really THAT bad? Perhaps it make a good video?

It's not the camera (Gear) it's the photographer, yes great lenses makes all the difference, in fact more important than the camera.. But You don't need a great camera to take great pictures, there was a photographer who was very famous, named irving penn. when he first started he use a crappy camera and took very famous pictures.. He photographer famous people such as: Truman Capote Albert Einstein Marlene Dietrich Alfred Hitchcock Robert De Niro Al Pacino Robin Williams David Bowie Père Couturier Tennessee Williams Pablo Picasso He Done work for Vogue magazine and tons of others, And he was 26 when he started using a cheap Rolleiflex Most of all of his work became iconic and famous, 90% of his work went into New York art gallery's.. Trust me it's not the Camera, it's the person using it.. Another real famous photographer who did work for Rolling Stones Magazine was Annie Leibovitz she started with a Minolta SRT-101, not a great camera.. Annie Leibovitz was a very famous photographer who done iconic pictures.. Again it's not the camera that makes you great...

Friends don't recommend Ken Rockwell to friends. My advice is to take anything he says with a pinch of salt, that would equal the Dead Sea.

FF (Lumix), APSC (Fuji) and MFT (Lumix) shooter here. IMHO the longer the lenses, smaller sensoc makes sense. The shorter the lens, the bigger sensor makes sense. When I was shooting wildlife I really adored the fixed 200/2.8 an 300/4 MFT system had. Reach of 400 and 600mm combined with excellent sharpness and Lumix class leading IBIS was just superb. But then I focused more on photographing my kids. All of a sudden Leica 42.5/1.2 for €1,800 didn't make sense as I could easily get Viltrox 75/1.2 or Lumix 85/1.8 for less than €600. I also admire the mich richer image depth on the larger sensor for nature and landscape photography. Sure, if I wanted to to wildlife with longer prime lenses on FF, that would on the other hand be much more expensive compared to the smaller sensors. In my eyes, there is almost no bad system on the market. I say almost because I'm completely switching from Fuji (H2 & H2s) to Lumix as Fuji's 4th generation of phase detect AF simply doesn't work compared to the very 1st generation of phase detect AF on Lumix which is insane. If my goal was to use €2,700 stacked sensor camera for some street snaps with pancake lenses? Yeaaaah maybe. 😂😂

What's crazy is that the MEDIUM format is actually larger than FULL frame.

After being away from photography for 20 years, I came back and used Panasonic MFT. I Really didn’t like the image quality. Sold it quickly for Canon R5 100-500. Even cropped, I’m much happier with my photos. Mostly I do wildlife. Weight is a consideration for me, so the cropped R7 is interesting to me on the 100-500 lens.. Waiting for the R7ii.

If you've gotten used to shooting with the latest professional full frame mirrorless cameras and the best glass out there, it's always helpful to leave all that gear at home for a weekend, and pick up a micro four thirds camera with a kit lens, or even a pocket size point and shoot, or an antique all manual film camera with manual lenses, and challenge yourself by just focusing on the basics of photography from time to time. The technology can give us super powers, but simple, old gear or cheap, crappy gear forces us to overcome limitations, to focus on the fundamentals of the craft, and makes us better artists.

Using a monochrome sensor has changed my life. The Leica Q2M is the most amazing camera I’ve ever owned. Shooting in almost pure darkness handheld with almost no noise/grain is a trip.

Sorry Tony but I just checked your two wildlife portfolios and honestly for the style of photos that are most appealing to me, I liked Chelsea’s. I do both styles but like to see more of the environment when it can be included.

Analogue wildlife photographers aren't changing ISO (or ASA ).

I use A mode and auto ISO, but sometimes I adjust down the ISO to 6400 or lower when I trust the image stabilization more than the camera recommend. 😅

The rule of third is important because it stops beginners of always putting the subject in the middle (whatever the subject is, can be a person, an animal, a mountain range, an island). It leads to boring, bad photos that always need cropping and it was the rule of thirds that made me stop doing that. I hate post processing so if I can get it right when taking the photo, that's a win for me.

I decided to go all professional. On my vlogging system. I spent time searching for the best video system. I discovered the ARRI company. Produces the best video recording system. I then purchased an ARRI ALEXA video camera. With everything that I would need. To get the ALEXA fully rigged out. I then purchased a vlogging stick. Off of TEMU, after I had mounted the. Fully rigged ALEXA to my new vlogging stick. Then tried using it. The stick broke, now I have learned. Not to shop from TEMU.

Hey are you going to talk about the issues with Sony's latest Firmware update? The update to my FX30 basically broke AF on all my lenses, adapted don't work at all, the Sony 18-105 sometimes works but defaults to MF at random times, the Viltrox 1.4 primes have been the best but still are on MF at camera start up. Also my playback is doing weird stuff... I don't know how to explain it but is seems to do something different every time I use it... and I need it to LiveU to one client so thats just annoying af. Nobody seems to be talking about it.

The prime v zoom boom bash hiss recently come across recent vlog the argument for prime often speed and walk the focal distance .But FRAMING!? Zoom can walk it back zoom in or out lot of framing options .Feel and frame ..forgotton a bit in the world of Crispy images !?

I agree with Tony on the rule of thirds. For me the “rule” is a compositional crutch. Composition is about flow and balance not rules. The “rule” originally dealt with color ratios, not composition. Research “Sir Joshua Reynolds” to learn how this obscure creative straight jacket came about over three hundred years ago.

The Rule of..... Treat the rules more like strong suggestions. However, the one rule that I pay very close attention to is The Rule of Motion, especially for wildlife, air shows, and sports in general. You want to ruin an otherwise good shot of a deer moving through the woods? Put more space behind the deer than in front of the deer when you're processing the shot. Or do the same with a P47 Thunderbolt making a high speed pass across the flight line. The shots lose perspective.

What is the difference between a Canon system and a Hasselblad one? A house! As a professional of 50 yrs, way back with film I would shoot weddings on roll film, motorsport on 35. I had 7 lenses for my 645, 35 to 300, but not only was the reach limited, the amount of film using 220 went through the roof. The main thing about progressing from film is I choose and compose each shot, I do not use H or H+ on my R5. If I wanted 30fps I would shoot 8K video. Oh, and you cannot compare P to M, even if you are using auto ISO you are still choosing your speed and f stop.

Camera physics/engineering is so much simpler than people think. In the end, anything FF can do, any other sensor type can do too. HOWEVER every change to the sensor needs to be compensated accordingly in the lens in order to achieve the same result. And i mean, exactly the same result under the same conditions, same bokeh, same noise, same fov, same everything. My issue with APS-C and especially MFT is that "bad" sensors need "good" lenses to compensate, and well, making the sensor bigger is A LOT cheaper than improving the quality of EVERY lens you own in order to get the same results. MFT and APS-C lenses arent naturally smaller, ligher or cheaper, they just perform less than the user believes due to marketing. So personally, the ONLY reason i consider APS-C to be a good choice, is when you already have great lenses and prefer an APS-C secondary body over using a high MP primary body (i personally hate high MP because you dont need them and they waste storage, bandwidth etc.). I'd rather have my R6ii and get a R50ii in a few years than having a R5ii instead. Similarly you might appreciate a R7 if you have an R1/R3 and expensive lenses, in order to get a higher pixel density. MFT on the other hand is imho nonsensical, since there arent any other sensor types you can double down on using the lenses with. And if you are fine with a "bad" sensor and a "bad" lens, just get a bridge-camera. That's the lightest, cheapest, smallest and most versatile option, if image quality is not a priority. Or a compact camera works too. And finally, does that make medium format even better, in theory? Absolutely. The only issue is it's not widespread enough for the prices to be optimal. That's the benefit of FF, that it's just very common, and has the most variety, while also ranging from affordable to an open ceiling.

Actually AF can be very important for 'landscape'/outdoor...especially when you want to shoot very late or vary early - dusk/dawn. Nope...no auto...all manual shutter, aperture and iso. Yes, that's from my film days...and yes it's automatic and actually much faster to get the shot as you want it - not how the 'auto' determined it.

I would like to add that when you're buying your first camera, you should buy a basic inexpensive camera and explore all different types of photography. You don't know what you'll really like or dislike. If you find yourself shooting sports or portraits then you'll know what limitations you have. You will also learn more about what features would be more beneficial to you..and when you get a lens, try a variable zoom lens and a prime lens. This will help you try out different focal ranges and shooting methods. Don't spend too much. And apsc is fine for this. I call this your training camera and lens. You might think you like wild life but not enjoy it and rather do flash photography, or landscape. So before you spend tons of money try things out cheap. Once you see patterns then you will find out your needs and wants more concrete and can purchase the right lenses and cameras and other equipment. Otherwise you will buy something you thought you want and need, but rarely end up using it. An example: you buy a full frame camera with 2 large heavy prime lenses. You find out later you don't take it to trips because it's too heavy and bulky and would rather have bought an APSC smaller camera with 2 pancake lenses making it lighter and travel friendly. But you would not know that unless you actually tried it.

I will recommend that any beginner take time to learn to shoot fully manual to fully grasp the exposure triangle. It's not practical all the time, but its good to master. Also, experiment with other modes to see how they can be useful in different shooting scenarios.

Tony's advice about choosing the lenses first seems counterintuitive, but it probably is correct. How this can relate to you two learning golf is interesting. And maybe this will help you. One guy that I've golfed with, who was a golf coach, said to start at the cup and work your way back to the tee. Too many people start at the tee and work their way to the cup, in terms of learning the game. Much like your photography suffers if you don't have the right lenses and blow your whole budget on the body, your golf game blows up as you get closer to the cup, if you don't know how to chip and putt. It seems like putting the cart before the horse, but it's really determining your goal then figuring out what you need to achieve that, but you have to work backward from that goal...

Interesting, in one video you rip the iphone 16 to shreds, stating it is equivalent to 3MP and in this video it is all fine. Thanks for this alternative fact.

After 10 in photography I, finally, have Nikon Z8 and Nikkor 85 mm 1.2. After 10 days working with this dream combo all I have to say - invest big and liberate yourself. It's freedom and joy. Simple as that...

I always agree with Chelsea, but I have to say, not with the thirds rule - remember Edward Weston’s advice about composition being “the strongest way of seeing” - every person can respond to the subject (Tony) differently, as individually, our visions are personal and hopefully not just a copy of the same old, same old…. A real challenge.

I have used my M50 and the R6 in comparison and it’s crazy to see how beautiful the photos from the M50 (with a flash)are compared to my R6 but, in low light the R6 definitely out shines the M50 by far! The lens of course made a huge improvement on the M50. Love listening to you guys✊🏼🤙🏼

Being an old and new school photographer (I'm 68) we bought film for different lighting conditions and depended on the dark room and our printing skills to correct over and under exposed shots to a great extent. Shooting wild life and action subjects was much more difficult in the old days and to a great degree was much more hit and miss compared to auto focus and exposure metering of today's even most basic cameras. Relatively speaking, photography was more expensive historically then today as well.

Hang on a minute. You’ve spent the last few weeks slagging off iPhones as not being real cameras only now to say it uses computational photography to compensate for a small sensor proving that a larger sensor isn’t always better. And all digital cameras use computational photography to some extent. Your Canon R5 hasn’t got a roll of film in it has it. Just for the record, ideally I would definitely have a Canon R5 too, but I wouldn’t take it up a mountain with me because it and the lenses would be way too bloody heavy.

It's not about the price. It's about knowing about the basics and using them properly: aperture, shutter speed, ISO - plus (Auto-)focus and focal length. After this you'll know what tool to buy..😁👍🏼

Love your unbiased reviews.. brands must hate you guys 😆 I have the r5 and im a portrait photographer, have no reason to upgrade to the r5ii.. the autofocus is the only thing that caught my eye cause I do shoot in lowlight, plus sunset shoots. The video upgrade is nice but it’s not a must. If you got the money and want to splurge then sure get the latest and greatest.

I picked up a used aps-c Sony and few years later, the FF big brother. The extra detail from the FF I like when blowing up the picture. Buying used....I picked up a-mount bodies to use with old Minolta lenses.

"A bigger sensor is better" - at least this is always true within the same camera size/weight class. A smartphone with a bigger sensor is better than one with a smaller sensor. Same for point'n'shoots. Same for system cameras of the same weight & size class (e.g. APS-C size&weight = compact full frame, nowadays). If you compare different size classes, especially when one of them (including the bulk/weight/size/costs of its typical lenses) may start to get annoying for many use cases (e.g. "medium format"), then it is a sweet-spot consideration: How much pain will you want to suffer for how much improvement, if any.

Bigger is also heavier, and larger to carry around. The lenses especially zoom lenses are much bigger than their APSC counterparts. That may not better for some. Also there is more to inage quality than lens and sensor quality. Some cameras like your phones use multiple lenses to create one photo buy merging the chomanance and luminance together. Some cameras jave different types of sensors such as xtrans sensor or bayer sensor. And some people frefer to use a light or nd filter which can control light.

There is always an outlier to every statement. Kit lenses are never sharp, except the GF 35-70, which is very sharp and smaller and lighter than the 32-64. There are many others, Olympus 12-40, etc.

Here is my view on rules Learn the principle, abide by the principle, and dissolve the principle. In short, enter a mold without being caged in it. Obey the principle without being bound by it. -Bruce Lee

My first camera was a 1960's Nikkormat with a detached light meter. I crapped up a tonne of films doing this. Every innovation after that was welcomed by me as something that would make my process easier and better. I shoot for fishing magazines professionally (as an outdoor journalist) and wildlife as a hobby. My fishing shots are usually with the camera on P or S (with auto Iso), my wildlife shots on S or M if I want to close down my aperture a bit (all with auto Iso). I am happy with that, which is all that counts to me. As a 60+ years photo enthousiast I don't give a f## about what people I don't know personally, think about my choices (and many people I do know). Time is too valuable to waste it on useless opinions.

Okay, you are out photographing animals. You see a scene and subject that you instantly know looks great. Take some pics and go home to view. You work on the image to make it look just the same as you viewed it in the field. (with blur) So the image is exactly the way you want it. You put it on your site to be sold at numerous sizes from small to huge. You offer it for sale and people try to buy it, but when they see it, it looks a little different from the original. At least the border will be different for all the different sized images. So the final image sold will not completely look like the original or really even the original scene. How do you compensate for all the different frame sizes when printing? And you both win but Chelsea wins a little more. Until she's not looking and then Tony wins.

Tony looks like you just found out something about Chelsea, like i didn't know you like more GIN than VERMOUTH in your martini.

On golf...take lessons. Unlearning bad habits is a nightmare. Learning good habits from the start is the way to go. And not everything good comes from RU-vid videos. 😱

The rule of thirds is simply a choice. It’s neither good nor bad. Implying that it’s always a ‘bad’ choice is a bit extreme. Therefore, Chelsea wins

Found a field of mother's favourite wildflowers picked some and took some pictures with my iPhone. Another person doing the same right next to me later while viewing each others takes claimed I had taken gorgeous pictures thus they wanted to get the same camera model as mine. I quietly announced that we both had the exact same model iPhones

You are an expert in Photography, I am an expert in golf. I would be more than happy to help you with anything you want to know about golf. The swing, equipment, rules etc. You have helped me, let me help you.

Film has a lot more latitude. And ISO is basically fixed. So for birds where you would have a min shutter speed, aperture would be the main adjustment, and that’s super fast.

Could you give some examples of the lenses you had in mind when you said that FF had “more” lenses than MFT? Thanks.

Early in the video you said that "kit lenses are never super sharp." I shoot Sony FF. If I went looking for a used or new small prime, what info should I use to distinguish from a kit and non-kit lens in the entire Sony lineup?

The best solution is that photography is like golf... go too the driving range and just swing it! You'll give the impression that you are a pro and people will think you know what you are doing.

As the owner of the D800 and the X-H2. I love my smaller frame X-H2 because of the bells & whistles, lack of a mirror and better video and great stills.

Isn't that indicative, then, that comparing the general purpose camera in a general purpose device (i.e., an iPhone) to dedicated cameras that are themselves only better for sports, or landscapes, or something else, is a bit unfair?

Sometimes less is more....

Nice video guys. I love an APSC sensor because it means I can get my camera and lenses in my small bag when I'm out and about. I could buy a full frame but I would take a lot fewer photos.

The R7 and R5 are semi-comparable. I see the differences image wise between them though. The R5 does a bit better with noise. Point is though, the crop sensor cameras are getting much better.

Most help content on RU-vid is not filled with annoying Ads like square space over and over but your content is extremely helpful and entertaining,

You’re both extremely talented! I like Chelsea’s website better. However, my own is closer to Tony’s… 🤔

Crack on fellahs, use your manual mode, hope you get your shots... Been photoing for nearly fifty years, sill use whatever gets me the shot, manual, auto, whatever. 😅

I shoot manual exposure keep both aputure and shutter at a constant and only adjust the iso to lighting needed while shooting. Mostly sports photography shooter though. I am not a fan of auto iso just cause it pushes too far for what's needed imo. Rule of thirds within any crop adjustments for sure and try not to look to deep in the viewfinder but focus is on the interaction and action of the subjects in the moment

As soon as you get home from a shoot - copy your memory cards and plug in your batteries - no matter how long a session then you are always at full capacity for next shoot which might end up being an epic (you never know!)

I’m with Chelsea on the rule of thirds issue. I don’t use a grid on my display, but I automatically frame my shots based on the rule of thirds.

Tony in most things I tend to agree with you (Sorry Chelsea), but Chelsea's Pics are more to my preference (Sorry Tony)!

Talking about the rule of thirds, bafflingly the grid overlay in the Z6 II is in quarters. I cant see any way to change it to thirds. Why?

Crop factor is not that technical. People who are too dumb to understand the crop factor should just stick to their smartphones

How many full frames have you bought vs crop sensors? Be truthful without counting cell phones or tiny compact cameras.

I got a Sony A7, and a Fujfilm X100S. Both by now older models yes. And yes with the right lens both have about the same expectations. Thing is the Fujifilm X100S is a whole lot of fun. And the quality of the images is perfectly fine for most use. Not to mention, it looks harmless, almost cute. Unlike my A7 ...

Edge Patrol - always check the edges of your frame to see what it intruding.

Thanks for your presentation! I gave up my Nikon D810 and lenses for a Mirrorless system, the Z6ii. As I compare my images from both cameras, the D810 wins out ! I concluded it was megapixels, what do you think?

Golf and Photography are similar, master the basics and then its up to your own style and lots of practice.

EXCELLENT! Huge difference between "that's nice" photo and a photo that tells a story.

Golf checkout Rick Schiels, Bryson DeChambeau, & Claire Hogel for some great tips

In photography and golf. Learn the basics, then learn how to bend them so they work for you personally.

I have full frame Sony but I recently bought a 1/2.5 inch Lumix CCD camera that shoots RAW and I am having a lot of fun with its images.

The sad thing about this is that the vast majority of people out there do not know or care about the difference between full frame or a crop sensor camera. They judge a picture by its content not by the quality or technique which sad but it's true. Show people a picture with a kid and immediately they say, that's a beautiful picture. They don't care that much about quality. Again, that's sad but it's life. Like or not.

Crop factor == club head offset and bounce. 😂 I really enjoyed this video thanks for sharing

I drive 90mph everywhere, anybody faster than me is a maniac and anyone slower should take the bus. The often touted FF mantra of bigger doesn't matter, but smaller does. The mental gymnastics for whatever reason, but also this topic is rage-bait.