5 Things I Don't Like About My Fujifilm GFX 100s 

Well if you don’t have more/same total light gathering (noise) and better control of DOF with the aperture then you give away a lot to FF where you could have the advantage. I don’t want a huge system but if they could make it only marginally bigger than FF I’d be in for it.

It's Fujifilm, not Sony; if they get enough constructive feedback, they'll change it in the firmware.

Until they apply a mosaic concept of nano lenses in the far future :)

yeah I'm spending a lot of time in the dark at the moment....

I shoot fashion and I shoot fast...

With regards to the self timer I wish I could choose to have it deactivated (todays implementation) or keep its setting every time I switch on the camera!

That actually (I recently discovered) is doable. In the shooting setting menu (Camera icon) look for “save self timer settings “ and set it to on. The camera will remember the setting every time it goes off. Just have to remember to check if the self time is on or off when you put the camera on.

I really like the Godox/Flashpoint line of strobes. I have the V860IIF for on camera and the AD200 and AD600 for off camera.

Apparently it’s quite easy to adapt a Canon EF 70-200 2.8 with minimal vignette or use ff mode

Just adding to.. using my m4/3 for a lot of the video work I'm doing.

Too bad this channel is dead

Then something like Olympus, or Fuji's x-series make even more sense. Why commit to overpriced and middling quality glass when you can get a better value and quality by staying away from the commodity brands?

@@MiaogisTeas it all depends on what is important to you. Currently AF speed and sensor read out is faster on smaller sensors. Where you pick your line in the sand will dictate in some way which format you choose. I just finished a shoot for a client where some shots were simply easier with my phone, so they made it into the final edit.

Do you think so? With so many people adapting Canon lenses for instance I'm just thinking maybe it only has to be marginally bigger than those. Here's to hoping anyway...

@@JosephEllisPhotographer A 1.8 nifty fifty is the 63mm prime. Dustin Abbott and Ken Wheeler are the lens element experts here not me. But I’d be renting it he Canon Tele to see how it performs. If you have to crop 15% it’s probably still worth it. You could also try Sigma’s EF Mount as the image circle could be different.

Mine does, with 16gb ram and by making use of the GPU. Of course, I don't use Adobe either. As for why, check out his previous video as to why he invested in the GFX system

I print up to 40x53 and it does make a difference. Also you can crop out a large part of your image and still have plenty of pixels to make a lovely print (not saying you should crop but sometimes you have no choice). Before buying the GFX 100 I built a computer using SSD's, 32 GB of RAM, an i9 processor, and a video card with a bunch of RAM. This handles the 102MB files with no problems. If you plan to build an i9 based computer it really needs to be water cooled.

Ability to crop down .....it’s extremely useful

Yes, both LR and PS are now both processing the raw files.

Very funny

Turn on captions if you wish,

@@richardbierman9856 Thank you! I ordered the GFX 100S and your information is useful for me.

Are you talking about t-stop or f-stop?

@@MiaogisTeas if we’re talking equivalent to the full frame system you can argue the T-stop but yes from what I understand the amount of light and the depth of field (although hardly a comparison when you’re on MF) is that of an equivalent lens barrel of a 2.8 and if you’re talking about strict measurements I guess 3.2. I am no expert but just trying to help those who might be confused when watching the video around why the gfx lenses have such a small aperture (f4 in this case) when compared to other zooms for wedding or portraiture in the full frame world. Love the channel and the videos :)

@@AliSatchu F stops are determined by the lens (focal length divided by aperture diameter) and have nothing to do with the camera. There are statements like above (and I'm not trying to be a as**ole, just stating the facts) which confuse the issue. There is an apparent difference in f-stop effect based on the sensor. In the case a GF 110mm, it is similar to FF 85mm. Because the focal length of the GF lens for a similar angle of view to the FF lens is longer, it appears to have a narrower DOF compared to FF lenses at the same f-stop, as if the f-stop were lower than it actually is. I suspect that the light coming through the GF lens reflects the real f-stop. I have owned all of the GFX cameras and many of the GF lenses and I have never had a issue with F4 as a maximum aperture, either getting a shallow DOF with lovely bokeh, or in gathering light. YMMV.

@@pauls9108 thanks for the knowledge share. I don’t really give a $#1t what f stop or t stop to be honest. I thought I was being helpful to the previous stop but clearly I was not. I love both my xt4 and my 100s. I care about the shots and really the experience which I can recommend to anyone interested in owning a Fuji system. Doesn’t matter which way you go - just get out there and capture beautiful shots. To anyone interested I am sure there’s plenty of videos that explains the difference between T stops and f stops :) Have a great day!

*post (not stop)