your name is perfect lol the guy fell in love with an average looking woman who was dead at the time based on a decades old faded polaroid, and he died for her kyle reese - the ultimate simp
"The reality of why dating is so easy for women is because men make it easy for them." Nail hit right on the head there. The root of the problem isn't women, it's simps.
The female 10s in my town date meth heads and alcoholics. My soul, mind, and body being in peak shape does nothing for me. There's some weird conspiracy to only mate with losers, I think they're doing it as a spiteful threat towards God tbh.
@@najirban You don't get it. Once those balls fill up men make fools of themselves Men are WEAK. If men were strong the sex industry for example would COLLAPSE in a week. Weak men are ALWAYS the problem. The problem ans the solution.
Simps have always been around. It’s in our nature to at least try every single option out there which gets us access to the p. Including crawling on the floor like an insect for your girl of interest.
"I want 6ft, 6 figures etc." women: "you go girl, don't settle for less!" red/blackpill: "women only date up and they don't settle for less" women: "that's offensive"
It all comes down to the biological fact that men have an abundance of semen, while women have a finite amount of eggs, in addition to what you mentioned about the females investment being much greater than the male. Hence, the females are biologically programmed to be more selective. As you said it includes both genetic quality for the offspring, as well as providing skills for the family. However as of recently many more women can now provide for themselves, making the priority genetics. Excellent video, this might be your best one.
Its more about the sex drive. Remove the sex drive from men and increase it from women and you will get the opposite in the sexual market ;) . While the number of sperm and ovule stay the same
@@clyp3016 Sure, if for some reason you went and collected them and separated them and then seeded them in multiple women's wombs. Unfortunately they only pop 1 or a few at most per month, most go off by age 30ish and women can't get pregnant while already pregnant. They have a practically finite amount of eggs and far less than the 39 million sperm per ejaculate that men have.
So what will happen to the future if this process continues or gets worse which it will? Are we heading for depopulation(not sure if that's the right word)?
The best way to live life as a man is to be born tall, with a Chad face. Everything else is attainable, especially with positive reinforcement along the way, because of the Chad face.
@@yyysamuel3215 looks is a tiny, very tiny % of all the things that definy your personality, Even at 2 years old people have different traits.. Gens, family, education, social circle, % of neuroticism, agreableness, extraversion (Maybe here looks can affect if a person ends up more extrovert or introvert), conscientiouness, opennes, place where you live, economics of your family... I could continue. Just... "personality based on looks" is dumb :P cheers
@@grindmode4781 No its not. This is a west 1st world problem. I went to Mexico in 2019. Saw many short average men with women better looking than them with kids. You white boys let your women off the leash. And this is your reward.
The best thing any young single man can do is be the best version of yourself and learn the art of not giving a fuck what women think of you. After I learnt that, things started to change massively for me. I started being rude to women who were rude to me, walking away from women who weren't giving me what I wanted, setting clear boundaries early whilst dating someone, and ghosting women that didn't respect them. From my personal perspective, if a woman thinks that you have the self respect to walk away the moment she wastes your time or crosses a boundary, she will actually respect you for it and not do it. Be nice, and she won't take you seriously.
That only works if youre a high value man to begin with, if youre an incel or a basement dweller , being an asshol3 will just enhance those features. Plus a man should desire high quality women as well, not just any woman that will pick them.
you don't know wtf you're talking about because you don't look like me and you have zero experience with attractive women. they aren't like that at all. extremely rare women will only date gigachads. it's actually tougher for gigachads than chads. i should know i am one. being an outlier gives you a lot of attention but also a lot of prejudice.
@@iamsobeautifulomg first of all your pic is like a 4. Second i speak from experience. in my youth i was a 7 and mostly took attention from 3s, 4s, fatties, handicapped girls etc. A few stacylites or high and beckies here and there, but way more rare... .
@@iamsobeautifulomg and yes you are correct that stacies after getting cheated and ghosted by their peer chads, turn towards normies instead..But first in their youth, they go for their natural instinct, and the socially acceptable thing. To date Chads.
@@keylanoslokj1806 in your youth you were a 7 😂 ty for the jokes. What a pathetic number considering you're definitely lying. 7 being your best is pathetic. Go home old man. Yes and that's normal IF you were a 7. What is your point? Y'all dum fr.
Please don't apologise for making longer videos- ever! They are even more thorough and insightful 🙂; thanks so much! You really help men to see things the way they really are!
but it is NOT for ""biology"". alot of men in the past due to the obligation to marriage after having sex with a girl by society and her family, had to go with prostitutes. if you see the data nowadays of young guys going with them, in America they are less than a 11% who had sex with a prostitute at least 1 time in their lifetime, and some of them are also the ones who have a paraphilia, so they are not just the most "desperates". the thing is that the ambient and the culture has changed that sexual dynamic. aside that single example: cultural and social obligations on men who are brainwashed since they are kids to overvalue women and do the "courtship", ARE indeed the real problem. using some fatalist cherrypicked biological-evolutionary theories of millions ago presumed dynamics, is just a way to NORMALIZE more those societal dynamics, making the situation even more worse. instead, you all have to understand that most of these dynamics are CULTURAL, and that us new generations of men, are way more self conscious than our dads, uncles and grandpas, and so on. we have an absolutely powerful weapon as the internet to make information on these dynamics, and to make other peers and young guys exit from those(like with MGTOW), and so, we have the power to regain and gain the power that society gave to women, and leave them without it in the next years and near future. marriage is dying, we will have artificial wombs, metaverses, fear for approaching for false accuses and STDs, humanoids and so on, who will drastically change relationship in a better way, and in a irreversible way, too. what you have NOT to do is: being "red/blackpilled" and going to push for those traditional male behaviors who are literally the reason of more female power of will in relationships; do not being a "traditional man" for that reason first, and for the fact that most women DO NOT have the duties of being traditional anymore since decades. THIS is what you have to do.
34 tomorrow and got a promotion lined up to take me into the top 10% of UK earners for my age in a few months time. Yet shockingly because I've never had a relationship there is no preselection benefit available for me to capitalize on and even though I've been improving myself it still feels like a constant endless battle of zero success, ghosting on apps and now seemingly surrounded by single moms, some of who are now stating on the profiles that they "do not want any more kids", yet they still feel that what I have to offer is not good enough for them 🤣 There's pretty much no words to describe how deluded women's standards have become in 2022
I’m driving a fucking brand new Porsche and I don’t get fuck all interest from women. I think if I sold everything I own (including my house) my investments my stocks etc. I would have close to a million pounds. If I try and start conversations with girls who work in shops (probably on minimum wage) I just get blanked. Girls on minimum wage turning down men driving Porsche’s, is a reality.
@@tonyzyklon9328 this is why I wonder when I see all this red pill content online "focus on yourself", "put in the work", "don't chase women, let them chase you", yet clearly we seem to be both putting in the work here and still not getting results. I don't drive a brand new Porsche, but I could with this promotion. Currently driving a Toyota GT-86 that only had 6,000 miles on it when I bought it for about £25k, monthly finance for 5 year term, so basically £5k a year + interest. It's all about the genetic lottery it seems, yay 🙄
Its just blackpill genetics- you were not born good looking enough. Otherwise you would have had many women by 34. Your best bet is to go to a poorer country, smash all you like, but don't EVER, EVER bring those girls back to your country.
The Normie class is merging with the Sub5 class while Chads are pulling away and living the lives of gods. You see a similar parallel in economics with the disappearing middle class and the rich getting richer.
This is a phenomenon I haven't heard anyone bring up so I want to talk about it. Last Halloween I dressed up as a trojan warrior with a mask....I had been working out and was in good shape...there was this girl (about a 7) who came in and she was hanging out with this Chad-light. I made eye contact with her a few times but didn't talk to her because she was with some dude...then I walked by her again, made eye contact, and she stopped me and said "how are you"....we started talking and I took off my mask and she said "oh I like your face"...I thought "that's good", but not really cause a little later she leans over to the Chad-light and says "I think you have some competition for tonight".....long story short -- I got competition anxiety and got out of the interaction. Last week, I was talking to an attractive girl and after 10 minutes she said "I have to go to the bathroom, I'll be right back." So I give her some time to come back but she doesn't come back.....a little later she comes back with her friend and I just ignore her (I considered that a flake and I was done with her at that point). After a while she gets up and leaves and when she comes back she sits right next to me and "accidentally" rubs her legs against mine. I continue to ignore her. She looks at me and smiles. I ignore......then she does something scary -- she goes on her phone and texts a guy to come to the bar. 5 minutes later the guy comes over and kisses her. I get the fuck out of there. It wasn't her boyfriend because they weren't seen together the rest of the night....I think she just "ordered some dick" on her phone when she wasn't getting any attention and was possibly trying to raise competition anxiety. Why are these women doing this nowadays? They're copying high status men who have women compete for their attention. The difference is that no self respecting man is gonna be a dancing monkey and try to win a girl over another guy (possibly ex lover). Things in America are becoming a shit show.
Dang. That's one of the scariest stories I ever read. I see alternate futures: either guy, thinking you initiated something, settling the question in a dark alley. Dude, honestly, love you lots and stay away from the flakes with companions. (Scary!)
My whole life I've been wondering why women didn't like me I didn't do anything wrong, am I crused to not receive love and affection? Now I know why Blackpill is the answer to all these questions it's not my fault and it's not women's fault either it is what it is even a slight hope of finding someone who likes me also is a big mistake that I wouldn't do.
Focus on yourself bro if you spend too much time focusing on being lonely and wanting love and affection you’ll go insane, it’s nothing but a vicious cycle. If you put your mind to things you like it will come eventually.
@@iamsobeautifulomg if she says: ""I'm a strong, independent woman! Pay for my bills! "... then say: "how can you be independent if you need someone to pay for you?"
@@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 how can you expect women to be independent completely? Do you like not understand science or have you never researched the differences between men and women? And you want to date? You're not ready for the real world yet.
It's not a contradiction once you think about it from their (often solipsistic) perspective: They ARE strong and independent. They've managed to acquire the lifestyle they want without being chained to the demands of someone else. They can make demands that you pay their bills. Not because they can't pay for it themselves ( they usually can ), but because they know even if you don't there's someone out there who will. The result is that women can have their cake and eat it too.
Historically what did low value men with no dating options do in order to cope with being sexual losers? I’m sure they didn’t just sit around and cry all day about Chad’s harem… Things are gonna get much darker in the next few decades if something doesn’t change.
They just paid for it; the tabooing of prostitution has had a large effect on the dating market. Something that seems to be ignored. It’s the sole reason incels can even exist. In the past if a man wanted to have sex, and couldn’t get it “for free” they just paid for it. Without any type of guilty conscience, or needing to break a law.
The thing is though, a lot of women (and even men) don't want children nowadays. But I guess the desire to date up is still being driven by the biological need to reproduce even when the woman doesn't want children.
100% get that bitcb on birth control, balance the relationship if you want one that kinda helps discern quality women as a dude and maintain leverage she ain't screwing around for awhile. Sooner or later get a vasectomy and then all you need is condoms and continual self improvement and inventory
Men, do not hesitate for one moment to place a court-issued restraining order against your female partner if you feel your safety and health is in jeopardy. Placing a permanent restraining order on my female partner was absolutely the wisest protective move of my adult lifetime. My only regret is not doing it years earlier. Men, be safe!
but it is NOT for ""biology"". alot of men in the past due to the obligation to marriage after having sex with a girl by society and her family, had to go with prostitutes. if you see the data nowadays of young guys going with them, in America they are less than a 11% who had sex with a prostitute at least 1 time in their lifetime, and some of them are also the ones who have a paraphilia, so they are not just the most "desperates". the thing is that the ambient and the culture has changed that sexual dynamic. aside that single example: cultural and social obligations on men who are brainwashed since they are kids to overvalue women and do the "courtship", ARE indeed the real problem. using some fatalist cherrypicked biological-evolutionary theories of millions ago presumed dynamics, is just a way to NORMALIZE more those societal dynamics, making the situation even more worse. instead, you all have to understand that most of these dynamics are CULTURAL, and that us new generations of men, are way more self conscious than our dads, uncles and grandpas, and so on. we have an absolutely powerful weapon as the internet to make information on these dynamics, and to make other peers and young guys exit from those(like with MGTOW), and so, we have the power to regain and gain the power that society gave to women, and leave them without it in the next years and near future. marriage is dying, we will have artificial wombs, metaverses, fear for approaching for false accuses and STDs, humanoids and so on, who will drastically change relationship in a better way, and in a irreversible way, too. what you have NOT to do is: being "red/blackpilled" and going to push for those traditional male behaviors who are literally the reason of more female power of will in relationships; do not being a "traditional man" for that reason first, and for the fact that most women DO NOT have the duties of being traditional anymore since decades. THIS is what you have to do.
Don't get married or take women seriously. If you put a career together in the hopes of providing for a family, your future wife-to-be is getting ran thru in the mean time. You will be seen as just a bail out. She's not attracted to you (she's had better in her prime), she doesn't respect you, and she's settling for you. On top of that, she's gonna be post-wall and probably less good looking than you are. It's a joke. Marriage is over
It’s all pointless at the end of the day, building a career just for the results to end the same, which is her leaving, relationships and marriage fails 98% of time, I’m convinced all this “self improvement” “improving you’re life” is solely to attract/get women, because they’ll never stick around, they all eventually leave that’s the reality, and if not like you mentioned, they’ll already have been ran through and had their fun hence settling for “you”, so if you ask me, every man should except this and do it for themselves instead.
Women " we will only marry rich men " then women " there's more rich men tan women, that's unfair, we need positive discrimination " Women now " there's not enough rich men to marry, how did that happen ?".
It's a clear example we don't love in the same way: - They need to feel admiration and respect to love you and it's conditional. - We only need real bonding and it becomes unconditional.* If you are not a Chad.
@@VirideSoryuLangley it shows why nice guys get little success with hookups and tinder. If a woman wants a hookup with no commitment, she is gonna only gonna consider an attractive guy. Considering the worst case scenario, at least with the attractive guy the kid will carry good genes. With an average guy she gets no commitment and no good genes. For long-term dating commitment 100% matters. Why would a woman want to carry a child and spend 18 years raising it for someone who isn't going to help? Only 0.01% giga chads can get women to commit to them without committing back.
@@dinobot7025 Here's a secret for you: women get married to nice guys, and then cheat on them with Chad. They get pregnant with Chad's kids and force the nice guy to raise them.
It's ironic that women are so picky that they actually destroy their own fertility waiting for Mr Perfect. It's like seeing an animal at the zoo trying to mate with a 2D image of the animal on a TV screen. Funny but also sad.
I don't really see any down side for women anymore. They can get quite all what they want without consequences. They can be single mothers, 40 and still find a good partner. they can choose a hookup life till 38 and still find a guy to build a family with. The only girls who lose are the 3/10 and less who couldn't secure a man or have a child. but more often than not, I see them with children as single mothers, then they hookup every now and then with low quality men. only men have the difficult task now. if you are not attractive enough in your early 20s, don't expect any change in your life to make dating "happier" for you. You can choose to settle for a low quality women from your late 20s and live with it. or be the guy with potential chosen by an average girl to be her provider for a while, before she gets bored. or build your career to be the guy that comes last, after she's been ran through, and still not be respected enough compared to THAT EX. Either you are from those who have had success from the early beginnings, or you can just cope with any enhancement you can bring to your life. I've never heard of anyone who flipped his romantic life upside down because of "more money", "gym", "whitening his teeth" or "playing an instrument"... if you were having 1 girl a year, it's gonna be maybe 3, but don't expect to be dan Bilzerian after 35 because you built your career. I don't even believe in ALL content creators selling hopes of becoming attractive to 23yo girls when they're 45. unless they are gold diggers of course, in this case anybody at any age can go to professionals, what's the difference! wife material girls don't do that! not that gap!
@@willf.8617 there is no downside for women in feminist societies, initially. But over time, the population starts to rapidly shrink due to below-replacement fertility levels. Then women start to suffer as the economy contracts and there aren't enough people to care for them in their old age. Eventually the feminist society's population dwindles so low that they are easily replaced by patriarchal tribes.
@@SpykerSpeed but you are talking about the long run. People, including myself, are selfish. we can't sort out an issue by waiting for the others to fail and then throw them a "HA HA!". it's a lose lose situation. but unfortunately I know that nothing can be done. Attraction is not a subject to advice. You can't tell anyone what they should prefer, especially for women (100% fail guaranteed) they'll agree with you when it's time to discuss why they are choosing badly, but once they're in the context of attraction, emotions will again prevail, they can't afford to do better. We'll (I'm at least) try to adapt as much as possible without losing our standards just to get laid. I grew up with a big dose of self-respect, and I can't afford feeling disrespected even a tiny bit, just to be with someone (such as feeling that i'm being seen as a lifeline for someone)
Pre-selection benefits and both sexual and relationship experience are a key aspect of attraction for older people in the dating market. Statistically, it's why older women prefer divorced men over never married men if they choose to date (divorced men start outnumbering the never married men from the late 30s). And it's also why we see anecdotal statements of men who say that they get more attention from women when they have a partner compared to when they don't. Lacking experience is something that is a major negative point against you. The problem is for middle aged and older men who lack experience is that it isn't something you can learn at University, you can't make up for it at a gym and it isn't something you can fake.
@@RK-bj8ho The problem with lying is that you will eventually be found out. Your actions, rhetoric and lack of experience will out you. Having to constantly pretend to be something else is emotionally and physically draining.
@@tgheretford it’s only till you get your foot in. Think of it as a resume in an interview. Of course it goes into the trash if you mention 0 job experience
@@harsh3948 The difference being is that you can attain skills through learning at a higher educational establishment. There is no legal alternative for dating and relationships, its a societal expectation that everyone who is middle aged will have experience or it is perceived there is something very wrong with them and will be seen as a grave red flag. But lacking experience when you are a middle aged or older male is a vicious circle - you lack experience which shows so you can't attain a relationship but you need to attain a relationship to attain experience but you lack experience... and so the cycle continues. At least in the job market there is the prospect of getting your foot in the door even if it is at the bottom of the career ladder. There isn't when it comes to relationships. It's akin to the sixty five year old who has lost their job in a dead industry and now has to start afresh in a new industry because they can't afford to take retirement. But at least they've got the chance to find employment as a greeter at a supermarket. And this probably explains the statistic that a man who is unmarried in his forties will statistically never get married. It is becoming apparent for relationships too.
This is 100% facts. It may be a tough pill to swallow but it’s better to know the truth than live in a lie. This is why I prefer to casually date multiple women instead of choosing to pursue a monogamous relationship. No risk of her “dating up” when you’re not taking her serious in the first place.
This is a sad time for many young hard working men trying to reproduce that perhaps weren’t fortunate enough to be among the top 20%. Unless they Simp out to an over 40 yr old woman with more miles than JLo. However this is all very true.
Tbh men having no social repercussion from dating down it's a new thing. Until some years ago those guys received the tittle of Saint George, slayer of dragons.
@@Lil_Slimetx why is it so hard to believe that a chad could be interested in the truth concerning sexual dynamics? a chad would benefit from the red pill yes, but he'd know he could always fall back on the good ol blackpill for comfort.
@@Hecticgunbunny Chad and blackpill are two things that don't match. It's not even about sexual dynamics or anything like that. A Chad can never be blackpilled, maybe a few but it's rare. For the rare few that know the blackpill only know it for the purpose of shitting on it. Most Chad's I know have happened to be in the middle of both red and bluepill. These are the same people that will offer quick fixes to everything, cannot get a girl? Just be confident bro!,looks don't matter bro! It's not about the size, it's about the motion in the ocean bro! And many others.
This is gold. As a man, it was pure joy to absorb a 27 minute long video with nothing but facts on the subject at hand, as well as it all being explained in a most constructive way. Subscribed.
Have you ever experience when you text a girl, you even go on a first date with her and than the girl feels the immediate need to tell you this is a bad moment for her, lot of problems, and that she is not searching for anything ecc? After one or two month you see her new profile photo with her boy-friend and no, he is not you I’ve experienced this situation pretty often Stay strong guys
Another very important consideration for why women are much more selective than men when choosing a mate might be that maternal mortality was much more of a risk in centuries past. Ascertaining the actual risk, however, seems problematic. For example, for medieval Europe calculations range from 5% to 50%. In any case, on top of being unable to bare offspring again for a maximum period of 9 months after becoming pregnant, women also risked death. I suspect that any selection strategy that paired a woman with the type of man that helped to minimize her chances of dying during pregnancy or childbirth was naturally selected and passed down. Stillbirths were also much more common in our distant history, and a woman who chose badly therefore had a greater chance of wasting her precious and finite months of fertility delivering dead babies.
Yeah. It's interesting to think about how the narrow birth canal, relative to our large human heads, may have actually evolutionarily perpetuated and increased the female hypergamy instinct. "In hominids, upright walking evolved 4-5 million years ago. The human pelvis was affected by these changes and evolved accordingly to better serve the new pattern of movement. Later, after bipedal movement had long become obligatory, brains evolved to increasingly larger volumes. With that change, the head size of neonates also increased. The growing heads, however, had to be delivered through pelvises that were earlier adapted to upright walking. This is the reason for the lack of space in the modern human birth canal during childbirth, which we have to live with today." So that means female maternal deaths probably started to skyrocket around 4 million years ago. I can only imagine how that shaped the female psyche and encouraged women to be more selective.
@@redpillsatori3020 that makes sense but how does it take into account the "hyper"-hypergamy were seeing today due to social media. Why would women select for men who are even more abnormally large? Many women today are seeking men a whole foot taller. Wouldn't that be detrimental to their own survival? And shouldn't survival instinctively take precedence over procreation. Wouldn't too much sexual dimorphism be detrimental to women in that case? I'm simply asking because I don't actually know and maybe you can explain it. Cheers.
@@loverofhumanity cause it is NOT for ""biology"". alot of men in the past due to the obligation to marriage after having sex with a girl by society and her family, had to go with prostitutes. if you see the data nowadays of young guys going with them, in America they are less than a 11% who had sex with a prostitute at least 1 time in their lifetime, and some of them are also the ones who have a paraphilia, so they are not just the most "desperates". the thing is that the ambient and the culture has changed that sexual dynamic. aside that single example: cultural and social obligations on men who are brainwashed since they are kids to overvalue women and do the "courtship", ARE indeed the real problem. using some fatalist cherrypicked biological-evolutionary theories of millions ago presumed dynamics, is just a way to NORMALIZE more those societal dynamics, making the situation even more worse. instead, you all have to understand that most of these dynamics are CULTURAL, and that us new generations of men, are way more self conscious than our dads, uncles and grandpas, and so on. we have an absolutely powerful weapon as the internet to make information on these dynamics, and to make other peers and young guys exit from those(like with MGTOW), and so, we have the power to regain and gain the power that society gave to women, and leave them without it in the next years and near future. marriage is dying, we will have artificial wombs, metaverses, fear for approaching for false accuses and STDs, humanoids and so on, who will drastically change relationship in a better way, and in a irreversible way, too. what you have NOT to do is: being "red/blackpilled" and going to push for those traditional male behaviors who are literally the reason of more female power of will in relationships; do not being a "traditional man" for that reason first, and for the fact that most women DO NOT have the duties of being traditional anymore since decades. THIS is what you have to do.
@Michael David I know that, but there are absolutely big changes and differences between men of few generations ago and nowadays young guys, due to culture and behavioral biology who is modified by psychology. also, alot of evolutionary biology is just theory, with some truths, that is not objective too, and there are not prove that those theories explain at a objectively 100% way those behaviors and dynamic. at the contrary, societal conditions, pressures, gender roles, have been demostrated in anthropology like a main cause of it. look at the Victorian Era where due to the second industrial revolution alot of women lost their work, the government had to change the societal engine making those women being overvalued like spouses, with men being brainwashed like always to make the courtship and "earn" their woman and the potential family, and if they just wanted to have occasional encounter, the families of the women would have accused them of carnal violence and rape(this concept of "rape" exists since the Roman Era for the same reason, exploiting men for their resources), obligating the man to marry the woman, and the woman would "marry up" to the man and be mantained for life. the only alternative to that? prostitutes. so they were OBLIGATED to do it, it was not "nature" or ""biology"" in the sense you're speaking about. here in Italy a similar dynamic was alive until the 60'/70'. and in America if you see the data on young men going with prostitutes, they are less than a 10-15% on the total who had sex with those at least one time in their life. until the 50'-60' in the US average men did it like 5x/6x times more. this is a very rapid social anc cultural change from less than a century who changed the psyches and behaviors of boys and men, and it will continue like that, also with androids, artificial wombs, metaverses, more social isolation due to feminism and sick ideologies who make men fear of false allegations and of women in general(and the contrary), more hikkikomoris and so on. and those are all technological innovations.
The problem is that modern women want to have a cake and eat it too. They want all the benefits of being with a traditional man while rejecting all the accountability and responsibility that come along with being with a traditional man. If you, women, expect a man to bring you money and resources to you, why are you crying about making him some sandiwich? Hypocrite much? Double standard much?
Of course paternity tests should be mandatory, but in this gynocentric world we live in, it will never happen. Not only that, there are countries that paternity tests are *illegal* (like France, soon Germany too). Their 'reasoning': "French psychologists suggest that fatherhood is determined by society not by biology".. The utter victory of women's strategy: 'If you can't secure the alpha's commitment, mate with him and have the beta-provider take care of you and the child'
i m from france. If you deny the child as yours, paternity test will be required by the court itself . Don't ever forget the paternity test before signing child birth act .you don't wanna raise another man's child
If it were the other way around, women would be screeching from the rooftops that we need maternity tests " for equality" and would never stop kvetching how men have guaranteed paternity and women don't
@@soundsokok So you have to openly oppose your woman.. in court.. and if you're mistaken, you'd have broken the trust between you. However, if you have a suspicion, you cannot have the dna test done privately because 'If those samples were found in the post by officials on their way to foreign laboratories, the French men who sent them could theoretically face a year in prison and a 15,000 Euro fine', as I read. So this is rigged against French men; you'd have to be almost certain that she cheated, and go berserk/court mode (and still you might be wrong), in any other case you lose..
@@leftjedi The trust has never been there in the first place . It's just that it might be the first time it " went public " . You can't 100% trust a female dude . Hypergamy is in its blood .
With regards career, when I hear of women with high aspirations for climbing the corporate ladder I generally view that as a big warning sign. They usually are very entitled, aggressive and are usually less playful.
Women aren't attracted to men who make less money than they do. So by focusing on "career", they are actually destroying their own chances of ever finding a guy they are attracted to.
@@Ligerpride Since I'm a woman whose primary goal in life is to climb in the social hierarchy (through studies and career), I must admit I don't understand your point of you. I've never had a man tell me that wanting a high position and a big paycheck is bad. Aren't you a little bit (just a little bit) insecure?
Whole video can be summarized as: If you're a man and you don't either have great looks or a lot of money, peace out! Also, this video doesn't hit upon a more recent trend. For most of human history, women have dated and married slightly up. 5 woman/6 man. 7 woman/8 man etc. It's gotten out of control to the point now that a "5/6" women thinks they not only deserve but DEMAND a man that is 8 through 10. The amount of action that men in the 5-7 range get now has decreased precipitously over the last decade and have basically been shut out of the dating market. At the same time... with overweight/obesity rates greatly increasing, the amount of women moved to the 1-4 range has skyrocketed. There is a virtual "Wasteland" now for average/healthy people to date one another.
according to his videos i am in that wasteland but im quite happy with my partner and have very little confidence issues. im either an exception or just not frustrated enough to let tendencies decide my life.
My sister is pretty and desired by many, but she still thinks I have it easy and refuses to believe when I tell her these things are out of my control.
There’s another element to why physical attraction is important. 99% of the universe is beautiful, wether it be alive or inanimate. Beauty seems to be a fundamental and intrinsic quality of nature. No wonder our instincts want to maximise that. Sounds like hippy talk, but the correlation is clear.
I'm 5'11 and most ladies say I'm too short. I make slightly double the national average income and most ladies ask me if I collect food stamps and live in section 8 housing with such a low income. I eat healthy so have a good body type yet not good enough to land any dates and it's been the same all my life. Ladies though can be 30 while working a retail job and living with parents, have $200k in student debt and look like free Willy, yet she will not accept anything less than a top 10% man. Sad but yet it's the normal today.
DAMN! The 5'11 being short is brutal. I myself am 6'2.5 and sometimes I have to stand with military posture at a club not to feel short! (5'9 chick's with 4 inch heels) 5'11 is actually the start of tall. It's all pretty gross and disgusting. The worst is when they actually claim they are at a disadvantage. Trying to squeeze every last bit of perks they can possibly get.
@@wismelmartinez2045 yeah, height matters less than facial attractivness. You are 5'8 in Spain. That's actually average height or even slightly above I would say. Your only as good as your competition. Great quote. I actually find Spanish girls (which are pretty) are a bit more lenient on looks. Also if you are upper tier in looks it is expected that you would be good to go. In America, USA, a lot of guys are struggling. A 5'8 guy who is an 8 would still fair well but a 5'8 that is average looks and socially inept will be stomped. Everyone's experience is different though. Many average men HAVE indeed faired well with women, however, the majority are struggling.
@FuckOuttaHere yea definitely lie and say 6ft. When girls hear 5'11 they hear 5ft. 5ft anything is a death sentence 🤣 . Jk. Have they said your too short Live? In person?
Resume: If you are poor you offer NOTHING. And you get NOTHING. At the end it's not what happened to me in my 20's: I had the shape to have multiple relationships but it didn't lasted because I hadn't enough money. Now I'm on my 40's and my exes are being summoned by some reason: All that some wmn can offer, after their 30's, is their last chance to being a leech. Because her beauty is fading. Not to mention her emotional baggage.
That depends on the man and the woman MR. If a handsome man offers that to an average woman. Do you think it will be worth nothing? If you do you are more stupid than most people already think you are.
Props to the guys who cold approach and unphased by rejection.. i see pretty girls everywhere and i never approach.. but watching black pill vids tells me that it's not worth it.. the only women that actually hmu are single moms, married women in 40s, or overweight women lol
Women are approaching you that’s a good sign can’t go wrong with making small talk and taking the interaction from their with women you find attractive
In France a woman with a child get 1750€ a month without doing anything. She'll get extras on september when the kid will go to school. The minimum gain with a full job is 1545€.
If this happens tomorrow in the whole EU there will be no reason for us to work for higher salary - even at non-expert position a good part of your taxes will go for these women. Probably most of them are from some minority - drug addicts, with criminal history, different race (no racism here, just a fact), etc ... Usually as a tax-payer this means you'll get a financial headshot in a short run (each year from your sad life till retirement), hence another proven fact that the modern social system is broken
A lot of guys have a thing for blondes myself included. On pornhub, blondes is an entire category in its own right! With that being said, blonde hair does not really work on dark skin.
@@addorsubtract650 Ik tahts why I was thinking of dying my hair blonde lmao but I’ll keep that for when I get old. is it light dirty blind or blonde? They look completely different with blonde looking gold rather than brownish striped hair
oh yeah this is what causes second trimester abortions. a woman is ready to be a mother and then a chad looks at her so she snuffs out the lesser man's seed. i think youre probably already living the sexless life of misery you deserve. maybe work on not deserving it so much
Loyalty, trustworthiness, the ability to provide, one could speculate these traits to be crucial for a male configured to deal with and be attractive during rough times. War, famine, pestilence.. that's when this kind of man historically might have been in high demand. Along the same lines, there could however also be what's essentially a fair weather male configuration. The archetypal Casanova is not necessarily loyal, trustworthy nor a provider. The uncanny ability of the Casanova to philander and spread his genes around to many a woman may however be distinct advantage to his woman when the same trait is inherited by her sons. When times are good and most children survive even without the help of the father, the advantage provided by the Casanova might be in higher demand and what women tend to prefer. And in developed nations at least, our modern time is in a historical context basically fair weather which never ends.
Well, interesting and i must agree to almost everything... However... Women are proned to end relationships in way higher numbers than men. And that actually contradict most of the points made in this video, that i actually agree with on almost everything. So, there is some more to look into there. But the explanation could be, they trade up, up, up and therein lies the breakup statistics for women.
Some of your normies and subfives are really attractive. There is a subjective, gray area when it comes to attraction. I think weight and age are the primary driver of attractiveness. So it's not all hopeless. Unless you are a guy under 5'7". Women discriminate based on height big time. Which sux, but I guess it's natural selection. That's why people are getting taller
People aren't getting taller. Statistically, in a lot of western countries there is a regression in average height compared to 10 years ago. Average height of late Gen X, milennials and zoomers is the same.
Decent video but WW glossed over the fact that the state can take man's role as provider. Also, WW didn't mention that modern women can make their own money and lots of it. These 2 things combined compel women to put looks far above all when choosing a mate. This is still a blackpill channel, right?
They do earn more, but they want their partner to earn even more anyway. Still, they'd certainly gladly cheat on their rich betabuxxer with a homeless Chad.
We gotta wake up the simps, stop shelling out money to these girls for nothing, stop promoting them stop watching them. If you know a simp call them out
Two comments: 1) One area WW has not covered (probably because of the focus on < 40 singles), is what percentage of single, available men and women actually WANT to date. A 2020 Pew Research Study found that 71% of U.S. single available women over 40 were NOT looking to date, while only 42% of U.S. single available men over 40 were NOT looking to date. An AARP study from about 10 years earlier found the same level of discrepancies. 2) I have a personal female friend (and this situation is becoming more common) who decided to have children without a man, but is NOT on state assistance - she makes a good income as an attorney. So there are more than a few women who decide to have children on their own who are self-sufficient. Comment #1 actually adds to WW's arguments, in my view.
Feels about right. Given the steepness of the pyramid of financial success for anyone. Would think that anyone able to raise a child on a single income with no state or partner help would be a minimum. Having said that partners do come with hidden liability, I could see this as an ideal that many women would aim for. With a friends with benefits type side deal.
It is something I have seen anecdotally. Older women will generally remove themselves from the dating pool and either have a child through a surrogate and IVF without a man, adopt a pet or even seek a same-sex partner. They will all happily embrace celibacy. If she does find someone, the man needs to exceed previous expectations and standards set by ex's. And you're competing with only the positive aspects of those ex's too. Older men generally still look for a partner, still have their libido and will lower their standards to rock bottom as long as they get action in the bedroom from a woman.
Another point WW missed is independent women are also increasingly opting for surrogacy from quality sperm donors and this is a point which is actually far more important as women can choose the quality sperms and raise a baby on their own because of their increasing power of finance (as a lot of women have started earning more than men) and feminist movement and they can also avoid sex which again will be a bad thing for men.
Also There is also increase of LGBTQ women which again takes a negative effect of single men, so many things going against Sub Five single men that it is very unfortunate.
Sympathy dates do exist they are called foodie dates. A women just fakes interest gets food/experience and the guy gets a it was a great night and a half assed hug. Then a text next week saying a don't think we going to work out.
@@MrsNicolas girl you were doing it because you wanted the sexual experience with those guys anyways it does not mean that you cared about the guy since you still think of them as sympathy dates. yo probably ghosted them after that. and if you freindzoned then after then you are a walking red flag to be honest.
@@snipe4ReVeNgE Naw, majority turned into relationships because they were eagered to have a mate, as they rarely if ever got attention from women. 🤷🏽♀️ I enjoyed dating social awkward men, they have low body counts. Lol.
13:30 Hypergamy may be somewhat innate, but much of it is learned. As you said, men would do the same thing if they had the same option. Ergo, it is not really some kind of mystical innate aspect of the masculine vs feminine. Instead, it is simply about options. Another point.... Hypergamy has changed. In the past, women really needed a man for financial support. For that reason, hypergamy had a large financial aspect and women were far more prone to withhold sex for marriage. Looks were also less important. But look at today's dating market. Women are chasing Chad far more than before. Money is still a pre-requisite, but it is not nearly enough (as it was in the past). Now a man must be way above average in looks as well. If a man is not a Chad, his only real shot at having success with women is fame. Women are now sleeping with Chad and raising their children instead of pairing off and forming families. So while women certainly do expect a man to have a higher income, they are more than willing to have casual sex with most any Chad, regardless of income. We are returning to a form of polygamy. But instead of one man having 10 wives, we have 10,000 men sharing 100,000 women. In both cases, 90% of men are living in a world with few or no options.
Absolute CRAP. Most babies are born to AVERAGE PEOPLE. Not average women and chads. Get a CLUE. All this nonsense is to pray on insecure men. To sell them dating courses and other B.S The only time men struggle is when they are LAZY (OVERWEIGHT) Very short (SUB 5 5") And ugly (A sub 4 in the face) And most men are none of those three. The problem with men is they want better than them. And thats why they struggle. They will be a 4 and want a 7 plus. NOT HAPPENING. Unless she's a goldigger and you are loaded. If you are a 5 as a man you go for a 4 or 5 woman. And that is THAT. IF you are a 7 you go for a 5 to 7 woman. You never go for above your looks match. Thats when you are going to FAIL. In the longterm.
Have to disagree with the makeup thing, I prefer when most women don't wear makeup. And also now a days women don't have to worry so much about trustworthness of Chad because they'll always have a beta bucks right there to help raise Chad's kid.
I can sort of see what he is talking about with the makeup, but I have always preferred less makeup, and I have developed an instinctive reaction to women with a bunch of makeup. I immeditely do an internal judgement and consider "why". Like why so much. Who taught you or rewarded you to do that. Those aren't the kind of people I value. Those who shaped this behavior in you are likely people you still associate with. What other superficial qualities have you absorbed from them? Makeup is expensive and doesn't make you taste good, plus if guys want to see through it they can -- in person at least. It has gotten to the point where I don't look twice.
It all makes perfect sense. Very thorough and easy to digest. Only left out one thing; that even when you're the 10/10 guy in all areas, you will still have women who will be dissatisfied. What was once evolutionary advantages has become toxic and detrimental.
Man I could r barely get a boyfriend when I was 19. If something happens to my current boyfriend and I end up single at 32 now I’m screwed (even though y’all also say all of us have lines of dudes) lol we don’t.
13 years ago and now are completely different times. Times and people changed a lot. Women raised the standards so much that left men no other option but to fight hard for scraps.
Do you think making a dating apps, with no algorythm and video greetings, and video calls instead of text would change dating apps for the better? Right now the biggest issue is, that women cannot really see how you are as a person. That is especially important when you are average dude
it's been explained women have lower body mass than men, fewere cells mean fewer chance of getting cancer. their xx chromosome gives them superior immune systems, in the past women didnt smoke or dink as much as men, women eat fewer protein than men, women in the past were exposed to less environmental hazards than men , so hence why their life expectancy is typically higher than men. now why their fertility is shorter window is because of their eggs. they stop ovulating after a certain point.
This is true and understandable but most modern woman think they are at least an 8 so in that sense they're only going for 9 or 10s occasionally an 8, this as we know has been backed up by stats, the 90/10 rule we all know about, sooo any men 8ish -6ish / 10 are basically getting hardly anything or perhaps having to go after or accept 5s and below... The women are all going after the same guys and getting ran through or led on cheated on, men are getting hardly anything but maybe scraps or below, the only people who really benefit are chads and Princess Perfects.... What needs to change is women getting some reality back so date on their REAL levels....
Exactly, most of these women dont see is that these "creeps" are asking them out becauae the "creep" naturally sees her on his level. You yhink that "creep" woukd ask her out again if he one day and woke up as a chad? That body positivity bubble needs to pop
I see my son and his circle of friends from college. They all come from good families, none are ugly, are athletic not nerdy and all are goal oriented majoring in engineering, science or computer tech. The few that have girlfriends are either overweight or are no higher than a 6 out of 10.
We sorta do, in the Middle Ages most people had recourse at least, usually through family, not to mention most people made their living simply by farming. Nowadays, if you’re broke, that’s it, you either get more money or die a nobody.
it’s a crazy world the dating game is, the way i move is now i don’t look for women i don’t go out my way. i don’t even look to date i just work & do my hobbies. why try and please people who not checking for you? 🏄🏽♂️
I actually disagree with you that femininity represents "submissive and admiration". In modern Western nations, femininity currently represents entitlement, assertiveness, and dominance. Women are trained from a young age to have masculine personality traits.
I think your being very disengenious with the post about the woman and her "Chad" bf... She actually gets ALOT of hate. she constantly gets comments saying why is he with her. I've seen them. I've seen all the videos done on them.
This is why I will never mock men who pay for sex, kind the contrary. You will save mental sanity and depending on your looks you will also save money. Plus you get acess girls out of your league. If you're going into the casual dating market route, you're not much safer from STDs(not that you should do things unprotected with strangers anyway) and you will also face a higher risk of a false rape accusations. So I recommend that you pay for sex until you find a girlfriend, specially if you're virgin. Once you made sex you can talk with women more naturally.
As a woman, I'm absolutely against s** work. It should be prohibited. I'm not doing it to stop men from getting laid, but only because I'm afraid my daughter (if I ever have one in the future) will consider this a career option at all. This is the dirtiest, filthiest, most degrading job on earth.
@@vhhj5517 I never said we are on the SAME side lol Just pointed something most of you females need to comprehend better and ain't nobody got time to explain that for ya. First, because you're adult enough to think by yourselves and secondly, we as a men are not here to fill some white spots in your common sense education
You cannot change the mindset of women, even when they are over 40 and had their kids (cannot have any more kids) Divorced, They still want a man with all of the Sixes, even though they do not need to biologically need the requirement anymore for reproduction
I know some guys who can sleep with fugly girls and somehow enjoy it. I guess I might be shallow because I'd rather do without than hookup with fugly girls. They say mopeds & fugly girls are both fun to ride until your friends see you on them. I do think mopeds are fun to ride but not fugly girls.
Imo mopeds are fun, too! I rode a classic moped, restored, full throttle 43 kph. It was genuinely fun, didn't care who saw me on it, it was just too awesome 🤣 I gave a fugly girl a try, too 😬 Moped is preferred.
@@jamesmohab if you’re even thinking about implying personality is the reason why, I have a video right above this comment section literally proving you wrong.
This channel is a goldmine. Wow. Thank God I found this channel. I really really appreciate you. From this one video alone I learned alot. Thank you so much.
Preventing human extinction. Look at China and India. They didn't think baby girls had anything to offer, who would grow up to be women. As a result, Chinese men are kidnapping or buying brides from other countries. When there's a surplus of men, then the country will eventually reach a peak in population before ultimately declining and might never recover. Thinking men have more to offer in these two countries, it why China and India is projected to have a major decline within the next 100 years. Why else would China reverse their 1 child policy back in 2016....they finally realize what girls/women offer. 😏
25:52 Weird... this same girl in these tiktoks made a follow up addressing all the hate she was getting/ people saying the guy should date someone better... also in another video, all her hate comments were getting highlighted
I noticed the same thing! I think they were mostly getting hate comments but have later deleted them? Or maybe Wheat Waffles lied about this despite of what he said..
If we think about evolution as a species and our instincts optimized at improving the species from our self, it all makes sense. When I say genetics, I dont just mean looks or health. This includes positive traits such as confidence, intelligence, social competence, or any other positive trait that can be taught by the father. Every man's goal is to spread and further their genetics as far as possible, regardless of their viability, and regardless of the quality of woman. Id say this applies unless the woman is a LARGE margin more unattractive than the man as that would be noticeable genetic average drop between the average man to woman. For women, this is much more complicated and important. Women are the great genetic filter. They decide who's genetics lives and who's dies. Their entire imperative is about genetic improvement. It makes sense why women wouldn't choose to date down or even equal in genetics and want to date up. Even if by a small margin, the goal is to increase their genetic average with whoever they choose. It makes sense why a guy thats a 10 can have many women and they will accept sharing that man as any emotional sacrifice will be instincually worth it. Globalization has ruined the "dating game" but its perfecting genetic optimization, letting lower genetic women meet higher genetic men. The only limitation to this benefit on the genetic pool is contraceptives as that reduces the genetic benefit of globalization. On paper, this works perfectly for genetic optimization as more women have more access to higher quality men, leaving little to no room for the lower and average quality men. This means that over time, the lower echelons get genetically filtered out and standards get raised. In 100s of years, our 8s and 9s could be considered average if not worse. It sucks for most guys' genetic imperative but its really interesting from an evolutionary perspective. Basically, we each individually need to become the perfect man and hope the majority does not decide to do the same. If every man were to raise their quality, standards would just increase to where the hard to change looks would have even more impact on choice, is it has. But for those reading, its not all looks. More men than ever are feminine and lack the positive quality traits I mentioned that go into that instinctual choice. Get your looks up, get social competence, confidence, intelligence, and of course wealth and you will see a drastic change in your quality of life, both with women and your view of life.
@@jamesmohab they do it if the guy has money. There are lots of rich losers without social skills. They won’t do it without an incentive in it for them
@@marcusmcgraw3519 im not talking about "rich losers with no social skills" im talking baout guys who arent that good looking but are confident/funny/have good personalities/etc, you know, regular guys (leave it to incels to think the whole world of men is divided into chads and jobmaxxing gamer nerds)
@@jamesmohab right, well typically the man is bringing something tangible to the situation. We have no idea if he’s getting used or not Here’s a good way of life to live by. Girls are stupid and see guys as “providers”. If you’re a guy, you should be looking to provide FIXED resources rather than VARIABLE resources. Fixed resources include stuff where you have already paid, for your own personal use. This includes stuff house, car, tv. Girls will try to exploit every VARIABLE resource that you have (money, gas, food). Don’t let them do this unless she offers you something worthwhile If you want girls to see you as a man worthy of respect, direct them towards using your fixed resources and let them know that you won’t let them use your variable resources unless there’s something in it for you. They have to be put in their place and they have to be kept there
One small point i disagree with, you say if men had the same number of women chasing them as women had men chasing them, they would also take the top girl. Most men would just fuck them all, that is in essence why women can date up, because men will fuck down, the supply of men available to women therefore is large, but in the past there was a shift slightly when it came to relationships, men werent as interested in staying with a girl in the past, this created low supply for women trying to get something longer term, i think from what i have personally observed, this has changed slightly, i have two friend groups, a friend group of chads and a friend group of definitely not chads, the group of chads have a new girl every couple of weeks, the group of not chads either have someone that theyve been with for over a year, or they have no one. Me personally, when i go out with the chads i can pick up girls pretty easily, when i go out with the weirdos i dont have a chance 😂
Another well thought out video. No playing around. Always provides studies to back conclusions. A lot of men are left behind wondering why they aren't good enough for a relationship. You only have so much time. Knowing the truth can provide a better acceptance as to why things are the way they are.
@@brandonwilliams4551 literally, a man can spend years and years trying to find true success in a relationship. Eventually, one will get old and the basic kind of relationship (usually 18-50ish) can evolve into something much different, then eventually after that all time may be lost for an indivisual. It happens to hundreds if not thousands of men everyday.
It's sad but it's natural that the 6+ will get a ONS with CHAD. The bigger problem is that the 5- are getting simped on, so they end with a unrealistic image of theyselfs.
The 10s won't give them the time of day. They start hitting on the 9. The 9s won't give them the time of day. They start hitting on the 8. The 8 won't give them the time of day... So on and so forth. It's way less inflated for men, but we also try to punch above our weight. The core difference is that men are ok settling below their weight.
Very interesting but I think he contradicts himself when he says the 28 year old woman is at a disadvantage in finding a new boyfriend. At the beginning he says that attractive women have hardly any difficulty in finding a boyfriend. They only have to choose the most advantageous one.
@Matt Joseph I agree. A prime example of this is the singer Ciara and her Football husband Russell Wilson. In the USA, 85% of American Blaq women from the ages of 20 and up are either overweight or obese. That means 15% are at a healthy weight. A healthy fit single mother, has a greater chance of being picked than a fat childless woman. Ciara was one of those fit single mothers, and she had easy access to men like Russell Wilson. Sure he could've picked any number of fit childless women, but how many come in his line of vision, especially ones that he desires? 🤔 So the 28 year old has to keep herself up in order to compete with the younger... fit... childless women.
2:55 This is an illusion. It's not actually true. They can hook up with those guys, but they can't get commitment from them. Many many many women are dying alone because of their delusion on this matter.
3:41 We also don't have to speak of hypotheticals when it comes to men being put in their position. Every "chad" is already in that position. The ones who want to settle down, do find somebody. Alternatively, you can live and work in SEA for a couple months. You will get the same experience. Women literally throwing themselves at you. Secretary at work throwing her daughter, niece, unmarried sister at you. And, again, the men I worked with in SEA... they may have enjoyed it for a year or two, but they settled down and chose 1 woman. Those that didn't; never wanted to settle down. When presented with these options, it's overwhelming at first... but men adjust and make a choice they can live with. Western women are too entitled for that. These women want to lock down the top 5% of men; but are incapable of doing so. Refuse to change their situation. They could move to Uganda and lock down a Tyrone; that's their equivalent of 40yr old dudes that move to Thailand to find happiness. Entebbe is a very comfortable place to live. They could work on self improvement to be a better person. They could stop having messy drama. They could not have another guy' children. So no, I reject your follow-on statements as well. We men are very aware of where we fit in society. And the solutions to our problems always involve tangible change; not wallowing in delusion on social media and blaming everyone else.
