8 Clear Signs Of Inside Job And False Flag Op Behind Kremlin Drones Attack 

The best way to help the channel: 🔴 buymeacoffee.com/INSIDERUSSIA 🔴 patreon.com/INSIDERUSSIA

I'm a little bit upset that the UK didn't get blamed this time, I mean we normally get blamed, regardless of what it is. Are we being censored, are we being excluded? Why rule us out? We're capable, we could have done it, we have easy access to drones ! I feel we're being ignored, and I don't like it.

The false flag operation didn´t even damage the flag

The drones didn't even hit the dome. They were remotely detonated in the air to make sure they wouldn't cause any damage. It looks like fireworks were used because no shockwave and not even the flag on the dome is affected. Cheap tricks.

Who had his/her camera zoomed exactly on the spot where the drone exploded? It is certainly not a CCTV camera. Who was there with their camera zoomed on that specific spot at 2:00 AM!! A tourist?!!

The single biggest factor indicating a false flag operation was the small amount of damage involved.

I can't see this being anything other than a pathetic inside job.

Steven Seagal did it ! He is experienced in "special effects", convinced russian citizen and great fan of Vladimir.

Thank you so much Konstantine! I’ve found that you never lie or exaggerate, and your analysis of the situation is very appreciated.

I love how the camera was perfectly centred and focussed on the spire of the dome itself in order to perfectly capture the perfectly-choreographed pyrotechnic charge detonate right on cue, immediately after the expertly-controlled and backlit drone flies smoothly into view..

You didn't mention the personnel climbing the stairs to the top of the dome as the drone approached. You know - to make certain nothing caught fire from the flashy but non-explosive pyrotechnics.

В 1991 Россия сжалась до границ начала 18 века. Плешивец начал войну за восстановление границ середины 20-го века, но по итогу получит границы начала 16-го века. Слава Украине!

Well said! I find it amusing that the self proclaimed 2nd strongest army is readily announcing it's incompetence and impotence in stopping two tiny drones.....

Russian media had suggested some months ago that they had installed air defences in Moscow and around the Kremlin. If this drone can get through, then these defences cannot be that good. This incident may actually incite further attacks from russian anti-war rebels.

Two more to make it an even 10. Why were the lights off in only that building when they are never off? And, why were two guys climbing up there just as the drone hit? Answer 1. Because they wanted to make it look like the drones knocked out the lights. Answer number 2. To contain a fire if one broke out. However, with a slate roof, there was little danger of that.

Yes, I don't many people are going to fall for this. When I saw it on the news, first think i thought where the damage?

If the Ukrainians wanted to make a statement or a valid threat they would definitely make it on a larger scale. And with more style. :D

Great material👍. The video shows that there were two workers on the roof who were waiting to put out a possible fire.😁

The false flag operation didn´t even damage the flag. I don't remember so much noise when their flagship was sunk.

Last question. Why are 2 guys climbing up the top of the Kremlin in the middle of the night - in general. Why exactly when the first drone hits?

I actually have nothing to add to what you have said, it is clear to me, 100 points that this was an inside job. Anyway, stay safe together with your family Konstantin. For now again grts from the Netherlands, you are doing a fantastic job by making these videos.

They had a guy on CNN who was the only Russian MP to oppose the occupation of Crimea in 2014 - he is now living in exile. He said that this was done by Russian partizans to try and get the Russians to cancel the May 9th parade. he also said that he knew who did it! (I have no idea if this is true or not, but this is a more plausible story than accusing the Americans and would also explain the 12 hour silence better.)

Those were not real explosions - they were display fireworks to give a visual display.

As Russ Martin said. Also the effects of even a 'fireworks' explosion from a small drone 'attack' would be a better visual effect at night. Something that size in daylight would seem almost like nothing.

I would humbly add one other factor I have noticed after the "bombing" and that any military expert in the comments could perhaps explain in more correct technical terms. This factor is the color, the way the explosion propelled itself from the supposed hit point, and the extent of the blast, that is gunpowder or a similar explosive, it is not, for example, C4 military grade. I find these actions by Russian officials both amusing and worrying, since it is a sign they have no more options left. Good video my friend.

What you just explained I and entire World agree with you 100%, well done Konstantin, take care and be safe wherever you are ❤️🙏

I love your short 20 minutes or less videos. My schedule do not allow for longer videos. I think you would get more viewers with shorter videos. Great work very informative

תודה!

I agree with you,100 percent. Thanks for your great analysis.

Finally some reasonable questions.

You're 100% right. Greets

💯 % Agree with your analyzes Konstantin. My hubby and have discussed this too, and I of course mentioned your thoughts and analyzes about it. There is a whole sea of 🐟🐟🐟 and one and another 🦈 behind all this Mess. Thank you so much for sharing your analyzes and questions as always Konstantin. Wishing you a great sunday as possible 🌞❤️ Looking forward to your stream tonight.

I think the main reason for doing it at night was: That tiny flame might not have really been visible for many people during the day. Also less people would have heard it. I mean there wasn't any real damage according to the videos. So such a tiny fire would not have been visible from very far during daylight.

The drone did not hit the building. It exploded above the building and then fell on to the roof. If Ukraine were to try and hit that building, they would use something a little bigger, which would do a lot more damage 😂😂✌️🇺🇦. Great channel nel and brilliant content, stay safe.😊😊

Yeh boi! The cut to the stock photo of the guy holding the fish had me dead 🤣 Lots of people are talking about your take on this. I think I have to side with Inside Russia on this one.

Nailed it

Hi Rex from Cape Town here. Maybe it was the British who finally released Guy Fawkes and instructed him to set off the fireworks display over the Kremlin. Keep up the good work, Konstantin!

I loved the cinematic HD video recording of the 2nd drone flyby it was a directors wet dream, we had the mystical full moon hanging there in the sky behind the Dome and the upright pole of Russian masculinity, the fluttering flag to the forefront of the image and the power of the Kremlin Dome sandwiched between the Moon goddess and the sacred flag and then we had this little pop pop drone slowly flying in front of this incredible imagery in a beautiful serene manner and then in a great flash of magnesium pyrotechnics and a cloud of blackpowder from the firecraker, the drone fell from the sky in bits. Magnificient! .. clearly the first drone flyby wasn't cinematic encough and so they sent up the second drone after reviewing the film.

And why were two people on a ladder on the roof before it happened (at 3 am)?

Ha, I have seen bigger fireworks in down town Helsinki on News Years eve. What is all the fuss about?

Look at the reflection, it looks like the guy is holding something. Perhaps operating that drone.. 😉

Thank you Konstantin ✊🏻👊🏻👍🏻. I have been eagerly awaiting this ! False flag 😎

That "poking a bear with a small needle" analogy you used is spot on and hilarious

Clearly a Ruzzian provocation ... no doubt about it.

Spot on. Only one thing missing - at the end: "No further questions. I rest my case."

That explosion looks like a theatrical stunt trick explosion, like when a magician makes his attractive assistant reappear.

Those drones looked like they self destructed .🤔 Duma benefits

Question 9. Why were there two people on the roof before the attack?

Excellent analysis! Makes sense to me.

My analysis : The two Amazon delivery drones have been trying to deliver the fresh underwear for mister Putin ...

The drones look more like fireworks thank effective explosive.

False flag was my 1st idea about this "incident". Btw I really love that you call 1999 bombing false flag 👍

There has never been an excuse for the way your nation acts ever none

Good description of what happened...

People of Russia, my brothers and sisters in soul. Let no man forget how good you are. You are people. Do you know what is there, waiting, beyond Kremlins walls, behind Putin? FREEDOM! Take it, it's yours!

Great video! Thx for your analyzes... I really like the way you made this video, not to long and on the point!!!👍

Looks a lot more like simple fireworks than it looks like explosives, doesn't it

I AGREE. IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. SMELLS OF A RED FLAG EVENT, EXACTLY AS YOU STATED. THE EXPLOSION ALSO DID NOT LOOK BIG.

Thanks as always!

As always, your analysis is pretty convincing. The last sign is the tell. No damage.

Agree with your analyzes Konstantin

Thank you! Spot on!

The so-called drone attack was a terrible fireworks display. It doesn't look like there was any property damage.

...and wouldn't they make shure,whoever they say does this, that there would be more damage than that firework? Thanks Konstantin for your great work❤

It was just another "spezial Military Opperation"

Keep it up Constantine, thanks.

I notice the drone operator on the roof flinched before the drone exploded.

You are absolutely right!

Everything going according to the plan.

@INSIDERUSSIA another brilliant & hilarious video K! So many logical questions that nobody in Russia is answering 😎

great analysis!

It looks like extremely minor damage. More for looks than damage.

Happy Sunday Konstantine. But it made Putin and Russia look weak and incompetent, i dont quite get it?

I do so agree with you Konstantin! You are spot on...

Excellent analysis!

Thanks!

You are the King of Sarcasm! Great analysis. Love your channel ❤

Great analysis Konstantin 👍

9:37 why two: the exposure of cameras was set wrong for the first drone filming, thus they needed to get two fsb photo specialists on the roof to measure lighting and then they released only the latter succesful "film'"

What a great Video. ❤

Why 2 people were climbing the roof of Kremlin exactly in the moment of the drone attack? What were they doing up there?

I agree with you. Lets see now if its a hinging point of escalation.

Good to see you again Constantine

KONSTANTIN, as usual you are spot on! Who would send drones packed with the power of fireworks?

Spot on!!

Theres is a great quote on how to spot a Ruzzian False Flag Ops. "If it has low poduction value, looks cheap, low effort, it must be a False Flag Operation."

HEY KONSTANTIN !!!!!!! Isee absolutely no exaggeration here. spot on.

Right on Konstantin.Nailed again.

He is so desperate to have the rightous option to bring out the Nukes,,,

Good Points to think about...

Thank you for sharing.

Desperate times. It looks like an old remote control plane, with a petrol bomb attached. No thought was given to how crappy it looked. Are they trying to fool the simple minds only? crazy stuff

Your way of analysing is great!

😂LMAO 👍🏼 maybe it was a manned drone - manned by Combat Squirrels

Those two explosions didn’t even knock the flagpole down.🤣🤣🤣🤣 😊

Thank you for your explanation Konstantin!

spot on !

If that was a "False Flag" then it was pathetic.

I've heard an analysis from Anders Puck Nielsen that this is not a false flag, because Russian false flags have 3 characteristic features: 1. They have poor production, that is sloppy and appears fake; 2. State media will talk the story up rather than burying it; and 3. They make Russia look good, rather than being embarrassing. Anders says this attack fails all three criteria. The video appears to be believable, without multiple camera angles, bad acting, editing, etc. that make it look fake. Russian media started amplifying other stories fairly quickly. It embarrasses Russia that the Kremlin could be attacked effectively. Anders is a professional military analyst, and is usually pretty good. But in this case I didn't find him convincing, and under the right conditions (desperation) I could see a false flag not following the pattern he described. I found your points more compelling in this case. My immediate thought was this was an attempt to justify full military mobilization and encourage the support of the Russian public.

Awesome video! 👍