No video :(

9 Biggest Little Women Differences Between The Movie And Book

Подписаться 7 млн

Просмотров 71 тыс.

50% 1

New movie Little Women looks a bit different than the original book.
SUBSCRIBE for more TheThings ► bit.ly/TheThing...
The Cutest Baby Yoda Scenes That Make Us Melt Inside
► • The Cutest Baby Yoda S...
Bombshell: Everything The Movie Got Right And Wrong ► • Video
[150-WORD DESCRIPTION FOR WRITERS TO FILL IN]
Back in 1868, the first volume of Louisa May Alcott's novel, "Little Women" hit the shelves. And shortly after, in 1869, the second volume of this timeless novel would follow suit. Since then, there have been many renditions of this literary masterpiece. In 1994, the cinematic remake of "Little Women" starred Winona Ryder and Christian Bale. But the novel-turned-movie is once again getting revamped as of 2019, and it has a brand new and very promising cast.
Saorise Ronan is all set to play Jo March. Eliza Scanlen is ready to make waves as Beth. Florence Pugh will step into Amy's shoes. And Emma Watson will take the stage as Meg. The March sisters are ready to bring "Little Women" to life once again. But this time around, plotlines are bound to stray from the novel’s original path. In this video from TheThings, we reveal the top 10 differences between the "Little Women" novel and its brand new 2019 film adaptation.
New Videos!: • Uploads
Most Popular Videos!: • Most Popular | The Things
Disney Facts You Will LOVE!: • Playlist
EVERYTHING Nickelodeon!: • EVERYTHING Nickelodeon...

Опубликовано:

14 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 127

@Paula_Shelton 4 года назад

I don’t believe Emma Stone would have been right for Meg. Emma Watson was perfect.

@XeaRae 4 года назад

Paula Shelton I disagree. Emma Stone is a really good actress. I think she would have portrayed Meg’s emotions really well. I don’t think emotions are Emma Watson’s acting forte.

@_william_1405 4 года назад

XeaRae sorry but for me Emma Watson it’s better

@aliceinrandomland7007 4 года назад

So true

@lovetolovefairytales 2 года назад

I'm surprised Emma Watson even agreed to play Meg, given she was all salty about Cinderella not being feminist enough for her. Meg is very classic female and not something I'd expect Emma to be okay with.

@iicookieii4485 4 года назад

so funny that Emma Watson was going to be in La La Land and Emma stone got it. And now Emma stone was supposed to be in Little Women and Emma Watson got it 😂

@leonakusasiracheryl5676 4 года назад

Ikr

@tommoncrieff1154 4 года назад

Emma Stone won multiple best actress awards for LaLaLand which Emma Watson could never have done because she's not remotely such a good actress. To be fair, she's well cast as Meg and is better suited to ensemble pieces.

@ROBYNMARKOW 4 года назад

& yet they're both v different -type actresses..( Imo anyway)

@sisters1662 4 года назад

And they both have the same name as me

@aliceinrandomland7007 4 года назад

IKR

@Lau.mp4 4 года назад

Florence Pug has me DYING.

@vickilaird2770 4 года назад

In the book Jo DID change the ending of her novel like the publisher said...

@felicity1877 4 года назад

Jo doesn't write a novel. Alcott did change the ending if you mean that.

@sarahsilva6226 4 года назад

Felicity Jo absolutely wrote a novel. And sent it to Fredrick who had it published.

@felicity1877 4 года назад

All I remember from the book is that Friedrich didn't like Jo's sensation stories. He got touched by a poem by Jo and returns that's why. The poem is about the four sisters and I think this is the one thing always replaced with Little Women in all movies. If I'm wrong, you have to tell me with quoting the scene you mean.!!!

@sarahsilva6226 4 года назад

@@felicity1877 There are sensational stories, and then the poem, and then the novel that finally starts making her a name and money, which continues in the next two novels as she become well known. It's after Beth dies that she starts writing novels that, according to her father "There is truth in it, Jo, that's the secret. Humor and pathos make it alive, and you have found your style at last. You wrote with no thoughts of fame and money, and put your heart into it, my daughter." Chapter 41

@felicity1877 4 года назад

@@sarahsilva6226 Thank you for reminding me. I love this quote! Although I thought it is only one little story printed in the newspaper, I think it counts as a novel as well as the following ones.Talking about truth, humor, pathos and heart, it's justified to take Little Women as Jo's novel. But there is no single book Jo sent to Friedrich and he published it secretly. I think that's why the new LW movie is better. Because Jo publishes her novel by herself and doesn't need Friedrich to get it finally.

@sarahsilva6226 4 года назад

This seems more based on comparing movies to each other; the mentions of Any are about the 1994 movie not the book. She’s absolutely aware of her family’s status and the book says she feels it the most keenly. She has a speech in the novel about money and men having power and why she needs to marry a rich man. Much of the rest of this is just a visual medium vs a written one. Of course a movie focuses more on looks.

@judithberman7566 4 года назад

She hasn't read the book so she does not know what she is talking about. The differences are quite significant. Having said that , THIS Laurie is like the one I always imagined.

@love2000amglam 2 года назад

There were a few scenes in this movie that were exactly as I imagined too. ✨

@felicity1877 4 года назад

Everyone: Talks about different movie adaptions if talking about differences. No one: Mentions that this movie is the closest adaption, but has still the big difference: Amy doesn't travel with Aunt March in the book, but with Aunt and Uncle Carol and Cousin Flo. I hate it that they are again excluded....

@thesunisbright5515 4 года назад

Oh right that gets so lost in the adaptations I almost forgot about it

@bressley4life666 4 года назад

I watched the movie yesterday. I love the differences and similarities

@imahecc585 4 года назад

Comments, 98. Me: Can I see them? RU-vid: *never*

@supernoon9018 4 года назад

Why Emma Watson and Emma Stone always compete for a role in a film. first la la land, beauty and the beast, and now this.

@luciadilazzaro2285 4 года назад

If Emma Stone had been here, she would have played Meg yo perfection

@ROBYNMARKOW 4 года назад

Haircuts? Except for Jo,a woman usually never cut her hair. I think hairstyles would be a more appropriate word.

@icansleepallday6377 4 года назад

i prefer the 2019 version to the 1994 i must say even if i watched it all my childwood and it was one of my grand mother favorite movie.

@gabriellacurry-greene1323 4 года назад

oh my god it is pronounced Pew not pug her name is Florence Pugh

@athulaperera3939 4 года назад

Some things never change like im holding on tight to the book...

@XeaRae 4 года назад

Athula Perera I see what you did there

@albertodillon 4 года назад

" Little Women " is a good novel l am reading now but l have seen the movie too

@crystaliclake 4 года назад

Who likes the 1994 version better? (I enjoyed the 2019 one but love the 1994 one)

@tiinake 4 года назад

1994 was the best. 2019 did not like it at all

@AudreyC379 4 месяца назад

Neither of them were great, IMO, but the 1994 version was better and has better casting choices. Beth and Laurie are better, but other than that, far prefer the 94 version.

@double_kvee3370 3 года назад

it's pugh...sounds like peww peww peww🔫🤠

@erikalerant3294 2 года назад

The pronunciation of Pugh is not pug, it's piuh, well researched video.

@christinanoxon4679 4 года назад

I haven't see the movie yet I want to see it so bad

@prernadhumal1917 2 года назад

U have watched it till now? Bcoz if u want i can give u link like u can watch it for free

@fannycrn_ 4 года назад

For me there are too much differences beetwenn the film and the book ! I prefer the Little Women from 1994 !

@luciadilazzaro2285 4 года назад

Have you seen the 2017 miniseries?

@mary.bx19 4 года назад

Lucia Di Lazzaro No but I have tried the series is not available. But I think it’s better (not very difficult for a book reader like me 😂)

@luciadilazzaro2285 4 года назад

@@mary.bx19 it's on RU-vid ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mCPX41bmFc4.html

@kelemwoldegebriel1142 4 года назад

My favorite character is Jo because her mood is 𝚂𝙾 "𝙸'𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕𝚜

@beckynelson6786 4 года назад

A lovely ,original version.The best!

@Nazaba09 4 года назад

Did anyone feel like marmee had more control of her daughters in the ‘94 version? It was probably greta’s writing but marmee in the ‘19 version was very liberal for lack of a better word and didn’t really control or educate or discipline. They acted much more like ‘women’ in the ‘94 version.

@elizaheathen 4 года назад

Florence Pug wow struggle bus has left the station

@DrDrama-jd1mh 4 года назад

This channel really dose like to talk about emma watson

@ladymary22 4 года назад

I like Jo but really I am cantankerous Aunt March

@georgi1690 4 года назад

I loved emma watson in little women , she portrayed meg so well! My favorite sister in the movie is meg and jo. Amy annoyed me Af but everythings good now

@hourofthehollowman 4 года назад

I watched that yesterday

@willowwagner2306 4 года назад

I clicked on this because of Emma Watson sry if i spelt it wrong

@arden961 4 года назад

Willow Wagner - ur good :)

@ashleygonzalez6837 4 года назад

It's florence Pugh (pronounced pew) not pug.

@AudreyC379 4 месяца назад

Love Emma Watson, but I'm sorry she can't do a steady American accent. She was the wrong choice to cast. Florence Pugh's accent was at least believable, although ridiculous as it was in her role of a 12 year old.

@vivianebeget 4 года назад

movies should not change have book was writen

@samamalfoy1482 4 года назад

LOL belle

@meggiemooism 4 года назад

Hed

@meggiemooism 4 года назад

LoLL

@Paula_Shelton 4 года назад

Please stop saying Pug!

@isabelleflower2235 4 года назад

Haha Florence who? Its Pugh like pew not Pugh like pug.

@mari-yg6qw 4 года назад

PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSED TO READ PUGH LIKE PIU'

@bleucremers9337 Год назад

lmao Florence Pug 🐶

@gavriellpasamonte 4 года назад

What about the servant? The servant wasn’t featured in the movie...

@RetroRockGamer 4 года назад

Hannah, the housekeeper, was most definitely featured in this movie. She was played by Jayne Houdyshell.

@suebob16 4 года назад

As far as I know, no adaptation ever introduces Esther who is Aunt March's long-time maid in the book. She makes friends with Amy during Amy's quarantine at Aunt March's home.

@luciadilazzaro2285 4 года назад

@@suebob16 Estelle? The only versión where she is show is the 2017 miniseries. She doesnt have of a role bc she barely appears in the book.

@suebob16 4 года назад

@@luciadilazzaro2285 True in the book she only appears during Amy's quarantine at Aunt March's home. But through the occasional conversation with Estelle, Amy learns about the ring that Aunt March intends to give her based on her proper behavior. The book never shows us the actual proposition like the 2019 film does. Amy sees Estelle's rosary beads and tells Estelle that she notices her look of peace after she takes her break to spend some time alone. Estelle encourages Amy to spend some similar tine alone to think good thoughts and to pray for Beth. Estelle helps Amy install a small shrine in her closet, and Amy does use it during the times she worries about Beth. And when Amy finally shows Marmee the ring Aunt March gave her, she tells her that she wants to continue wearing the ring to remind herself not to be vain and selfish. Estelle may have had a small part in the book, but I believe she was also a friendly and positive influence on the future mature Amy.

@luciadilazzaro2285 4 года назад

@@suebob16 agree

@MovieNostalgiaEdits 2 года назад

cof* Florence Pugh* not pug ma'am lol

@christopherd.1200 4 года назад

Hello- i think it would be deadly for a film version of a literary classic to be letter faithful to the novel. a little adaptation never hurts.

@bmessmark6297 4 года назад

My favourite musical number is rotten to the core

@user-qm1vn5ek1c 9 месяцев назад

Amy ! Florence Pugh

@UHFStation1 3 года назад

Too many remakes of stories simply using the familiar title for different story.

@heartz_iyah 4 года назад

This is all true

@Ak-jh5lo 2 года назад

Florence what?! PUG?! This it’s pronounced P-e-w

@mayakee1459 4 года назад

I watch the two women yesterday

@sylviejones9833 4 года назад

It's pronounced sir-sha ... not sure how this girl is pronouncing it

@mamajacquelinebts9776 4 года назад

It can be said like you have explained or like this girl said. Seer sha.

@abbiethebookhoarder6071 4 года назад

It's [pew] not [pug] ugggghhhhhh

@Tennistud6964 4 года назад

Florence Pugh ~ PUG? ~ Pew

@peterritchie5593 3 года назад

Florence Pugg???????????????????????????

@tommoncrieff1154 4 года назад

Hahahahaha. Florence PUG. Hahahaha. Shows you how illiterate the voiceover is and how little effort and research goes into these these cut and paste videos.

@armblinkworld9998 4 года назад

@ameliajane8226 4 года назад

@JS-zp8bs 4 года назад

When we gonna hear about the local trans girl from Boston in the movie Little women

@DRATHAILA 4 года назад

😢😢😢

@katemaloney4296 4 года назад

Just say 2019's version of "Little Women" is woke, and get it over with.

@moonightpayz9128 4 года назад

Oof i dunno what to comment

@emily_r2140 4 года назад

Emma watson was actually born in France

@mamajacquelinebts9776 4 года назад

Maybe so, but her parents are British, so she is at least half English lol.

@rls034 4 года назад

Jacqueline SeokJin mama are you dumb? 😂😂 she was born in Paris, France yes, but both her parents were English and she moved to Oxford (in England) when she was a young child, she is fully English

@stagnantwater2375 4 года назад

seventh

@ailsa7471 4 года назад

Early but no one cares

@kelemwoldegebriel1142 4 года назад

Same same

@GhostSjr-xk7mj 4 года назад

First

@terribleaim2510 4 года назад

FIRST

@GoGreen1977 4 года назад

I don't care how good the movie is. I was distraught as a young girl, years ago, after reading the book. I couldn't believe Jo turned down Laurie and ended up with that much older, stick in the mud, German professor. And then Laurie marries that brat, Amy. Yuck! I cried and cried. I think the current movie "sexes" up the professor to make Jo's relationship with him more palatable, but that's not how he comes across in novel. I've watched all of the previous movies, hoping some writer or director would change the ending, but of course not. Guess I'll skip this one.

@sp3491 4 года назад

I won't spoil anything, but given your point of view it sounds like you would LOVE the new movie. Some things are changed in a way that I think you would be very satisfied! Give it a shot!

@Windupchronic 4 года назад

I would say Gerwig agreed with all of your issues and addressed them.

@NS-vw8pm 4 года назад

GoGreen1977 I think every girl who reads Little Women the first time is disappointed when Jo and Laurie don’t get married, I sure was.

@mamajacquelinebts9776 4 года назад

If you listen to Jo's boys the proffersor is not a stick in the mud at all. And he adores Jo very much and trys to make her happy in every way possible. And the way they portray him in older movies, he's actually a very handsome man.

@juanaabadiebottcher5508 4 года назад

I think Jo had daddy issues because her father spent much time away because of the war, and thats why she likes the proffesor who Is middle aged and has similar character traits to her father

@llddau 4 года назад

This looks awful. Might be a good movie if you’ve never read the book or seen any other movies, but this is too many unnecessary changes that seem like they wouldn’t have made anything any better anyway. The only movie I’ve enjoyed was the 90’s one, this is just too far from the story, no point. In this video no mention of the men either, are they even in the movie? They played a huge part in the story. I’m going to read the book again and then watch the movie. I never enjoyed the older ones.

@rachaelbean1439 4 года назад

I think this movie is closer to the spirit of the book. I have seen all movies and read book. I loved the 94 movie too but I seriously think this 2019 version is way better.

@rachaelbean1439 4 года назад

@@theshamrockdolls9909 I agree Winona Ryder made an excellent Jo, Jo is described in the novel as "Fifteen-year-old Jo was very tall, thin, and brown, and reminded one of a colt, for she never seemed to know what to do with her long limbs, which were very much in her way. She had a decided mouth, a comical nose, and sharp, gray eyes, which appeared to see everything, and were by turns fierce, funny, or thoughtful.” Pity Blake Lively was too old for the role. (I am not American btw) It is sad that such an iconic American book had no American actresses taking the roles of the March girls.Kiernan Shipka from chilling adventures of Sabrina would have made an excellent Amy. I thought Laura Dern was a great Marmee I wonder if she auditioned for the girls parts in 1994?. Having a Frenchman play a German too was a shame in some ways. Pity they couldn't get Max Riemelt for Professor Baher seeing they made Baher much younger than middle aged in this movie. i just looked up hairstyles of 1860s and '70s in Vermont and the movie seemed accurate in this respect. Their clothes are colourful because in many ways the Marches are bohemian which works for me..