Let’s see... 1. Brazil 2010 2. Brazil 2012 3. 70th Anniversary GP 2020 4. Italy 2013 5. Singapore 2017 6. Germany 2019 7. Azerbaijan 2017 8. Azerbaijan 2018 You guys can add on to the list.
I think the mechanical failures shouldn't be counted because every driver suffers from these and you could end up having to remove wins if he inherited a win from another drivers breakdown. You could definaitely count any of those 6 missed races that Irvine won.
While Schumacher lost several races through no fault of his own, he also won several races through luck. The same goes for Hamilton, Senna, Prost, and others.
@@CutLeRoc not true if his teammates had realistic chance for title or wim they were winning see end of 99 also schumacher gifted barichelo two wins in usa 02 and Hungary 02
@@ricahrdb Just imagine 06, Schumi didn't retire in Suzuka and he didn't had that fuel pump issue during qualy in Interlagos. Hell, don't even need the fuel pump fix, how about that puncture with Fisi never happened?
Ferrari 4 years of dominance then Rule change, RedBull 4 years of dominance then Rule change.. Mercedes 7 years and still waiting for that rule change..
there have been 2 significant rule changes since mercedes began its dominance in 2014 and still they stay on top. That should tell you something about their efforts.
Similar to that one, I think there is Australia 06. I can’t remember if he was leading though, but I remember that when he crashed I thought “oh no he could have won this one!”
Yep... 20 - odd laps away from 97 title. A stall away from 98 title. A broken leg away from 99 title (All in at least the second best car, maybe 3rd best in 97) A broken engine away from the 06 title. With four races more luck he wins another FOUR championships. THINK ABOUT THAT.
3rd best in 97? Which team (No Williams) was better than Ferrari that year? In 99 Ferrari was the best car I think (unless so similar to McLaren) because Irvine could win the championship being worst driver than Mika.
Actually JUST finished watching the 94 Spanish Grand Prix and Schumacher didn't get stuck in 5th AFTER the first pit stop. He got stuck in 5th BEFORE the first pit. He went through 2 stops stuck in 5th. The gearbox stuck in 5th coming up the hill right before the chicane. You see him hit the auto down button and it never shifts down going into the chicane. He takes his first stop that same lap. Just wanted to throw that out there as this has been my favorite drive from him since I 2atched it that day in 94.
Canada 95, was cruising before getting jammed in 2nd gear, managed to limp back to the pits and recover to 5th. Gave the winner Alesi a lift back to the pits too. Silverstone 97, 40 seconds in the lead and a wheel bearing went (I've always assumed he had a mechanical issue before you know what happened at Jerez in 97 as he had a big lead there too) France 99 he was out front and looking in control when an electrical issue dropped him down the order. Out of the lost wins mentioned in the video, I still remember Monaco 93 like it was yesterday as I was absolutely gutted when he went out :(
It's interesting how a driver with a reputation for being utterly ruthless would basically gift wins to his teammates on occasion. Schumacher was a complex man.
I think you left out 2003 European grand prix, When he had a puncture on the closing laps, and the 2000 Monaco grid prix when an exhaust failure heated and broke the suspension.
Are you sure about Europe 2003? The only contenders in that race were Ralf and Kimi. I don’t recall Michael getting any sort of puncture/being in contention in that race.
@@bumblebity2902 He wasn't leading in Germany when he got the puncture: he was running 2nd behind Montoya. Nor was he leading at the Nurburgring before the Montoya incident: Ralf was running ahead of both of them. Neither of those are "lost wins".
I'd throw in Monza and Silverstone in 95 when he got taken out by Hill. While he wasn't leading by a massive margin, he would have won those since the Benetton that year was the best car on the grid
@@The_Curious_Cat Where were jos, lehto and herbert those years? 6th,8th? Pfft. What a joke. Hill got fired in 1995 essentially because frentzen signed before the season had finished. DC was also shown the door. Why? Patrick head didnt appreciate the failing to beat schu in the best car.
There were so many more! How about the 1998 WDC bec he stalled his Ferrari in pole position just before the formation lap in Suzuka while, leading the championship! In those 4 years from 1996-1999 he could've won atleast two WDCs. Looking at the way those Ferrari's of '96-'00 performed it's amazing he even competed for the championship. You only need to go back and watch those qualifying moments to see him power sliding across the circuit.
Hindsight is a fine thing; i cant help but wonder if Senna would have taken away at least a couple of those championships if he had lived. i think he would have at least taken 96 and 97 possibly 94 and 95 but those are less certain.
You cannot compare Michael Schumacher's wins to Hamilton. Reason why? There were 16 races in 1994 and 17 races in 1995, 2000, 2001, 2002, 16 in 2003, and 18 in 2004. If you are going to compare these results to Hamilton's wins then you must inflate Schumacher's results to the number of races per year in the current era. In other words the more the races you have now, the more you would have to inflate Schumacher's wins as the number of races per year was significantly less. Hence why Hamilton's 92 GP victories cannot be compared unless you inflate Schumacher's results. In conclusion, Hamilton would need a lot more than 92 wins to beat Schumacher's records.
As someone who was a Hakkinen fan now a Raikkonen fan when Belgium 1998 comes up ' Good Work David'. Suzuka 1998 was also another potential lost win given he stalled on the parade lap then got a puncture in the race and retired.
Yep... 20 laps away from 97 title. A stall away from 98 title. A broken leg away from 99 title (All in at least the second best car, maybe 3rd best in 97) A broken engine away from the 06 title. With four races more luck he wins another FOUR championships. THINK ABOUT THAT.
French Grand Prix 2000 he had an engine failure for the first time ever after getting beaten by the mclarens including Coulthard who gave Schumacher a middle finger possibly not happy about him pushing him wide at the Adelaide hairpin before DC had him in his sight and pushed him off wide and then coulthard pulled away from him and then seconds after that hakkinen followed Coulthard through and Schumacher was hanging on in third before the engine let go on him
*Who won those 9 races?* Monaco 2012 -> Mark Webber Belgium 1994 -> Damon Hill Monaco 2004 -> Jarno Trulli US 2002 -> Rubens Barrichello Spain 1994 -> Damon Hill-again Malaysia 1999 -> Eddie Irvine Monaco 1993 -> Ayrton Senna Belgium 1998 -> Damon HIll-3 TIMES ALREADY?! Japan 2006 -> Fernando Alonso I guess no one asked and they are said on the video, but here they are anyways...
China 2012. I think he had an engine failure while leading the race. Rosberg had about 20 wins with Mercedes and a world championship. Schumacher got a podium and a pole. If only Schumacher stayed in f1 longer.
2005 season entirely. It did it purpose to get rid of Ferrari winning (everything) but it also stole multiple victories from MSC. Not getting title - totally fine. Not getting more than one ("famous") victory - not fine.
The great Michael Schumacher should have won way way more than he did I was doing some adding up the other day and the results I got was if it wasn’t for retirements during races while leading not only would Schumacher’s win record shoot up from 91 to 111 wins his titles would also increase from 7 to 11 Stats never tell the full story and they certainly don’t tell half the story for Michael he is the greatest driver the world will ever see it’s as simple as that and it’s not because of the numbers but because of the way he achieved his success during his outstanding career Get well soon Michael we miss you very very much
You mean by the time Mercedes calls it a day. Its only the car. If Charles or Max had his and Bottas seat we would see something similar. Unfortunately F1 is shit atm.
Monaco 2004 should not be on here. He was never going to beat Trulli to that win. Monaco 2000 should be on here instead, he had a massive lead and was cruising to victory when his suspension failed.
Let's not forget his broken leg which arguably cost him another world title plus the 1997 season where he tried to take Villeneuve out. Had he races clean and won the race that's another world title. 2006 was also agonisingly close. Without the engine failure in Japan, the qualifying disaster in Brazil and the puncture during the same race he could have possibly even added another. So it's fair to say Michael could have easily finished his career with 10 world championships. The fact that his 91 wins tally was beaten by Lewis is also owed to the far fewer number of races per season that took place. All in all huge respect to Lewis and his achievements but let's keep in mind that Michael certainly didn't max out his achievement either. Both are Goats in my eyes.
or seb could be a 7 time world Champion 2009-2013 with Red Bull 2017-2018 with Ferrari with a bit less mistakes and Hamilton only 3 Time 2008 Massa 2017 -2018 Seb Things could be so different
Lewis Hamilton's lost races: 2015 Monaco - Team Pit him while in the lead, they didn't know what the gap was and threw away Hamilton's win, finished P3. 2007 China - Team left him out to dry while being in contention for the race win and with extremely worn tyres put it in the gravel on pit entry. 2018 Australia - Leading comfortably untill a VSC allowed Vettel to pit and come out ahead by less than a second. 2016 Malaysia - Leading by over 25 seconds and gets a engine failure 14 laps from the end. 2010 Spain - Puncture while leading the race comfortable and DNFed. 2020 Italy - Leading by over 15 seconds with his teammate down in sixth, team does not tell him that the Pit is closed and gets a 10 second stop go, comes out at the back and comes back to finish P7. 2012 Singapore - Dominating the race until his gearbox fails. 2012 Abu Dhabi - Car problem while leading the race, took pole and was looking good in the opening laps. 2008 Spa - Won the race, he cut the chicane because of a slippery surface, let Kimi through and then re-passed him, and even though Kimi crashed later in the lap they gave him a 20 second time penalty to give Massa the win. 2017 Baku - Vettel behind has a 10 Second Stop go penalty and is around 10 seconds ahead of a slower Riccairdo, he's headreast brakes or something like that and is forced to pit to replace it. A couple more but enough to go above 100.
- Brazil 2006 definitely, he would won this without all the issues in qualifying.. then puncture in the race etc - Japan 2006: leading the race and then retire because of engine failure (would also be his 8th title) - Monaco 2000: Suspension failure - Maybe you can add Turkey because of ferraris dumb pit stop
Another one well could be Monaco'06, where he could take not only a pole but a win on merit, but we all know, how he had thrown away everything that day
-Says Kimi Martinez on RU-vid. I'd rather listen to every F1 driver, pundit and former legend including Lauda who consider him as one of the greatest there's ever been
@@aayushkarnik7166 -Says a lot of people who know a thing or two about racing. Hamilton will be about as memorable as Jacques Villeneuve 10 years from now. Calling it.
@@HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva This is the funniest most brain-dead shit I've seen 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. You mean "a lot of people who supposedly know racing". In short, guys like you who are stuck in 2005, who can't stand watching Lewis smash the records of your favourite driver and just have blind hatred for him. Judgement clouded by an agenda. If you knew a thing or two about racing you'd have thought twice before even commenting .
@@aayushkarnik7166 'In short, guys like you who are stuck in 2005,' *You're saying that like it's a bad thing.* He's an overrated crybaby who's had the best car for the majority of his career. Face it, fanboy.
@@HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva ooooh the salt. I can taste it all the way over here. "Overrated", "had the best car", all the excuses coming out. Anything to downplay his greatness. Lmao that is enough to tell me that you are one of the self proclaimed "wHo KnOw A tHiNg Or TwO aBoUt RaCiNg" guys. Lol take the L and bounce
Pointless exercise unless you are going to deduct the races where team orders gifted Schumacher a win and add the races that Hamilton should/could/would have won but didn't. For much of Schumacher dominant years he was the team's official number one driver, which came with advantages, Hamilton has never sought or been granted that advantage, Hamilton's biggest rival has nearly always been his team mate.
bottas has had to let hamilton through on numerous occasions. the video also isn’t about hamilton so why bring him into it. and if he has to do a video on hamilton then he has to do a video on everyone else right? no? just your little golden boy? that’s what i thought
If you really think about it Schumacher lost 3 titles as a fault of ferrari 1999 Where he broke his legs because of a brake failure(teams fault) 2005 Fuel pressure problem (teams fault ) 2006 His engine exploded (teams fault) And on top of that he could've won at least 2 more titles if he stayed with benetton for a while longer so in my heart he's a 12 time world champion
the amount of retards there are in this world is astonishing. You may research how legit the benetton cars where. and if you then still proud, and how many times Micheal had a slave as teammate
@@209PH Rewatched it recently, and he was ahead of Barrichello before he crashed. Considering Rubens was leading 5 laps before the red flag, I think you could logically say he had a good shot
Aside from the entire 05 season after the FIA stepped in and purposely changed regulations to negate any advantages Ferrari and only Ferrari had. If they had treated Mercedes like they did Ferrari, Hamilton would not be any where near this mark.
Malaysia 99? Immense pressure from montezemolo? Damn straight, that's what happens when you get caught playing football with your kids instead of going back to your job. A lot of people would get sacked for that
@@Formula1Madx You need to rewatch some 90s races dude. I take it you saw the accident. I take it you saw he barely slowed down. I take it you get your f1 news and views from brit sources like sky,autosport and bbc. Fake news mate. Btw, ferrari confirmed brake failure.😉
IN CASE YOU'RE IN HURRY :- 00:42 Monaco GP 2012 01:30 Belgian GP 1994 02:20 Monaco GP 2004 03:05 US GP 2002 04:22 Spanish GP 1994 05:23 Malaysian GP 1999 06:15 Monaco GP 1993 07:05 Belgian GP 1998 07:45 Japanese GP 2006
I do believe Brazil 2006 would have been a win for Michael as I have always believed that Fisichella hit Schumacher on purpose which could have been team orders.
Martin Brundle summed up Schumacher's brilliance at the 1999 Malaysian GP beautifullly when he said "Schumacher has spent the whole race going as slowly as possible, and if he's not careful, he's still going to win. Megastar."
Schumacher won Austria 2002 and US GP 2005. Also not counting his wins in the illegal 94' Benetton. By your own logic, Lewis has already beaten Michael last season
@@a_yan6581 without their mess up at Monza and the start shit at Russia, plus Belgium, it might have been 95 at least. Then engine blow up in Malaysia 2016
The 1999 Malaysia GP was the most painful "lost win" for Michael Schumacher because he could've claimed his 3rd title in the same year but if only Ayrton Senna didn't crash at the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix and eventually became the winner of the 1999 Malaysia Grand Prix (while driving for Ferrari alongside Michael Schumacher), it won't be *TOO MUCH* painful for him! 😣
Seriously this video is sooo "what if".... Like how Lewis isn't already a 9 time (2007+2016) or more if McLaren didn't eff up 201x years, why he is not at 100 now, X amount of wins that Hulkenberg would have, X amount of races that Ricciardo should have won, etc etc. You guys making this for a segue to X amount of races X driver should have won? Hindsight is a bitch, move along.
Canada 1995 obviously. Britain 1997 should have been his, as well as the weird 1999 French Grand Prix. He should have won the 2000 Monaco Grand Prix was well, even though that one may have been self-inflicted, as well as Canada 1999.
