0:00 Intro 0:20 Start 1:59 Pope Formosus and the "Cadaver Synod" 5:07 Council of Constance and rejected decrees 19:43 Pope John XXII and the Beatific Vision Controversy 27:48 The Arian Crisis and the false equivalence with today 35:32 R&R using arguments from enemies of the Church to argue their position 39:07 St. Jerome's famous quote on the Arian Crisis 42:03 Does sedevacantism destroy the visibility of the Church? 47:55 R&R supporters don't know what the Universal Ordinary Magisterium is 50:54 Just War theory and the Crusades 54:10 On being Galileo treated pretty nicely by the Church 58:38 Wrapping Up 59:57 Outro
Superb - thank you so much, dear Nikhil. Truly happy to finally have had the chance to watch this - going to have to watch again, so many details! Hope you get to have Father on again very soon - he explains things so thoroughly. May God bless all your efforts.
If your Novus Ordo priest has a doubtful ordination because he was "ordained" by a bishop of the invalid 1968 episcopal rite, how is he going to validly consecrate the Host? You need a true priest with valid Holy Orders. Absolutely Null and Utterly Void, The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration - Rev. Anthony Cekada mostholytrinityseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NewEpConsArtPDF2.pdf
Excellent. Appreciate this presentation a lot. One observation: How come Nature supersedes the Bible on the centrality of Earth? Moses wrote the first five books, was highly educated in Pharoah's household, knew science, architecture, astronomy, languages. Many historic, archeological, health and scientific truths in the Bible have been substantiated. Yet regarding Galileo, suddenly most stumble in trying to remove the shock everyone in those times felt about Holy Scripture being refuted. Galileo actually wrote that his theory could not be proven. The book Galileo Was Wrong, The Church Was Right even has NASA and Einstein back up Scripture! Have you read it?
From a historical perspective, the heliocentric model was held as one of two possibilities until the late 1800s. Tycho Brahe had a model that answered all Galileo's objections, but had the Earth in its proper place (the center). Both were "scientifically acceptable" until anti-Catholic academics in the post-French Revolution eras needed to pull the plug on a Christian worldview (literally). Einstein's "general theory" of relativity was developed to explain heliocentricism, but it was insufficient...so he developed the "special theory", which is proof of geocentrism. Despite his flakiness in terms of the NO being Catholic, Dr. Robert Sungenis is good on this, as was the late Dr. Wolfgang Smith.
