9 Ways Honest Gun Owners Accidentally Wind Up In Jail 

Ironic, don't you smell? Honest Americans think about and consider these issues. However, modern American "law enforcers" are MORE consistent with WWII NAZIs than true Peace Officers AND "just follow odors.....oops orders" AND NEVER consider "lawful"......

I literally do not give a f about bump stocks. If anyone wants to be a Karen then they need to re evaluate the last 5 or so years and see the long game

I wish you'd stop saying 16" or less.....IT'S Less than 16", there is a difference

What torques me off about most lawyers who talk about guns, is that they constantly talk about Federal and State Laws, but they never talk about Constitutional Law, which is Supreme Law and any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void. The Supreme Court said that any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void. Lawyers need to grow a Spine and band together and take on these UnConstitutional Laws. What people don't understand is that Doctors are far more deadly than Guns ever will be. Doctors are responsible for over 8 Billion People's Deaths since the 1960s, in the United States alone. As a Journalist, I get these reports all the time. Wake up People, this Country is on the tipping point of not being the United States, but a totally different Country.

They didn’t clarify, have a gun and marijuana, or have a gun while using marijuana.

*Remember it is always about the paycheck. A bust like this is easy pickings with little risk and ones arrest metrics look good come next performance review.*

Welcome to communism

​@blackrifle6736 That's right. Go for the "low hanging fruit" and the establishment knows that the honest citizens will pay the attorney and the fines.. all that looks good to the public and helps fuel the "industry." Edit- typos corrected.

they did at one point. they really need to learn the saying, "just because you, doesn't mean you should"

Problem reaction solution...order out of chaos

if "ignorance of the law is no defence" then we all need to have a good education in law from the earliest age.

That is the intent. Make any laws that make you a criminal and make the gun unsafe.

How else would they make money? Trust minor laws ruin lives. Lmk if you want to hear one person's experience, soon as I turned 18 I was a target.

@@maxnomad8561there's ignorance of the law and then there's the code book that's eight feet thick and changes from state to state and county to county. Simple common sense gun laws yes but what law abiding citizens are expected to follow, which change on a whim, would be a full time job. Gun scholars can't even agree on the meaning of some of these laws, How is John Q Public supposed to?

There is an army vet in my town who sold a gun to a guy who wasnt allowed one. The story is he went to buy it and the guy asked him if he is a felon to which he replied jokingly “ive been in 40 years” or something like that, i forget the quote. But long story short this 70 yr old man is going to die in prison and like 340 guns are being sold of his through family. I bought 2. A .17HMR and a .22 hornet. Both for $200 plus ammo and scope. Its sad. BUT. His legacy will live on bc im telling my kids and grandchildren this story when i hand these guns to them…..over my dead body ofc😅 i love rimfire. Wnd yes ik hornet is center but the recoil isnt like a centerfire either.

More then that.. all of those people who spent time for nothing.

read again @@bubba328

@@bubba328the right of people

🎯 exactly

Shall not be infringed doesn't mean what you think. It doesn't mean - and therefore no limitations can be applied. It simply means you can own a firearm...which we can. It doesn't mean - therefore you can own a bazooka.

Exactly! Yes! Somebody finally said it!

Agree if u can legally own a gun it should be any gun available

Straight to the point:)

I do think you should have to get a license for full auto weapons but agree

@staledorito6174 no you should not need a license for full automatic that is still a form of regulation. Before 1984 there were very little crime with full automatic gun. Just like today they want ARs banned and they are on the low side for crime.

Actually, Trump has gone on record saying at one point not long ago that he “didn’t like suppressors. Can we just ban them?” Trump is NOT pro 2A or anything shooting related.

​@@lancekrystoff9619 can you read he said trump jr

As long as the corrupt government can control you, gather information on you and take your money... they'll do it.

@@austindiaz6767You are correct. I somehow missed that. That said, I would highly question whether or not his words are genuine given his father’s track record with the second amendment and tendency to run his mouth.

No guns or gun accessories should require tax, stamps, registration, or permission. Completely defeats the purpose of the 2nd.

Literally all of them.

@@clydemarshall8095 Why would they criminalize possession of property and not go after the ones doing the crimes? Because they want to impose on anybody who owns anything they don’t like. It sounds like these stupid laws were made by some insolent old lawmakers with no common sense whatsoever.

They are well thought through....they serve the purpose they were intented. Stopping populos from saying NO

Not stupid, unconstitutional! Abolish the ATF and repeal the NFA/GCA!

They aren't gun laws they are Constitutional infringements. Plain and simple.

Absolutely! I mean no! Or maybe? Please don’t bring logical questions to the comments section.

Uh you can't even defend someone else if they are in danger or being robbed Unless your protecting a elected official or their family member then it's OK 😅 Laws are for you not them that's being proven daily

While I agree, it’s their job to enforce the ridiculous laws that are out there. They have to presume the worst with all.

@@Farnorthfarmer”Just doing your job” doesn’t cut it as an excuse for doing or partaking in something that is wrong.

@@lancekrystoff9619 I DO agree with you, however they are held to an oath. If each upheld their own personal beliefs, ideals and feelings that were not based in the bylaws they agreed to uphold, I’d think the word “rogue” could be applied. I do support law enforcement 💯 and do my best to not give them anything they would question. I do have concerns with how I would be judged if I had to protect myself or fam. I’m just too naive.

2a

They aren't unconstitutional, but they are exceptionally controlling.

All gun laws are unconstitutional. If you say otherwise you are a collaborator.

@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdshall not be infringed. but i understand your point. I’d counter that with just because a judge says it’s not unconstitutional doesn’t mean that it isn’t.

@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdanything that would in anyway undermine the ability to keep and bear arms is by definition unconstitutional.

In My Humble Opinion, Unfortunately, that is probably closer to the mark than most people realize👍🤠🤣‼️ I am NOT saying that I agree with the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME, I'm just saying that your statement is closer to the truth than anything that the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME says to the contrary In My Humble Opinion !!

@@texastomsshavingtips6359 You should probably start agreeing with the Socialist regime, because this problem is one of the big things we address. Late stage capitalism breeds this type of corruption for the cops, prosecutors, and judges to keep lining their pockets.

@lorettacaputo6997 Don’t forget. I learned this lesson first hand. COPS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!! They ARE SNAKES!!!! But to add to your point. The cops job is to get you in jail and return to duty as fast as humanly possible.. it’s messed up. And I learned that and will never forget it.

They seemed so happy that they could infringe on peoples rights for life. Maybe they should read the book three felonies a day before they start getting so excited, they aren't the law abiding citizens they think they are, they just haven't gotten caught yet.

1) a well regulated militia 2) being necessary for the security of a free State. Missed some big qualifiers there. The 2A isn’t 1) whatever guns you want 2) for your security.

​@@boombox05learn to make a point.

@@JacobWilliams-vo6qy learn to read

@@boombox05 The hell it doesn't. John Adams was asked by a merchant whether he could put cannon on his ships to fight off pirates. Adams' reply was basically, "If you feel you need cannon on your ships, hell yes, put cannon on them."

We aren’t free we have the illusion of freedom

You should add that 10+ years in prison is cruel and unusual punishment and should be considered treason by itself on whoever imposed that law on us. Also the fine is purposeful to cause people to become destitute and purposefully broke which still amounts to a cruel and unusual punishment. Also, sending people to prison for not complying with their demands is an easy way for the Judicial system to garner some very serious enemies. These are facts, it is literally based in our Constitution but they don’t apply Constitutional standards when they violate the law to impose on people. They purposely ignore the Constitutional laws they are supposed to reference against their own Court dockets and that is the problem I am trying to bring awareness of.

We haven't operated under the constitution since the act of 1871.

Only free because they tell us so...

theyre meant to be because theyre scared of us

It has become the land of "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime."

A-effingmen.

Awesome but commieforina is not one, where I'm stuck with age 78 and doctors in this democrap state

@@frankfields2071 Forget about gun laws, politics, and making California not communist. At your age you should be in prayer, asking Jesus Christ to take you away to His Kingdom before its too late.

29 now. (:

Doesnt matter. 2A trumps all state "laws",; 1A auditors do it all the time

Know them, then ignore them.

This video is very important and every gun owner should watch, that's for certain. Every gun owner should watch this and understand what a Fudd is, someone who defends the right to keep their bolt-action hunting rifle but, otherwise, doesn't give a rat's-tail about the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms.

how about enacting FEDERAL GUN LAWS - how many more innocent folks have to die because every yahoo is 'carrying a firearm' (second amendment says REGULATED MILITIA - not everyone each to his/her own - with guns aplenty...the gun lobby is twisting the constitution for their own sick purposes - grow up.

Me😂

Blapeepo

criminals

@@heroinmom153 and why wouldn’t we be worried about these laws..

You nailed it.

There has always been reasonable restrictions allowed. From the founding forward. Its not about bending knee and the inference is insulting,.

​, you're very wrong.

Not to out myself for anything but, I don’t know what gun laws are, I don’t follow them anyway

@@MrJSchiedelthe nation was founded by rebels fighting their government, they hated 3 things, Taxes, the King, and the government trying to take their guns

Yeah, but you won't find many (if any) at 16" exactly. They're always made a fraction over for the obvious reason.

@@kennykash6089 I noticed a few times that 16”or less was stated as illegal. I think the point is that 16” is legal. Less than 16” is illegal.

​@@frugalfamilyliving4266any idea the rifle the kids are using

We used to. Thank libs for taking that away.

They change all the laws every 6 months. So it wouldn’t matter.

@@_Delta_P_ I said gun education not gun law education. They are very different things

And gun laws are unconstitutional so..

Have you ever had a protective order against another person? It involves going to court and providing proof they are a danger to you. That's due process. I've had a stalker and was happy to hear their unstable a$5 couldn't legally aquire a gun.

@@bubba328And we know that envelope has to pay for the assault...

To be fair....I'm sure where he works has gun ranges and dept owned guns. Don't have to have one in your home to be trained and familiar.

Haha. So true.

What if they make it illegal to own or obtain or carry said gun? Now your argument is invalid because simply owning the gun is committing a crime. You're bound to either become an unarmed boot licking law abiding citizen, or you're going to become a criminal by simply owning a firearm. Pick your poison.

LOL

The problem is they use pre-crime laws involving our gun rights out of concern for others to impose on us. Let me give you some examples: -If you end up on probation for something minor you can’t own anything they say you can’t and they expect you to “transfer” or “sell” said property. -Any law they can impose on us even if we have absolutely no malicious intent whatsoever to misuse our property(guns), it’s all a control tactic is all it is based on mob rule by compliance squads that will kill you if you don’t comply. That is how I view much of these problems. They expect you to give up your right to self-defense if they demand you do even if your life could be at stake if you gave up your guns and they don’t care if you die because of them. That’s the problem.

Experiencing this situation first hand, I agree 100% law abiding citizen here with no criminal record, just a paranoid crazy ex.

Correct. Trump is a businessman and entertainer, NOT a "gun guy". So yes, he took bad advice on something he had little knowledge of and made a huge mistake. However, it was a mistake, and not part of a larger PLAN of hard-core gun control like Joe Biden has pushed for.

And from watching this video gun owners as well. So long as the attitude exists that you can deny rights to a person forever because you think they're a bad person based on something they may or may not have done in their past there will always be opportunity for government to find new ways to make prohibited persons. That's what the gca was for, it was gun control and a easy way was create felons then disarm them it ranges from 10-24% of state populations with Florida and Texas being the highest as prohibited persons. With numbers that high if these people were dangerous we'd be war zones. At least Texas allows non violent felons to have firearms for self defense on their property five years after all time and probation is done. Feds can still charge them but state can't.

I agree. What is maddening is that in any fact situation where a “fine line” exists between a lawful / unlawful action, you can pretty much depend on some Democrat, Soros bought-and-paid-for, eager beaver prosecutor to opt to go for a full bore prosecution. They will ALWAYS go with the “interpretation” that is least advantageous for the hapless citizen. Also, their obedient lap dogs in the MSM will always broadcast the Leftist narrative (lie) to the public to paint you in the worst light possible and contaminate any potential jury pool of your “peers.”

No federal laws should exist. It should merely protect citizens' constitutional rights from state laws.

@@bubba328 Ask the live kids who are alive because a private citizen protected them with a firearm. Democults are not forward-thinking

Quoting yourself is the most cringe shit Ive ever seen

How long are they in for usually or do you know the sentencing

I carry into the dmv, I "illegally" concealed for years in cali. I don't abide by unconstitutional laws😊.

Check local laws to a lot of times the sign carries no legal ramifications. Just means you can’t open carry. In my state if you’re caught concealed carrying in a “gun free zone” the most that can be done is you are asked to leave the private property.

Being one of these so called law abiding citizens would mean you follow only the supreme law of the land right. I know how to read and my reading comprehension has been scaled very high on tests, so carry what you want, when you want, how you want. Enough said

You technically could sue them, it just hasn't been done before. You would have a case technically, you are being disarmed, thus the establishment is directly liable for anything that happens to you if they don't have security to protect you. But you would have to probably have such an event occur for a court to listen, because you would clearly have standing then. Otherwise, most courts won't listen to hypotheticals, but the law as written states that standing is gained either a) by an event occurring, or b) by the potential of an event occurring to you. Such as a law being passed, like the Trans laws in Tennessee for example. The laws would make being Trans in public illegal, so a) would effect anyone that is arrested for breaking the new law, but b) applies to all Trans people in the state, because there is the "potential" for them to be arrested. Try to file a lawsuit, see what happens, I would honestly be very interested to see, because I do honestly agree with you.

If they don't regain their rights, then how is their debt paid? How can they be considered free from discrimination? How can they ever feel fully accepted as a free American citizen? Why should they have any less of a right to protect themselves or their family? Why shouldn't they have a voice in the voting process?

I live here and when I got my suppressor which doesn't follow the same rules as sbrs. They told me of a guy who broke up with his gf and he went across state lines with both and she called the ATF. He's a felon and serving like 10 years bc he didn't tell them of the sbr.

So the atf are making good people into felons while doing nothing to stop real criminal threats

@@quintonhays371 That’s why it’s important to get petitions and flyers of said petitions to end these illegal infringements of our Rights. What they are doing to our gun rights is illegal. The Constitution forbids these Unconstitutional rules from being enforced, the Constitution is for the Courts to look at to make sure they are not violating any Constitutional laws or the Bill of Rights. They are purposely avoiding using Constitutional references in Court because these Federal Judges know they will lose. I say this because Constitution.US explains that the Constitution is there to tell them what they are allowed to do and what is not allowed.

No reason to ever go into KCK 😂

Clearly, you didn't grow up with a firefighter.

I would add a few things: don't buy anything that might attract thieves and home invaders. For the same reason, keep you property looking dilapidated (better yet, don't own property, rent a small apartment instead). Ride a bus. Don't wear new or nice clothes. Never visit a restaurant, just buy groceries, lest somebody thinks you have extra money to steal. Don't get a well-paying job, because that money will attract robbers/thieves. Don't date women, they are the ones with protective orders. Always run away from conflicts, because standing up for yourself leads to "escalation". Yep, just be a compliant little mouse/pushover/doormat, and let everyone else run your life. 😂😂 One exception: you can absolutely, positively get angry over a RU-vid comment. It's quite safe. Just don't express it as a threatening reply, or I might report you and you might get in trouble. Do you see what I'm getting at, wise one? While there is some wisdom in your words, some things you simply can't avoid or evade in this life. Your philosophy is that of complete compliance with the government. Well, might as well give up that gun, you'll never use it even if you have to, and it's not what the Second Amendment was for.

@@user-io2ym6gm8z Now you're just being silly. The advice he gave is beneficial to most and will help keep people out of trouble. However this is social media and even a post expressing how beautiful and sunny the day is, will be met by someone with some silly negative commentary about it.

@@charlesdonahue3667 I'm not being silly. I'm being sarcastic. I'm highlighting what his way of thinking amounts to. "A firearm is a government-licensed toy that I'm lucky to hold in my hand". Instead of, you know, CONSTITUTIONAL right. And it's always hard to deal with partial-truth comments. But I think I said "there is some wisdom in your words", a point that you missed, obviously. I'm only really against "don't get into a sit where you get a protective order" and "don't show firearm to de-escalate". The first one is dumb and completely unconstitutional, a random angry chick should be able to take away your rights, and the second one is just plain dumb. In the first one, "don't get into a sit" advice tells you not get into something you have no control over getting into. With the other one, What am I going to wait until he actually attacks me so that I'm forced to kill him in self-defense? And then have to go through the legal and financial nightmare of proving my innocence? Instead of simply showing the gun as a warning and getting him to back off?

​@@user-io2ym6gm8z Anyone reading your commentary understood it was sarcasm, they also understood it was silly. Someone posted a video offering practical advice on how to avoid legal trouble relative to EDC and you viewed it as an opportunity to joke. The First Amendment protects your right to do so. Your decision to hyperbolize the video's message to make a rant about constitutionality reveals your temperament. It's up to readers to decide if they choose to be influenced by such commentary in matters concerning their legal rights and safety.

He had the correct information on the screen. Its a raw video, misspeaks are going to happen occasionally. Stop being that person.

@jimyeats you're under the assumption I watched the screen while listening. So your idea of occasionally happens to be repeatedly in one video...yeah, don't tell me what I should and shouldn't do.

@@benlastname6667 Yes, I am, because its a video, and because you came and felt the need to type a comment out.

@@jimyeats you also felt the need to type yours. You live in a glass house. Kick rocks.

@@benlastname6667 My point noting your comment is that you would had to have been looking at your screen, thus seeing the fact that they are putting information and corrections on the screen.

SCOTUS 1876, shall not be infringed by Congress. The 2A does not give you gun rights, It prevents Congress from making laws that take away rights you were BORN with.

U took it off 😂? U must like the way leather taste.

The problem is there are so many of them who really don’t understand that they are persecuting their own friends, family and partners with these illegal and Unconstitutional laws. These are my beliefs. The other fact is these are factions of people using force against individual people who don’t comply even if they have done nothing criminal with their own property. That is where the problem lies.

Fun fact: We have one of the most restrictive weapon laws in the world here in Germany. However, foregrips on ARs are legal for everyone and if you have a hunting license, you can go to the store and buy as many suppressors as you want without any issue. 😅

Eh, maybe you should do some more research on the rifle/shotgun situation. The GCA pretty much says Licensees (FFLs) at their premises may sell/transfer long guns to out of state residents, non-licensees must transfer them through a licensee. Each sate also has their specifics on importing/transferring firearms to their residents. USCCA, and a few others have good articles on it.

@@brianhess226 Sorry, I should have been clearer. I am speaking as a Type 07 Class 02 FFL/SOT here in NC.

Utah is awesome country but if you get the chance, go see the John Moses Browning museum. It is well worth the drive. Holy, moly it's fantastic. What a genius..... You know considering he was Mormon and such.........lol.

The lower is legally always an SBR once registered. Doesn't matter what upper (even no upper) you put on

Constructive possession. If you have a short-barreled upper you better have first built or bought a pistol lower.

⁠@@evanwells6284 Do you know what doesn’t make sense about the ATF’s dumb law about SBR’s? If you register a lower as an SBR it still doesn’t make it an SBR but they have it as such if you registered it. You could have a SBR lower for the purpose of building a perfectly legal ar platform pistol which is not considered a SBR by the ATF’s definition. You could even categorize gun parts by category and that doesn’t mean you have any intent to make an SBR, but they still think they have the power to manufacture people into criminals for intent based on parts alone even if you wanted to build an ar platform pistol not a SBR. You see the flaws in these dumb laws are what I call obvious infringements for example you could have stocks for the sole purpose of building 16” rifles in a pile of parts in one category and ar platform pistol parts in another categorized pile, so do they just get to misconstrue criminal charges based on their own decision of parts and what they think a person wants to use it for? I call complete bs on ATF’s logic on this one.

⁠@@dalepres1 Constructive possession is bs. Intent to manufacture what they deem as illegal is more what they define constructive possession as.

@@evanwells6284 Do not register it ….

They're Fudds. Obey beyond the law. Surrender more rights than otherwise forced. Next the might be asking to just turn in those nasty fully semi-automatic weapons.

I am pretty sure that illegal/Unconstitutional law was struck down in Court.

As I said, Utahans deserve a better class of gun-rights advocates than these bozos.

​@@dalepres1we do what we want here

The 18-20yr olds not able to purchase handguns just got shutdown by a judge ruling it unconstitutional. Now the ATF will appeal of course as always but they arent going to win due to Bruen. Now NICS will needs to be changed to allow the purchase, but currently they can now legally purchase handguns.

I'm anti marijuana. But a stoner should 100% be able to own any gun they'd like.

Freedom! Should not matter what one chooses to put in their body…. Shall not be infringed!

Absolutely true. Why don't people understand that, that is the way they get to sneak in more restriction.

In My Humble Opinion, The problem with your question is that they do NOT want an armed population, they want a Dis/Un-Armed population that they can CONTROL !! An armed population can fight back against their TYRANNY, whereas a Dis/Un-Armed population must submit to their TYRANNY, or face the RETRIBUTION of the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME !! The preceding statements are MY OPINIONS, and as such, I realize and understand that it is within the realm of possibility that your opinions might conceivably be different from MY OPINIONS, no matter how implausible and unlikely that scenario would actually be, it does remain to be a slight possibility !!

you answered your question. it makes you more accurate. they don't want you being accurate. they want you to be defenseless

Silly rules and laws….. I’d love to hear the rationale for these ridiculous laws!

I don’t think they’re cops! Those aren’t badges on their shirts