Very annoying. I mean, one slipped up or two is fine, but come on, make your homework and get the terminology right. You are interviewing the hottest name in the field nowadays, and you keep messing the name (an easy one at that) of his product.
If I smash three random keys on my keyboard then what is the probability of typing "GPT"? Answer: The probability of randomly typing "GPT" by smashing three keys on a keyboard depends on the number of keys on your keyboard and the specific arrangement of those keys. Assuming you have a standard QWERTY keyboard layout with 26 letters, 10 digits, and some additional characters, let's say a total of 40 possible keys. The probability of randomly typing "GPT" in a specific order would be 1 out of 40 cubed (40^3), since each keypress is an independent event. So the probability would be 1/(40^3), which is approximately 0.000625 or 0.0625%.
I loved GCP 3, but GPP 4 is when I realized our world is about to change dramatically. I cant wait for GTP 5 incremental upgrades, and I am sure we will figure out how to address safety precautions before GHP 6+ is here.
Even thought I've seen Sam on a dozen interviews now, and a lot is being repeated, I still watch, just for some small tidbits, and because it's fun to constantly hear. This explosion in AI has really excited me as a person. I'm diving into so many creative things, as well as help with my analytically challenged brain.
I'm both excited and freaked out by what's happening. My brain has a hard time comprehending how fast this is all happening, but I guess that's what some people predicted. I thought Ray Kurzweil was a nutjob ten years ago, and I still think his mind-uploading religion is crazy, but he was accidentally right about exponential change. (I say accidentally because he based his predictions on hardware improvements, not software improvements.)
I can't discern if his calm demeanor is extreme anxiety by his astute rigid posture and constant Y Combinator pitch tactics, or if he is literally always attempting to add words like "use case, adapt, release, products, platform" to any generic sentence no matter how related they are to things like his daily routine. To us "we're hungry" To him, "His colognes pain point must be met with a minimum viable product of carbohydrated organic ingestibles."
Its really a stepping-stone for those with dyslexia and dysgraphia like me. A powerful tool for use and other generative AIs. It will be an opportunity for many humans with disabilities or other disorders...
I didn't even notice because clearly english is not his first language, and I'm not a stuck up prick who get's hung up on the minor, inconsequential mistakes of others.
How many human beings can have millions of high quality conversations simultaneously? GPT-4 is already massively super capable at above average human intelligence with perfect recall.
You're reading way too much into it. There isn't a single instance of chatGPT running, but millions of them. To give you an analogy, the millions of RU-vid users that are currently watching a video are not communicating with a single giant computer, but rather millions of small ones.
@@OrlOnEarth I'm not sure why that's relevant? It's still one architecture providing an artificial intelligence capable of millions of instances of GPT-4 operating at any one moment in time. That's a lot of office workers replaced in an instant, no coffee breaks. How well can you multi-task? 🤓
@@OrlOnEarth It's still a single set of trained weights, hence - a single mind. And it's scalable in a way no collective group of humans can ever hope to match.
@@nonfictionone nobody really understands how it works, but somehow it manages to infer common sense from all of the data it uses. I imagine it's also read millions and millions of books as well as our bits of text.
I'm just afraid that increased efficiency under capitalism won't lead to abundance, but more hoarding and disparity. Companies would be able to choose between producing more/lowering prices and just reducing costs. Buying power will diminish and shift upwards, towards high-end goods. Basically the opposite of the promise, a dystopia. Not sure what will they choose but I feel like the current system rewards greed, until everything grinds down. Also reducing costs is the easier path.
Great speech dear Sam Altman sir thank you for sharing..all your hard work is going to Turinng out to be great success and for helping everyone when in real need of wisdom or quick decision making thank you again... sir appreciate your time and the open public engagement. sincerely
When interviewing someone as high profile as Sam Altman, they should have at least got their sound setup right, so many echoes. Also, like others have pointed out, it's GPT not GTP.
Life is so precious, when you know you own a property or an investment to always keep you on go...I have no regrets starting my journey in cryptocurrency.
This will likely turn it into the .0000001% too. Technology has not brought abundance to anyone - the years of our greatest technological innovation has done the exact opposite in terms of equity. This kid and anyone thinking tech will solve the worlds problems is naive as hell.
Making money should be a routine A weak dollar can signal an economic downturn, making me to ponder on what are the best possible ways to hedge against inflation, and I've overheard people say inflation is a money-eater thus worried about my savings around $200k>
As with an my big financial decision, it’s important to keep your guard’s up for economic risks. However, smart planning, time management and seeking advise from a financial adviser can help keep you and your money safe.>>
Great one! thank you :) but I wish someone talked more about the progress of research in rogue states like Russia or China. We are very responsible in The West but aren't those rouge states the real danger in developing AI models? There is no control... Luckily for us both Russia and China are the Third World countries...
"First, AI comes for physical labor..... almost everybody predicted this wrong.......we may have AI that can do science before we have that factory robot that can do everything"
WHAT UNIVERSE I asked the ChatGPT to count the total number of legs when you walk into a random house. Now, when you walks into a random house and you see only 1 lady there and she was just finished giving birth successfully. What are the total number of legs were there? *ChatGPT answer:* in the given scenario, when the person walks into a random house and sees only one lady who has just finished giving birth successfully, we can determine the total number of legs based on the information provided. Assuming the lady has the typical number of legs for a human, which is *two,* and there are no other individuals or animals mentioned in the house, the total number of legs would be two. Therefore, in this case, there would be *two* legs present-those of the lady LMAO, cheers
@@noivongxoang235gpt 4 If I walk into a room with only a lady who has given birth, I would assume that the newborn baby is also present in the room. Assuming both the lady and the baby have the usual number of legs for humans, there would be a total of four legs in the room-two legs belonging to the lady and two legs belonging to the baby.
Tbh that part is nit really realistic, the ai will be smarter than humans, they will do nearly any job better and cheaper so we'll rather have 16 billion ai workers with million human workers
@@noivongxoang235 That's a nice question to test their current limitations. As the person below you pointed out, GPT4 can tell you it's 4 legs present, but the real answer should be 6, because I walked into the house too so it forgets to count my legs. So far none of the models can answer 6 correctly, and using this question we can rank models by how smart they are: GPT4 - almost gets it right but neglects my legs Claude+ - gives a similar answer to GPT4 GPT3.5 - gives a more nonsense answer like in your comment Bard - gives absolute garbage It's possible GPT4 can answer 6 correctly if prompted right, it can find its own mistakes and self reflect, but so far it can't answer this question from the getgo. It will probably able to in a year or two.
It’s part of the responsibilities of the CEO. And that’s not necessarily a perk. They’re publicly scrutinized for running bad companies, but they’ll reap the rewards for doing it well. But don’t be fooled, they are always under the watchful eye of the board and investors.
Pump pump pump... inflate that narrative bubble. And by the look of the majority of these comments, so many of you are ready, willing, and able to contribute more hot air.
7:02 when was this filmed? Now it again gets better with scale? I'm confused, just a couple of weeks ago Sam seemed to be of the opinion that we've exhausted that route. They had GPT-4 already for months when they released ChatGPT, as he said. He is repeating this mantra that "we're not training GPT-5". Maybe it's because it has already been trained.
Helion has been on my radar for 2 years now and i am glad that one of the main AI developers has taken notice. They sure could use some help from an AGI to finish their vision. My issue as with AGI is, who will control it. Aslong fusion power is controlled by a private company and not a publicly funded institute i fear this in combination with AGI would lead to a Moloch of a company, having too much influence onto our political systems. I mean besides having to talk in front of congress, some senators already seem cozy with Altman.
I think he was doing it on purpose, waiting for Altman to correct him, and say " it's actually GPT" , then he'll sound cocky and he'll get his sound bite. But my man didn't fall for it ! 😅
Why is technology the only vector to a more brighter future? I think it all starts with mind set. Which needs no technology but common sense, the brain, a body (as a sensor) and the will to improve. Nonetheless, I really like ChatGPT, it is amazing how the system responds intelligently even in a philosophical context.
Here is my hypothesis which was recently confirmed by our team: In collaboration with the State University of New York (SUNY), Massachusetts General Hospital, Tokyo Institut of Technology, and University of Munich, I have been conducting research relating to three modes of cognition ― instinctive, intellectual, and intuitive. MRI Study of the importance of Instinct, Intellect and Intuition in Human Intelligence Introduction Understanding intelligence is one of the great scientific challenges of our time. In recent years, many groups have made progress measuring brain activity using numerous non-invasive methods and a series of notable studies have been made by several research teams. While the relationship between the work of neural circuits of the brain and intelligence seems obvious, the hypothesis of ‘neural efficiency’, which was long used as an assumption by most neuroscientists and psychologists, was confirmed experimentally (Smith et al., 2015). Studies of human intelligence provide strong evidence for the neural efficiency hypothesis, which suggests more efficient brain functioning (i.e., less or more focused activation) in more intelligent individuals. Additionally, the role of intuition versus deliberation in human cooperation was studied (Bear & Rang, 2016). The latest study reports the first evidence that electrically stimulating the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex can enhance our ability to ‘think outside the box’. (Luft et al., 2017). Another few groups of researchers demonstrated that functional connectivity profiles act as a ‘fingerprint’ that can accurately identify subjects from a large group (Finn et al., 2015). The results from this experiment also indicated that an individual’s connectivity profile is intrinsic, and can predict levels of fluid intelligence. The variation of brain functioning in different people should be examined. The proposed study allow to avoid overly complex methods and might help to identify the principles of intelligence and fundamentally advance our understanding of intelligence as a whole ― be it human, animal, individual, or collective. Method MRI can show the activities of the specific brain centers in each of three groups of participants and their brains’ wiring patterns. 1. Illiterate Individual who are not exposed to formal methods of schooling and thought. 2. Educated individuals, who are trained in thinking logically and understanding complex ideas and concepts. 3. Leaders of science, technology, business, economy, and culture with proven ability to use their intuitive insight. Instinctive mind: The first level of cognitive mode is instinct: the way in which people naturally react or behave, without having to think, which is generally understood as an unconscious mental process. Instinct is directly related to the ancient, animalistic group memory which is responsible for survival. It is below the level of awareness and activates automatically. The brains of such pure instinctive individuals should have some specific centers responsible for the operation of instinctive mind and detectable wiring patterns between them. Intellectual mind: The second, higher level of cognitive mode is intellect, a conscious mental process with a self-learning neural network. Intellect is responsible for the accumulation, organization and preservation of knowledge from the past. It is based on the accomplishments of the past, the repetition of the past and closely related to a collective mankind memory. Intellectual thinking consists of deduction or inference, which are the rational abilities of the mind. But intellect works only in a linear direction - from the realm of the known to the known. "The intellect selects in a given situation whatever resembles something it already knows, or is familiar with; it seeks this out to apply its principle that 'like produces like' " (Bergson, 1907). Intellect is incapable to produce ingenious ideas. Nevertheless, intellect has two important roles: First, it is responsible for translating intuitive discoveries into scientific or cultural forms understandable to the general public. Second, intellect has a fundamental social function - it unites humans with other humans. Intellect employs some of the following conscious mental processes: self-reflective thinking, planning, predicting, deliberation, attention to or monitoring of their actions, conceptualisation of action, control, effort, and acting for a reason. Compared to the instinctive mind, intellectual mind has higher level of awareness and self-awareness and more features of decision-making. The brain of such intellectuals should have detectable specific centers responsible for the operation of intellectual mind and wiring patterns between them. Intuitive mind: The third and the highest level of cognitive mode is intuition or, in other words, intuitive mind. It uses the most advanced neural network and requires the highest level of awareness and self-awareness. Intuition is not analytical and is not to be confused with instinct; it is above both ― the animal instinct and rational thought. In comparison to instinctive and intellectual minds, intuitive mind is NOT based on the ancient/animalistic groups’ memory or collective intellectual memory, as it does most of its discoveries contrary to established collective patterns and regardless of the views of the highest authorities. The brain of such individuals should have detectable specific centers responsible for the operation of intuitive mind and wiring patterns between them. BUSINESS PROPOSAL onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=870D7D1389B4E11E!7585&ithint=file%2cdocx&authkey=!ANWA7lhZDS5nc1A
Sam an Open AI is awesome (and all the people helped directly and indirectly) the pie getting bigger and way richer = positive metrics in society increasing seemingly predictibly, thats what i also been saing and i relly relly relly like the thinkin. Maybe we can think about extending healthy happy life in the future if the economy increases massively otherwise small isolated tryes will likely be doomed or a drop on a hot stone. I think another big industrial revolution would be fixing the medication finetuning being done by try and not by a AI sytsem with infinite context memory/Memory that can just intake your medication protocols by whatsapp for example and ask you questions and check your dosages and then deliver insights and patterns/trends to the doctor and you. Also making use of the gadgets that collect data nowadays and getting a „opt put of you want“ medical data bank and data ealy (since when u are 80 and the hole wolrd just starts with collectibg data the time it takes until the AI‘s/machinelerning symthonic (bunch of stuff together/combination of all techniques that controbute some unique strength) have to figure it out might be not doable anymore. Also all the mental health people even if you dont see the cost the indirect costs of peole being fucked are immense, even just being stressed /anxiety/ not motivated probably is the grave of a billion ideas/innovation or just dilligent work the difference if you have fun or life is pain/struggle. Get the adhd finetuning going please, it would be simple just improve memory and let people upload txt files or let the AI prtially remember/store and sort things you ever said it no matter what, this also improves everything else, the amount of tailored AI buddy responses would be way better if they dot repeat the same thing 10000 times over different chats because they dont remeber previous chats on the same account at least imperfectly. Get away feom perfection of memory - perfection is the enemy of the good, and use the collective computing power of the worlds personal computers (idle ressources of pcs around the wold and do smth with it like - it cant be correct to leave those ressources iddle and wait until Nvida replicated all the wolrd graphics cards again, use - those resources! (Even if ineffitient all that idle computing used by a dynamically adjusting program you can opt out or change how much % you let it have seems like a no brainer, gotta figure out things that can be done there and the results feed back to GPT cloud or combined with cloud output locally.
I think he is well meaning but putting a limit on what level of capability open source models are allowed to be developed to before licencing is required smacks of regulatory capture
I asked the ChatGPT to count the total number of legs when you walk into a random house. Now, when you walks into a random house and you see only 1 lady there and she was just finished giving birth successfully. What are the number of legs were there? *ChatGPT answer:* in the given scenario, when the person walks into a random house and sees only one lady who has just finished giving birth successfully, we can determine the total number of legs based on the information provided. Assuming the lady has the typical number of legs for a human, which is *two,* and there are no other individuals or animals mentioned in the house, the total number of legs would be two. Therefore, in this case, there would be *two* legs present-those of the lady OH MAN LMAO
It couldn't recognize that the bady also has legs (don't get me wrong, it can do calculus), and there's possibly ants and other insects in the house that contains legs. Anyway those you guy thinking that the robot someday get really smart🤣. No, it's just a machine that do whatever we set them up to do.
Imagine a world where the billionaires developing AI are better people ... All People would have Healthcare👍 ... We could put an end to poverty and homelessness.
Remember NOW where you are , what your day is like ... exactly as we've done growing up before the home computer and the internet , iphone . How life's daily momentum moved ... as everything we know is about to change and NEVER return . A completely new paradigm we will be living in . Remember the Mayen calendar that recently came to its end, and everyone wondered what would happen if anything at all?? Well, we are about to see.
Open Direct Competent Democracy replacing capitalism and the financial or economic or monetary system is the only way to advance science, engineering, technology and utilize it in the most fair, equitable and liberating way for all people around the world while creating abundance for all without any more financial hindrance or constraints.
it is strange, that we always live with something that are supposed to be better then it arrives.... So the teq we live with today are never working at its op because something better is always around the corner. perhaps we should just stop and try to enjoy what we have..... just a thought ....
whoever decided to embed these terrible closed captions into the encoded video, please don't they're just distracting the the youtube captions are better
2 500mw generators per day. That's one gw per day so 365 gw/year. So 56 years to replace all of the worlds 20 tw of energy use. I would rather get it done in 25 years but the uranium fission bros will perhaps manage the other half.
Cool with fusion energy everyone in the world will have year-round agriculture and will have no need for coal and gas, now we can all be friends haha 😂
I think they don't want people to get attached.. people are emotional creatures, that's why ChatGPT annoys everyone by endlessly saying "As an AI language model, bla bla bla".
It doesn't make sense to release v3.5 when v4.0 is already available if feedback from public is what you're after. Now, what's this feedback going to feed into? V5.0? No, the reason is that v4.0 was slated to be a commercial version. Don't give us this crap of excuses, we're not children. gee!
