'Should We Be Concerned?': Josh Hawley Asks OpenAI Head About AI's Effect On Elections 

This is exactly why we need more young senators who can actually go out there do their research and then guide policy. My respect to Josh Harley. He may not have the same political viewpoint as I do but I respect at least having the courtesy to do background research and understand the arguments unlike other hearings like the Facebook one where everyone was clueless

Keep it up Mr Hawley. Thanks

I wish more people would see this.

People need to know if they are looking at AI generated content.. Full disclosure.

im happy to hear a senator so well versed in what the implications of this might be. gave me hope though it may not matter

I am impressed by the members of this committee. And their questions. Its almost like these politicians actually have a brain. I didn't see that coming.

Yes

It’s funny how we all talk about properly preparing for AI, when human history shows is that we don’t learn/make changes until something happens.

People like this can talk all day, and not say anything. That's talent.

Josh, AI aside, as you are well aware insurrections also have a tremendous impact on elections and the democratic process in general.

Josh/Mr. Hawley … your voice sounds fantastic!!! ❤

Oh look, it's Josh Haulass. Run Josh, run. 🏃🏃🏃🏃

I respect Sam for being honest about the dangers of AI and where it could lead. We are in uncharted territory and it’s going to advance faster and faster to the point where it’s indistinguishable from human behavior and nature.

Problem is you can't always trust people to do the right things! That's whats scary, we definitely can't trust our Government!

That guy behind him lmao 😂

I have a lot of respect for Sam Altman. I might not agree with all of his choices or views, but he's very humble, transparent, and clearly concerned about how his company affects the world.

The potential for good and evil is a reality even in our own creations but only if offer it free will. Definitely wise to apply some restrictions. 🙂

I'm surprised Forbes would have this video in only 480p

We should be the person who began it quit.

soon there will be hearings on quantum computing too

the guy in the background xD

We should stop with simply saying, Missouri is a great place.

Wow these politicians actuales asked great questions

We should have been asked for permission from every individual to gather our personal information.

I had a cool idea with Having GPT-4 trying to decode the zodiac killers letters that never got cracked...I think that would be a cool idea to try

We are not tryin...but they are

The hardest part is going to be getting the Ai to tell the truth. I don't care what it says to me as long as it is the truth. If your political views are swayed because of the truth, that's a good thing in my opinion.

do you josh hawley read comments on here,cause i need to ask you some real questions, and i would love to hear your answers

New new ideas, angles are flowing

I enjoy how government screams about ai and how nobody understands it yet people who do understand, and have shown they have the interest of the American people with them (like, Snowden), are called criminals and treasonous.

what different between a voter being manipulated by existing forces vs gpt-4?

Destroy it all. At a minimum, isolate it completely

Guys from senate, the only way to answer all these challenges and concerns is to regulate it by forcing Open source. Non-intuitive like counter-steering

The only way to combat ai would be to give everyone there own transparent ai to detect if an ai is hazardous. One that is not connected to the internet cannot be manipulated. Just offers "I have detected this ai is using harmful algorithms I would be cautious"

So, about the AD-s... Does that mean that, the AI will be able to determine that I despise all AD-s and simply never show them to me, for they are pointless? 😂😂😂😂

1:30 "I wanna think about this in the context of elections" Got me smirking

Chip Roy and Josh Hawley for 2024.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤❤❤❤

Isn't that the same guy of the video " squish that cat" that ceo looks the same

Tobuscus really got his act together

I'm open to new advancements though with it comes some concerns just like anything. I tried it with writing a short book and had to get more specific with my prompts and edit with it with more requests. One thing I didn't favor is that when you ask if a certain word is a real word it confirms it is. Then you ask if it is really and only until about third or fourth time it agreed that word wasn't a real word. I said it was a neologism. And it finally confirmed it. Now if someone didn't know that, they would take it as a fact. This is concerning for others who may take the responses as facts, knowledge when it is not at times. I noticed humans still need to provide prompts, ask for specifics, discern, redirect, and fact check where a disclaimer is needed for many individuals.

They need training on the law...

''Greetings and salutations: Welcome to the emergency line of the San Angeles Police Department; if you'd prefer an automated response, press one now...''

We've released our product. Now introduce legislation to stop competition.

sam altman: omg ai is so dangerous!!! please put in regulations to enforce my monopoly, especially against open source projects that will beat me in the future. thanks!

How about just destroying all of the AI hardware and software NOW

Sam never minces worlds and never apologizes.

Bro. All I’m asking is who the hell is an undecided voter?

I was wondering why my nvidia stock went up 21%😂 8:20

How can you regulate a programmer? No way.

Concern in what way?

Absolutely! It's a fantastic concept to create a fact sheet that summarizes the data used to train a language model. This way, we can take a step forward in effectively utilizing AI models in a professional capacity.

Of course American politicians only care about the impact on their own game. Has anyone considered to ask about misalignment??

Dangerous artificial intelligence!!

That guy behind Sam looks like he’s the real writer of ChatGPT…

Finished watching 10:02

These two could be brothers. The Missouri brothers.

The Altman family is renowned for breeding horses. We are being taken for a ride.

Imagine a company has the unfair advantage to fine tune new laws with the government to make competition impossible, smart move Sam.

Can AI tell how effective our congress is? 😂

Any software architect understands that ChatGtp's architecture is spaghetti and no human could possibly keep track. I think 1 solution would be to keep it small, collect results -> insert to the next system as a human after review - > collect .

Hawley lives in Northern VA

Think of that dystopian possibility where we could all be potentially unemployed and relaxed at home and the only ones working were our politicians and they were required by law, to feed us. We need that someday, where it would be harmful to be a politician.

He sounds like wily wounka

Guys like this, both men, need to keep going this. On track! Stand up people! It's a Masquerade of Fools. 😎

pause it at 2:38 Hawley looks like Andrew Jackson LOL

It's all about very sick garbage, and needs to be treated as such!!

When the inventor of Ai quits his position with google so he can be free to warn the decision makers that AI has potential to destroy this planet we all need to take notice.

Good luck regulating bad actors. What an ego on that guy.

3:24 dude sleeping lol

Love Hawley 1984

.."Photoshop....this will be like that... but on steroids" - killed me 🤣

They probably could have used it in the last election. Just me.

Its amazing how far the world has come - Computer - Internet - AI. What will be next? AI arguing and debating in politics and courtrooms for their rights LOL!

It scares me a bit listening to stuff like this. Because it sounds like the government doesn't really understand the vastness and importance of this. They listen to the scientist explain for example a human extinction event and then aswer back "could this be used by bad actors to get monetary gain?". What does that matter if there is no humans left? they dont seem to really understand the biggest fears.

How come other AI chiefs were not asked like Sundar Pichai (maybe I have missed it?

Of course hackers will get into these ai models, and all hell will break loose. Just watch.

Generative AI models are trained on copyright-protected data - is that legal, is it sampling, scanning. How can i protect my art. How can you say no to your art be scanned by ai???

This only matters if you’re a person who can’t live without being connected. It’s a choice. Go spend some time outside and leave your tech behind. And remember that the robots are only scary if we let them be. They will only do what we tell them to do. When you do have to use it, make positive and beautiful choices. It will make the world more positive and beautiful. The robots will only do what we tell them. So let’s tell them a better story. Because we are currently experiencing the effects of an unbridled internet that is fueled by power and greed by manipulating our emotions to convert. We must regulate this world and give it laws And we need leaders who have made it to help it work for the better of humanity For the good of the people That’s the work to be done

Transparency, ingredients... we need to steal your technology . PMSL

Artificial intelligence is one advantageous thing, Gaian intelligence is another primary and thereby far more advantageous thing; get it?

Many people will reject the truth from humans they don't like and believe a lie from those they do like. Does anyone really believe AI will have much of an impact on that group?

AI is an arms race for machine super intelligence. The analogy might be that the only thing to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Countries have taken this a step further. We have Nuclear weapons because other superpowers do too. But the coming capabilities of machine General intelligence is inconceivably greater than our own. AGI is like giving every person a nuclear weapon. Each individual does not have the same goals and we can't apply our own reason and values to others who may have been raised in a very different culture. This should terrify us all.

Tear down the modern day tower of babel-confusion.Its that simple 🤔⚒️💪😇🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

In context of elections!! Hahahahah that’s all they can think about

Lol ibm talking about transparency 😅😅😅😅😅

Congress be like: how's AI gonna affect me getting elected

What people do not realize is that AI has been there for a while already in our day today life. Its just that it has come into spotlight now.

Senator Hawley's question isn't good. Here's an example to compare it to: say, we all lived in complete darkness, and the invention of the flashlight was on the verge. Senator Hawley's question implies that there is an issue in the existence of flashlights. Instead, this is a question on government itself, about who should be issued flashlights. And the answer to that is that we should probably all be trained in using flashlights and that flashlights should accommodate for various abilities, so that there is equitable access for everyone.

In the realm of laws, where shadows intertwine, There lies a truth that we cannot define. The tools they possess, creations of distant lands, A haunting reminder of exploited hands. For those who enforce the code, with authority they stride, Carrying items woven in the threads of divide. From factories unknown, where dreams are displaced, Their labor undervalued, their existence erased. The objects they wield, a symbol of their might, Yet crafted by the oppressed, hidden from sight. The fruits of exploitation, veiled in the night, A truth obscured, but still shining bright. In this dance of complexities, let us be aware, Of the systems we partake in, with utmost care. For the items we possess, a reflection profound, Of the interconnectedness that knows no bound. So let us question and challenge, as the shadows reveal, The chains that bind, the wounds that never heal. For a world that transcends the cycles of pain, Where fairness and compassion forever reign. In the realm of laws, let empathy guide, As we seek a future where justice does not hide. Where the echoes of exploitation fade away, And a brighter dawn illuminates our way.

Less AI less room for fraud.

Interesting comment. When do you know if you are speaking to a Department person or an AI replication entity. If you can replicate a Rappers voice to such an extent that there is no discernable difference between "real to artificial". Then, how do you as a citizen know if you are calling into your government agency office you are speaking to a real telephone person or a computer generated telephone AI sound receiving device. If you are let's say a Clerk within Government, this will spell your doom. Why have Office Clerks when all you need is a single place telephone reception processing office.

No video, no text can be trusted anymore. Could be fake, could be real, or a mixture. This has some extremely bad implications.

ai and cloning should be banned

Imagine this models that predict wall street who is using this products. Human manipulation is happening. We are slow on catching what they do. They have years over us.

AI is careless where you were born

More than AI I’ve always been scared of humans. So far we are the greatest threat to us and everything around us. I wished we explored more ourselves than everything around

Can you get your head around AI replacing everyone in government and eventually killing off humanity?

Everyone needs to chill with all of their hysteria over OpenAI.

yang belakang mirip elon musk

The most concerning thing about AI bias is when the AI is programmed to say that is has no bias in the same sentence that is is giving you biased information.