Here's another video on evaluating the gaussian integral using the Leibniz rule; the difference here is this one's much more extravagant and something you'd expect from Mr. Feynman
This is the first time in my life I have ever heard the phrase "reverse cowgirl" applied to mathematics and it's got me giggling. 😂 Physics: "for simplicity in this example we will assume a spherical reverse cowgirl in a frictionless vacuum..."
thanks a tonnn !!! i can finally understand this integral because the feynmann technique is fantastic. i can literally understand the gaussian integral at 17 !! THANKS A TONNN
Another way is, simply do substitution x^2 = t, then use Feynmann technique within this use the Gamma function and then the Laplace transformation porperty, L [f(t)/t] = int{s to inf} L(S) ds.
I couldnt even do simple equations in math yet i‘m here watching this and literally understanding zero. This stuff gives me ptsd from highschool times.
Ah yes the interchange of limits....you're right....although the integral's convergence is trivial given its form it would've been better to mention this to justify taking the limit inside the integral operator
Paul Nahin's 'Inside Interesting Integrals' is an entertaining book. He has a Chapter on Feynman's technique and another on contour integration. That is only 2 of the 9 chapters. There are some mind blowing problems in there about realistic problems from math and physics.
I evaluated the fresnel integrals the same way so I applied it here. I got the fresnel integral approach from flammy but he messed up near the end with the complex exponential so I just improved on it.
@@maths_505 i'll be honest here, im just watching these vids for fun cuz my love's not with me and im kinda lonely and missing her haha... math's just awesome! i haven't studied calculus in that depth but watching you makes me realise there's so much i need to learn, thanks ❤️
Your thoughts on the current controlled extraterrestrial reality disclosure process and related US GOV cover-up? When the nervous contagious giggling subsides, how will our civilization adapt to this publicly known reality? What might be some of the potential implications of disclosure of this reality? New energy sources perhaps? Religions? History? Do we really want to know the full truth?
Gamma function approach is the simplest one....if anyone complains about the Γ(1/2) thing, I would direct them to the reflection formula for the gamma function.
@@maths_505 I agree. However, the polar coordinate approach is more elementary: we learned how to calculate the Gaussian before we evn heard about the gamma...