Тёмный
No video :(

A crazy approach to the gaussian integral using Feynman's technique 

Maths 505
Подписаться 57 тыс.
Просмотров 36 тыс.
50% 1

Here's another video on evaluating the gaussian integral using the Leibniz rule; the difference here is this one's much more extravagant and something you'd expect from Mr. Feynman

Опубликовано:

 

23 фев 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 84   
@Decrupt
@Decrupt Год назад
NOT THE REVERSE COWGIRL FOR INTEGRALS NOOOOO
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
😂😂😂
@stapler942
@stapler942 Год назад
This is the first time in my life I have ever heard the phrase "reverse cowgirl" applied to mathematics and it's got me giggling. 😂 Physics: "for simplicity in this example we will assume a spherical reverse cowgirl in a frictionless vacuum..."
@RichardJohnson_dydx
@RichardJohnson_dydx 11 месяцев назад
Unexpected but welcomed.
@TheArtOfBeingANerd
@TheArtOfBeingANerd 8 месяцев назад
No because I told my mom I would keep my youtube PG while watching my brothers and she literally walked in when it said reverse cowgirl
@jmcsquared18
@jmcsquared18 2 месяца назад
""Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give practical results. But that's not why we do it." - Dick Feynman, who probably enjoyed cowgirl
@zahari20
@zahari20 Год назад
In my opinion, the smoothest evaluation of the Gauss integral is to take its aquare, write it as a double integral, and use polar coordinates.
@TechToppers
@TechToppers 8 месяцев назад
Yeah I saw some paper and they said... This is an elementary approach so much more tricky to find. More advanced techniques make it way more trivial.
@christophermorris486
@christophermorris486 Год назад
😂😂😂 I was hooked at reverse cowgirl trick for integration
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
If only youtube would allow me to use the corresponding thumbnail
@daddy_myers
@daddy_myers Год назад
@@maths_505 Technically you could, you'd just have to use a different platform.
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Ah yes....maths 505 on the hub😂
@christophermorris486
@christophermorris486 Год назад
I did watch the video with on hand….the other hand was had a pencil in it following along
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Had us in the first half not gonna lie
@zdzichumis
@zdzichumis Год назад
What a truly beautiful way to evaluate the Gaussian integral! Your work shall not be underappreciated.
@madhurpopli1790
@madhurpopli1790 15 дней назад
thanks a tonnn !!! i can finally understand this integral because the feynmann technique is fantastic. i can literally understand the gaussian integral at 17 !! THANKS A TONNN
@BalajiKomanabelli-nd1xq
@BalajiKomanabelli-nd1xq Год назад
At some point it looked like Laplace's approach but it is actually a great approach. But the easiest way is squaring and using polar coordinates
@_nemo171
@_nemo171 Год назад
No fancy uses of Gamma function properties, a clean approach. Nice!
@zunaidparker
@zunaidparker Год назад
Another awesome integral! Can't stop watching these!
@cot2a
@cot2a Год назад
Another way is, simply do substitution x^2 = t, then use Feynmann technique within this use the Gamma function and then the Laplace transformation porperty, L [f(t)/t] = int{s to inf} L(S) ds.
@jmcsquared18
@jmcsquared18 2 месяца назад
"A crazy approach" That alone tells you that it's gonna work.
@yoihenbalaishram8903
@yoihenbalaishram8903 Год назад
That was very, very clever. Especially the substitution part....
@pacotaco1246
@pacotaco1246 10 месяцев назад
This is a really cool way to do it besides switching to polar. Nice!
@cadmio9413
@cadmio9413 2 месяца назад
Thanks, this is one of my favourite videos on all the platform, never really understood polar cordinates :p
@doroffixial
@doroffixial Год назад
I couldnt even do simple equations in math yet i‘m here watching this and literally understanding zero. This stuff gives me ptsd from highschool times.
@circuitcraft2399
@circuitcraft2399 Год назад
Doesn't 2:00 follow from the fundamental theorem of calculus, no differentiation under the integral required?
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Indeed it does but the Leibniz rule provides a nice insight into its mechanism
@Singularitarian
@Singularitarian 10 месяцев назад
You’re right, we should just use the fundamental theorem of calculus at that step.
@mohamednour7680
@mohamednour7680 Год назад
We can use the gamma function and it will be in the end gamm(1/2)= √π
@terrariariley1643
@terrariariley1643 2 месяца назад
I watched the video and started crying after 40 seconds
@NightWanderer31415
@NightWanderer31415 Год назад
Very nice! Nitpicking, you could have explained why the limit can be taken inside the integral in the final step.
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Ah yes the interchange of limits....you're right....although the integral's convergence is trivial given its form it would've been better to mention this to justify taking the limit inside the integral operator
@yudoball
@yudoball Год назад
That's a cool trick
@noomade
@noomade 5 месяцев назад
"reverse cowgirl for integration" ... subbed!
@AndDiracisHisProphet
@AndDiracisHisProphet Год назад
excellent thumbnail choice
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
I have you to thank for it
@AndDiracisHisProphet
@AndDiracisHisProphet Год назад
@@maths_505 no problem :)
@cameronspalding9792
@cameronspalding9792 10 месяцев назад
I would define the square of the integral to be J(t) not I(t), namely because I is defined as being the integral from zero to infinity.
@michaelbaum6796
@michaelbaum6796 Год назад
Thanks a lot for this cool solution👌
@aryaghahremani9304
@aryaghahremani9304 7 месяцев назад
bro just pulled a reverse feynman technique, never seen a partial derivative be taken out of the integral wtf did I just watch lmao
@maths_505
@maths_505 7 месяцев назад
The reverse cowgirl formulation of calculus
@aayushiajith.
@aayushiajith. Год назад
Can anyone suggest me a book to start with feynmanns integrals???
@robertbachman9521
@robertbachman9521 Год назад
Paul Nahin's 'Inside Interesting Integrals' is an entertaining book. He has a Chapter on Feynman's technique and another on contour integration. That is only 2 of the 9 chapters. There are some mind blowing problems in there about realistic problems from math and physics.
@indescribablecardinal6571
@indescribablecardinal6571 8 месяцев назад
​@@robertbachman9521Thank you very much, this will be so helpful for physics.
@chengfang545
@chengfang545 3 месяца назад
I didn't quite understand the change of variable in 3:31 can someone explain? thank u
@Chris_387
@Chris_387 9 месяцев назад
When taking the derivative why you do these with the limits? Is there a general rule?
@maths_505
@maths_505 9 месяцев назад
The Leibniz rule
@Chris_387
@Chris_387 9 месяцев назад
@@maths_505 okay and why d(0)=0?, how do you evaluate if you have a number
@chrissch.9254
@chrissch.9254 Год назад
Lovely!
@rido4822
@rido4822 Год назад
U r Monster
@randomeme3484
@randomeme3484 Год назад
Well gamma function is op
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Agreed
@andikusnadi1979
@andikusnadi1979 Год назад
at 0:54 why its square ? thank you sir.
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Watch the rest of the video It'll become clear
@vatsalsharma4879
@vatsalsharma4879 7 месяцев назад
I love maths
@noobiegamer9080
@noobiegamer9080 Год назад
Root pi
@daddy_myers
@daddy_myers Год назад
Oh no, not this pic of Feynman! 🤣🤣🤣
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Had to this time 🤣
@rythmx123
@rythmx123 Год назад
how did u come up with the I(t) and then square it lol
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
I evaluated the fresnel integrals the same way so I applied it here. I got the fresnel integral approach from flammy but he messed up near the end with the complex exponential so I just improved on it.
@rythmx123
@rythmx123 Год назад
@@maths_505 you're amazing man! no words only respect :)
@rythmx123
@rythmx123 Год назад
@@maths_505 i'll be honest here, im just watching these vids for fun cuz my love's not with me and im kinda lonely and missing her haha... math's just awesome! i haven't studied calculus in that depth but watching you makes me realise there's so much i need to learn, thanks ❤️
@sayharshu
@sayharshu 11 месяцев назад
What application is he using to solve this integral?
@manstuckinabox3679
@manstuckinabox3679 Год назад
ahh... a classic problem solved in a classic way, you should try with contour integration next. 0:47 THIS IS NOT CLASSIC! THIS NOT CLASSIC AT ALL!
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
What else do you expect from the reverse cowgirl formulation of the gaussian integral 😂
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
You should check out qncubed3's video on the gaussian. It's pretty cool
@manstuckinabox3679
@manstuckinabox3679 Год назад
@@maths_505 oh yeah I did, just wanted to see it from my fav youtuber, thought you might have a cool approach (his was also extrememly cool)
@ahmeT0007
@ahmeT0007 Год назад
Ramanujan solved like this by square root he used beta function
@sushil7276
@sushil7276 Год назад
Why I am not smart like you
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
I'm not smart....just persistent...so you can do it if I can
@mars_titan
@mars_titan Год назад
How can I suggest you a problem? Mail?
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
It's in the about section of the page
@yunwenzhu2193
@yunwenzhu2193 9 месяцев назад
Seems to be overkill of this problem
@Dodgevair
@Dodgevair Год назад
Your thoughts on the current controlled extraterrestrial reality disclosure process and related US GOV cover-up? When the nervous contagious giggling subsides, how will our civilization adapt to this publicly known reality? What might be some of the potential implications of disclosure of this reality? New energy sources perhaps? Religions? History? Do we really want to know the full truth?
@georgesmelki1
@georgesmelki1 10 месяцев назад
Why complicate things? It's useless! The polar coordinates method is still the best!
@maths_505
@maths_505 10 месяцев назад
Gamma function approach is the simplest one....if anyone complains about the Γ(1/2) thing, I would direct them to the reflection formula for the gamma function.
@georgesmelki1
@georgesmelki1 10 месяцев назад
@@maths_505 I agree. However, the polar coordinate approach is more elementary: we learned how to calculate the Gaussian before we evn heard about the gamma...
Далее
Мухочирон эхтиёт бошед!
01:31
Просмотров 112 тыс.
Qora Gelik
00:26
Просмотров 489 тыс.
how Laplace solved the Gaussian integral
15:01
Просмотров 736 тыс.
Does this sound illusion fool you?
24:55
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Feynman's technique is INSANELY overpowered!!!
22:25
Просмотров 20 тыс.
Berkeley Math Tournament calculus tiebreaker
14:24
Просмотров 93 тыс.
The Dirichlet Integral is destroyed by Feynman's Trick
8:15
Мухочирон эхтиёт бошед!
01:31
Просмотров 112 тыс.