Esta obra está a propósito hecha de forma atemporal, si bien ya no usamos cascos como ese, todos entendemos que ese hombre es un soldado, y esas ropas que parecen trapos son justamente hechas así porque no representan ninguna época y tampoco buscan llamar la atención, dejando ver lo más importante que es la interacción entre los personajes de esa historia. El mensaje que transmite podría haber sido comprendido hace 500 o más años, y probablemente siga siendo comprendido en el año 2500 a no ser que nos volvamos cyborgs jajaj.
Feet are far too big. Arms are too massive for bodies. Maybe these are a different species of human. Artist needs to break away from Odd's influence. Clearly he encourages a house style.
@draxey: After all, that's the big question that no one knows! But just to give a few, in my opinion interesting approaches to a new understanding of art in the 21st century, I would like to mention Jenney Saville, Helnwein and Anton Hoeger. (There are a few more) They are fundamentally different. Ok, Jenny Saville was a strong painter, with an interesting form of representation of the human body. But unfortunately, as so often happens, success gets into her brain, always paints the same thing in different colors and gets worse and worse. But the Austrian Helnwein brings interesting contemporary themes in his hyperrealistic painting. His depictions of the broken child is one of his important themes. Anton Hoeger, a German puts the self, self-discovery, the loneliness of man's action in the universe in the foreground of his painting. Besides, he is the only one, as far as I can see, who thematizes the modern self-confident woman. His ingenious multiple layered interpretations show perhaps a new way of painting, because it is not about technique, but about content. (Yes also Nerdum is a pure painting technician. It is mainly only about the technique of Rembrandt. How did Rembrandt paint. How was his color palette. Which oils, which brushes etc...) The same with most abstract or wild figurative painters. In fact, 95% of all painters today are all about technique. Whether each pore is painted with the finest hair brush or, as with Saville, with broad, energetic, wild strokes of colour, or dripping (pollock) or colored areas, - the only thing that matters is the technique. Whether you are an amateur artist or an artist. They all show how to mix skin tones, or how to make oil paints, prime canvases, play with acrylic paints...etc...) It's all just technology. And that's what I find so interesting about Helnwein or even more so about Hoeger.
I don't understand how you can paint such nonsense in the 21st century? It is, if anything, a reactionary form of an art movement. Art should never be reactionary! Is this a religious or ideological sect in which the quasi-artist lives? Does the world need something like this? If you want to see mythical paintings, go to a museum and you can admire them there. And in an originality that only makes this would-be replica ridiculous. Apart from the fact that this painting is incredibly bad.
@@Think_Noir Also, but my teachers were mainly the great old masters. Nevertheless, we live in the 21st century, without monk's robes, without mythological rituals. We have invented electric light and work in daylight.
@achimborn5850 yes! in the 21stC we should just be throwing crap at the canvas and calling it a masterpiece of expression! In music we shouldn't be writing great movements, instead we should be smashing bottles and calling the noise also a masterpiece of expression. Who needs representative art in the 21stC, it's soooo 'then'.
@@achimborn5850so what do you want ? What do you exactly want all artist to do ? What is the 21st century style ? How about you let people enjoy what they enjoy making.
