Тёмный

A small nugget with the GPX 6000, I thought the signal given was very weak for the size of the gold. 

Simon
Подписаться 739
Просмотров 476
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

26 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3   
@royjohnson465
@royjohnson465 7 месяцев назад
Yes it is very odd, I cannot figure it out? A Minelab dealer in Oregon, USA explained this to me:: The Coiltek 10x5 Goldhawk was our most sensitive 6000 coil available and is also runs quiet with sensitivity at 3 or less. The 10x5 Goldhawk was about 1” inch deeper than the 12x7 Xceed on a 3 grain nugget.
@phrunt
@phrunt 7 месяцев назад
The smaller the gold is the better than 10x5" performs over the 12x7" that's for sure. The 10x5" is a much more sensitive coil to small gold I think.
@phrunt
@phrunt 7 месяцев назад
This is the Algoforce on the same nugget, I think it does a much better job on this particular nugget than the GPX 6000 even though the Algoforce is running a bigger 10" coil. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KcHr68OEJFA.html
Далее
Algoforce E1500 First Gold.
30:31
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.
Algoforce E1500 on some deep coins buried in my yard
4:21
Minelab Gold monster 1000 metal dedecting
9:30
Просмотров 2 тыс.
Vendor Honesty Test - Alaska Mint Gold Paydirt
26:31
Просмотров 100 тыс.
This $479 Metal Detector PAID for ITSELF in ONE DAY!
24:42
Analyzing Jason's MBMMLLC Gold Ore
27:51
Просмотров 67 тыс.
How To Recover Gold From Computer Scrap
39:51
Просмотров 1,5 млн
Deep Aussie Gold Ep 4 | GPX 6000 is UNBELIEVABLE
27:59