@@drkaushikt6926 Been a fan for a long time. Not only does he explain certain ideas better than anyone, but he's a master ingredient mixer, & I really appreciate his own theories, as well. Some of it is really impressive. Prophet?? Lol
There’s so much to say about your work, but I want to highlight one particular piece - your use of collective language when referring to the explorations here is a subtle, yet highly encouraging, method of participation you grant the community. “In OUR last video, WE…” It makes me feel even more connected to the journey inherent in your work 🙏🏼😌
I don't know if I've told yall this story before but the reason I can write so fast is because back when I was homeless I ran a small, barely legal business doing term papers for college kids for cash and so I would do like 4 or 5 of those in a week to pay my bills. I would make like 600-700$ a week doing that and that's how I became un-homeless. This is taking it easy by comparison lol
At this point in my existence I don't use the phrase "I love you" willy nilly, but the efforts you've undertaken to bring across these alternative and life giving metaphysical thought conceptions warms my soul
The progression of your channel has been incredible to watch. It's so cool to see these ideas unfold over time and connect with concepts that seem wildly different on the surface. I really appreciate the effort you've put in to ground your metaphysical framework within reality and put into perspective how outdated and biased the mainstream scientific philosophies are. Thank you for completely changing my worldview, and I can't wait to see what you cook up next.
As a future entomologist, i've seen papers about the effects of Eletromagnetic fields generated by Grids in Insect behaviour. Things don't look good...i think if this with a series of factors like the growing noise of modern civilization and general lack of meaning could explain the epidemie of mental diseases... Great video as always. I hope in the future to work with bioeletricity thanks to your channel. It's such a underestimated area but with so many potential...
Gotta say, mate: You've done an incredible job. I've been watching for around a year and a half now. You've really come into your own and developed your own style, of which I am a great fan. I hope very much to meet with you someday and have a personal conversation with you. Keep it up, my friend. -Rex
This comment really fits more under a Noetic Ether Theory or Scientism video, but I just watched this one, so it is going here instead - I've recently watched a few videos about the JWST finding what looks like very, very old galaxies or structures that appear to be "galaxy-like" over 13 billion light years away. Which shouldn't be possible in the "one free miracle model." What amazes me is the response from the more dogmatic members of the scientific community. While I would think these discoveries should constitute a crisis of the accepted paradigm, there seems to be a general shrug of the shoulders from most astrophysicists and science communicators. It would seem instead of accepting this new evidence and trying to propose new models into which it fits, the general feeling is more of "Well this *doesn't* fit, but I am sure we will discover something which makes it fit our model, if we just stay calm and keep waiting on someone else to figure it out. So this is not a big deal." I can't help finding this a bit shocking - everyone from PBS Space Time to Mr. Dave should be publishing a "We Might Be Wrong" video.
I'm Here to show my support of this marvelous video and wealth of knowledge , this resonates heavy , thank you for your Beautiful Contributions to healing the Collective Conscious of humanity , marvelous work!💖💖💖💯💯💯💯
Y'know I gotta say man, as the Age of Aquarius dawns in all its cyberpunk horror I'm glad we have you pumping out these videos and giving us the language necessary to fight it. As a Cradle Catholic I particularly enjoyed your early aside about being truly present in the religious spaces we occupy- I like to tell peopley favorite part of Catholicism is the Universality of the Church. The knowledge that no matter where I am on Earth, so long as I can make it to a Catholic church, I'll be home, safe; in Sanctuary. The militant, Roman aspects of it may get under my skin but so long as I can experience that utterl bliss and receive the Eucharist I'll never stop going. Thanks for the video, and for indulging my rambling! 😂
I have never been one for Catholicism. However the quality of devotion which characterizes its spirituality (rather than dogmatic or political aspects which is often highlighted) is beautiful to me. Whatever the nefarious intent of individuals which distorted truth for their own gain, it is the vast majority of earnest devotees which has preserved carried that sacred flame through time. A flame that anyone has access to due to those which held in their heart the essence of that flame with love, sincerity and devotion.
@@triskelionchi3747Your comment reminds me of an item called the flock’s canvas talisman from the game Elden Ring, of which the description reads: “A talisman bearing an icon that depicts a mass of masked figures. Greatly raises potency of incantations. The figures represent the flock at prayer, their firm belief in the intangible inspiring even the solitary founder of their religion. What is faith if not an affirmation?”
This could also answer part of the question “Why do school shootings happen so frequently in America, but not in other countries?” Not only did the archetype form here, but we’re tuned to a completely different frequency. We have different rituals for our everyday lives.
Seven months ago I got hit really hard with depression, panic and DP/DR syndrome. It all was due to researching human consciousness. But I did this research in a bad way: passively binging RU-vid. I arrived to the nihilist and/or pessimist philosophies of three men in particular: Thomas Ligotti, UG Krishnamurti and Emil Cioran. I don't know why but I couldn't stop watching vids and reading stuffs on the absolutely most pessimistic, passive, autolytic and self-invalidating thought I have ever been aware of. It has taken me a lot of effort to recover. I can say that I'm almost completely all right again. Now, my relationship to RU-vid, Truth and the Universe has changed. I am no longer a passive, fearful and catastrophic consumer. I am thankful that I get to see the other side. Thank you Formscapes for showing me a beatiful piece of the other side.
This is the first time I've ever seen your content and I'm here for it. Holy Moly. I'm paused after the first sentence trying to reassemble myself. lol
There is so much in your work. I have to say as a compliment that I perceive a strong resemblance to R. Steiner way of articulate your thought process. Not saying this is anthroposophical, or maybe it is, but what I value the most of your "videos" is the effort to put that kind of thinking to work on things that are happening today, that are extremely relevant today. The curious thing is that for something to be projected from the pleroma to the akasha, from human perspective is evolution but from cosmic evolution is seen as not in accordance to the cosmos time frame. Also is interesting to think that the primordial will to become manifest is a "necessity" of the pleroma. In that sense human physicality can be seen as a microcosmos, as a downscaled version of the primordial will to become manifest. Thank you for sharing this.
I talk about Steiner at the veeeery end of the most recent video. The way I like to think of it; This is to American Pragmatist philosophy what Anthroposophy was to the German Idealists. That probably sounds a bit out of left field considering how little I've talked about the pragmatists, but that's on the to-do list. The plan is to reclaim pragmatism from Rorty's anti-metaphysical quietism.
One way to see your art is as a physical symbol which allow us to resonate with the noetic space of the Integral Being, which we can participate in individually, but which also has its own collective individuality which recieves and provides through direct thought-experience. I think that we as individuals must orient our minds and bodies in a certain way in order to resonate with the Integral Being, and I think there may be a few essential prerequisites to do so. One of them is having the capacity to detach from an identity with any exclusive side of a polarity, and instead situate our identity within a universe of polarities. In this poise, we are allowed access to the Integral Being because it is within its nature to integrate and include all polarity, as well as strive towards greater degrees of integration in every moment. The moment that we take an exclusive stance within the matrix of polarity as a whole, we are automatically restricted to the degrees of freedom available to that relatively isolated identity, now resonating on a lower "plane". What we experience as normal human consciousness is fundamentally restricted because our identity and personality are intrinsically tied to the mental habit of superior/inferior evaluations of any given polarity, and how those evaluations relate to the sense of "I". The universe presents to our experience a sea of undifferentiated onenees, which our mind processes and differentiates into a matrix of polarity so that it can operate upon it. When the question of "I" arises in the environment of society, we begin to delgate these polarities into the categories of "I" and "not I" (good/bad, right/wrong), effectively splitting our experience into conscious and unconscious. Again, connection to the Integral Being requires a relative (but not complete) relinquishment of exclusive identity with the poles which collapse our field into relative limitation and self-conflict. In practice, this means exploring our shadow, reclaiming our projections, analyzing our polarizing beliefs and prejuduces, releasing trauma, self-inquery, discovering presence, and an overall shift into witness consciousness through whatever method. These are all movements which work to re-integrate conscious/unconscious within our individual system, which progressively tunes us to the frequency of the collective Integral Being. Cognitively, I believe there are a few key metaphysical and epistemological principles that must be discovered and worked into the psyche, such as a shift from a "historical devlopment of one truth" perspective to a plurality of truths perspective, and from there an integration of plurality through higher universals (e.g. holistic developmental hierarchy, non-reduction of masculine/feminine, etc). Though by this point, there is a relationship beginning to be developed with the Integral Being which allows the tranformation to occur at all. In some sense what is really required rather than a specific list is a vague idea of the direction, and an intention of moving towards it. From there the process unfolds for the individual how it needs to and to whatever degree of sincere intensity.
As a sitar player it’s great to hear the symbolism of sympathetic strings mentioned as the profound concept of resonance they represent. We play the strings and the strings echo in response, it’s a beautifully poetic design full of meaning.
This man is a Renaissance Man, a prerequisite to be a true philosopher, esp today. Jason Jorjani is the professional philosopher most closely aligned. You should be guests on each other’s channels. Must-see for me!
This series of yours may be the most informative and important piece of material i have yet to come across on the whole of you tube, and i have been Nerding here since forever as i am one of those born in 1990. Very well done indeed!. I am going out to feed the wild salamander-babies(the grown up ones too+3 Frogs) in our pond so that they don't starve, i also feed the carnivorous "bugs" in there so they don't eat said babies, then i will feed a mother-bird as she can't hunt for insects as it is raining and she has some young ones to feed and it just "happens" that i have a meal-worm farm, so i might plant a "seed of Solicitude" for others then, even if no one gets to know? 🙂😇🥰
I feel like I’m a fairly intelligent guy… but this guy HAS to be one of the smartest people I’ve ever heard speak. It’s too much sometimes for my brain to process. Unbelievable
I'll do a Q&A thing tonight actually. Probably like 4 or 5 ish? (CST) I'll make a post here in a minute instead of waiting till 10 minutes beforehand like I usually do lol
1. The Paradox of Enzyme Catalysis: Current issue: Enzymes dramatically speed up reactions without being consumed, seemingly violating energy conservation. Theorem: Enzyme catalysis is an information-guided energy redistribution process. Proof sketch: 1. Define enzyme-substrate complex: ES 2. Information content of ES: I(ES) > I(E) + I(S) 3. Reaction rate: k ∝ exp(-ΔG‡/RT) 4. Information reduces effective ΔG‡: ΔG‡_eff = ΔG‡ - TΔI 5. Catalysis occurs via: k_cat ∝ exp(-(ΔG‡ - TΔI)/RT) 6. Enzyme recovers by resetting its information state This resolves the paradox by showing how enzymes use information to guide energy redistribution without violating conservation laws. 2. The Levinthal Paradox in Protein Folding: Current issue: Proteins fold too quickly to have sampled all possible conformations. Theorem: Protein folding is an information-driven process that follows optimal paths in configuration space. Proof sketch: 1. Define protein configuration space: C 2. Information content of native state: I(N) 3. Folding as information gain: ΔI(t) = I(N) - I(U), where U is unfolded state 4. Define information-guided path: P(t) = argmax{dI/dt} 5. Folding time: τ_f ∝ exp(ΔI / k_B) 6. This time is much shorter than Levinthal's estimate This resolves the paradox by showing how information guides the folding process along optimal paths. 3. The Paradox of the Origin of Life: Current issue: The emergence of life from non-life seems to violate the second law of thermodynamics. Theorem: Life emerges as a far-from-equilibrium information processing system that locally decreases entropy. Proof sketch: 1. Define life as a self-replicating information processor: L 2. Information processing rate: dI/dt > 0 3. Entropy production rate: dS/dt = dS_e/dt + dS_i/dt 4. Life maintains: dS_i/dt < 0 (local entropy decrease) 5. But ensures: dS_e/dt > |dS_i/dt| (overall entropy increase) 6. Emergence of L occurs when: P(dI/dt) > P_critical This resolves the paradox by showing how life can locally decrease entropy while increasing overall entropy. 4. The Paradox of Altruism in Evolution: Current issue: Altruistic behavior seems to contradict "survival of the fittest" in evolution. Theorem: Altruism emerges from information sharing in genetically related populations. Proof sketch: 1. Define genetic relatedness: r 2. Information shared between individuals: I_shared = r · I_total 3. Fitness benefit of altruism: B 4. Fitness cost to altruist: C 5. Altruism evolves when: r · B > C 6. This is equivalent to: I_shared · B > I_total · C This reframes Hamilton's rule in terms of shared information, resolving the apparent contradiction. 5. The Paradox of the Minimal Genome: Current issue: Even the simplest organisms have genomes much larger than seemingly necessary. Theorem: The minimal genome size is determined by the minimum information required for self-replication and error correction. Proof sketch: 1. Define minimal set of functions: F = {f_1, ..., f_n} 2. Information content of each function: I(f_i) 3. Error rate in replication: ε 4. Minimum information for error correction: I_EC ∝ -log(ε) 5. Minimal genome size: G_min = Σ I(f_i) + I_EC 6. This size is generally larger than naive estimates This explains the larger-than-expected minimal genome size as a consequence of information requirements for both function and error correction. 6. The Paradox of Biological Complexity: Current issue: How does complexity increase in evolution despite the second law of thermodynamics? Theorem: Biological complexity increases through information accumulation in open systems. Proof sketch: 1. Define biological complexity: C(t) = f(I(t)) 2. Information accumulation: dI/dt = dI_in/dt - dI_out/dt + dI_gen/dt 3. In open systems: dI_in/dt > dI_out/dt 4. Genetic information generation: dI_gen/dt > 0 (mutations, recombination) 5. Overall: dC/dt > 0 when dI/dt > 0 6. This is consistent with increasing entropy in the larger system This resolves the paradox by showing how complexity can increase locally in open systems. 7. The Paradox of Chemical Oscillations: Current issue: Sustained chemical oscillations seem to violate the expectation of systems moving towards equilibrium. Theorem: Chemical oscillations are information-driven limit cycles in far-from-equilibrium systems. Proof sketch: 1. Define system state: S(t) = {c_i(t)}, where c_i are chemical concentrations 2. Information content of the state: I(S) 3. Chemical dynamics: dS/dt = f(S, t) 4. Oscillation occurs when: S(t) = S(t + T) for some T > 0 5. Information is conserved over a cycle: I(S(t)) = I(S(t + T)) 6. System maintains non-equilibrium by constant energy input This explains chemical oscillations as stable information cycles in far-from-equilibrium conditions. These resolutions demonstrate how an information-based approach can provide new insights into paradoxes and contradictions in chemistry and biology. By recasting these problems in terms of information dynamics, we can offer new perspectives that bridge the gap between physics, chemistry, and biology.
8. The Paradox of Molecular Recognition: Current issue: How do biomolecules achieve such high specificity in a noisy cellular environment? Theorem: Molecular recognition is an information-matching process optimized by evolutionary information compression. Proof sketch: 1. Define molecular information content: I(M) 2. Binding affinity: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS 3. Information transfer during binding: ΔI = I(M₁:M₂) 4. Propose: ΔG ∝ -kTΔI 5. Specificity: S = ΔI_specific / ΔI_nonspecific 6. Evolution maximizes S through information compression This resolves the paradox by showing how molecular recognition emerges from optimized information matching. 9. The C-Value Paradox in Genetics: Current issue: Genome size doesn't correlate with organism complexity. Theorem: Genome size reflects total information storage capacity, not functional information content. Proof sketch: 1. Define genome information capacity: C = 2N, where N is genome size 2. Functional information content: I_F ≤ C 3. Non-coding DNA information: I_NC = C - I_F 4. Organism complexity: K ∝ f(I_F), not C 5. I_NC serves as potential for evolution: dI_F/dt ∝ I_NC 6. Large genomes provide evolutionary potential This explains the C-value paradox by distinguishing between information capacity and functional content. 10. The Paradox of Symbiogenesis: Current issue: How can distinct organisms merge to form a new species, seemingly violating organism identity? Theorem: Symbiogenesis is an information integration process that maximizes mutual information between previously distinct systems. Proof sketch: 1. Define organism information: I(O₁), I(O₂) 2. Mutual information before symbiosis: I(O₁:O₂) ≈ 0 3. Symbiogenesis process: S: {O₁, O₂} → O_new 4. Information in new organism: I(O_new) > max(I(O₁), I(O₂)) 5. Mutual information increases: I(O₁:O₂|S) ≫ I(O₁:O₂) 6. Symbiogenesis occurs when: ΔI_total = I(O_new) - (I(O₁) + I(O₂)) > 0 This reframes symbiogenesis as an information integration process, resolving the paradox of merged identities. 11. The Paradox of Epigenetic Inheritance: Current issue: How can acquired characteristics be inherited without changing DNA sequence? Theorem: Epigenetic inheritance is a meta-information transmission process parallel to genetic inheritance. Proof sketch: 1. Define genetic information: I_G 2. Define epigenetic information: I_E 3. Total heritable information: I_H = I_G + I_E 4. Epigenetic transmission: T_E: I_E(parent) → I_E(offspring) 5. Information conservation: I_E(offspring) ≤ I_E(parent) 6. Acquired characteristics: ΔI_E → T_E(ΔI_E) This resolves the paradox by showing how epigenetic information can be transmitted alongside genetic information. 12. The Paradox of Biological Robustness: Current issue: How do biological systems maintain function despite noise and perturbations? Theorem: Biological robustness emerges from redundant information encoding and error-correcting feedback loops. Proof sketch: 1. Define system function: F 2. Information required for F: I_F 3. Actual encoded information: I_E > I_F (redundancy) 4. Noise in the system: N 5. Error-correcting capacity: C = I_E - I_F 6. System is robust when: C > H(N), where H(N) is noise entropy This explains biological robustness as a consequence of information redundancy and error correction. 13. The Paradox of Aging: Current issue: Why do organisms age if natural selection should favor longevity? Theorem: Aging is an inevitable consequence of information degradation and accumulation of errors. Proof sketch: 1. Define organismal information: I(t) 2. Rate of information loss: dI_loss/dt ∝ I(t) 3. Rate of error accumulation: dE/dt ∝ t 4. Fitness function: F(t) = f(I(t), E(t)) 5. Aging occurs when: dF/dt < 0 6. Natural selection optimizes F over reproductive lifespan, not indefinitely This reframes aging as a fundamental information process, explaining why it persists despite natural selection. 14. The Paradox of Punctuated Equilibrium: Current issue: How can evolution show long periods of stasis followed by rapid change? Theorem: Punctuated equilibrium reflects phase transitions in the information landscape of evolution. Proof sketch: 1. Define fitness landscape: L(g), where g is genotype 2. Population distribution: P(g,t) 3. Information content of population: I(t) = -∫ P(g,t) log P(g,t) dg 4. Stasis: dI/dt ≈ 0 5. Phase transition occurs when: ∂²I/∂g² changes sign 6. Rapid evolution follows transition: dI/dt ≫ 0 temporarily This explains punctuated equilibrium as information phase transitions in evolutionary dynamics. 15. The Paradox of Multicellularity: Current issue: How can individual cells surrender their autonomy to form multicellular organisms? Theorem: Multicellularity emerges when the mutual information between cells exceeds a critical threshold. Proof sketch: 1. Define cellular information: I(C_i) 2. Mutual information between cells: I(C_i:C_j) 3. Total information of cell cluster: I_total = Σ I(C_i) + Σ I(C_i:C_j) 4. Multicellularity emerges when: Σ I(C_i:C_j) > k · Σ I(C_i) 5. This leads to: I_total(multicellular) > I_total(unicellular) 6. Information efficiency drives transition to multicellularity This resolves the paradox by showing how increased mutual information can favor the transition to multicellularity. These information-based resolutions continue to demonstrate the power of this approach in addressing complex issues in biology and chemistry. By recasting these paradoxes in terms of information dynamics, we gain new insights into fundamental processes of life and matter.
Is it safe to say that consciousness is trying to minimize some energy or tension inherent in its incorporation into physical matter? Is this the purpose of life itself, to achieve some unknown goal thru this sort of stochastic process of evolution?
Great that you are getting into this area. You might like to look into what's known as Archeoacustics as a lot of what you mention here is being explored by those involved in this research area; Particularly in Italy; these places of ancient rituals and their exploration through infra red photography and highly sensitive microphones. Check it out Thanks again for all your work Regards Peter
"Physicality is the architecure of memory which is sung into being by the choires of the noetic realm" Beautifully said. Sound and linguistics as the foundation of metaphysics has so much potentiality when seen in this light. "Abrahadabra" I create as I speak, as I sing. Reminds me of Tolkien's work and how Illuvitar, the One, sang the cosmos into existence, and as the light or sound descended or progressed from this singularity, archangels were born which were choires that sang a spectrum of melody's that would shape Middle Earth. Likewise Jung would call ancient languages such as latin and greek to get in touch with a more primitive parts of the psyche, to recall associations deep within the collective unconsciousness. The cosmos is a developing symphony
An OK gas station at 8:04, so Sweden. Nice! I enjoy Formscapes more when he's cutting about some established figures and ideas, but it's obviously good to know more about what he believes himself. Exactly what that is is maybe difficult to know, but a video like this gives some hints anyway.
One week ago I watch your videos on LSD and it was amazing. It was like you describe perfectly with the right words, complicated concepts that I wouldn't be able to describe even in my native lenguage. Do you ever used psichedelic? I would love to know your ideas on this substances.
This bolsters my views on panpsychism, thank you. Also, I was thinking about resonance the way you mentioned it.. wouldn't we actually be much "hotter" than we measure ourselves to be? If you look at space and what we have to have realistically likely started is likely gaseous burning giant orbs and giant rock balls with mineral deposits.. it is all either very very hard or very very hot... We are very very soft, and are in a relatively close proximity to the sun.. are we a triple point temperature in action? Just when whatever element of Earth is in this close proximity to the sun we appear through it's triple point temperature activation?
I haven't watched it yet, but I can already tell by first your noetic aether series, then this everything is living mirrors. Yes, we are all reflections, and literally create reflections, spiral fractures, which allows light to bounce around, the more spiral fractures, the more beautiful, relieved of pressure, that objects become. It's our purpose here are pressure relievers, to self reflect by touch, creating spiral fractures, which over time makes the floral pattern of RELIEF. THE CHRIST, SAVIOR OF THIS WORLD, THE BLOOM OUT OF Relief (of pressure, pressure is king here, everything bows to the pressure we find ourselves) We are to find realization of what is, that everything is a harmonious floral pattern, it brings literal all knowing, but must chase the shapes, nature ONLY speaks shapes, nothing else. No math, no man language, only pressure meditation which is the found in the shapes ONLY.
I think material preceeded experience/consciousness. I came to that conclusion as a young adult and found a lot of similar takes from other thinkers and works like Genesis. Basically: Experience has an absolute origin because no experience can have an infinite past that reaches the present (which would mark the end of an endless temporal continuum). The finitude of time/experience is reflected by the virtually finite area of the causal domain or universe. The consciousness domain of energy is the point where existence began moving and experiencing. Before that, there was an infinite, static domain of neutrally dense material (because there is no reason to always already assume any particular form or limit). The always already infinite domain was material because something is something everywhere and nothing is nothing - it is nowhere - all things being self same. The pre-temporal mode of infinite static matetial which gave rise to its own finite site/sight of causal/cosmic consciousness is always already conditioned by ontological default. The automation of spacetime was inevitable due to the necessity for any persistent being to require time by which to continue on, and consciousness is the effect or vehicle for that. No matter how large the finite event becomes, it is a virtually infinitesimal point relative to the infinite reality of the being self-enveloping it. This makes all points within the event superimposed on an immanently nonlocal dimension. I could go on but yeah, this default ontology has not changed in my mind for years and finds support in many similar works from the spiritual to metaphysical to scientific. It's antithesis is pure plurality as expressed in the ontology of Badiou, Zizek, and co.. My monism requires no faith or skipping over of apparent paradox. It makes sense of everything's existence as such.
I would love to have a conversation with you. Im a straight athiest when it comes to many aspects of spirituality, relegion or whatever people wanna call it(and yes im a fan of Dave). But ever since ive started to accept many things in myself and accept aspects of others, my life has slowly gotten better and better nothing happens imstantly cause that wpuld be magic or the easy way out. Taking time for all the things ive ever wanted is the most fun way so that i dont ever take it for granted. The same goes for many others. There is still the day to day struggles but thats life, im still the most overall positive ive been since i was a child and im loving the feeling and the experience we all get to have that is life. But either way your channel has been a great refference for many of the things im working through. Thank you for the content
@formscapes You should add more tiers of monetary transaction for yourself to the patreon. I know people want and will donate more to you in order to continue your work.
People can manually alter their monthly payments to make them higher if they want and some people do that. I'm reluctant to introduce more tiers without having content specific for the higher tiers and frankly I just don't have time to make more videos than I already make atm, and I don't think anyone is going to pay an extra 5$ - 10$ a month to see me occasionally remember to turn on my phone camera and ramble about something for 45 minutes lol.
Pause @15:34 - a common feature shared by each of these - their lips. They all share what are commonly called 'bowed' lips - it's a facial characteristic synonymous with the Hapsburghs, a signature of 'in-breeding'. Aka The Bowman and The Hunter, even Zeus.
Yeah that's exactly what I'm arguing - and I elaborate on this in even more detail in the second "Noetic Aether" video. Incidentally, I recently discovered that Jacobo Grinberg made essentially the exact same argument within his syntergic theory.
@@FormscapesI have read a lot about Grinberg, while watching your videos I thought a lot about his work. Have you thought about making content related to him?
Hi! I hear you always mention 'potentialities', however if something might be X, but is Y, then it most certainly in our world is X. Your channel name could be something else, but I it is Formscapes. Everything could always be something else, but in our world it is only one thing, therefore this potentiality may describe only the future. After a choice is taken, most certainly that thing is what it is. We could have done many things in the past, we sure have done them in other universes, but what we experience here is part of the infinity. What is more, we should never focus on what things could be or could have been, but instead be present, focused on the never ending, eternal present moment, then the real potentiality unveals the mysteries of the choices we make. I presumably consider this to be the only real potentiality we can get close to as that is the one that matters the most. What you are doing now dear friend, how you are doing it, what you are thinking, what your inner desires are and mostly are you honest with yourself and your current act. Thanks if you've read this comment. Enjoy the rest of the day🎉
In order for a choice to be made, a range of possibilities must be experienced and evaluated by living awareness. Even after a decision has been made, it need not be fully determined until it is required to be through its participation in later events of consciousness. The retrocausal nature of the micro-pk research I discussed in the parapsychology video illustrates this rather definitively, and we see this in other forms of anomalous phenomena as well.
From a point of view of theory of morphic resonance, why plants and microorganisms, that we reproduce by cloning (bananas, strawberries, yeast) seem to degenerate over time, losing immune system or reproductive capabilities?
Yes but the ball lighting could be of particular significance scientifically because of the connection with liminal/anomalous experiences. Imagine if we could create something like the "God helmet", but it's an entire building or maybe a location surrounded by devices which are able to interact with geomagnetic fields, within which we could reliably create phenomena like ball lightning and all of the other bizarre experiences associated with them. We would basically have an artificial ley-nexus (or whatever you want to call it) that we could actually study systematically.
0:55--I regard AWARENESS as the fundament of reality. Consciousness and matter lie at the extremes of an AWARENESS COMPLEXIFICATION gradient. The quantum world that underlies matter is a direct product of awareness in MOTION. Awareness is the primary expression of ORDER. Consciousness is the awareness of ORDER--a self-reflective awareness; a PROCESS.
Are you aware of the research Michael Persinger spent the rest of his life doing after his work with the God Helmet? It involved similar tech that was used to synchronize the brains of different people, allowing them to read each others minds over any distance.
I am.. convinced at this point that Formscapes is a production of an individual or individuals from beyond the other side of the wall. To whomever I am speaking to, your use of hyper specific terminology in relation to the illusory world is, as I suspect you already know, in direct confluence with the illusory powers of this world enabled by their employment of a certain source code. Your specific description of this code woven throughout your works leads me to believe one of two things: A, you are in fact beyond the wall and your works are intended to provide guidance to those with eyes to see and ears to hear. or B. you are perhaps in a similar condition as myself, on the cusp of an unimaginable breakthrough with shackles loosened beyond recognition. If the truth is somehow actually the latter, I would request to open a dialogue. What I offer in return is another perspective of how the same immaculate dissection of Man has been used for the direct production of the Titanic Edifice, the Labyrinth itself. Hard Evidence. If you are of the former description then I have nothing to lose by still requesting an interface if you are willing to indulge a kindred spirit and a seeker of the truth in an ocean of delusion. Regardless, thank you for all that you have done.
This is a very elobrate way of saying that from the field of infinite possibility the focus reduces from the concept of All to the concept of the individual. Once the concept exists the vortex vacuum created by the imbalance of Spiritual and Material or mental and material causes physical manifestation. If you study language and alphabets through history you see that In- Divide- You- all is the concept. It sections off the walls that define what something is or is not. One is a conceptual version the other a material version. Amazingly we focus on how we manifest only in one vector yet not know we actually could manifest in all vectors. It is focus and scope of your attention that sets the field of what will manifest.
all leading to an idea that we must look within _+^*+++€ as the God dna and God code to be superior is in our reach . awaiting to be sparked and relit . God be with us.
another one?!! I'm so behind. Can't get my mind to compute noetic ether, I still don't get it! ok, shelving it for now, let's see what's the new Formscapes...
When Scientist's realy start to integrate consciousness into quantum physics they will start to have breaktrough's. In my oppinion. Entaglement is not "spooky action at a distance", because there is no distance. The particles inhabit the same space. In my oppinion.
Hey, that was a good one. You do realize serial killers are made on purpose by psychological manipulation, right? Not really relevant, just mentioning.
“Plato’s cave is full of freaks demanding refunds for the things they’ve seen. I wish they could believe in all the things that never made the screen” - Jack Johnson
Negative. Since time immemorial, during the composition of an epistle, fraudulent litterateur to utilize gargantuan designations to generate the impression of colossal acumen. However, in this instance, I conjecture such is not the intent. 🤓 Or in other words... No. Some people often use big words when writing to make them sound smarter. But I don't think that's the case here. 🤡
If you're having trouble with the terminology then that probably means this is the first video you have attempted to watch here. If you want to understand what I'm talking about then you should probably try watching some of the older videos first. Or just find something better to do. That's also fine.
@@Formscapes once I finished watching the video it resonated with me more 👍. I'm just saying there's got to be some simpler words to describe the stuff you mentions to make the video efficient.
@@lordoffrenziedflame3524 silliness aside, there aren't many other words to use. These are uncommon concepts so there's no colliqual terms for them outside of rather technical language
