A320 engine fire procedure 

Thank you 😃

Easy there Mohammad!

Yes i think so. Above 400’ pilot should do ECAM antiinflamasi first untill eng secure, then accelerate to green dot and climb up. After that pilots can assest the situation and decide to countinue or RTB.

You are totally incorrect. 400' is the minimum altitude. Company procedures can have you do it later. PIC can make a decision to do it later. Calm down please.

Especially at an airport like Salzburg where you are surrounded by terrain. It is probably the safest course of action to fly a Engine Out SID and start the procedure 10 sec later. It is not gonna help anybody if you have secured the engine but flown into the alps.

Yes good Idea you do the ECAM at 400ft and fly straight into the mountain...

It’s absolutely fine

on a smaller twin this is dangerous but this jet is fly by wire and is extremely stable in a 1 engine situation

@@runnygames9027 i see! thanks for the reply

You can't because the fire trucks are on the taxiways waiting to enter the runway. The fire was also still going, so putting it out is the priority, vacating the runway would only delay that.

@@dgonL And if it's only runway and some on there would have fuel emergency without another airport close by, then what? 2 possible crashes at the same day?Pretty stupid story for the news today, don't you think so?

​@@Valentin_MeL That's why aircraft are required to have an alternate airport and carry enough fuel to go there.

@@dgonL Are sure? Maybe if we speaking about airliners that's true, but if if we speaking about VFR cessnas, this could be a different story. Oh ye, you should check wikipedia and the stories when airline planes crashed with a reason "out of fuel", there is planty of them. Their stories doesn't really suit for your "carry enough fuel" Driving away from the runway can only take a few seconds after landing. Doesn't look like a big problem for me, espessialy when runway have plenty of taxiways amoung it's length, and with this you can save someone's life.

​@@Valentin_MeL VFR traffic has different but similar rules regarding the amount of fuel they have to carry. Did you actually look at the airline crashes due to fuel exhaustion? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airliner_accidents_and_incidents_caused_by_fuel_exhaustion If you did you would know that this is extremely rare and in fact hasn't happened in 7 years. I couldn't find a single case, not one, where the crash was due to the runway being blocked. As I said before the aircraft has to stop on the runway because there are fire trucks blocking the exits of the runway. Taking the time to vacate the runway would simply not allow the fire trucks to get to the burning engines. The runway is also much wider than the taxiways, allowing the fire services more room to get to the engines. Stopping on the runway in this case is not a choise the pilot even has to make. Every company manual and aviation authority will tell you to do that and this will make the firefighter's job easier.