AbramsX - 8 new features explained !

Подписаться 604 тыс.

Просмотров 179 тыс.

50% 1

Play War Thunder for FREE! Register using wt.link/Defens... and get a premium tank or aircraft or ship and thee days of premium account time.
General Dynamics Land Systems has officially unveiled its AbramsX future main battle. AbramsX is a proposed upgrade of the M1 Abrams series of tanks.
It is being pitched as an interim solution between M1A2 SEPv3/SEPv4 and a future Main Battle Tank.
Viewers may note that the initial information regarding AbramsX was provided in a press release that General Dynamics Land Systems put out ahead of the Association of the U.S. Army's (AUSA) main annual convention and trade show in Washington, D.C.
The company first teased the next-generation Abrams design back in June.
In this video Defense Updates analyzes how lethal is the new AbramsX tank ?
#DefenseUpdates #AbramsX #usarmy
CHANNEL LINK:
Facebook - / defenseupdates
SUPPORT US:
Patron: / defenseupdates
AUDIO:
scottleffler.com
BACKGROUND MUSIC
incompetech.co...
"Giant Wyrm" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons...
IMAGES USES
Screenshot from General Dynamics Land Systems RU-vid Channel
• AbramsX Technology Dem...
www.military.com / US DOD
www.military.c...
www.reddit.com / US DOD
/ general_dynamics_land_...
www.thedrive.com / US DOD
www.thedrive.c...
Screenshot from General Dynamics Land Systems RU-vid Channel
• AbramsX Technology Dem...
Screenshot from General Dynamics Land Systems RU-vid Channel
• AbramsX Technology Dem...
Screenshot from General Dynamics Land Systems RU-vid Channel
• AbramsX Technology Dem...
en.wikipedia.org / Rheinmetall Defence
en.wikipedia.o...
nationalinterest.org / Russian Ministry of Defense
nationalintere...

Опубликовано:

4 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 625

@nekopop8159 2 года назад

The augmented reality to see outside through the walls of the tank is what I had been daydreaming for tanks! When I first heard about this I am excited that it is a real thing. I can’t wait to see how the Abrams X performs.

@Bluelightbandit 2 года назад

03:24 "Straighten your cover, slacker!"

@lesball6839 2 года назад

Been watching your videos for ages, the best thank you so much

@Chuck_Hooks 2 года назад

Obviously, rumors of the death of MBTs on modern battlefields are wildly exaggerated. Poland is all in, too. Sensor integration makes situational awareness similar to F-35s, including being able to see "through" the tank 360 degrees.

@teddy.d174 2 года назад

There’s some really amazing tech being produced. Have you seen the temperature adjustable tiles that can be added to vehicles, in order to mimic the ambient temperature outside the vehicle?

@pepperVenge 2 года назад

I think the AbramsX is going to be nicknamed the A-X, or maybe the Ax. Both have a nice ring to it.

@keithedwards9953 2 года назад

"The Battle Ax" has a nice ring to it.

@OG45tool 2 года назад

Brahm X sounds good too

@tshavfengvang7831 2 года назад

Or "AjaX" from the mighty Ajax who fought against the undefeated foe of the Greeks…Hector.

@aaron2709 2 года назад

I think it will be called the A- yo, you just got GOT- X.

@alexnderrrthewoke4479 2 года назад

@@tshavfengvang7831 no. Ajax has already been named for British armored vehicle

@Lightning206 2 года назад

correction: AbramsX is an experimental proposal to the US, not an actual replacement. Basically, General Dynamics proposed this and wants the US military to "cherry pick" the things they want from it and change others for future variants of tanks. Expert tanker offers his opinion ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0YJtVqxTSn4.html

@kilianhufgard1035 Год назад

this very well could become a a full blown production tank the Abraham replacement program was a flop and they probably feel pressured considering Russia has a new tank and Germany just unveiled their new tank and not to mention if this tank has all the tech working and to maturity which by the looks of it it does then the army very well could choose to use this tank well into testing phase

@Lightning206 Год назад

@@kilianhufgard1035 It could but I doubt it, it's still a test bed and the US military has yet to confirm what they need from it.

@kilianhufgard1035 Год назад

@@Lightning206 they have become desperate trust me they will except for testing

@Lightning206 Год назад

@@kilianhufgard1035 I'd hardly call the Abrams being desperate. The only thing would be the 130mm cannon maybe and the auto loader but that's it.

@ronaldmiller6580 Год назад

@@kilianhufgard1035 h

@hilairelaplume1616 2 года назад

When it comes to US tanks one thing they have had in the modern era is ridiculously top secret and complex armor I hope they keep that formula going and even if a tank looks amazing as we are seeing with a lot of Russian equipment it really is all about how good your tech is if they continue the Abrams trend and put it in this package you've got yourself a hell of a tank

@leedex 2 года назад

Russian equipment sucks. Look at their tanks in Ukraine and some of their hyper sonic missiles have 60% failure rate 😂

@mrgreen8357 2 года назад

1 hand held American javalin anti tank missile equals one dead Russian tank no matter how new it is even has took out the newest tank's

@hilairelaplume1616 2 года назад

@@mrgreen8357 I've seen a lot of videos of Russian and Ukrainian tanks which I guess are just all rushing tanks surviving direct hits and then driving away not really in one piece but still operational I don't know exactly what they were firing because Ukraine propaganda is just as bad as rushes but it looks like they do have fairly capable armor I guess depending on what the hell the ukrainians are shooting at them but one of the things I'm noticing really really fast is Russia's ballistic anti-armor is not even close to living up to the task luckily I trust Israeli and us trophy systems and ballistic armor way more than I would trust the Russian ballistic armor

@notsureyou 2 года назад

Don't worry some fool will reveal the secrets in a forum, to win a debate......... 😂😂

@cesaravegah3787 2 года назад

Top secret, ridicously complex and insanely efective armor, correct me if I am wrong but most Abrams lost on combat were mobility kills making one of the most safest MBTs ever built.

@Bluelightbandit 2 года назад

I wonder if the new turret will have that Special Operations Pop Off Feature that certain other tanks have???🤔👌

@rammul7801 2 года назад

Just asked about that

@darnit1944 2 года назад

The blow out panels already exist in the M1 Abrams that first came out in the 1980s. Since the gunner and commander is now inside the hull, i think the tank is even safer when its ammo detonates.

@owenarnold5585 Год назад

Yea I was thinking the same thing, with those massive shot traps and what else… Oh I know, the carousel autoloader, yea that’s a great idea, totally not what’s wrong with the Russian tanks or anything…

@darnit1944 Год назад

@@owenarnold5585 Do they use bustle autoloader or carousel autoloader?

@owenarnold5585 Год назад

@@darnit1944 from what I’ve seen and heard, it’s a carousel autoloader

@davidlefranc6240 2 года назад

Can't wait to see it in action moving around 👍

@peterh8553 2 года назад

I really like the KF 51 Panther I would hope this tank has A auto loader . 130 or a140 mm gun .Room for a 4th crew member . The fourth crew member is the drone operator. It should be able to use the drones for a indirect fire role. Other than that I haven't got A clue

@acs9289 Год назад

This has the potential to make tanks more practical and creates new new opportunities for doctrines all of its own. With the ability to add or subtract armor packages to the tank, this could mean that two tank types could be utilized. Lighter tanks could be used for higher mobility situations. to have increased reconnaissance ability for an MBT chassis is major. The army could use this to cross fragile infrastructure like small bridges so the infantry wouldn’t have to cross water ways alone. It would also be great for training and maneuvers as it wouldn’t damage infrastructure and would reduce on fuel costs, not to mention it would make maintenance easier. Having a singular main tracked armored vehicle like this is much easier on logistics, universalizing parts for wartime use. With light and heavy tanks looking nearly the same, this would also confuse enemy intelligence on the approximate strength of allied units.

@classifiedveteran9879 2 года назад

Based on what I've seen that our neer-peers have, a 120mm should be more than adequate. Perhaps design the turret so a 130mm can be mounted without having to redesign everything, but at the moment the Abram's current caliber is the only thing that doesn't need to be updated. This would also mean our old tanks and new tanks would have compatible ammunition and we could hand over our Abrams to countries that need them without major logistics concerns.

@verdebusterAP 2 года назад

The West has T-72B3, T-80BVM and T-90M thanks to Ukraine Testing will make or break the 130mm program depending how Russian armor does against western 120mm rounds

@dwwolf4636 2 года назад

The XM360 can utilize or can be made to utilize higher pressure 120mm ammo compared to what is commonly used these days.

@verdebusterAP 2 года назад

@@dwwolf4636 That goes back to testing of the captured armor Is higher velocity ammo needed or larger caliber EU's problem is they dont use DU

@cstgraphpads2091 2 года назад

@@verdebusterAP The West already had T-80U tanks thanks to South Korea. They can extrapolate the need from that.

@johnsilver9338 2 года назад

A 120mm gun with higher velocity has higher kinetic energy than a 130mm with previous slower velocity. This can be seen from the equation KE = 1/2mv^2 where velocity is more relevant as it's squared. But if 130mm also has higher velocity then 130mm may be the future but then again a new faster 120mm can also be developed.

@brucenorman8904 2 года назад

This is a technology demonstrator it is NOT the next iteration of the Abrams. It sole purpose is to showcase potential new technologies to be adapted for the Abrams or a successor tank.

@kyee7k 2 года назад

This tank is around 52 tons. With the complete armor package, as explained by the GDLS rep in another video, the AbramsX is well north of 70 tons.

@viceralman8450 Год назад

It weights 55 metric tons.

@cmdr1911 2 года назад

I would honestly be curious how the original stack up to the modern Abrams. This almost seems like a near complete redesign. It doesn't appear the haul has a need to change, but the newest armor, active protection, coms, targeting can be mounted onto the platform. Turret swap seems to update everything. The Abrams X seems to be a new step forward and almost a new platform.

@darnit1944 2 года назад

You want to compare the original M1 Abrams with 105mm against the M1A2 Sep V3?

@cmdr1911 2 года назад

@@darnit1944 I mean at this point, what is original? Starting to feel like calling a 1985 F150 the same thing as a 2015 F150. Same name, same job, same manufacturer but completely new.

@hilairelaplume1616 2 года назад

My guess is it's more modular because with the Abrams they had to do complete overhauls for active protection systems and upgraded armor panels and reactive armor this one looks like you could put a different pair of shoes on everyday

@JamesLaserpimpWalsh 2 года назад

The actual TANK threats havent changed for 35 years have they? There are no new abrams beaters about, or eagles beaters come to that. Detection and stealth are the new things. Drones and all that too.

@darnit1944 2 года назад

@@hilairelaplume1616 GDLS says the AbramsX is an interim tank to bridge the gap between M1A2 Sep v3/v4 and the future MBT

@curtcoeurdelion 2 года назад

It would be interesting to see a matchup between the AbramsX and Russias newest tank, the T62!

@HeLLFiREGM 2 года назад

t62 wins. in the cost, 100 t62 vs 1 AX. how many ammo can carry each tank? ax can kil 30 or 50 (really 11-14 tanks)but another tanks destroy this one.

@obivankeno2068 2 года назад

Abhrams X mixed with T14 Armata,or already is Armada X?

@trevcharchartrev834 Год назад

@@HeLLFiREGM Wipe your nose, dry your eyes, and go back to bed little one.

@sskipp9883 Год назад

@@HeLLFiREGM By the time AX and T62 reach the battle head to head no T62s will be left. Ukraine is quickly removing them from the equation. I highly doubt the RF could put 100 functional tanks of any one type in any one place in the world to engage any one modern tank from any nation given demonstrated logistics and readiness capabilities of Russia this year. However considering how slow a T62 is and how big the AX turret is I expect around 40 rounds available as we no longer have crew in the top. So battle is something like this, stand off out of range, 40 kills, retreat, reload, return, lather rinse repeat until complete. not to mention the 30mm can reach out and pop tracks. Unless every RF tanker is a suicidal type 100 won't make it past the first 20 to 30 getting taken out anyway. life isn't a video game.

@HeLLFiREGM Год назад

@@sskipp9883yeah u r right, real life is not a video game. all optics, electronics, will crashed in 3-4 shots on a turret, then how u can defends? each shell carries 3-6kg of tnt. dont underestimate the enemy.

@jacobzindel987 2 года назад

The whole logistical and economic benefit of having thousands of old M1's in storage, is that the basic structure of the tank is the same, so odd bits, electronics, weapons, engines, etc can be swapped out in order to restore or upgrade them without requiring an entire new body to be manufactured. I think this upgrade would require too much modification to existing tanks, and you may as well start from scratch.

@cstgraphpads2091 2 года назад

It basically is an entirely new tank, so I highly doubt you'll see older ones be modified.

@slartybarfastb3648 2 года назад

It still uses the original A2 hull. The hull of this prototype was probably built in the 90s. It really is the beauty of Abrams in it'recycleability for nearly endless upgrades. Hopefully, the turret and loading system were specifically designed to fit seamlessly into the A2 as previous upgrades have done. Had they not been, it likely would be called the A3, as opposed to an enhancement package.

@madkabal 2 года назад

@@slartybarfastb3648 the entire crew sit in the hull, so no it does not. It just LOOKS like it. The same way the F/A-18E Super Hornet "Looks like" an upgraded F-A-18C Hornet. Its an entirely different aircraft, just like this is an entirely different tank.

@slartybarfastb3648 2 года назад

@@madkabal Sorry to burst your bubble. They haven't made a new Abrams hull since 1992 and that was a limited run for Saudi Arabia (M1A2S) who own the only newbuild M1A2s in the world. All other M1A2s no matter which upgrade package they have, all started life as M1A1. The M1A2 was a standardization program which, over time, brought all the M1A1s back to the Lima Ohio plant to be stripped down and completely rebuilt using the original hull as the starting point.

@madkabal 2 года назад

@@slartybarfastb3648 WTF are you talking about im not talking about existing hulls, im talking about the hull on the Abrams X. It is not the same. It just looks like it externally.

@DemonHippo266 2 года назад

under armor is making power units for tanks now? Damn. Now that is diversified company

@casbot71 2 года назад

Yamaha… "hold my beer".

@SiriusMined 2 года назад

I think it means "below the armor", not the Underarmor company.

@MrTJPAS 2 года назад

The background music track is the same one I hear in horror story videos made by people like MrBallen and Mr. Nightmare. I was wondering if I was going to hear a story where the narrator describes working the graveyard shift at a 7 Eleven has a dangerous encounter with a strung-out AbramsX that tries to jump him in the parking lot.

@hughjass1044 Год назад

Very interesting to hear some details on this tank. A good idea in my opinion, to make it lighter. Allied tanks were beginning to get too heavy to operate in many parts of the world and fuel economy was/is also a major concern so good to see that it's being addressed.

@augustlandmesser1520 Год назад

Well, there is simple solution to that; let them operate in their part of the world.

@DivusMagus 2 года назад

Smart to make the turret unmanned if putting in an autoloader, that should mean that if you get a magazine explosion the turret can explode without killing any crew, unlike what is happening with Russian tanks with autoloaders.

@ridethecurve55 2 года назад

Umm, I think with the Russian tanks, that was a feature, not a bug.

@DivusMagus 2 года назад

@@ridethecurve55 True did give the troops more flight hours to help compete with NATO flight hours.

@MaxDeVoe 2 года назад

@@ridethecurve55 In the Russian tanks the crew feed the autoloader by hand. Sometimes they even have their hands amputated. And when the turrets explode the crew is also killed.

@verdebusterAP 2 года назад

Ukraine is just example of piss poor tactics

@cstgraphpads2091 2 года назад

@@MaxDeVoe Maybe in Russian tanks 40 years ago, but not now. You can literally find videos of the auto-loaders working with zero hands involved.

@infantryblack 2 года назад

So ready for combat in 8 years with limited amount produced due to over costs.

@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr 2 года назад

We are taling about Usa, not Russia lmao

@Alsayid 2 года назад

I'd like to know how AbramsX compares to the new Panther, and if one is more advanced.

@gusgone4527 2 года назад

The "Euro Tank" as it is being dubbed. Is nothing more than an reworked leopard 2 hull, "Frankensteined" to an updated, and up gunned French Leclerc turret. Reflecting the national interests of the nations involved in it's cobbling together. As for which is the most advanced. That will depend very much on how easy it is to update the AI and sensor suit. The battlefield data integration network and other things. We will just have to wait and see. The hull armour of the Panther is not as good as Challenger, while the new 130mm gun is something of an unknown quantity and will depend on the ammunition being produced. The turret is very much the same as Leclerc. I just invented a new word "Frankensteined" can I have a prize please.

@maxjohnson1758 2 года назад

@@gusgone4527 🌟

@Kurikost_ 2 года назад

@@gusgone4527 the Panther and the Euro Tank are 2 different Tanks!

@gusgone4527 2 года назад

@@Kurikost_ So, no prize.

@T33K3SS3LCH3N 2 года назад

One thing people in the comments don't seem to get: IT'S ONLY A DEMONSTRATOR. This means that it's not a fully designed tank. It's just an old chassis that they bolted all kinds of cool new technologies onto to show to the army and see which ones they like. It's never going to go into production like this.

@factfilenews 2 года назад

The Abrams x seems adequate to rival both the T14 Armata and the kf51 Panther. USA is a better supplier than Germany, so NATO members and allies should seriously consider the Abrams.

@peterbaker8443 2 года назад

They need something Lee's that 62 tons that's for sure, give it a big gun make it fast and still good protection.

@gregparrott 2 года назад

Interesting..especially the unmanned turret and the inclusion of some hybridization features to improve fuel efficiency. As relates to fuel efficiency, does anyone know if the AbramsX will stitch from a turbine engine to a Diesel?

@WLOUIS1024 Год назад

Hopefully the Abrams X will have defense against drone attacks

@rick67hou 2 года назад

"The armata.. is limited production..." Yes. Very limited production...

@Maddog-xc2zv 2 года назад

I still would go with the german KF51 Panther, but I really wouldn't mind at all to have some AbramsXs at my side :)

@Maddog-xc2zv 2 года назад

@@Elatenl :) can't stop a man for having the company and protection of the two most brutal MBT nowadays (and I hope not to hear of the armata, surely another paper tiger dully overrated). cheers. Have fun driving one of those if you will be able to :)

@casbot71 2 года назад

As far as the power pack being hybrid, switching the IC component to being diesel would be a major logistical improvement… needing a separate supply chain just to fuel MTB's is a nightmare. And heaven help any nation that has a mixed force of Abrams and other MTB's - like Poland, that is buying every spare top tier tank it can in order to replace all the tanks they gave to Ukraine, so they have a mixed force of American and South Korean MTB'S. But even for Nations running Abrams only as their MTB force it still means two separate fuel supply chains (one for the Abrams, one for every other ground vehicle, diesel military motorbikes exist just to make logistics easier), something that is extremely difficult for everyone besides the US with its massive logistics. In fact the argument for Australia getting the Abrams was that they would _only be used in a combined operation with America,_ so Australia could just use their fuel supply chain. As well, being able to use diesel means that civilian fuel infrastructure can be used _and scavenged ad hoc,_ very useful when it's a serious conflict and resources are at their limit … instead of the kurbstomps that the Abrams has been used in, … for now.

@lukefriesenhahn8186 2 года назад

First, Rußland comes out with the T-14 Armata (Marsch 2015), the United Kingdom develops the Challenger 3 (sometime in 2021) then Deutschland develops the Kampfpanzer-51 Panther recently in (June 2022), then the United States of America develops the Abrams-X recently in (Oktober 2022). Clearly the years of the tank are not over.

@chrisdean6700 2 года назад

And we'll have to worry about all 10 of the armata tanks, won't we? hahaha

@jinmo2821 Год назад

This tank is just a concept, still on drawing board. The features that you see here are still developing. Even then, it's even not a full 4th gen. tank and only a 'stop gap measure' (It's admitted so in the video). In comparison, South Korean K2 Black Panther is a full 4th generation tank in operation and in full production.

@jacksonteller1337 2 года назад

A good move with the exception of a handful of programs all went over budget due to not using proven systems. By testing new systems in a proven platform they only have to work the teething issues out of the chassis and engine/transmission assembly.

@MinecraftsAssassin 2 года назад

The AbramsX has been specified MULTIPLE TIMES that it is NOT a new Abrams, nor is it acting as an interim tank for ANYTHING. It is STRICTLY a Tech Demonstrator. The opening of this gave me an aneurysm.

@flackcat5928 2 года назад

With all these possible upgrades why don’t they upgrade the main gun to 130mm versus staying with the 120mm?

@Joe_Friday 2 года назад

Will the new electrothermal chemical 120mm gun have more punch than the current 120mm guns we're using?

@jaimeg9700 Год назад

a solider can also control the gun from inside the tank using a 3d camera

@chadx8269 2 года назад

GD Land Systems needs more money!!! They have been playing this upgrade game for years.

@cezarfernando1802 2 года назад

tanks should have 360° view helmet of the surrounding just like the 6th gen jets. that would be efficient.

@redgeneral5792 2 года назад

Until the sensors get knocked out in combat.

@cezarfernando1802 2 года назад

@@redgeneral5792 just like the other sensors, its inevitable. but having a 360 view would definitely help a lot. and also a drone flying above the tank to give it vision of its surroundings would really help.

@alpine9996 2 года назад

One fewer crew to fix and maintain the vehicle

@jacobzindel987 2 года назад

Freaking awesome looking.

@allanbaldoque2055 2 года назад

The original lethal on battlefield

@paulfribbs8516 Год назад

Tanks survivability will be linked to the drones they have linked to them! For both recon & survivability (as interceptors & attack projectiles!).

@lizadonrex 2 года назад

It can also lunch switch blade drone and control it

@ropeyarn 2 года назад

Next needed is a virtual land aircraft carrier, composed of multiple vehicles operating as one "ship" and controlling multiple short and medium range drones.

@arkandrada3305 2 года назад

I believe that it will retain the fourth crew… not as a loader but as the UAV operator as well as any unmanned buddy attached to the tank…

@gordonhenderson1965 2 года назад

Maybe I heard it wrong, but didn't it say the turret was unmanned? Doesn't that reduce the crew to 2?

@arkandrada3305 2 года назад

@@gordonhenderson1965 it will be unmanned with an auto loader for the gun… It will have a tank commander, gunner and the driver but I believe it will retain the fourth crew…

@samuelmendoza9356 2 года назад

There is no space for the 4th crew. The crew module, which copeis the Armata, no wait, sorry, the Cold War relic prototype the M1 CTTB, which uses unammend crew, carousel autoloader that uses single piece ammunition, and an armoured crew capsule. There is no space for the 4th crew. A shame because 4th crewman means smoene can handle the other gizmo like microUAV or help out in maintenance or share other workloads.

@arkandrada3305 2 года назад

@@samuelmendoza9356 the auto loader I believe will not be carousel type… the Ammo will take a third to half of the back part of the turret with a blow out panel at the top… there will be enough space for four crew as there’s no turret basket… the driver will be on the left side instead of under the gun and on the right side opposite him will be the hatch for the other crew members… I can’t determine the lay-out yet but it can be any which way as the there will be no need for vision blocks except the driver and everything will be on fancy screens or even helmet mounted displays… as you can see, there are two target acquisition and designation modules in front of the secondary armament… and the secondary armament itself have its own target acquiring and targeting element… that’s too much for two persons…

@DOI_ARTS 2 года назад

This is two man tank only

@JD96893 2 года назад

This should just be called the Abrams 2. I find the hybrid engine system very interesting, i'm not sure on the details, but it should allow the tank to move more silently because of no need to start the engine. I'm sure the increased range is a nice bonus as well. The use of an electric motor should also make it highly maneuverable with instant torque and likely equal forward and backward speed.

@liamseven1604 2 года назад

The electric side kicks on when the tank idles because for some ungodly reason the Abrams tank consumed the same amount of fuel while idle as if they were going full throttle so it's really just to stop that, the minute it starts moving the electric side shuts off.

@JD96893 2 года назад

@@liamseven1604 seems like wasted potential. Combustion engines are boon to stealth.

@oldhag2881 Год назад

Will it have a spontaneous combustion feature, like the Tesla?

@JD96893 Год назад

@@oldhag2881 that could actually be useful.

@oldleatherhandsfriends4053 Год назад

@@liamseven1604 because it is a turbine it spins the same rpm weather the vehicle is moving or not.

@againstviralmisinformation510 2 года назад

Good for target practice

@J다빈치 Год назад

미국 차세대전차란게 놀랐음 성능이 좋음 그만일수 있는데 솔찍히 디자인만 놓고보면 새로나온 장난감인가 하는 생각이 들어요 디자인을 여기저기 넘 남발한것 같은게 보고있음 어지럽기까지..ㅎㅎ

@jaimeg9700 Год назад

the amor body of the tank should be able to left its self up to take cove behind a bolder or a heal

@johnallen7230 Год назад

***The Abrams X is equipped with the XM360 an ETC Cannon with "twice the muzzle energy" of 120mm 256 cannon equipped MA1A2Sep3 Abrams.....TWICE let that sink in for a minute.***

@johnwayne2442 2 года назад

Wow! I’m glad this all top secret

@d.l.hemmingway3758 2 года назад

I guess the AbramsX sounds like a precursor to the hypothetical Centaur Terminator Tanks of the Terminator movies. I suspect that GD is going to seek a way to rid the tank of its crew entirely as the firm modifies the AI system.

@brookss2141 Год назад

It's basically is. We are just one step away from drone tanks and Skynet

@d.l.hemmingway3758 Год назад

@@brookss2141 that's what I found scary. The elites seem bent on killing off Humanity to the point of even removing humanity from humans as they are removing humans from every aspect of living.

@Eduardo_Espinoza 2 года назад

Rumors say the built in A.I. will sound like Defence Updates.

@24tanksalot 2 года назад

Please keep them coming

@WestValleyTransparency 2 года назад

When I look at this MBT, the first thing which comes to mind is the turret of a Challenger 2 with an M1 Abrams hull👍 Make a video about the Stryker-X👍

@PropperNaughtyGeezer 2 года назад

Now it looks like Leclerc. The tin hatches should also be better armored. Otherwise not a bad concept. I would be interested to know whether the hard kill or soft kill measures.

@williamjulien5858 2 года назад

All of the features and enhancements sound great but.......who will they lower the mass with all the add ons? What will be removed to make up for all that is added and then some extra to make it lighter? Sounds like a contradiction since as well as weapon systems, almost all vehicles (even our cars) suffer the same weight creep of added features that has plagued the Abrams program. Seems like just the autoloader and added isolation from the turret would add a few tones.

@victoryfirst2878 2 года назад

Do you have any idea as to where one can experience the realism and feel of this tank ??? The circular vision must really be the coolest part for sure.

@JD96893 2 года назад

a VR headset, or one of those 360* pictures.

@DgroUriel Год назад

I think it should be called Abrax-Hammer1(H)

@LentPanic7 2 года назад

Seems the upper front plate is still thin as hell though.

@DOI_ARTS 2 года назад

X means experimental Army needs to field test it so they can decide which part stays and which one have to go but I hope they keep the anti drone and and the switchblade tube for defense

@garhent Год назад

Yeah lets cut down on the armor on the turret of the AbramsX so it can be shot off the like the Russian Terminator system. Relying on the chariot to protect the turret is going to be interesting when countermeasures are developed.

@devo1977s 2 года назад

Might as well put the thousands of Abrams in storage to good use inside of building something from the ground up

@darnit1944 2 года назад

To good use such as what? They have way too much Abrams in storage and would give it to Ukraine. Unfortunately they are too stubborn to adopt NATO standard currently and still prefer upgraded Soviet tanks.

@mattmccaughen8082 2 года назад

The turret on the top must extend upwards hide behind walls and still be able to get rounds down range

@UENVEYME2 2 года назад

Where's the Electro-Thermo Chemical (ETC) Cannon?

@mr6johnclark Год назад

the only features that has to go: 1. the three man crew 2. The autoloader.

@onefromkekistan1828 2 года назад

B-21 raider please🙏🏻

@keith6400 Год назад

It does not seem to have a hybrid electric motor and will not be very environmentally friendly.

@rammul7801 2 года назад

From what we understood following the war in Ukraine, is that one of the weak points of the Russian tanks was having an auto loader that was causing the turret to fly sky high when hit directly. What’s the difference between the Russian tank auto loader and the new American one.

@kevf500 2 года назад

I believe not sure they have a blowout door , which explodes outwards instead of straight up

@ridethecurve55 2 года назад

Umm, I think with the Russian tanks, that was a feature, not a bug.

@michaeljames4444 2 года назад

The problem with the Russian tanks has to do with the way the ammunition is stored, in a carosel around within the turrent with no safety measures (e.g., a blast door between the ammo and crew of a blow-out panel).

@verdebusterAP 2 года назад

No Ukraine is just an example of piss poor tactics.

@samuelmendoza9356 2 года назад

The ammo rack is still in the bustle wherr it uses cassette style autoloader much like the French Leclerc. Also, it still uses blowout panels.

@KhanLikeNo0ther 2 года назад

Heart Warming ❤

@chrislloyd261 2 года назад

Javelin has entered the chat

@joemelmiranda4798 2 года назад

Please make a video about the new French reconnaissance vehicle the Jaguar scorpion program and the new EMBT

@shot9702 2 года назад

Reducing crew size in my opinion is not a good thing. Track is heavy and an extra man is helpful. In a combat zone, someone is likely to be on guard while the others sleep, eat, use the bathroom, etc. Fewer people to do this is extra burden on those already there. There is give and take with every option.

@Tattletale-Delta Год назад

The AbramsX uses a new lightweight track.

@maotyrias 2 года назад

the turret shape looks strangely familiar ...

@JackofAllMasterOfnone86 2 года назад

Hopefully they wait until lithium batteries get back seated. A lithium fire in a depleated uranium tank burning for hours is going to be a problem.

@trejt 2 года назад

Yes, but will it connect with Bluetooth headphones?

@cesaravegah3787 2 года назад

Still not sentient AI equipped and not missile launchers as secondary weapons, I am still waiting to see a BOLO deployed for real.

@Mizrahim777 2 года назад

They said it's gonna get a 140mm cannon, I can't wait to see that !!!!!

@newmombasastreets1459 2 года назад

When did they say that?

@newmombasastreets1459 2 года назад

@ERRATAS 0202 cutting edge tanks don't matter if the president is braindead 😂

@-p2349 Год назад

@@newmombasastreets1459 sleepy joe 😴😴😴💤💤💤💤

@wwsjr2 2 года назад

I'll take just one. Skip the men and add 10 megaton bomb wired failsafe against attack. Remote, of course.

@haakonsteinsvaag Год назад

So, no active protection systems, that could pose a real problem vs anti tank missiles.

@marshallmonroe8803 2 года назад

Wondsr how it stacks up against the KF51 Panther

@j.davidbogue3961 Год назад

From my recent experiences in Ukraine, clearly tanks will survive as technologies evolve which counter man portables and drones effectively. Such capabilities would then integrate closely with armoured units as they pressed forward. It is a new era of weaponry, for which we must stay ahead.

@philthai99 2 года назад

Very nice.

@montecorbit8280 2 года назад

It is a good looking tank!! Now let's see if the proof is in the pudding....

@mojaeger85 2 года назад

Amazing. The great thing about the United States is that these proposed features will actually be in the tank. Versus the Russian T-14 and it’s capabilities are probably as real as a tourist attraction in North Korea.

@-p2349 Год назад

About as powerful as the North Korean air-force

@DarthVader-yd9id 2 года назад

I can see this tank easily serving for the next 30yrs before it becomes outdated

@btfilther 2 года назад

The armata is like everything russian made of the same cardboard that was used for the sci-fi book about its capabilities. The new Abrams and Panther on the other hand look absolutely intimidating.

@John-hu9qg 2 года назад

The Armata is a generation ahead of most tanks. An absolute beast apparently in exercises. The speed of the unmanned turret can target and get a shot off faster than any other tank currently in service.

@darnit1944 2 года назад

@@John-hu9qg Compared to old T-72s sure. But we will never know Armata's true capability. It will never be mass produced now with all the sanctions on high technology stuff.

@SJstackinbodys 2 года назад

@@John-hu9qg the armata is 0-1 against a parade…… paper tiger

@johnmckee6483 Год назад

Question the church don't accidentally burn itself up does it but maybe a feedback from the generators or anything like that on that tank used to the m681 when the blower motor is accidentally went backwards it burned up the inside of the church if this does something like that a vultures regulator maybe your answer to stop the madness how is the first Cavalry Division and the 70s and on the m683 Section 8 armor we tested xm1 from GMC to Chrysler one had a pantai diesel and had a turbine but since I've been out of the services 1990 I'm still asking the question is took me this long maybe to figure out what was causing the the problem by just simply replacing a vouchers regulator to keep from burning the turret up

@jimh9359 Год назад

Can I use one for quail hunting?

@panpiper 2 года назад

Great, they shave ten tons off it's armor and do NOT install an active protection system. Sounds real well thought out.

@jackwells2924 2 года назад

Will it still have the trophy system??

@juanlugo7492 Год назад

Can the AI reduce the crew to two and will it have an escape hatch like the Merkava

@ronl2463 2 года назад

A Diesel engine would provide 50% better fuel efficiency over the current power plant without an expensive and complicated unproven drive system.

@samuelmendoza9356 2 года назад

US uses JP8 fuel, which is kerosene based.

@liddz434 2 года назад

What about active protection/trophy systems...they are one of the most important technologies to include in tanks these days given what we've seen in recent times.

@LordEd21-21 2 года назад

This tank has that as well.

@liddz434 2 года назад

@@LordEd21-21 that’s what I thought, would’ve been nice to get some details about it.

@LordEd21-21 2 года назад

@@liddz434 If it is US heavy armored fighting vehicle it will use trophy aps and if they are light afv they will use iron fist aps for probably the next 10 to 20 years as they are the most mature hard kill aps available with a proven track record with Israel.

@liddz434 2 года назад

@@LordEd21-21 no worries, cheers. I wonder how they go with top-down attack style projectiles?