Acolyte Controversy - Forbes Journalist Gets DESTROYED 

Its more funny when you bring in legends and note there was a jedi almost 200 years before the movies that tried to warn the jedi the sith were still alive and using a format called the rule of 2 and everyone laughed him off like he was crazy.

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

A member of the Jedi council who had no idea of the massive anti-Jedi conspiracy rolling out while he was sitting around on his HC ottoman. Yup, his judgement and opinion are definitely infallible.

Order not Orden. Please fix. Thats confusing I google orden archives to see what the hell that was lol

@@cald1421 sure. It's called Orden in my native language.

Rey Skywalker is the real chosen one. She fulfilled the prophecy

Womp womp no one likes Rey

Star Wars 1977-2012.

@@kevinvassagohaha funny

@@dopeastro If I'm wrong, then why is there a book called "Rey Skywalker, the chosen one."

this and she likes women was probably getting the seconds after harvey was done.

@@dandyjandon4231 Jesus Christ, it’s scary because it could very well be true.

A Judis Goat

EVERYONE closely associated with Harvey the creep knew what he was doing. Headland is a garbage human and a complete whackjob.

💯💯💯

Force Ghost Slimer

Time stamp on when they said “the Sith weren’t laying low” please? Can’t find it unless ur making it up.

They probably thought it meant in the closet.

@@corruptsion3725The implication with the way this series is being advertised is that there will be Sith featured in it, which, unless it’s Tenebrous and Plagueis secretly killing Jedi or people trying to figure out their Sith identities without anyone figuring it out, makes zero sense.

@@paradox2210 Yh but it’s just being implied that the sith aren’t laying low, we don’t know until the show comes out. Can’t take implications as fact until we actually see it. That’s why I don’t understand why he quoted “the sith weren’t laying low”, cause I can’t find it in this article, hence why I asked for time stamp.

And there would need to be some kind of cover up. If a bunch of key Jedi just go missing there would be some kind of investigation. Psychometry would immediately reveal what happened so it's gonna have to be layered. I have strong doubts on that happening

@@jordan6254 That's true, I was thinking about that too. If a bunch of Jedi go missing and they end up finding them, they see lightsaber wounds on them, that would also be a hint that a lightsaber user killed them. I also do think that someone with psychometry could just solve the whole thing if they find the dead bodies of the Jedi. But keep in mind, psychometry is not a common power. Very few Jedi possess this power and actually know how to use it consistantly.

​​@@jordan6254 Cover up would be way too in line with the Jedi. I mean it isn't like they shouldn't have known about the nameless prior to Loden getting leveled. Since the whole conflict with the path century prior and Jedi on Dalna letting Marda go.

The Acolyte: A Rogue One situation but instead of passing the vital information successfully onward, the entire show characters die before they can tell anyone.

I agree ✅

Keyword being "living" cause again, as far as the Jedi were concerned, the Sith were dead and gone.

Who’s to say there is even a Sith in the show?

@@bradleyc6564 red light saber in the trailer and using the force... at the end of the fcking trailer holy sht bro lol.. do you even watch star wars god dayum bro did you even watch the video?

@@dandyjandon4231 Red lightsabers aren't exclusive to Sith. Sith is an ideology like Jedi, being a dark side force user doesn't automatically make you a Sith. However, the show is meant to go into Sith so likely that is one or a Dark Side user on his way to meet the current Sith Lord or is the current lord.

@@dandyjandon4231He could be a dark side user not a full on sith. The sith at the time were Tenebrous and Plagueis.

“Yeah but I hate those dudes so”

"And I don't give a crap about any of them, your point"

@@Angry_Peanut_52 I see though the lies of the Jedi

You do realize that the empire did not exist at the same period as the acolyte until after revenge of the sith.

​@simtonporestudio4427 he does realize that. He's just pointing out the blatant disregard for canon and even just for basic logic in regards to how the Disney shows fit in the timeline. The Kenobi show took a giant dump all over established canon. The Acolyte will likely follow suit.

and kenobi met vader, even though he supposedly haven't met him ever since revenge of the sith which is why they spoke like the last time they met vader was his student.

Yeah exactly lol. Maybe not specifically about the Asian and black leads, but those live comments about the white men were everywhere. Probably Ryan’s casual viewers lol

It's Theory's job to keep pretending this never happens. There will never be a day when he actually disowns them. Instead he provides a shield for them and says "well no one is saying that", as if his gaslighting will work on the people who see it clear as day

Theory said no one is saying woke, but people in his own comments section is literally saying it lol. What does he gain by pretending that no one is saying these things? That's my question to him

.

were there white men? if not, why is it wrong to point it out? I thought representation is important?

This man is clown

Exactly, people are too quick to comment but slow to read it seems.

eh, given how kinda useless the Council are in the prequels a Sith could do a dance right in the council chambers and the Jedi would still be like nope impossible the Sith are all dead

I think people need to reread the article, including theory. The author is countering the arguments of Star Wars fans online .

Who misunderstood the obvious?

@@likeluptid theory did. He should of read the article instead of reacting to it live. The author and Theory are saying the same thing.

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

Lol I dislike Disney star wars too but cmon now.

but it is.. So...

The whole star wars universe Was never canon since 1999

@@crowkid5553 There is still people in 2024 that only like the OT? Wow, its just ignorance at this point

@Wushaaa no I like the prequel movies (at least 3), and admittedly 7. I also like rogue one and solo. But even with the mess disney made that dosent mean it wasn't all good before then

Yup, anyone that goes on IGN, and Star Wars Facebook posts for The Acolyte, it's nothing but people calling it "woke".

There is a difference between woke accusations and complaining about the leads being black and Asian. The trailer doesn't even make clear who the leads are.

@@PeregrinTintenfish "woke accusations and complaining about the leads being black and Asian" are both bad things?

Yeah, did you hear? Disney is REMAKING the Originals, IV through VI. The leaked titles are: Episode 4: A Rey of Hope. Episode 5: The Empire Strikes Back, Again. Episode 6: The Return of Palpatine, Again.

I remember the day he sold star wars to Disney and Disney talked about releasing 3 more sequels and everyone was so hyped. If only we knew the horrors Disney would do to the franchise. Poor George, seeing his baby being mutilated like this, I bet he wishes now he would of made the sequels and kept his rights to his star wars franchise.

Even George Lucas is on their side. Star Wars is DEAD it has been once he sold it.

It's a Chinese Russian marxist secret Service psyops

@@Jtb1122own Disney/Sydney playing with George's/Andy's toys.

As long as every character in this show dies, both Jedi and the villains, sure.

Didn’t he state it was absurd to state an opinion as a fact?

Reread the article. Tassi and theory are actually in agreement. For some reason Theory got diarrhea of the brain.

This!

yeah, and I do believe that they are not completely dumb. Which means even worse: they consciously destroy the thing.

Sam Witwer is ❤

Tassi is mostly in the Destiny community, so him going to Star Wars isn’t surprising but he should’ve at least done diligence before making the article, he’s a popular person in the Destiny Community but idk what brought him to make that article

Both the article and Star Wars itself are badly written works of low level fiction. Who cares?

@@The-Chaos-Agent makes sense then

Just did it. Am expecting a furious tweet back.

Just found out someone already did it, lol. Ah well.

That would be the dumbest ending possible.

👏👏👏 Thank you, you've said it all I think there was a big misunderstanding here, it's just kinda sad

Theory takes the Tim Pool route. He never agrees or disagrees. As long as he rides the fence, he'll be able to play both sides.

More click bate shite

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

So many people are not only misunderstanding the meaning of the article Theory is talking about... they're also misunderstanding Theory. Theory himself literally says, "That's EXACTLY what the Sith were doing... hiding in the shadows!" @2:47. And the writer of the article himself states, "...hiding in the shadows... which is apparently EXACTLY what is happening in 'The Acolyte'." Theory simply misunderstood the journalist's meanings, and doesn't realize the two of them are in agreement. And sadly, people are confusing the issue even more by misunderstanding what Theory is saying. C'mon guys.... it's kinda sad that we're all arguing over nothing. Think of it like this... someone comments (admittedly not using the clearest language they could have chosen), "The sky is blue. Some people think it's green. But the sky is not, NOT blue, just because some people think it's green." ...And then someone reads that, misinterprets it as if the commenter was saying, "The sky IS green, it is NOT blue." And then everyone attacks the commenter for allegedly claiming the sky is green, which is not what they said in the first place. Does this make sense yet?? I promise you... We're all on the same side here... (mostly).

and this is just further trashing them then, because it's not just like they were ignorant for a couple of years while Palpatine is preparing his rise to power, now we get another century of crap going on? granted, we don't know a lot, but I don't predict they have a great, satisfying story arc that fans will appreciate. they probably think that because some fans will buy anything, and because Lucas got away with making it up as he went along for so long, that they can and should do the same thing, and they can somehow even do it better without putting in much work.

Sith Acolyte is literally a Sith Padawan.

it doesn`t matter if it is a sith or not, the red lightsaber is the lore braking point here, there where no red lightsabers seen in canon in star wars before episode 1 for a 1000 years. only sith have red lightsabers nowone else, even the disney fanmade stuff stated you must bleed the crystal too make it red and too bleed a crystal you must be in full dark side mode, there is no way around even in the disney fanmade canon. and in the george lucas canon there is also no work around that stuff. red lightsaber means sith 100%. even an dark side corupted jedi has no red lightsaber.

Functionally, they are Sith.

@@rl00668 Nope. Functionally, they are Dark Side Force-users, NOT Sith. They are two different things. Sith are Dark Side force-users, however the Sith are a strict Order, just like the Jedi. Even more so when the rule of two was created.

@@Wushaaa the point is, no matter what the excuse is, it's a huge stretch

@@rl00668 its not a huge stretch at all. There are plenty of various Dark Side users and groups. Heck there could be a group of zealots who are obsessed with the Sith, corrupted by the Dark Side or an artifact. They could act and look like the Sith, but it still doesn't make them Sith. Look into the lore of star wars, you'll find out its very easy to do something like this ant not break Ki Adi Mundis single line.

This is peak hilarious 😂

He really didnt debunked anything, even saying that darth maul in comics was revealing himself prior to PM, to debunk that there were no sith and jedi encounter for the thousand years prior. He contradicts himself through the rest of the video too or straight up lies about some fans, and most star wars channels.

This fool basically just angrily agreed with the entire article and didn't realize it The only part he disagree with is his claim that no one is talking about race and "woke", but that's easily refuted when you look at his own comments section. Bunch of people literally saying woke on his own channel, yet he says they don't exist lol

@@CoS-ci5gdi think both you are slow. “They were hiding in the shadows” aka not a single red lightsaber, not a single dark side user that was not a jedi had been seen by the naked eye UNTIL DARTH Maul and that’s it. Plus there is a rule of two anyway soooo.😂

Triple negative. If you elimate NOT you get "just because the Sith were prominent like in the Old Republic days, that does mean that they were hiding in the shadows"

@@LukiKruki no, the negative in the “weren’t” of my comment does not apply, because that’s the premise. Everything after the comma is the statement, therefore my capitalized NOTs: double negative.

He misunderstood the ENTIRE article. Tassi's article is a response to those who want to dismiss Acolyte because "it breaks canon cuz council says they all dead" - he posts an example tweet & gives reasons it's dumb AND Theory AGREES with him. What is even happening here?

I think half of the bullets is misunderstood by theory but I see where he’s coming from

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

Oh please. They've been destroying all their franchises for ages now while calling everyone that disagrees with them all the worst labels. They're constantly spitting on fans and even when they're losing money they keep screwing up the exact same way. The trailer is embarrassing.

@@kelp7060 Your probably right the shows gonna be ass but still who know?

They've confirmed everything we already knew. The blind leading the blind

Scrolling through the comments now thankfully there seems to be quite a few viewers calling out the lack of reading comprehension. It's honestly hilarious watching the "anti woke" guys getting themselves angry about an article they actually agree with. 😂

@@kevinperry8093 I wish to the heavens that someone makes a response video to this garbage

yeah like 80 or even 90% of his fanbase is just as braindead. here i am thinking if i got something wrong, but no. He got everything wrong...

Confirmed: Theory has a comprehension issue. The blind leading the blind as usual in our society. He says he destroyed the article, yet he agrees with it. That's crazy. Also, how dishonest can Theory get? He says no one is saying woke or talking about race, but bunch of the comments in his own channel says woke and "i see no white men". And this isn't the first time either.

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

So many people are not only misunderstanding the meaning of the article Theory is talking about... they're also misunderstanding Theory. Theory himself literally says, "That's EXACTLY what the Sith were doing... hiding in the shadows!" @2:47. And the writer of the article himself states, "...hiding in the shadows... which is apparently EXACTLY what is happening in 'The Acolyte'." Theory simply misunderstood the journalist's meanings, and doesn't realize the two of them are in agreement. And sadly, people are confusing the issue even more by misunderstanding what Theory is saying. C'mon guys.... it's kinda sad that we're all arguing over nothing. Think of it like this... someone comments (admittedly not using the clearest language they could have chosen), "The sky is blue. Some people think it's green. But the sky is not, NOT blue, just because some people think it's green." ...And then someone reads that, misinterprets it as if the commenter was saying, "The sky IS green, it is NOT blue." And then everyone attacks the commenter for allegedly claiming the sky is green, which is not what they said in the first place. Does this make sense yet?? I promise you... We're all on the same side here... (mostly).

CT-0766, 'Order 66', 'cause of the merch, maybe?

I am not talking about diversity and that stuff but come on, guy. SWT here said that before Prequel Trilogy Maul killed Jedi before they could tell anyone and even then Palpatine was mad at him and THEN he said Sith never revealed themselves to Jedi through the millinion by Ki-Adi-Mundi words of whole Jedi cousil. Like, you do not see his hypocrisy in relation to his previous video? In order for Acolyte to work with Prequel Trilogy the Sith there have to kill all Jedi the moment saw them, their red lightsabers (like Maul I already told you) and cover up their deaths with being the doing of other enemies of Jedi like Nihil, Pirates. It would have to be Rogue One but in reverse, all dies but no info is send further.

Absolutely on point comment

Yeah this video is so stupid, he's proving the articles point

@@Sonicbitter100 Yes, I don't think comprehension is a strong point. It's kind of scary how many people in the comments don't get it.

I was thinking the same thing like “but aren’t you….agreeing with the author” 🤔

⁠@@cloak1408na basically theory is trying to correct him with the exact same thing he wrote 😂. Read the text again u will see. Bro debunked his own answer. Edit: ah shit talking about reading shit properly, i litteraly just did what theory did to the article, but to ur reply. I should really go to bed 😂.

you’re so lost

Ooh I like that

Ive said this too,he had Venamis at the same time as Plagueis.Plagueis would have been a teen during this time but Tenebrous 100% knew him.I think its maybe an apprentice/assassin to Tenebrous that didnt make the cut lets say.

Tbf, the article is incredibly stupid and poorly-written too. The problem with the acolyte extends far beyond simple 'lore mistakes'. It lies at the root of Disney and its new source of income, esg.

@@paradox2210 so because SWT can't read it's the articles fault? Weirdo

@@notme3384 I’m not exactly sure what you're insinuating. The article itself is poorly-written and doesn’t mention the _correct_ reasons why the show may or may not contradict the lore. I never even mentioned or commented upon the fact that Theory 'can't read'. You haven’t really 'said anything'.

@@paradox2210 well we don't know what your definition of "correct lore reasons" is so it seems like you're siding with Theory, but I'd like to know what the correct reasons are!

@@notme3384 Three of the *correct* reasons are as follows: - The people surrounding the show are inferring that the Sith we will see aren’t going to be Tenebrous or Plagueis, even though they should be considering the show's time frame. - The people surrounding the show are pretending that the Sith aren’t just 'the bad guys' despite the fact that they objectively are, and this absolute falsehood will more than likely carry over into the show. - The trailer and the cast have implied that one of the lead characters is a female Sith, which doesn’t make sense during this time period, since the only two Sith in the galaxy *are* Tenebrous and Plagueis. If anything, she would be a Dark Jedi, but they consistently have mentioned the term 'Sith'. I haven’t once mentioned Theory as part of my argument, and yes, I know that he misread the article. Theory misreading it doesn't confirm nor deny that the article is poorly-written in any way. The actual content of the article confirms that it is poorly-written.

He’s literally agreeing with Theory, but he’s not understanding the article he’s complaining about. Lol

At this point is it really pop culture to Star Wars fans like yourself? Pop culture gives an impression of being enjoyable to the masses which includes everyone, not just butthurt loser white geeks living in their mom’s basement.

I have yet to see a single racist comment about it, stop projecting.

I've seen it everywhere in fairness, not that it matters to me but it is obvious there's a reason disney have done it...

What racist comments have you seen?

Calling out the diversity check boxes and the anti male mysandry isn't racist. All the comments are 99% jokes. Of course you need to point out the tiny minority.

Bro they have their eyes closed and fingers in heir ears lol

More like Blackdik, but seriously Paul Tassi is a sweet baby defending piece of trash. Guy doesn't have a truthful bone in his body.

An Disney was obsessing over the lack of black woman and queers

The funny part is it shows you not only his IQ level, but the people who he says doesn't exist throughout his own comments section yelling "woke" The popcorn is delicious

That's not what I got from it. What did he agree with?

The problem is if there is a plot hole where the acolyte and Sith were known to exist recently by Jedi, but then somehow the wise educated force seeing council of Jedi masters somehow later believe the opposite despite that they should know better.

@@CoS-ci5gdnice try droid. Move along.

The same way we know about the Roman Empire despite not seeing them. In a galaxy far, far away. You don't think they got history books?

@JesusChrist-sx1lf well before that there was thousands of sith and bane wiped out the rest and and created his own rule of 2 and went into hiding. I would like to know how this information about bane came alight. Who snitched

@@ShelteredMan The same way the holy bible was written hundreds of years after my death. In a galaxy far, far away. You don't think stories spread, becomes legends and eventually gets printed in a history book?

Most people don't, lol.

It's not racism, at least not on the commenters' part. One can see what people are talking about in Lucasfilm's offerings of the last couple years- they have established a certain way of writing characters based on their gender and race. The "Ahsoka" show offers good example of this. It makes for predictability, bad characterization, and nonsensical plots, so of course people are tired of it.

​@@marychocolatefairy this is an incredibly good faith response and represents a valid concern. What you're missing is the abject racism and homophobia that abundantly weave their way into the livestreams and comments. In the latest plot lead video, Theory spends the first two minutes screen-sharing the opinion of someone using an ableist slur. I challenge you to wade your way through the comments on that clip and maintain your opinion about the people commenting on Theory's content.

@@te.leg.raam_me_Starwarstheory0 Thank you for continuing to feed this universe that I STILL love... but it's difficult! dark times...

No lies detected

Are u sure it’s an agenda problem and not a writing problem 😂. Perfectly good movies with a female lead, like rouge one. This ain’t got nothing to do with Disney’s agenda.

Agreed writing is shit too.

@@corruptsion3725Nah, it is obviously an agenda problem. If you know where Disney and every other company are getting their main source of income, you understand why they’re doing it… esg.

Yes he is, the comment section is so funny 😂 I think he will eventually realize it, if he does read his own comment section

Yeah your not going crazy. This video makes no sense tbh

​@@YilueHis reading comprehension sucks shit, and these people in the comments like holy shit lol

I’ve said this several times. Theory and the author are in agreement. I don’t know what his deal is, just ready to be outraged I guess.

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

Yes please, like why are we so few to react over this?

No, his point is that they show Jedi fighting a Sith in the acolyte. And they said that there was no Sith for 1000 years in the prequels. so it makes no sense for there to be Jedi fighting Sith, unless all the Jedi did see the Sith die, and never get to the high Council

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

Did you even listen lol?

@@CaptainRockoBD Yes. Lets take point number for for example, the articles talks about how people are trying to argue sith existing in The Acolyte show doesn't make sense because in episode one they say the line "The Sith have been extinct for a millennium". In point one, the writer is saying that is a bad argument because just because they weren't around en masse, doesn't mean they didn't exist. Theory miss-read or misunderstood the point the author was making, and treated it like the Author was in fact agreeing with the argument people were making, and then proceeded to "argue" against this misunderstanding, by re-stating exactly the point the Author wrote.

Any heat that Paul takes is completely self-inflicted.

@@OldVetNerdSage agreed

Even the destiny community doesn't like him lol

Exactly. Click bait BS. He's literally arguing the same points. Musta been a slow day.

Everything is being blackwashed, it’s noticeable and openly anti-white. It’s wrong and no one can convince me otherwise

@cloak1408 I agree with you 100%.

He's FOS if he hasn't seen it.

Literally a decent amount of his live stream chat just spams “Woke Wars” or diversity hire or something along those lines. Thankfully i’m not the only one seeing this

The problem is that it seems purposeful. That’s why the RU-vidrs you’re referring to take issue with it.

A legend who cant read and comprehend He just agreed with the article

I haven't seen it at all.

I’ve seen people annoyed by the leads comments not because she’s black

false, Nobody who is fan of star wars cares for skin color of the characters. Mace windu and lando was very famous characters in star wars universe, not because of there skin color but because the characters was written very well and portrayed very well by good actors. This whole race narrative ideology is woke leftist making up sht just like the article writer. We've had black characters before and many people who are black are very famous and loved. The whole idea that it's racism is white liberal fantasy.

People just want a good male character to go with either a good female character, a cast of fun and interesting side characters, or both. There’s nothing wrong with that. Black, white, asian, whatever. Just a good, solid, competent male character with a backbone who may or may not have allies that are competent when called for to aid him in his chosen mission. People liked Cal Kestis and Merrin and their crew, people seemed to enjoy Din Djarin and Cara Dune, Grogu, Greef Karga, etc…. but of course, there aren’t very many of those partnerships and characters that we can say, definitively, 'Wow, I'm really impressed with this', thanks to Disney being given esg money.

Think about the level of illiteracy here. Many in the comments think he really just dunked on the writer here even though he just angrily agreed with article. Most people legitimately have poor reading and comprehension and this comments section proves it lol. Those of us who noticed this are in the minority. Most people aren't educated. And the one part he disagreed with about no one saying "woke", can easily be debunked by looking at Theory's own dam comments section. The blind leading the blind.

BIG OOOOF!!!!!.... I'm not trying to throw shade at Theory here... I am usually a fan of his videos, but Theory is completely misreading or misunderstanding the article and the journalist's points. THE TWO OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY AGREEING on the same points, but Theory has misinterpreted what he is saying... Examples: The journalist says in POINT ONE, "Just because the Sith were not around en masse like in the Old Republic days, it does NOT MEAN they did not exist and were hiding in the shadows." The journalist is basically saying, "The Sith were hiding in the shadows"... same as Theory. In POINT TWO, the journalist is criticizing A COMMENT THAT AN OBSERVER of the trailer made, (the Cantina1234 commenter, whose comment is shown within the article), NOT THE JEDI WITHIN THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE, and NOT KI-ADI-MUNDI as Theory mistakenly interpreted the journalists words to mean. In POINT THREE, the journalist is again REFERENCING THE SINGULAR OPINION(S) OF ANY ONE COMMENTOR (again, probably also the Cantina1234 comment, but also applicable to anyone single person's opinion), however THEORY AGAIN MISINTERPRETED HIS WORDS to be criticizing the in-universe character of Ki-Adi-Mundi, which he was not. Sadly, a misunderstanding like this just bolsters and amplifies the Star Wars fan base's frustrations and negative reactions to recent, current and future Star Wars projects. Admittedly, we often have legitimate reasons and examples from the state of the SW franchise in recent years to be frustrated, disappointed, maybe even a little mad, and certainly to be wary about future projects, but in this particular case, in regards to this particular article and this journalist's words... he's not 'the enemy'. In truth, he and Theory are not disagreeing here, and the journalist is actually trying to offer a glimmer of hope by showing us that the set-up for 'The Acolyte', at least as shown in the trailer, is NOT in contradiction to established Star Wars canon. Of course, whether the show ends up being a success and embraced by Star Wars fans remains to be seen, and we should reserve final judgement until we actually watch it, no matter how discouraged we have been from other SW movies and shows. My hopes would be that, if Theory sees my comment, or any of the others I've seen that point out his misunderstanding of the article, he would re-read the article to better understand the journalist's intended meaning, and then come forth with an acknowledgement of a mistake made. We all make mistakes and misinterpret things, (including the HUNDREDS of Theory video viewers who either also misunderstood the article or didn't bother to read the journalist's words for themselves... ), but when you have a platform with an audience as big as Theory's, and the power of influencing literally MILLIONS of people... the right thing to do is to set right an unintended wrong.

So many people are not only misunderstanding the meaning of the article Theory is talking about... they're also misunderstanding Theory. Theory himself literally says, "That's EXACTLY what the Sith were doing... hiding in the shadows!" @2:47. And the writer of the article himself states, "...hiding in the shadows... which is apparently EXACTLY what is happening in 'The Acolyte'." Theory simply misunderstood the journalist's meanings, and doesn't realize the two of them are in agreement. And sadly, people are confusing the issue even more by misunderstanding what Theory is saying. C'mon guys.... it's kinda sad that we're all arguing over nothing. Think of it like this... someone comments (admittedly not using the clearest language they could have chosen), "The sky is blue. Some people think it's green. But the sky is not, NOT blue, just because some people think it's green." ...And then someone reads that, misinterprets it as if the commenter was saying, "The sky IS green, it is NOT blue." And then everyone attacks the commenter for allegedly claiming the sky is green, which is not what they said in the first place. Does this make sense yet?? I promise you... We're all on the same side here... (mostly).