Advaita Vedanta and the need for evidence 

But can you prove the realization? Otherwise how do you know you're really realized?

@@hinduismwithpremananddasbhagat "There is nothing to be attained, and nothing to be realised. You are enlightened, just as you are here and now. Understand this and be happy." - Ashtavakra Gita Enlightenment isn't something that is to be attained like how many believe.

@hinduismwithpremananddasbhagat prove to whom, after realisation there is none left to prove.

​@hinduismwithpremananddasbhagat and there is also nothing to prove here. The fact that you know that you exist is the only proof. Because existence is you.

😂😂😂

Or michael james on teachings of sri ramana maharshi.

Its not shallow it's damn near non-existent. His knowledge of Advaita that is. Advaita stands at the pinnacle of human philosophy.

😮 According to Sanatan Vedic Hindu Dharma there are three Sciences Adhibhautic Aadhidaivic Adhyatmic gyaan - vigyaan - vidya Spiritual science and philosophy ke liye Aatmanubhuti hi sarvashreshtha praman hai . Materialistic is not answer or solution . Guru pradutta Sadhana karne se satya samne aa sakata hai . Towards the Truth . 😊 Buddhist Philosophy ki apurnata - kamiya - galatiya to pahle hi Adya Shankaracharya ji ne ujjagar ki hai .

True The podcast is also available in RU-vid.

@@shatabdabasu505 true but his conclusion for hinduism is also mythology

Kushal Mehra is the Charvaka

He said it himself that he is materialist. That is Charvak.

Well sir but if you are claiming something you should give evidence that's how it works If i say there is something but you can't prove it or there can't be evidence around it Same statement might apply to god as well then That God is out of nature and how can you actually prove something's out of nature by living inside the nature But that's just ridiculous claim bcz such claims can be made about anything

@@relaxingtube5043 Advaita Vedanta is fundamentally concerned with the first-person experience. It's a science of the subjective (first-person experiential). Sciences like physics and chemistry are only objective - they study the world around. They're limited to the waking world. They cannot study the first person experience, because there is not even any conclusive evidence as to what is a conscious being. You cannot know if someone or something is conscious. You can only know you are conscious.

Imagine asking evidence is too much a burden

@@FatAtheistthat comment by No-thing about the vacuum is just pointing to the fact that Advaita deals purely with subjective experience, which no one but a conscious subjective 1st person point of view can confirm (in your experience, there is only proof you are conscious). But aside from that context, Advaita has most evidence going for it.

​@relaxingtube5043 it's like waking up from a dream. Now if you are in a dream you can't disapprove the dream and say that this is just a dream and it's an illusion and the reality is different(although we can lucid dream at times but let's not bring it here for the sake of analogy). Now take this analogy a step up I.e your waking reality is a dream when you wake up only then you realise that it was all false. A awakened person can never prove an unawkened person of the actual reality using words( words imply duality) he can only point towards it( neti neti approach).

I have studied it.

@@vimoh when you say evidence what are you looking for. And by the way, you have mentioned reading it, but your understanding is wrong about Advaita Philosophy.

@@jayaram5127 No it isn't. If you want to debate it, come on my live stream and do it.

@@vimoh Dear Vimoh, please do not get me wrong, your statement "Universe is one mind and that one mind experiences or something like that.... " Indicates there is a doubt and you have not understood what you have read. Iam sure you are a serious spiritual seeker, and my humble request to you is to please do a thorough study and understand before you oppose an idea. I will leave it at that.

@@jayaram5127 I'm pretty sure I've got it right, but if you think you have a better handle on it, feel free to come on my live stream and talk to me.

Please next time come to his live session n give your explanation

Hinduism (Brahmanism) = casteism

@@AbcDef-gw4dg Hinduism is an umbrella term. Casteism is rejected by Advaita, as it teaches to see everything as God and Nirvana Shatkam of Adi Shankara states "I have no caste".

@@thebioinformaticsbro785 See the reality around not imagination. All brahinical texts are written to keep the dominating hierarchy of brahmins .

@@thebioinformaticsbro785 Sankracharya was also a casteist, read his works

Vimoh said he is happy if there is a method 6:00. THERE are 112 methods provided by adiyogi (vigyan bhairav tantra) to experience adavita vendanta as a life reality and not a philosophy.

Isn't vigyana bhairav tantra a Shaivite text? What does it have to do with Vedanta?

"Advaita vedanta is not to be understood intellectually." This is true, because if you understand it intellectually you will see that is philosophically unsound. Ramanuja said so. Oh, wait, no sorry, this is not true. Because Adi Shankara was an intellect and he described it (at least in the 30 writings of his I've read, how many have you read?) quite intellectually. So, essentially you're saying the father of Advaita Vedanta didn't understand his own faith cause he used intellect! So that means, essentially, you are smarter than Adi Shankara! Congrats!

@@mithilbhoras5951 Advait Vedant means non duality and Vigyan bhairav tantra is a part of Kriya yoga. Yoga means union. It is aimed at realising the oneness of the existence. To realise that we need Sadhana.

😂 you can feel the pain in your body or skin muscles. Happiness and sadness are just emotions 😂. Emphasizing ' I ' who's ' I '? Realised after the death till then enjoy your life with your body. Don't get deluded because someone told us. And don't worry I'm not laughing at you sorry 🙃.

​@@Ulpzexkgwjjzx8655the one who thinks they are body are themselves deluded.

​@@mohitdhiman79 😂 consciousness itself is a delusion, do any movement without moving your idiot body then tell . You can't even think without a certain part of your body ! 🙃❤ If you're really eager to prove something then destroy your body and prove your Identity without getting rebirth 😊

​@@mohitdhiman79 😂 consciousness itself is a delusion, do any movement without moving your idiot body then tell . You can't even think without a certain part of your body ! 🙃❤ If you're really eager to prove something then destroy your body and prove your Identity without getting rebirth 😊

​@@mohitdhiman79and first read great dvait , understand the greatness then come ok. Prachanna baudhh ke pille😂

wdym

Postive claim

Exactly we never say i am brain we say this is my brain subject can never proved only objects can be proved this is common sense but ultra intellectuals dont understand 😂

This is quite good explanation of it. But you are explaining it to a low iq fool. 🤣 Not worthy of your time.

Hi. That is a really wonderful explanation of Advaita Vedanta philosophy. Can you tell me from where are you studying Advaita? Any sources or teachers to begin with?

@@cinefile0075 What is the evidence for evidenceness ? phenmneological properties exist to subsume epistmeological position

don't know what this kind of advaita is but it's a mish-mash. and u know it

Ok if these gurus claim to be realised then why don't they just create a planet since the they are the absolute truth and divert the youth towards spirituality. This stuff ain't verifiable . Just a philosophy nothing else

I think what modern education does is that it teaches people to question and be critical of tradition. This is why many people refuse to swallow horseshit ideas without thinking them through and often even reject them if there is no evidence backing them up.

@@vimohlive you are doing a good work sir but Here you are wrong You talk about material and AD Materialism is totally your conditioning and your psychology and it is build Over the time AD can't be proved that is a totally a different Same with Buddha's path To understand these things you should start from basics i. e pyschology and how human works

Sir modern education claims that reality is Materialistic without giving proof of it. Can u provide proof for ur concept of reality. Can u prove how consciousness is generated in the brain?@@vimohlive

Rude

As long as people keep seeking, this will not stop. It has nothing to do with modern education. Modern education provide good explanation of physical phenomenon but it doesn't has answer to all question. If modern education don't provide answer it doesn't mean people should stop seeking answers.

Also we live on our perception ! Perception formed from 5 senses. Now how true are these perceptions? What colour we see on a object is simply product of which wavelenght of light our eyes percieve. Their are many wavelenghts our eyes don't percieve and so we can never know about other colour. This proves that our senses can't be relied upon as evidence of existence of an object.

So who are you talking to right now? Yourself?

@@vimohlive Nothing can convince me that this isn't like the experience I had when I talked to Goku after taking 2 full roll of ganja in my first try. That world was real and it lasted for 2 whole years for me until Majin Buu absorbed me and I woke up. So yeah, I could be, in all probability, texting my own imagination in my own imaginary world. The question then becomes, what happens to the world if I die? I will say it disappears but some other person can say that's wrong as so many people die everyday yet the world lives on. But that person who puts forth this argument and the person who dies, only does so within my senses once again. The filter point is still my own senses. So the question still remains the same with no answer. In this imaginary world of mine though, I am an agnostic as even I cannot generate the god anywhere within this reality of mine. One can however say that if one is capable of such vivid imagination and that itself is an act of creation and that entity itself is a Brahman having imaginary fun.

@@codedusting Right. So on behalf of all of us who are not completely cuckoo, have a nice day.

@@vimohlive Lol. Dismiss with an ad hominem. Reminded me of my 16 year old hard core atheist rationality. Oh well! Have a nice life.

@@codedusting I am figment of your imagination, remember? So it is you yourself that's insulting you. No?

Its purpose is not to bound you in a community and attach an identity (i.e call urself hindu n all). It just says that the human being is that entity which suffers and it suffers because it doesn't really understands who it is. The ultimate goal of an individual is to set free of this suffering i.e get liberated from bondages of desire. Now unlike others it doesn't say that following some practices (yoga/ritual/idol worshipping) will set you free of this suffering. It says understanding the self, self knowledge, self awarness is what gonna liberate you and all this comes from deep-inquiry (i.e self questioning). It basically contains dialogue between knowledgeable ones (rishis/scholars) and students who throw questions and the rishis answer. Now it takes a sincere approach to understand this but since common man has always been ignorant, he misunderstood the stuff completely and this is how all different religions came about. Anyways if you do wanna dive into this you can check out acharya prashant (graduated from IIT delhi, IIM ahemdabad, ex civil servant). Obviously approach him with skeptical mind for self verification of his authenticity. Would suggest you to check his older videos (2013-2019) or maybe you can just check my channel. Have made a playlist. But anyways if you are doing fine in life and you are content with life then you don't have to get into this.

When you ask what is the consequence and ultimate value... can i ask how do you define these personally? It will be helpful in framing a response

It's ultimate purpose is to the very least not to be an ignorant frustrated comment warrior like you 😂😂

It tries to answer existence beyond material realm, who we are beyond our body

@@rdc515 simply as in, how does it help?

watch acharya prashant's video on advait vedant

I'll do you one better - WHO is matter?

So u agree even materialism is not proved, so there is not much difference except the materialism is believed by most people unlike Non dualism.@@vimohlive

I don't rely just on my senses. I also rely on verifying what my senses are telling me through science.

@@vimohlive science is information that is received through the senses .

@@vimohlive and how do you verify that your senses are telling the truth? How do you even perceive those very verifications? All of them are done through your senses...

@@arahul4045 If I tell you, will you accept what I say, or will you doubt it because you are accessing it through your senses?

@@vimohlive if you and many others tell me that the colour of rose is red, how does that actually mean that we all are seeing the actual 'red' colour? It only means that whatever colour we are seeing, we have agreed to refer to it using the word 'red'. You could very well be seeing the 'blue' colour but referring to it as red, because that's what you have been doing since childhood. Same case with me. How do I agree that the things detected by senses could be taken as a proof directly?

Look, i just cant get this ' senses are unreliable' part, because all the methods that we can be sure of providing easy usage is observation by senses and instrumentation. How can you not say things like placebo's effect, or induced reality apply here. Its like saying i see god in front of me even though no one else does. Although i havent tried following advaita vedanta till now, but i will try following it in future. But i am still not sure of how it pushes the need of evidence beyond the faith.

@@gurnoorsingh2214 It does not push the need for evidence, your pursuit of epistemology to describe phenomenological truth is what causes you to run around in circles, induced reality and placebo are non sequitor, hard problem of consciouness exists precisely for this mismatch effect in foundational truth.

Pick up NCERT Inorganic chemistry book of class 11.

There are instruments and ways of measuring which go far beyond the resolution capabilities of your 5 senses, which allow for people to measure and identify stuff like molecules, bonds and atoms. Basic science. Advaita Vedanta is speculative nonsense and nothing more.

Another day of Theists trying to defend their claims with senseless arguments

You can say that about literally anything. "Christianity is only about experience". "Islam is only about experience". "Shaivism is only about experience". People who are in the religion experience stuff based on their beliefs and physical drills.

Maane drugs

​@@TarunMohandassorry but abrahamic religions do not priorotise inference(pratyaksa) but vedanta does.

No vedant said god is not the ultimate reality rather the ultimate reality is brahman and here's the thing about idol worship this is what Swami Vivekananda quotes in his philosophy that the first step to reach formless bramh is to first realise that bramh as a person for those who don't know anything about bramh

@@shivanshprithu184 but how do you know what Swami vivekaananda said is objective truth. That too becomes a opinion rather than a fact... 👍

Lol what nonsense astavakra Geeta predates buddhism

Hi. I made a video about this yesterday. Please check out my main channel Vimoh and watch the latest video.

Yes you understood this very well. And yeah AP is definetly authentic ! Had he been ambitious like sadhguru , he would have allied with current govt or focused on popularity/fame since the beginning of his YT channel (2013) but until 2019 he just had 4 thousand subscribers for 3.5 thousands videos.

@Yesman38 yes, he's good for beginners definitely for understanding vedanta

@Yesman38 how?

Don't apply nursery logic here bro get some common sense

Itna gyan kahan se laye guruji ??

​@@Xzim69google se😂

Vedanta has the concept of Mithya. Often translated as unreal, its real meaning is "conditionally real". A common example is a clay pot. When broken, the pot ceases to exist. However, the clay the pot was made from continues to exist. Hence the clay pot is said to be "conditionally real" or mithya, because it is dependent on the clay for its existence. In turn, clay is Mithya, because it's made of several minerals which in turn are mithya because they are made of molecules, atoms and subatomic particles. AD claims there is a final layer, which is "satya". It is satya and not mithya, because this final layer doesn't depend on anything else to exist. This is the "unseen world" you talk about and it is called Brahman. Brahman is meant to be pure consciousness and is sarvyapi (present everywhere like space). Brahman can be known, through Vedantic practices and those who do are said to have achieved moksha

It is defined there clearly, u just need to read and understand it, "Pure consciousness" is not perceivable, it's only realizable. U don't need to achieve "Pure consciosness" U are already that thinking of being somthing else, In the same way the Consciousness in a dream is the same consciousness of the person that is dreaming.

I suggest you to keep reading books regarding this philosophy. Only you can find the answers because this is a philosophy about yourself. Otherwise if ready made textbook answers are given then it becomes religious dogmas for atheists.

The most skeptical point of view is Science.

​@@spuriusscapula4829 how is it the most skeptical when it continuously makes a bunch of assumptions like natural kinds, induction, causality, reliability of memory, pragmatism meaning truth, mereology, etc? I have a feeling you've never read anything on skepticism or scientific realism

@@linguistme6870 not interested in weird sectarianism, just talking about how Advaita is conceived of today

I’d disagree on the part that Brahman (or its equivalent Tao elsewhere) can be reduced to a quantum field, since that is again a conceptual category that describes the empirical world. Brahman is the nothingness that is an ontological prior to all that is physical, hence it necessarily transcends space, time, causality and language itself. There is a great stress on the upanishads to repetitively assert not to mentate Brahman as something to see, feel, touch, talk about, think or speculate in any way. All that can be meaningfully asserted is that the bedrock of all existence escapes descriptions.

Its not advait it is another name of casteism

​@@OPTIMUSPRIME1243lol an advaitin can't be a casteist if one believe in caste system this itself goes against advait siddhant

@@OPTIMUSPRIME1243 whaat?

​@@OPTIMUSPRIME1243you understand 0% of something then cry about it

What is a "real job"?

its other way around

It's better

No. False

@@vimohlive if you chose to believe than it is so. :)

@@tjmanou6422 Reality doesn't depend on your or my beliefs. It is reality. And the only way to come to true conclusions about it is evidence.

@@vimohlive what you call reality is appearance. When you dream that’s a reality for that moment. You don’t say it’s a dream and you are sure it is reality till you wake up to another experience you again call reality. Just like you go to sleep creating a dream that you are in your dream your called “reality” keeps changes. Find the unchanging then you found the ultimate reality. I’m not lecturing you. But there is more to what you decided to see. You chose that pint of you for your own reasons. And that’s acceptable. I’m just saying you chose to accept that variant not because there is no other. Thank you

@@tjmanou6422 I guess if everything is an illusion, then so is your comment and I can ignore it.

as acharya prashant says, science talks about the object (everything external including our anatomy) and true adhyatm/spritiuality (advait vedant) addresses the subject (the entity who is experiencing).

Source please.

@@himanshukandwal1374 verse 1:34 of Avadhuta Gita ( you can search On Wikipedia as well -- Search Avadhuta Gita Wikipedia then click on External link in it then click on the Avadhuta Gita given by Wikisource.... There you will find this verse also along with total verses of Non dualistic Avadhuta Gita)

And it is true

@Aham Brahmasmi Upnishad is also coppied from Buddhist philosphy. All pali words are copied and changed its meaning to fake, kalpanik philosophy hindu(irani chor lucche), even Bhawga(Bhagwan ) word is used only for Buddha, wake up man their is no archaeological proof of kalpanik veda, upnishad before mughal era. Bas Khayalo me pulav khao. Kalpanik feku unnishad book are written to please Akbar (Brahman devta). Allah upnishad

Kindly prove that hindu comes from thief in Irani🤓👍

You have read all this mate, but you couldn’t wake up and just read the guidelines of this channel on which you are commenting! Dumb

@Aham Brahmasmi no archelogical proof of vedic feku and feku sankrit before Buddhist, Just coopied everything from Buddhism

Buddha plagiarised like 70% of Upanishads. Tell your fantasy somewhere else because it makes you a laughing stock at best.

Just because I can't day something is false, doesn't mean it is true.

I just see it as alternative perspective of reality than proposing it as an alternative reality. So no new claim here which require a proof. Door half closed also imply door half open.

@@subramanyam2699 I am only interested in understanding reality. Not speculation devoid of evidence.

@@vimohlive Whatever the understanding of reality we can have can only be possible by the consciousness we processes ( which includes but not limited to scientific enquiry, logic, contemplation etc.. ).

@@subramanyam2699 There is a video on my main channel about whether our senses can be trusted. Please go watch it.

He won't be convinced believe me.

Actually tumne jaise explains kiya aisa nehi hai. Itna easy bhi nehi hai adivat vedant. Sab kuch partical se bana hai isiliye world ek hai aisa nehi. Tum world ko khud se alag dekhte ho kyuki tumne ek point creat kiye ho khudke andar jisko "mai" Kaha jata hai. Yeh mai hi tumhe ek individuals ki feelings deta hai, jo gaheri nind mai mit jata hai. Tab na mai hu na world hai. Tumhara knowledge or experience tumhare andar mai bhab ka prakat karta hai. Tumhara memory chala jaye to tum tum nehi rahoge. Iss mai ke andar kaya hota hai? Bhut kuch- ahankar, hate , memory of pain, pleasure, jo bhi knowledge collect kiye ho tum ko creat kiya hai jisko tum "mai" Khake pukarte ho. Yeh sab gayeb ho jaye to kaya koi ved hoga tum me Or mujh mai?.

@@Sanjay14728 This ! shayad apne acharya prashant ko ache se samjha hai haina? subscribing you bro ! Future mein will connect to you for better understanding bhai , take care :)

@@preetgamer1495 nehi maine j krishnamurthy se samjha hu .

@@Sanjay14728 that's great :)

You can put all the word salad in your paragraphs as you want, but does not mean it needs to make sense. The idea of consciousness being metaphysical is itself not evidence based. Scientifically we know where consciousness comes from. Consciousness is a function of all the neural connections a brain of every individual has made since conception. It is by no means metaphysial. It is simply a function of being alive.

@@TarunMohandas And who is projecting all this theory? Your conciousness right now yes? So had body given birth to conciousness or conciousness gives birth to body (by body i mean the external world) I know this would seem very bizare but think about it :) Peace !

Come on the live stream and prove it.

If u can prove to me that U are conscious then I will prove it to you. That's the problem. It's defined to be Objectively unprovable and U want me to prove it. Subjective nature cannot be proven objectively, That's limit of logic and science. Those are objective proof of subjective nature, meaning U will never be 100% convinced because any objective proof can be discarded as effect of subjective experience instead of the evidence of the subject itself. Can u do a live and prove u r conscious subjectively. These lectures and concept give the evidence of Advaita Vedanta not the "Brahman" itself. It's unprovable. Also I don't claim to be an expert in Advaita Vedanta so I don't want to Misrepresent the Idea by calling my understanding of it as "Proof". The mathematical proof I talked about is proof of Paradoxical nature of reality which Advaita Vedanta talks about, That can be proven to oneself only by the process of "Yoga" or "Realization". I can't prove it to u I can only prove my limited understanding of it. I said Scientists are aligning with views of Advaita because theories like "Quantum Field Theory" And some other are very similar to Advaita Vedanta and dissimilar to Dualism which is the globally accepted model of the Reality. Science accepts that 2 completely independent entities cannot possible interact with each other until there is some platform on which those entities can interact with each other. I will ask one question, if everything follows laws of Causation then what caused the Creation of Universe itself, If it has a cause then we will need cause for that cause too, this is contradictory nature of reality and Advaita gives an idea that Universe is appearance in "Absolute Reality" so all the causation happens inside Maya and "Absolute Reality" itself is uncaused because it is eternal, an eternal entity doesn't require a cause because it was never created at the first place, This solves the issue of Causation, then comes the infinite nature of "Absolute Reality", as the Time and space itself is an appearance in "Absolute Reality" Everything that we can experience or know is also a part of "Maya" or "Appearance". If the existence of something is dependent on another entity then that entity itself is not considered to be actually real but a " "Form" the Original entity according to Advaita, for example Waves in Ocean are not real in the sense that their existence is dependent on the Ocean, so the waves are an "Appearance" in ocean but also the Ocean itself is not real because it's existence is dependent on water, so in this example the Water is the "Absolute" reality and Ocean and Waves are not real. Here saying "Not real" is not used derogatory to discard existence of something but it suggests some underlying reality which is appearing as this Dependent Entity. When we dream we think our body is different and independent of other people and nature but when we wake up and realize it's a dream, we realize that every other person including nature is just an appearance in our own mind, Same way in Advaita, "Absolute Reality" can be called a "Universal Mind" where the physicality is an appearance in it. This is not very convincing because we have tendency of taking words literally when understanding things so immediately we will think "Mind" means it's a personality like Human so "God" is huge human and we discard the whole idea thinking it's absurd to imagine that there is a huge invisible superhuman who is creating and controlling this world, It may be suggested in the sense in many other philosophies and also in ideas of Hinduism but Advaita Vedanta doesn't suggest this, According to Advaita Vedanta, True reality "Brahman" is like a screen in which the Movie called "Universe" is being played where the "Brahman" itself doesn't have "Thinking Mind", It's not graspable, It's not objectively verifiable or even perceivable, It's the subject, any subject can only perceive it's object, a subject can't perceive itself same way a camera can't capture itself, it can at best capture it's reflection, When one realizes the true nature of reality "Brahman" it's not that he becomes god or something, It's just that his identity is shifted in the mind and he will no longer consider himself as "Body Mind" but as the "Consciousness" itself in which this dream of life is being experienced and appeared. So Advaita Vedanta suggests that reality is not some disconnected structure of random happenings but a interconnected dependent entities which can't exist independently, and everything has a base on which it exist, existence itself, that existence is called as "Brahman" or by Hindus "God", Although "God" word is not applicable because it suggests an independent human like personality sitting in the sky which is very unlikely. Matrix movie is a good representation of reality in terms of Advaita Vedanta where everything is just part of same code and the code is the only true reality and all visible perceivable entities are dependent realities and are formation of same original code appearing to be something else. For better explanation u can watch video of "Defining God" of Swami Sarwapriyananda. I again say I am no expert as The true reality is said to be "Beyond language" so it cannot be proved by language the same way we can't explain whole universe accurately by language, any representation will be a compressed corrupted version of the Original entity, I know I won't convince u, nor I am trying to I am just trying to justify my point, I hope u will take this is an open minded approach and not as me trying to criticize ur opinion by saying I am right and U r wrong, I am not a realized being so even I am proved to myself so I won't try to prove it to anyone else unless it's proved to me, The only way Advaita Vedanta can be proved is by self realization, Call it as may, This is it's limitation. Advaita Suggest absolute reality as "Subjective Entity" by it's own definition it's objectively unprovable, something claiming it to be objectively provable is lying or is talking about something. This goes back to my first question, Can u prove to me u r conscious?, Any proof u give can be descarded as a human like Manmade object acting like a Human.

If u want someone to prove or try to prove it to u, I would suggest u to get in touch with Swami Sarvapriyananda or Bernard Kastrup himself, I am not the guy who can prove it to u. Bernard is a scientist and have worked at Cern, so I think he will give better scientific evidence based explaination of Non Dualistic nature of reality, U can ask him as much scientific reasons for his argument as u want, I can't do that. I am sorry. Also He is not preacher of advaita vedanta exactly but his form of non dualism, but I think very minor differences don't matter as it seems ur disagreement is with the main point of Reality being "Non dual" itself. @vimohlive ​@@vimohlive

Solipsism is unfalsifiable, sure, but it is still evidence-based. You do not have evidence of other people's subjective experience, or that other people are conscious. But you do have evidence of your own subjective experience.

@@thebioinformaticsbro785 No, I have evidence for other peoples subjective experience as well, just that I cant know for sure whether or not its a figment of my imagination only.

@@shardsofice I meant to say you cannot know other people have a subjective experience. I suppose "evidence" would be they exclaim "I feel pain" , but a perfectly human-like robot could also do that.

@@thebioinformaticsbro785 No, we understand the mechanism of how the feeling of pain is generated. We can verify what is the responce of that mechanism is to a painful stimulus, and can observes other people who claim they feel pain have same responce.

@@thebioinformaticsbro785 I can know the mechanism by which feeling of pain is generated. I can see the same mechanism exists in other people. So the responce to painful stimuli would be same for me and that other person. If a robot has that mechanism the robot would be feeling pain too.

As an Atheist I believe in Advaita Vedanta.

@@NoThing-ec9km Yes, it's compatible as Advaita Vedanta is copied from Buddhism.

@@navinraut5920 if it is copied from Buddhism so what?

​@@navinraut5920 Sorry but chandogya and brihadaranyank upanisad predate buddhism 😂 N Buddhists accusing hindus of copying them?

​@@navinraut5920sanatan samiksha expose this thought

There is no such thing as deep and profound, your lexicon stems from ressentiment

*Advatians don't care about ur opinions anyways, it's deep but U won't understand it. U will go to theatres, watch Matrix, Interstellar and "Avatar" and say wow this movie is so deep without knowing the fact that such movies are inspired from the same "Ladvaita" non deep philosophy.

​@@NoThing-ec9km Advaita is speculative bullshit which asks for no supportive evidence, and which, worded or structured whichever way, is of no valuable consequence. In conclusion, it is *pointless*. At best, it is just an exercise in thought from older times. Nothing more.

No one cares if you won't believe😂

*Nice joke*

Nobody cares😂