AIRBUS A350 - High Tech In The Air | Exceptional Engineering Full Documentary 

Me all the way down from the Philippines

I've been to Qatar 777 from Manila to Saudi and Philippine Airlines 330 from Dammam, Saudi Arabia to Manila..how about you???

Me! Bucharest.

mememememe....aspire to b a pilot but failed in education...

🙋‍♀️

form follows function.....beautiful engineering

Ugliest nose section ever though..terrible

The wing is nothing special. It was designed for better fuel efficiency. That’s it.

Not quite . Some structural issues remain, The stress test limit to destruction was missed, but still certified. There are also flutter test, with uncertain statistical variations . To be sure this are limit load margins, not ever reached in operation , unless there are related to fatigue, a long time effect due the numer of load cycles, high frequency in the case of vibration and low frequency in case of flight cycles , number of landings, pressurization etc. Some sructurally safe but drag increasing local skin separations was a big problem, when Quatar grounded their A 350 fleet in a dispute with Airbus.

@@Arturo-lapaz Boeing 787 fanboy loser

It burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

a minor hit? it took the cost guard plane out of existence and you call it a minor hit????@@joeschmoe21

​@@joeschmoe21 all people got out of the a350 and it's much safer than older titanium aircraft

Hah, nice! Just how did we all miss that one !! * ;]*

Rofl

That’s what she said

Only legends understands this. 😂

Lmao

Isn't 'flying' one of these just more-or-less supervising the automation outside of a few minutes on either end ? There can be little comparison to fighter jet flying I would think - or even a crop duster maybe ? 'Stick and rudder ' skills don't apply to commercial airliners I would imagine . Is that fair ?

@@DrTWGthey do a little…but mostly they read the stock reports and the plane does the flying.

i get it

Are you a comedian?

After the Japan airline 350 fire, Airlines will be dumping the 350. 737 Max crashes happened because third-world pilots lacked English proficiency and didn't understand the manuals. These incompetent pilots committed suicide, taking all passengers with them. Boeing has dumbed down the manuals since then, but I would avoid third world airlines, simply because their pilot selection process is rife with nepotism (as opposed to the people themselves having any problem). Meanwhile, airlines are buying the 737max as fast as they can. Airbus is a state funded company and makes bad decisions. The A380 was just like the Concorde, a complete commercial failure. So Airbus copied the 787 to make the a350. But the A350 burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

@@joeschmoe21 do you really believe what you are writing there? This is hilarious. Do you own Boeing stock or are you just a fanboy?

@@1zui I did work in Boeing Integrated Defense, but I also worked in Europe, and have a pretty comprehensive understanding of the two companies. For example, A380, Concorde were both created as 'national pride' projects, because Europe feels they need to better than US. But politically motivated products don't get accepted by the market. So both planes were commercial failures. This does not being Airbus engineers (French or German) are bad. The 350 was created by copying the 787 in a hurry since Airbus is under pressure to show success after commercial failure of both A340 and A380. So they cut corners and used flammable plastic in the plastic-composite fuselage. Since most people will not understand this, and there is too much misguided praise of the A350, I decided to share some facts. But they are just that, facts. You can verify it all. Look up high Temperature Plastic Composites, PMR15, etc.

It stayed in the marketing departement, I suppose...

Paul right, these dudes are spitting some straight fake news

The pilot always has full control, except when it is being crashed by faulty software.

I thought the same when i heard that

I guess that the original "pilot in command of the aircraft" smoke-screen was nothing but resistance against Airbus' push towards fly-by-wire technology. A move that in the long run was inevitable. That Boeing BS suggested that Airbus pilots had no direct contact with the control surfaces of the aircraft, and thus were no longer in control. That was not a philosophy, that was a dumb-ass excuse for not facing some inevitable automation realities and - most of all - for not pulling the finger out of the anus and GET SOME INNOVATION ON THE TABLE. Not knowing how else to declare defeat in face of Airbus being clearly outperforming them, they shoved MCAS under the butt of pilots. Fly by mis-wire, the Boeing way. The rest is history.

Lol

Boeing lost his reputation

@@BaasB007 they don’t care anymore. They’re too big to fail and they know it.

It burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

The 737Max crashes were caused by pilots in third world countries who are weak in English and didn't understand the manuals. Boeing has, since then, dumbed down the manuals to meet the low English proficiency of these third world pilots (usually the result of nepotism in admission to flight schools in third world countries). Boeing 737Max is a superb plane (for the money) and airlines are buying them as fast as they can. If you fly the 787 copy (A350) carry lots of water. These planes are highly flammable. 🤣

Yep

On a video game

Your mum. Definitely

And ph is…?

Thank you for a beautiful account

It burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

​@@joeschmoe21it wasn't a minor hit, it collided with a dash 8 full of fuel. Plus Japan airlines ordered more of them after the crash, Korean airlines also placed an order for them on the same day

Wow must be so gratifying to see

@@xino_z thanks!

👍

Shut up

Beware of Boeing. In 2015, an auditor with the Federal Aviation Administration discovered a Boeing subcontractor was falsifying certifications on cargo doors for hundreds of 777s and had been doing so for years, according to interviews and government documents. Boeing mechanics were leaving tools inside plane wings, precariously close to the cables that control their movements. Workers also were improperly installing wires in 787s, which could increase the risk of shorts or fires, FAA officials found. Repeatedly, safety lapses were identified, and Boeing would agree to fix them, then fail to do so, the FAA said. The agency launched or was considering more than a dozen legal enforcement cases against the company for failing to comply with safety regulations, a review of FAA records shows, with fines that could have totaled tens of millions of dollars. So FAA officials tried a new approach. Rather than pursue each violation separately, agency officials bundled them together and negotiated a broader deal. In 2015, the FAA decided to try to get Boeing to meet, then go beyond, federal safety requirements by addressing broader corporate culture and governance issues, including what agency officials considered a lack of transparency. The week before Christmas of that year, Boeing and the FAA signed a five-year settlement agreement that was unprecedented in scope. The company paid a modest $12 million penalty, but it agreed to make significant changes in its internal safety systems and practices for “ensuring compliance” with regulations. In the days after the agreement was signed, top U.S. officials cast it as a powerful reminder that every company, no matter its size, must comply with minimum safety standards. But Boeing’s profits after signing the deal topped $20 billion by the end of September 2018, making the company’s $12 million penalty easy to gloss over despite occasional press reports of the firm’s shortcomings. The company committed to improving the quality and timeliness of information it provides to the FAA. But in the case of the 737 Max, the FAA said, it took Boeing more than a year to notify it about a software problem that disabled a crucial warning light connected to the automated system at the center of the tragedies.

Yes, I have to agree.

It burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

It's far safer than driving, or even trains.

Same i've always been kind of anxious when flying but watching documentaries like these has made me feel a lot safer going forward which is awesome because i actually like flying overall, i always pick the window seat

99% of cabin crew are absolutely lovely, I’ve had very, very few bad interactions with them and they’re incredibly understanding. I always try and remember that all the crew and pilots want to get home too, their own lives are in their hands as well as ours x

hahahhahahha amazing

theyre lyin lmaooo

In fairness, that WAS the Boeing philosophy. The rot at Boeing started when THEY bought McDonnell Douglas but fired their own executives and instead kept McDonnell Douglas's executive staff.

@@brianeleighton In fairness, that was the 787 he was commenting on, which was well after McDonnell Douglas entered the scene. Continuing to espousing philosophies long abandoned tends to ruin a companies reputation when disastrous events prove them to be lies.

@@deaddoll1361 The 787 development went for years...and was in fact the first Boeing aircraft developed under the new management group. This management group has had a disastrous run of designing new aircraft...the 787 and now the Max.

@wookie5689 you said american not me. and im not american either

If you are an international engineer, then you can understand what ever units that are used. Even in some SI metric countries, their scale may not be in thousands but rather hundred of thousands.

Temple Cat As an American Aerospace engineer have been using both systems my whole career. That’s just the way it is, and most people just deal with it.

@@templecat3974 In Europe except for the UK, almost nobody understands imperial units. Maybe engineers in the aviation industry but only few others.

@@arnoldhau1 so you've gone throughout Europe and asked everybody, right? or how else would you come up with that conclusion?

@@mariacheebandidos7183 Yes. It was quite an effort for a RU-vid comment, but I guess it was worth it.

I miss the a380 on the flights to Los Angeles. It was always such a special feeling getting on that plane and taking off

The 350 burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

They are already being grounded. They have degrading fuselage problems

@@747heavyboeing3 There is a problem on some, it is fixable and unlike Boeing not a killer of passengers. In 2015, an auditor with the Federal Aviation Administration discovered a Boeing subcontractor was falsifying certifications on cargo doors for hundreds of 777s and had been doing so for years, according to interviews and government documents. Boeing mechanics were leaving tools inside plane wings, precariously close to the cables that control their movements. Workers also were improperly installing wires in 787s, which could increase the risk of shorts or fires, FAA officials found. Repeatedly, safety lapses were identified, and Boeing would agree to fix them, then fail to do so, the FAA said. The agency launched or was considering more than a dozen legal enforcement cases against the company for failing to comply with safety regulations, a review of FAA records shows, with fines that could have totaled tens of millions of dollars. So FAA officials tried a new approach. Rather than pursue each violation separately, agency officials bundled them together and negotiated a broader deal. In 2015, the FAA decided to try to get Boeing to meet, then go beyond, federal safety requirements by addressing broader corporate culture and governance issues, including what agency officials considered a lack of transparency. The week before Christmas of that year, Boeing and the FAA signed a five-year settlement agreement that was unprecedented in scope. The company paid a modest $12 million penalty, but it agreed to make significant changes in its internal safety systems and practices for “ensuring compliance” with regulations. In the days after the agreement was signed, top U.S. officials cast it as a powerful reminder that every company, no matter its size, must comply with minimum safety standards. But Boeing’s profits after signing the deal topped $20 billion by the end of September 2018, making the company’s $12 million penalty easy to gloss over despite occasional press reports of the firm’s shortcomings. The company committed to improving the quality and timeliness of information it provides to the FAA. But in the case of the 737 Max, the FAA said, it took Boeing more than a year to notify it about a software problem that disabled a crucial warning light connected to the automated system at the center of the tragedies.

@@barrierodliffe4155 Like Scarebus has never had any plane crashes.

@@747heavyboeing3yeah due to pilot error mostly, you have no area to talk you literally are a Boeing fanboy it’s all over in your username lol, atleast Airbus is innovating instead of keeping 60 year old airframe like Boeing and slapping some new engines on it

Who has research this matter? Hugh Hephner maybe?

Thats what my girlfriend said

big plains for the future of covid-19

Will do. Cheers

We human beings are awesome!!! We are a credit to God's wisdom!!! Just look at the current state of the world.

How true but the mankind always deny God

its not even our technology

Thank you for your speech. Now shut up

yeah! which timestamp MAS thumbnail had?

They missed mentioning the flammability of the A350. The A350 burns very easily. Like Tinder. Airlines will be dumping A350s after the Japanese A350 burnt down to ashes after a minor hit.

There is a very big difference between a 17,3" seat witdh and a 18" seat witdh ? If is true why a larger seat is technolog argument?

Yes, the little things. I don’t want fancy electronics in my head area with the pull-down screen. I just want to be able to stretch my legs straight or put it higher. I’ve been on both Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner and Airbus A350. The Dreamliner is super comfortable with state-of-the-art window screen controls and the A350 is very comfortable as well. It really makes a difference because you arrive less tired even though you have been flying very long hours.

Mj

You idiots. Boeing is still far safer than Airbus. Airbus: 35 crashes, 28.3 million flights, 0.81 million flights per crash. Boeing: 251 crashes, 461 million flights, 1.84 million flights per crash. Boeing is over twice as safe. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about.

@Computer User Yeah...shitty American technology that has basically led the aviation industry for the last 120 years. They must be clueless.

ye 737 max was a failure but I actually like Boeing more than airbus the models I like the most are 737, 747 and 787 dreamliner they look amazing, and on airbus the only model I love so far are a380 and 320 neo, the rest are meh and this 350 just looks like they copied 787. I am from europe btw.

Sad but true

Oh the pilot is in full command. Just in command of a insubordinate plane

Multiple airbus planes have also crashed because of the fact that the pilot has very little actual control

I have a big fear of flying but learning about how safe the plane I'll be going on has really helped me! It has been really interesting learning as well! thank you for this Documentary!

A380

@@markmnorcal they showed the A350 as well....

Shut up

Tim Davie wrong time stamp. The 777-300ER and 777-200LR/F uses GE90 only but the 777-200ER also use the Trent 800 or PW4000

Timmy Jones they’re the only two really

@@bschell1969 lmao

@@bschell1969 Embraer? Bombardier?

The Rolls-Royce Trent I was referring to the large commercial jet producers. I apologize.

@@bschell1969 Oh sorry

Cheers

Big plans for the future I see... Then comes COVID wooooo

Who else loves aviation??!!

I used to be a Boeing fan. They simply got corrupt after adopting the MD culture.

Was thinking exactly the same, nice hats indeed!

Apply for a job with Airbus as a technician and you will have loads to work in ( if you are offered a job of course) ;)

Indeed it is Sir

lol ;)

lmao

Toys ? ;)

Boeing has gone downhill, I for one will not fly in a Boeing again after reading the following. In 2015, an auditor with the Federal Aviation Administration discovered a Boeing subcontractor was falsifying certifications on cargo doors for hundreds of 777s and had been doing so for years, according to interviews and government documents. Boeing mechanics were leaving tools inside plane wings, precariously close to the cables that control their movements. Workers also were improperly installing wires in 787s, which could increase the risk of shorts or fires, FAA officials found. Repeatedly, safety lapses were identified, and Boeing would agree to fix them, then fail to do so, the FAA said. The agency launched or was considering more than a dozen legal enforcement cases against the company for failing to comply with safety regulations, a review of FAA records shows, with fines that could have totaled tens of millions of dollars. So FAA officials tried a new approach. Rather than pursue each violation separately, agency officials bundled them together and negotiated a broader deal. In 2015, the FAA decided to try to get Boeing to meet, then go beyond, federal safety requirements by addressing broader corporate culture and governance issues, including what agency officials considered a lack of transparency. The week before Christmas of that year, Boeing and the FAA signed a five-year settlement agreement that was unprecedented in scope. The company paid a modest $12 million penalty, but it agreed to make significant changes in its internal safety systems and practices for “ensuring compliance” with regulations. In the days after the agreement was signed, top U.S. officials cast it as a powerful reminder that every company, no matter its size, must comply with minimum safety standards. But Boeing’s profits after signing the deal topped $20 billion by the end of September 2018, making the company’s $12 million penalty easy to gloss over despite occasional press reports of the firm’s shortcomings. The company committed to improving the quality and timeliness of information it provides to the FAA. But in the case of the 737 Max, the FAA said, it took Boeing more than a year to notify it about a software problem that disabled a crucial warning light connected to the automated system at the center of the tragedies.

😀

I was looking for someone to point that out

Exactly, fail on the research part of the documentary maker.

Why does that matter?

@@jetmech9287 Uh, because being inclusive is nothing but a positive and has no negatives?