All 27 Harry Potter Actors That Were Replaced (HP Explained) 

Ok np

MovieFlame I was 9 years old back when the first Harry Potter film came out in 2001

You forgot about there was another actor who played Grinderwald in a flashback scene. Where Grinderwald is in Azkaban where he was questioned about the wand that Dumbledore had.

@@theresaiwright7085 He was a different age. Doesn't count

@@theresaiwright7085 its like saying kid Lilly is another actor than adult Lilly.

The order of the Phoenix: the year everyone got a haircut

The half blood prince: the year everyone got together

This joke is older than Dumbledore but ok 😌

@@keatonmorgan4883 the deathly hallows: the year everyone died

@@eviehnt 😂😂

I agree!! I thought they were two different characters

Same here. I didn't think it out of place that the Minister to have like s butler/servant. Never realized that was supposed to be tom

I noticed that from the get go myself, and I said,(from the first time I saw the movie) "IS THAT SUPPOSED TO BE TOM, IT CAN'T BE, CAN IT?!?!?!" and then I said "WHAT THE HELL!!! it HAS to be TOM THE INNKEEPER, because that's who shows Harry his room!!!" And that laugh... Even if it WAS the correct Tom doing they "idiot henchman" laugh, it just feels so inappropriate to the rest of the movie to me, almost as though he's laughing at Harry because he knows Sirius black is after him or something... I mean, logically I know it's referring to the whole aunt business but still, Tom always had that "I Know more information than I'm supposed to" feel to his character, not helped in the least by the idea of "Loose Lips Hagrid" stopping by often for "The Usual", and well, that hunchback Tom just takes that and adds the creepy "I won't spy on you Harry Potter, I promise *wink wink*" kinda vibe to it for me. I don't know why that is, but still, it's just how it is and although it doesn't completely ruin the movie, it takes that moment where Harry knows something is going on and having people joking about it just makes him feel, to me at least, like someone is laughing at his predicament which feels like it's the whole escaped convict who happens to be his godfather thing, although he doesn't know that at the time

That change made zero sense to me. The original Tom seemed like a Pub Owner, the Hunched Tom seemed like Fudge's servant, doing his bidding.

same

Exactly.

Richard Harris would have been able to do both had he been younger. Check out some of his work, Amazing actor

I could imagine Richard doing to Ministry of magic fight scene between Dumbledore and Tom a lot better than Michael Gambon. Richard would just sashay about casting spells like Tom was an amateur.

Perfectly summarized!

Well said indeed!

Yeah he was handsome, cold and actually sounds evil

I was in love

The actor died I think. He could've at least waited until after deathly hallows part 2

@@arthurmorgan8529Not sure which actor you're referring to, but the original actor who played Dumbledore did die (which is why they had to replace him after the 2nd film). The actor who played Tom Riddle didn't die. By the 6th film, He was just too old to play the part again.

Gay af​@@valentinaesguerra4810

Yeah I think if he had made it through GOF I’d have been okay with Gambon doing 5-8.

Richard Harris passed away in 2002 at age 72 right before the Chamber of Secrets was released.

I always wondered what it would have looked like to see Richard Harris falling from the astronomy tower, especially that one part when you are looking up at him as he falls backwards.

Or if Harry asked any of the older students to do it..

It was not the gambons fault for screaming did you put your name into the goblet of fire, it was the shitty directors decision for him to say that. Richard Harris would have said it like that if he was still alive

Agreed.

“He asked calmly”

Nah Richard Harris was still better than Michael.

Richard Harris showed what was the regal wise old man he is so well known as, while Michael showed the powerful badass wizard Dumbledore is capable of being. I agree it was perfect recasting. I enjoyed both performances just as much

Tbf 2nd on was darler already

yes omg i also think that the other actor looked way too young in comparison to christian coulson t

@@taekait And way too "obviously evil", while Coulson was exactly how Tom was portraid in the books.

random fact, Frank Dilane is the son of Stephen Dilane (aka Stannis Baratheon)

@@taekait I thought he looked about the right age. Could have looked slightly older, sure. But, you just get some older and younger looking 16yo boys. It's not like watching Grease and thinking They were meant to be playing 18yo at 23

So wholesome 😄

ditto what you said about chamber of secrets tom. in half-blood prince, he looked more like a preppy trust fund kid, which is far from tom riddle's character.

I like to think of the Tom we know from the chamber of secrets being in his late teens (16-18) and the one from the half blood prince in his early teens (10-12). This sounds like a coping mechanism lmao.

I wish they had shown Coulson as an adult Voldemort. Preferably when he went to kill the Potters. We never saw Voldemort as an adult when he was just a normal human with a nose and hair. I think Coulson would have played a good adult dark lord, even if the actor was a bit young, you can help with Mackup.

@Fuchsfeuer just imagine coulsons but more pale, with black hair and dark eye circles

@@Comet_373 Or when Riddle went to apply for the Defense Against Dark Arts job.

Same

Same.

I’m sad now

Dumbledore basically stated that choosing to be a Slytherin is bad. Really?! No wonder why Slytherin houses most of the vengeful people - the headmaster is very much biased against them.

I was valedictorian for my high school class and I ended my speech with this quote. I absolutely adore it.

That one really bothered me.

Thank god someone pointed it out

I always thought it was a different person, was even wondering why he wasn't in the video. I kind of preferred the first look, to be honest

@@majascha3414 they were originally meant to be different people, they just casted warwick davis as the choir conductor too; but they decided to change it because the choir conductor's makeup took only two hours while the original flitwick's took four hours

@@badeggontheyoutube Yeah I get the makeup part, but the "choir conductor" didn't have any lines, yet they changed Flitwick's voice. In the first movie, he has a much more cartoony voice, while in the other movies, he sounds normal.

He was recasted for only valid reason I can think of.

man, when i was watching the 3rd movie, i was just asking my parents, what happend to dumbledore, that explain that the real actor passed, man i was upset

Yeah Michael Gambon did not do that good

For example “DID YOU PUT YOUR NAME ON THE GOBLET OF FIRE!?!?” Dumbledore asked “calmly” and by calmly he was yelling

@@katjablum3837 that's more of the direction's fault. If Richard was still in the role he probably would've done the same

I understood that reference

That man is playing Galaga

I didn’t understand that reference

When I first read this,I thought you were talking about Morgan stark,Tony's daughter.Then I realized you were talking about Morgan, the head of MovieFlame

Duh

Emma nearly ledt

Did u hear about ur man barder

@@sasha-od2jr what???

@@endzi1248 yeah I think she wanted to focus on her education after the fifth or sixth film, but in the end she decided to stay

@@theawolf2478 Oh thanks for the explanation :D

I was a little annoyed in the beginning, but I think it was coloured by the Goblet scene. Everything else is very good. The director should've just informed Gambin about how he should deliver that line. So I would say that was a director mistake and not acting mistake. (I actually think I heard once that Gambin hadnt read the books, but I dont know if thats true or not)

@@alisemaleneohme4666 The director of Goblet of Fire, Mike Newell hated the fourth book cause it was too long.

@@user-wk7jk5of4f How incompetent!! A director who doesn't like a book, that he has to make a film about, because it's too long and makes such an important character like Dumbledore obviosiuly look bad 🙄🙄🙄

He was continuously complaining about how long the book was and that he got the longest book to adapt into a film. He also had trash ideas like burning the forbidden forest and it took the whole team to convince him not to do that.@@DetectiveConanAptx

@@user-wk7jk5of4f Unbelievable

I was quite upset with the re-cast of Dumbledore as at the time, I had no idea that Harris had passed. After finding that out, I just watched as Gambon worked his own 'magic' and made the role his. I think that we all benefited in the long run as we bore witness to the talents of both men.

@@maryjoyspohrer256 great way to look at it. I agree.

It is super jarring and they should have forced him to read the books and study Harris’ acting. It is immersion-breaking.

@@maryjoyspohrer256 He SHOULD have made a more gradual transition, becoming less and less like Harris’ character or just done it more like Harris (and Rowling’s writing for the character) all the way through.

@@maryjoyspohrer256 Same. Harris was brilliant in bringing us the ‘magic’ of wise, grandpa Dumbledore. Gambon gave us the ‘magic’ of badass behind the wise grandpa, the hint that he’s not all that he seems, that there’s an understanding of his potential for darkness that he works to suppress while reluctantly still flirting with that I don’t think Harris could have portrayed that easily. I’ll admit, at first I didn’t recognise the recast as it felt in line with tonal change of the movies & I was too young to notice, then it felt jarring, now it just feels quirky but fitting.

Wish he had the red eyes when he was reborn

Watch Harris's older movies, he could do powerful characters VERY well.

@@thebluestig2654 Exactly his older movies, but if he would have survived he would be too old for the more action packed lines

I still think about it every day. Had Voldemort succeeded in that part he would have looked and sounded like that all the time! That would have been very interesting

I agree! That was by far my favorite. The younger version reminded me of Damien from The Omen or Children of the Corn. 😂

yes!! i loved him

Agreed. He's such a handsome kid, exactly how I imagine young tom riddle

But he ruined Dumblodore's character in Goblet of Fire "HARRY, DIDYYA PUTT YOURR NNAME INN THE GOBLETTT OFF FIYYAA!!?" and in the other movies too, he was not always calm and collected, like he was in the books. I mean, yes some of his scenes were great. Michael Gambon was OK, but Richard Harris was perfect. RIP

@@NareinM I can agree on that Gambon was bad in the 4th movie, but I see it more as a director mistake. I saw the movies before I read the books and I actually prefer Gambon. He was not book accurate but he felt more human, like this outstanding wizard still has flaws and I kinda liked that. I liked it more than the books because Dumbledore was a bit too perfect for me as a character (in interactions, not origins).

Me too bro

#Michal Gambon fan.

# Michal Gambon fan.

Nah in the first 2 films the original dumbledore didn't do much movement, but in the later films dumbledore moved a lot so they actually changed his clothes

In the books the duel seemed really one sided with dumbeldore not even breaking a sweat, the movie definitely put on more of a show there

Honestly I do think Harris could’ve done it too but sadly we’ll just never get to know or see that to bee sure.

I liked him as well, but there was something truly unnerving about the one in Half Blood Prince, and I thought that he pulled it off quite well.

@@maryjoyspohrer256 ya looking back at it I was a little harsh😂 he did a good job, I just think the original really nailed it bc to me that’s exactly what I thought Tom Riddle would be like in real life

@@ryanstaiger1712 I've always thought of it as: the Tom we saw in Chamber was maybe right before he graduated his Seventh year, and Tom during Half Blood Prince was slightly younger

I did too. I thought Tom was supposed to be this sneaky and handsome guy who turns into a villain and Chamber of Secrets gave that

@@j.pnewcomer1069 Interestingly, Christian Caulson portrayed Tom Riddle in his fifth year while Frank Dillane portrayed Tom Riddle in his sixth year.

I wish Christian Coulson came back for an older version of Voldy. David Yates should’ve cut this comedy and teen drama. Have him come back as an older Tom Riddle and the Half-Blood Prince movie would’ve been much cooler

Bill at least appeared later, I think on HBP or DH1, Charlie was straight up cut from everything. But yeah, I really wanted to see all Weasleys together on the cup.

@@corneliahale7871 I agree. Anyways, Dohmnall Gleeson did some justice for Bill Weasley’s character. Still, I am so fed up with some of David Yates’ and Mike Newell’s decisions, particularly for HBP and GOF.

He really was, I thought he was great as grindelwald

Yes he was amazing

Fuck Amber Heard and Fuck WB 😡.

@@Thederanged1 i swear that woman somehow still got to that l'oreal event in Paris long with other celebs like Camila Cabello while Johnny Depp is probably still getting shit on by some feminazis whom literally support Amber Turd. #JusticeforJohnnyDepp

@@anakinskywalker5088 yo I'm confused who TF is Amber?

I mean, he was good, but I can’t imagine him in the other ones, where it all gets lot darker

Here’s a time stamp for anyone wondering when: 22:03

😂😂😂😭😭😭

was the more weird thing is they did not try to fight or try to escape or just not be there. they were being taken to prison by a caretaker., the enemy left there own inside the school and did not seem to care about them silly leaving your own troops behind enemy lines in a big battle

the only comment which is not biased tbh

I like both Dumbledore, but I think it's better to replace Harris's role with Gambon after goblet of fire when Dumbledore are more active and things are gradually getting out of the control of the magical world. Harris seems to be to wise to fit Gambon's role of Dumbledore who sacrifice himself for the greater plan, but I do want to see Harris in the imaginary King's cross station. But for now, I think we can take a moment for both great Dumbledore.

Gambon ruined dumbledore for me

I always loved the part in the 3rd movie where Harry is falling of his broomstick and Gambon stands up and says "arresto momentum!" So powerful gives me chills everytime

Personally gambon was my fav

omg like i'm convinced we are all living the same life

I use these vids to fall asleep

Same actually 🤣

Same

Huh it’s lunch time for me lol

Yeah, that would've been controversial on the long run.

Not having the character represented properly at all is far worse.. There's no excuse around that.. That's like if Ron magically showed up Black when he's known for being a Ginger.. but the excuses lie dormant

@@grammysworld5449 I think the difference is that the book never actually described what she looked like (to my knowledge). She was a very minor character both in the books and the movies until this point with no physical description, so the film makers could interpret her any way they like. But when she was suddenly thrust into an important supporting character, they may have had to rethink how they wanted to represent her.

@@guitarsbunch347 As I remember, somewhere was written that they just let Rupert Grint to pick a girl he liked for a role of Ron's girlfriend😇

To be fair? The reason she was recast was because they didn't want a black actress having such a large role considering her storyline. Don't be daft.

the importance of Dumbledore "bursting into the room" is only relevant because Dumbledore is supposed to remain very calm throughout the rest of the series. he recognizes that Moody is a fake and that Harry's life is in danger, so he basically says "fuck u calm ass bitch" to himself and shows what he can be when necessary. if Dumbledore is always losing his cool (like in the DIDJAPUTYANAMEINTHEGOBLETOFIYAH scene) then him bursting into the room to save Harry's life from Barty Jr loses its significance.

@@JuanMataCFC agreed, and that scene would have had much more of an impact if Dumbledore hadn't been like that through the whole movie.

I would have loved to see Richard do that. All the gambon fans don’t get that it’s how dumbledore is supposed to be. They’re all fake fans.

Rip Richard Harris

It's sad that Harris died but I love both him and Gambon as Dumbledore

Yes he left us behind with some of his last beautifully acted moments

@@Ryan79345 yes I agree, Michael Gambon did a great job in his role as Dumbledore as well.

Richard Harris was able to portray the dumbledore we all imagined, mainly the long ass beard. RIP

Yeah, my memory might be just awful but when he asks him if he put him name in the goblet it didn't feel like how he acts in the book. Way more aggressive than Dumbledore was in the books.

I think they were both great and I don’t think they were that different. I honestly never noticed they recast dumbledore until someone told me. I think they both did a great job and they made a good choice in choosing an actor to replace Harris.

He says forgetting all the scenes where Gambon is JUST as soft and gentle to Harry as Harris was, INCLUDING Goblet of Fire

@@Cloud-dt6xb he for sure played the character more stern than harris. Now there is a tone shift for sure starting with the third movie so that could also play into it. And the whole 5th movie where he is keeping us distance on purpose. That could skew how people look at them both. Harris was never in a “darker” Harry Potter movie. The first two were still “magical” and then the drama and crazy starts ramping up.

I know, he would've been too old for that role then, though.

i think it was because of age, but i agree he was the best for the role.

Tom Riddle was supposed to be so charming. The recast actor was not. He looked more like someone who would get bullied. They should have at least cast a taller actor.

@@audioliquor YO LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I 100% agree, Christian coulson had the charming yet manipulative aura that Tom's meant to have

They only had the first 3 books to go off when thet were making the first movie. Incomplete is a bit of an understatement :P

@@a.jherbert5436 they had 4 books to go off of when the first movie came out. Goblet of fire came out in July of 2000 while the first movie came out in November of 2001.

At least this series turned out well. GOT is on the complete opposite end of the spectrum.

@@savannahryan91 But how which books were available during the PRODUCTION of the first movie?

The movie series would have ended in 2017 if that was the case. The target demographic was starting to age up and they had to strike the iron while it was still hot.

Exactly. Everyone wants to “believe the victim” until it’s a man and then suddenly, there’s no way a man can be a victim. Like what???? And Amber gets to keep her roles? Utterly ridiculous and disgusting on WB part.

Yeah even everyone knows there is actual audio clips of Heard abussing Depp, if you ask me WB dropped the wrong actor even though I don't reject micklson taking over the role it just won't feel the same as what Depp has done with the character of Grindelwald

@@alphawolf3398 I feel bad for Mickelson because none of this is his fault and he is getting hammered

@@MAGAWITCH1990 I don't think enough people talk enough about how hard the situation must be for him. He's a great actor, and a good guy, and he's making the best of a difficult situation.

@@taylorodell9017 Same with Ezra Miller, as a homosexual actor, who has been known to be rough with people in bars (IIRC he even chocked a woman once) and yet he still got to play Credence.

HAHAHA aw that’s so cute 😭

IKRRR

Yeah that would make sense if Hogwarts wasn’t such an old school hahaha

Exactly

That's the way I feel about it, too. Gambon was the perfect choice. I also feel the Goblet of Fire scene was brilliant. There was a lot of sacrificing going on to keep tabs on Harry. A gentle voice would seem out of place at this point in the books and movies. Parents raise their voices when they feel their kids put themselves in danger.

@@skylilly1 I think for the first movie, Richard Harris creates a lovely nurturing charater but later on in the series, especially as the story gets darker and more threatening and violent, I can't picture the nice nurturing version doing acts like hunting horcruxes or battling voldemort in the ministry etc. I think the more aggressive version also fits the character Aberforth tells us about too.

That’s the whole point of the powerful reputation, it contradicts the way he acts and is why it’s even more impressive

'Did you put your name into The goblet of Fire, Harry?' Dumbledore asked calmly.

Ikr

i like how this comment is worded, it made me laugh :)

I could have lived my whole life without this information. BUT OH MY GOD HE *IS* ?????

@@Piccadally Yup. Imagine how I cringed when I learned that🙃

what after movies

Love depp but Mads should have been cast as Grindelwald in the first place. He's perfect.

True

I'm not upset about who they recasted, I'm just upset why they recasted. Johnny Depp has proof that he did not abuse Heard yet WB force him to resign and keep Heard for Aquaman 2

@@patrickmcgregor5168 Same, honestly. He's innocent and she should be fired, but I think Mads Mikkelsen will do a good job too.

@@adventurer1357 Johnny was amazing too

Weird decisions? The GoF director wanted to burn down the Forbidden Forest and add a scene of trolls doing ballet. It went as far as having costumes made for the ballet scene. Thank goodness that the other people working on the film talked him out of it.

@@serenitythesiren5031 they needed a better director

@@serenitythesiren5031 The idea of the ballet-dancing trolls was actually for the "Half-Blood Prince" film.

Hot take but in terms of building tension and establishing the danger of the tri wizard tourney the choice to make Dumbledore yell at Harry just makes more sense cinematically. Just because an author wrote a scene a certain way doesn’t make it perfect, especially when looking at the context of the situation. Why would Dumbledore be calm??

@@moviemaniac9034 The painting across from the room of requirement depicted a knight I believe attempting to teach trolls to do ballet. That was probably what seeded the idea.

Nope they were both in their last few years of Hogwarts

i thought that too at first lol

Same here! I was very surprised when I found out they were both supposed to be 16, since the second one looked so much younger to me lol

@@emilie1265 But like Christian Coulson really fit the textbook description of Riddle being tall and dark-haired.

@@priyanshasharma3599 He did! He was my favorite

That may be, but they are drastically different ages in between FB and DH. Realistically they would not be able to use the same actor. HOWEVER, Jamie Campbell Bower did play teenage Grindelwald in both instances 😄

Yes, it definitely should have been mentioned!

​@@britn617 Thank you for that comment! I was scrolling to see if anyone else would have written it before me. I agree that the ages are drastically different, but at the same time, neither "Old" Grindelwald nor "teenage" one look like Depp or Mikkelsen. It's so hilarious that the two Dark Lords have the most recasting through the series

The makers did a dirty job with them in the yule ball from the make up to their dress up Both of them were really beautiful actresses and were bangladeshis the country were i belong to (in the book, they were indians)but their make up were done very lazily And their dresses were awful i wouldn't even wear that while going to my coaching classes let alone a frickin ballroom We desis have a lot of beautiful party dresses They should have given them a lehenga, gown or saree Its not that hard to find a decent looking dress And who th wears bangles in one hand Its just terrible smh And out of all names, rowling decided to go with the most old and grandma name she could ever find

@@conserztasfia0078 I agree that the costume department really let them down, even in the book what they wore was described as so much nicer than what was in the movie, but am confused how this is relevant to my comment?

Unfortunately I don’t agree with Richard. He was average meh

Richard Harris was better but was given less to work with, even in the 3rd movie Dumbledore doesn't really do much even with the new actor, if Richard Harris got to play Dumbledore from the 4th movie on I think he woulda stole those movies

@@xKillZone99100%, he would have been able to capture both sides of dumbledore were he a younger man and able to see the movies out

@@xKillZone99idk if he would be calm hopefully he would have

Gambon was really good in every film except goblet of fire tbh and especially the half blood prince

True, but I feel that’s more of the writers fault for making Dumbledore act that way and not the actor.

Every time I was reading the Harry Potter books, I always thought of Richard Harris and his voice when I was picturing Dumbledore in my mind, especially starting with Prisoner of Azkaban.

It was the director's mistake.. He didn't even read the book.. Gambon was perfect in rest of the films

I feel like it was more the director's choice than anything. At the end of the day the director really has the final say on how a scene plays out, I think. GoF is full of weird directing choices- though the ferret scene couldn't have been better 😂

toby regbo? are you forgetting him?

@@msrainbowbrite I didn't know his name

@@ParkerM the more i think about it. you could be right because (from memory) toby only appeared in a photo from the book of dumbledores life but jamie actually appeared jumping out of a window

@@msrainbowbrite Both technically appeared in the mirror of Erised scene in Crimes of Grindewald, but that's about the only actual footage Toby currently has

Exactly

All true

I would argue Mads should have been cast in the first place. He speaks multiple European languages (Gellert is a European character who takes over Europe) and is known for making complicated fascinating in Western movies.

Depp shouldn't have been cast in the first place, personal issues aside he was terribly miscasted imo glad he's gone. Mads will be great I'm sure or Farrell could've kept the role.

Depp shouldn't have been cast in the first place, personal issues aside he was terribly miscasted imo glad he's gone. Mads will be great I'm sure or Farrell could've kept the role.

Super easy, no doubt which one is better?

@@pigi1004 HARRYDIDYAPITYONAMEINTHEGOBLETOFFIYA?!?!?!?

Roses are red This is the Shire dIdYoUpUtYoUrNaMeInThEgObLeToFiAh

Dumbledore, I didn't like the new version in Prisoner of Azkaban @ 1st. He grew on me. But I understood there was a legit reason to need a new Actor

Also Grindelwald Technology Jamie Campbell Bower played him.

Wait what happened?

@@ceezee57 he said "Harry, did you put your name in the goblet of fire" in a frustrated and louder way, but in the books it was meant to be said calmly. To me, it made more sense for it to be the way Gambon did it, made it sound more important.

@@smoothie9931 Yeah, and it was Gambon's decision to make it that way, since he had already stated that he wanted to make his own Dumbledore, different from that of Harris.

@@feder373 makes sense. To me, Harris sounded wise, and old. Gambon sounded kinda loony, but powerful.

@@smoothie9931 that’s not how dumbledore was tho. All you people who claim that gambon was the better dumbledore do not know how dumbledore is supposed to be.

DIDJAPUTYANAMEINDAGOBLETAFIYAH🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

This deserves way more like!

Uh, Steve Kloves and Michael Goldenberg wrote the scripts. Newell and Yates only directed those scenes.

Mike newells direction was the reason that dumbledore was portrayed so poorly. Other than the goblet of fire Gambon was really good in every film particularly the half blood Prince where he was outstanding.

@@CodyJMinor0620 Doesn't matter! The point still stands, the way the film character was acting in the scripts is out of character if you're comparing the films to books as adaptations

Goodness gracious!

6?! That 1 less than 7

@stream rock with you Rowling is the last one

I heard that the actor for Quirrell played Voldemort in that scene. I don’t know if that’s true or not though…

⁠@@TheDMan2003It was actually Richard Bremmer who played Voldemort in the flashback. The CGI Voldemort on the back of Quirrell's head was voiced by Quirrell's actor (Ian Hart).

Really?! Omgg

Isn't Young Tom, Ralph's nephew or something like that?3

Absolutely

Yeah, I think that the animated format would do the books a lot of justice. Despite cgi, there are just certain things you can’t do in live action. And given how magical and fantastic the Harry Potter books are, animation would be able to add a lot of those elements to the screen.

Yes that was i thinking and each book must have atleast 24 episode or more to each movie

I don’t feel like an animated show would do the Harry Potter series justice.

HARRY DID YOU PUT YOUR FUCKIN NAME INTO THE GODDAMN GOBLET OF FIRE

I can hear this comment

YOU SHALL NOT PASS!!! oh sorry wrong series

l m

How poetic

That’s insane 😆