ALMOST UNWATCHABLE: Hawley Asks Nom Over & Over For Take On Anti-Israel Statement, Can't Get Answer 

Allowed for Israel only.Saudi Arabia for example, is prohibited

this people try to not to have a conversation about Palestinians suffering. There have been 18,000 people dead. This senators just dance with the money!

Except if your a Biden😮

That guy was there only for the money . Didn’t give a sh#t about what was being discussed and decided or the statements that were being formulated. Has , by his own admission, not a clue as to what was going on . It’s ? Either that or he is morally bankrupt!! Probably both.

@@OZ-hn2shThe “people” voted in Hamas!

Totally agree. My son once to me "I'm Chilean" country in which I was born. I have to correct him by saying and explaining to him that he was AUSTRALIAN, beautiful country that he was born. And that was Australian, born in Chile of Spanish/British descent.

hes showing who his allegiance is with

You're right those who fears AIPAC will take away their jobs. What Isreali allegiance got to do with local judge nomination? If I were him I'll have said what I believe which : Isreal is Aparthied State which annihilated 20,000 ppl 7,500 were children whlist 6,000 were Mothers & young girls.

Why do you think it’s been ongoing for the longest time? It is the last front. And they’re the ones meddling in others businesses. When has the Middle East ever invaded America? Not even in history. Because we all know who “discovered” it!

End times ... Impressive!

This is the harvest of the sowing seeds.

Look around, face masks, purple hair, groomer teachers, and manface galore.... you can't believe it? Really? Really?

No I really can t Jennifer

Zionist Leader David Ben-Gurion what did he say about creation of Isreali ? “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?” David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121. “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” - David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech. “We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.” David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948: Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes: “The old will die and the young will forget.” “We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.” David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978. “If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation). “It’s not a matter of maintaining the status quo. We have to create a dynamic state, oriented towards expansion.” -Ben Gurion “Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.” - Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13) “We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population? ‘Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘ Drive them out! ‘ “ Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979. Partition: “after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine “ - Ben Gurion, p.22 “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan. “The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today - but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concerns of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” P. 53, “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan October, 1936, during the Jewish Agency Executive meeting Ben-Gurion arguing in favor of transfer as a policy, he said “We are not a state and Britain will not do it for us…” although “there is nothing wrong in the idea.” “If it was permissible to move an Arab from the Galilee to Judea, why it is impossible to move an Arab from Hebron to Transjordan, which is much closer? There are vast expanses of land there and we are over crowded….Even the High Commission agrees to a transfer to Transjordan if we equip the peasants with land and money. If the Peel Commission and the London Government accept, we’ll remove the land problem from the agenda.” The Arabs, Ben-Gurion claimed, would not become landless as a result of Zionist land acquisition; they would be transferred to Transjordan. October 29, 1936 the 21 member of the Jewish Agency Executive endorsed the proposal of a transfer of displaced Arab farmers to Transjordan. Only two of the four non-Zionist members opted to dissent. Flapan, Zionism and the Palestinians, citing protocols of the Executive meeting, p. 261 12 July 1937, Ben-Gurion entered in his diary: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple” - a Galilee free from Arab population. Ben-Gurion went so far to write: “We must prepare ourselves to carry out” the transfer [emphasis in original] 27 July 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We have never wanted to dispossess the Arabs [but] because Britain is giving them part of the country which had been promised to us, it is fair that the Arabs in our state be transferred to the Arab portion” 5 October 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We must expel the Arabs and take their places…. And, if we have to use force-not to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev and Transjordan, but to guarantee our own right to settle in those places- then we have force at our disposal.” “It is very possible that the Arabs of the neighboring countries will come to their aid against us. But our strength will exceed theirs. Not only because we will be better organized and equipped, but because behind us there stands a still larger force, superior in quantity and quality …the whole younger generation of Jews from Europe and America.” Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p.297-299, p. 330-331. See also Teveth, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 182-189 Ben-Gurion in an address to the central committee of the Histadrut on 30 December 1947: “In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of its establishment will be about a million, including almost 40 percent non-Jews. Such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness. With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority…. There can be no stable and strong Jewish State so long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 percent.” On the 6th of February 1948, during a Mapai Party Council, Ben-Gurion responded to a remark from a member of the audience that “we have no land there” [in the hills and mountains west of Jerusalem] by saying: “The war will give us the land. The concepts of “ours” and “not ours” are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 6 February 1948. p.211) Addressing the Mapai Council the following day, Ben-Gurion declared: “From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema… there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has not been so Jewish. In many Arab neighborhoods in the west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will change… What had happened in Jerusalem… is likely to happen in many parts of the country …in the six, eight or ten months of the campaign there will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the country.” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 7 February 1948. p. 210-211) And two months later, Ben-Gurion speaking to the Zionist Actions Committee on 6 April, Ben-Gurion declared: “We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and Jerusalem area….I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change in the distribution of the Arab population.” [Ben-Gurion, Behilahem Yisrael, Tel Aviv, Mapai Press, 1952, pp. 86-87] Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary on 12 July 1937: “the compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the projected Jewish State…. We have to stick to this conclusion the same way we grabbed the Balfour Declaration, more than that, the same way we grabbed at Zionism itself.” (Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p. 299)

Asking someone if "Israel is a violent colonial state" is not straightforward at all. It requires a huge amount of historical knowledge and international law knowledge. You will get vastly different answers from highly intelligent people on both sides. It would be irresponsible to answer that question without being an expert in the long history of the area of the world. Unless you are a dishonest politician. Then all you have to think about is how will this look to my voters.

@dakotaeaslick1733 The problem is that this happens a lot at these things. When they don't want to give an answer, that will be on the record and shows what position they have on a subject. They deflect by not saying yes or no. Also, when they are asked to come to these things, they generally know what the topic is and therefore can prepare. This is not an isolated event. This happens every time the answer to the question may hurt them politically. The issue with Israel should not be that hard to answer for an educated person like him. The fact that a yes answer would hurt him with his peers is enough to make you believe he was deflecting on purpose.

When I am asked a question on a survey I can answer yes, no or not sure.

Oh so the right to remain silent or answer as we choose means guilty now? Ladies and gentlemen there goes your free speech

No politician should work for another country. Another AIPAC stooge.

We can’t afford to live-this is not a real issue as usual with Josh

He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

yea how he wants his children to be safe , and he's Palestinian :D @@monotech20.14

@@monotech20.14 No, he didn’t!

​@@gals5252 He did say yes. WTF is wrong you people

Is Israel practicing apartheid? If no, then why Palestinians living in the West Bank live under martial law and Israelis in the West Bank live under martial law???

@@HusseinDoha It will be a long answer for me and the Senator cannot answer because either he is an atheist or non-religious. Senator and his comrades need to be schooled. Muslims do not hate the Jews or Children of Israel. The fact that Jews or Children of Israel are addressed directly so often in the Qur'an should tell us something. Allah wants to address Jews, to give them dawah [the message], to give them the Qur'an, instead of having stereotypes about them. Islam doesn’t allow stereotypes. Everyone is equal in the eyes of Allah, and the only thing that makes some people better than others is Taqwa [faith/belief]. In the Bible, Joshua 21:43-44 states: “So the Lord gave to Israel all the land of which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they took possession of it and dwelt in it. The Lord gave them rest all around, according to all that He had sworn to their fathers. And not a man of all their enemies stood against them; the Lord delivered all their enemies into their hand. Not a word failed of any good thing which the Lord had spoken to the house of Israel. All came to pass”. This passage suggests that the Israelites had already taken possession of all the land that God had promised to their forefathers even before the creation of modern State of Israel. The promise of land belonging to the Children of Israel is never permanent. It comes with conditions: “Surely, following the ˹heavenly˺ Record, We decreed in the Scriptures: “My righteous servants shall inherit the land.” (Qur'an 21:105) Psalm 37:29 states that “The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever”. This passage is often interpreted as a promise of God’s blessing for those who live righteously. It is believed that the righteous will be rewarded with a place in the land of Israel, which is often referred to as the “promised land”. Similarly, G-d is sovereign over the nations and history. He raises up and brings down kings and empires according to His will. He uses human agents, even pagan ones, to accomplish His purposes. He is the Lord of hosts, who controls the armies of heaven and earth (Jeremiah 1:15; 25:9; 27:5-7; 32:17) If Zionists claim that G-d had given the land of Palestine to the Jews is true, then why Abraham had to negotiate with the Hittites to purchase a burial plot for his wife, Sarah [Genesis 23]? Why didn't Abraham just take the land like the Zionists did? The so-called "promised land" was given to descendant of Abraham - Isaac only. Likewise, descendants of Ishmael never lay claim to land of Arabia! In addition, Moses and his followers did not enter the "promised" land due to their disobedience. Qur'an 7:128 states: Said Moses to his people, “Seek help through Allah and be patient. Indeed, the earth belongs to Allah. He causes to inherit it whom He wills of His servants. And the [best] outcome is for the righteous.” Jews are no longer G-d chosen people. The Israelites did not keep their part of the covenant. Here is the evidence: Jeremiah 31:31-34: “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.” It had already been prophesized in the Bible that the descendants of Ishmael/Arabs shall administer the Temple Mount/Jerusalem. Isaiah 60:7 "All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." All the flocks of Kedar - On the word 'Kedar,' see the notes at Isaiah 21:16. The Kedarenians were a wandering tribe that frequently changed their residence, though it is probable they usually dwelt in the south part of Arabia Desert, or the north of Arabia Petraea. They are mentioned as dwelling in beautiful tents Sol 1:5 : 'I am black, but comely as the tents of Kedar,' see Psalm 120:5; compare Isaiah 21:16-17; Isaiah 42:11. The language here also means that that which constituted their principal wealth would come and enrich Jerusalem. The rams of Nebaioth - Nebaioth was also a son of Ishmael Genesis 25:13; 1 Chronicles 1:29, and was the father of the Nabatheans. They were a people of Arabia Petraea, and lived principally by plunder, trade, and the keeping of flocks. The country of Nabathea extended, it is supposed, from the Euphrates to the Red Sea, and embraced Petra, the capital of Arabia Deserts, and also Medaba. It is not possible, however, to fix the exact boundaries of the various tribes of Arabians. The general idea is, that their most valuable possessions would be devoted to God. The second Temple had been completely destroyed as predicted by Jesus in Luke 21:5-38. For 500 years or more, it had been left in ruins by the Jews. When Umar Ibn al-Khattab, the second caliph of Islam, captured Jerusalem in 638 CE, there was not a single Jew in Jerusalem. Now, as prophesized by Isaiah, Jerusalem is administered by descendants of Ishmael/Arabs. Dome of the Rock is the Third Temple. There are some interpretations of the Bible that suggest that the construction of the Dome of the Rock is prophesied in the Book of Daniel. Specifically, some people believe that Daniel 12:11 is a prophecy about the building of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. "And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days." [Daniel 12:11] Rabbi Isser Weisberg of Machon Mishne Torah in Lakewood, explained that the “appalling abomination” spoken about in the Book of Daniel is the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, which was completed in the year 692. Counting 1290 (a thousand two hundred and ninety) years from the completion of the Dome of the Rock “you get 1982 and the 1335 (one thousand three hundred and thirty-five) ends in 2027. So that’s the window (1982-2027) when the Moshiach has to come.” This may confirmed the Qur'anic message. In Qur'an 17:104 says "And We said to the Children of Israel after Pharaoh, “Reside in the land, but when the promise of the Hereafter comes to pass, We will bring you all together.” The modern state of Israel was promised by British and its allies and not by G-d. In ancient Israel, G-d had prepared Moses for 80 years to lead His people Israel. 1948+80= 2028 may be the complete systematic dismantling of the modern state of Israel by God All-mighty. It is a heresy/unholy to think that Jews shall administer Temple Mount/Jerusalem as it had been clear in the Holy scripture that descendants of Ishmael/Arabs had been ordained by G-d to administer Jerusalem/Temple Mount. In Hebrew Bible, Devarim 32:17 reads as follows: "They sacrificed to demons, not God, to gods they had not known, new gods that had come recently, whom your ancestors had not feared". The medieval commentator Ibn Ezra suggested that the “new gods” mentioned in this verse were actually the gods of foreign nations that the Israelites had come into contact with. "new gods" is today's Zionism. Zionism is a nationalist movement that emerged in the 19th century to enable the establishment of a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. The movement initially emerged in Central and Eastern Europe as a national revival movement in the late 19th century, both in reaction to newer waves of antisemitism and as a consequence of Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment. Since the establishment of Israel, Zionism became an ideology that supports “the development and protection of the State of Israel”. One cannot deny that the conflicts in the middle-east is caused by the Zionism movement and the violations of the 3 Oaths made by the Jews found in the Talmud (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:5, 8:4): The Oaths: First Oath: Israel should not ascend to the land in a wall (i.e., en masse or forcefully). Second Oath: The Holy One adjured Israel not to rebel against the nations of the world. Third Oath: The Holy One adjured the nations not to oppress Israel excessively. Jews worldwide are now paying the price for the violations of the 3 Oaths Zionism ("new gods") is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, 'oh, it is God given to them' and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti Semitic; it couldn't be anything further from the Truth. Leviticus 26:18 “And if ye will not yet for all this hearken unto me, then I will punish you seven times more for your sins.” Qur'an 62:5 "The example of those who were entrusted with the Torah and then did not take it on is like that of a donkey who carries volumes [of books]. Wretched is the example of the people who deny the signs of Allah. And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people."

@@HusseinDohaIsrael doesn’t govern the WB. Try again

It's not a simple question though!

It’s not exactly obvious and simple … I have followed the conflict as best I can but don’t know how I would answer this

@@alliebirkin8661 The answer is as obvious as Bibi's genocidal intent.

He cldnt answer for fear of his life. No muslim can belie the islamic narrative no matter how false or twisted it is.

@@alliebirkin8661 no disrespect to yourself, but… this guy Knows very well what he should be doing and saying

What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court?

Answer ...round the bush???

​@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat The guy is probably on a dozen boards and he is supposed to know the letters that every member of every board he's ever sat on has written. I know right wingers love Hawleys yes or no grandstanding but he's just part of the lowering of discourse.

@@TheDmonet Better not be "right winging" at me if youre some lefty antisemite btw.

Answer yes or no is the way tyrants like to ask questions

Apparently that's all u need to be a politician.

as long as the left holds such power and hates jews, that is sadly what college kids are taught. Between 70-90% of the refugees agree with Oct 7 actions, and that is what they seem to agree on

Isreal hasn't violently colonized the west bank?

Woe to those that call good evil and evil good.

Nah, they don't just use the sympathy card, these lunatics play the VICTIM CARD, every chance they get!

He should have been permitted to answer completely in his way, then decide what his intention is. If he is to be accepted as a Judge that he has to be more forthright in giving reasons for his judgement.

This Judge's judgment can't be trusted!

​@@hugoanson2135 yeah, why? Time is money. He should have just said plainly, "sounds like something a doosh bag would say. I condemn that." Rather this dooshbag was all "derpy derp-derp, better make sure the guy buying me dinner didn't say that, derp derp."

He did answer the question. Just because some people don't understand his answer doesn't mean he didn't answer.

You realize every judicial nominee does crap like this??

He ought to run for president

Funny how you want an American to be nominated but have no issues with been occupied by the Israeli lobby who work and make policies in the interest of Israel at the expense of the Americans…… The Irony😂 Here we are all thinking its only Palestine that occupied.

He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

@@monotech20.14 Please explain how he answered it .....will wait.

@@monotech20.14 No he did not answer it. He refused to answer it. Did you not understand that he would not answer the question.

@@brianmcgovern9005 And this is just another crud that will be added to the swamp. This guy is a stain on America.

@@blintzkreig1638 Did you not "understand" I was commenting to another person. Do you understand much?

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱

You're not very bright are you?

@@bernibeckmann9753seems you’re noT the sharpest tool in the shed.

@@AmyHoward-lq5tg Yeah so because they don't answer ANY question they should be DQ'd despite what democratically elected senators think? LOL pipe down

Nice logical fallacy

Who josh

Foreign allegiance - he should NOT be an employee of the Federal Government

The only importance to them is Islam… He’s proved he won’t answer any questions.

Yes

​@@MrNewAmericanAll your top officials in the WH & State Department are double Nationality Amiracan - Isreali. 90% they work with Isreal

They are all like that. They will give you a word salad answer that actually answers nothing. In my opinion they pick the guy who can answer without actually answering anything.This is like a test to see if they stand up to questioning under pressure. This is an initiation not a hearing.

No to this individual.

@Judahkings unlike your simple minds he realises things are more complicated and myprejudicede decisions he could be making in the futur, which could lead people to claim bias on one side or the other.

@@Ugskdjrdjhdjzsjwjoh what a bunch of crap. He was asking a moral question. It wasn’t difficult to give an answer, and an advanced knowledge of Middle Eastern geopolitics is not needed to provide a moral answer.

@@Ugskdjrdjhdjzsjwj So, supporting Terrorists is now moral? Because honestly if you don't support or defend Israel, and you agree with Hamas than you are supporting Terrorists and continued Terrorism. Hmmmmmmm.......🤔

Not any foreign country. Only Israel. That’s the only country you can’t criticize. Israel’s interests are put before the interests of our own country.

He supports organizations that support terrorism and one that has connections to the killing of cops .

Its not about criticizing, its about the affects that it has on society like anti-semitism on college campuses

@@Mondo_mog How many protests on campuses do you see about North Korea, Russia, China, Boko Haram etc? Why the relentless focus on the one Jewish nation on Earth? Islamist propaganda.

But he is NOT just a citizen, Adeel Abdullah Mangi is a nominee for the US circuit court and just like all others he must undergo hearings!

He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

Don't you think the senator is the person off on a tangent here? What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court? Hawley embarrassed himself trying to "gotcha" this guy, "HOW COULD YOU NOT BE AWARE OF THIS LETTER!?!" - "Uh... that advisory board only met once a year."

He did answer. He said "I don't know."

​@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat They want to support AIPAC

we can't afford having a jihadi sitting in that court.@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat

He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

Well said! This Man did not answer any of the questions and failed at his job. He needs to be removed

they are a violent colonial state, building on the West Bank contravention of international law and USA policy is illegal.

@@emilywise3767 Man answered it. Sorry you did not like it. BALOD

Deflection! That’s all y’all know

What has the holocaust got anything to do with the question.millions off people around the world think israel is a colonial state.thousands off jewish people think what the current government is doing is wrong.its absurd these queations.and its all to do with one thing.the israel lobby.its worth millions to politicians in america.and as long as it lasts no one will speak out.why?because your finished if u do.

Isreal hasn't violently colonized the west bank?

Biden's team

That’s your opinion!

@@HopefulInterventionsthe whole country of pakistan doesn't recognise ISRAEL as a country

@@vikashkumar-vk3im True! They don’t recognize Armenia either.

It is very disgusting to use holocaust to justify the savage Israeli crimes against innocent Palestinian people and blackmail any one say the truth about israeli occupation and i think 7 October was the reaction to all atrocities to the Palestinian people for more than 70 years

Ditto! That was what most of us were feeling!

Likely Durbin. He's rooting for the blue team all the way.

I KNOW! I caught that too.

That would be the clown Durbin I believe

@@josephzerblad2979 Clown indeed. Turbin and the rest of the donkeys know better but for some damned reason will not say so.

Why should he condemn, it's an accurate statement.

​@@jamescook4402I'm wondering also, let's ask Cruz and Hawley if they condemn what Israel has done to Palestinians for the last 50 or so years.

If he asked me if Israel has and still is using violence for colonialism, I can answer the question yes, I know the history though. It would be irresponsible to answer that question yes or no if you do not know the history.

Zionist Leader David Ben-Gurion what did he say about creation of Isreali ? “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?” David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121. “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” - David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech. “We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.” David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948: Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes: “The old will die and the young will forget.” “We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.” David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978. “If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation). “It’s not a matter of maintaining the status quo. We have to create a dynamic state, oriented towards expansion.” -Ben Gurion “Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.” - Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13) “We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population? ‘Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘ Drive them out! ‘ “ Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979. Partition: “after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine “ - Ben Gurion, p.22 “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan. “The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today - but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concerns of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” P. 53, “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan October, 1936, during the Jewish Agency Executive meeting Ben-Gurion arguing in favor of transfer as a policy, he said “We are not a state and Britain will not do it for us…” although “there is nothing wrong in the idea.” “If it was permissible to move an Arab from the Galilee to Judea, why it is impossible to move an Arab from Hebron to Transjordan, which is much closer? There are vast expanses of land there and we are over crowded….Even the High Commission agrees to a transfer to Transjordan if we equip the peasants with land and money. If the Peel Commission and the London Government accept, we’ll remove the land problem from the agenda.” The Arabs, Ben-Gurion claimed, would not become landless as a result of Zionist land acquisition; they would be transferred to Transjordan. October 29, 1936 the 21 member of the Jewish Agency Executive endorsed the proposal of a transfer of displaced Arab farmers to Transjordan. Only two of the four non-Zionist members opted to dissent. Flapan, Zionism and the Palestinians, citing protocols of the Executive meeting, p. 261 12 July 1937, Ben-Gurion entered in his diary: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple” - a Galilee free from Arab population. Ben-Gurion went so far to write: “We must prepare ourselves to carry out” the transfer [emphasis in original] 27 July 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We have never wanted to dispossess the Arabs [but] because Britain is giving them part of the country which had been promised to us, it is fair that the Arabs in our state be transferred to the Arab portion” 5 October 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We must expel the Arabs and take their places…. And, if we have to use force-not to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev and Transjordan, but to guarantee our own right to settle in those places- then we have force at our disposal.” “It is very possible that the Arabs of the neighboring countries will come to their aid against us. But our strength will exceed theirs. Not only because we will be better organized and equipped, but because behind us there stands a still larger force, superior in quantity and quality …the whole younger generation of Jews from Europe and America.” Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p.297-299, p. 330-331. See also Teveth, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 182-189 Ben-Gurion in an address to the central committee of the Histadrut on 30 December 1947: “In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of its establishment will be about a million, including almost 40 percent non-Jews. Such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness. With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority…. There can be no stable and strong Jewish State so long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 percent.” On the 6th of February 1948, during a Mapai Party Council, Ben-Gurion responded to a remark from a member of the audience that “we have no land there” [in the hills and mountains west of Jerusalem] by saying: “The war will give us the land. The concepts of “ours” and “not ours” are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 6 February 1948. p.211) Addressing the Mapai Council the following day, Ben-Gurion declared: “From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema… there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has not been so Jewish. In many Arab neighborhoods in the west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will change… What had happened in Jerusalem… is likely to happen in many parts of the country …in the six, eight or ten months of the campaign there will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the country.” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 7 February 1948. p. 210-211) And two months later, Ben-Gurion speaking to the Zionist Actions Committee on 6 April, Ben-Gurion declared: “We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and Jerusalem area….I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change in the distribution of the Arab population.” [Ben-Gurion, Behilahem Yisrael, Tel Aviv, Mapai Press, 1952, pp. 86-87] Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary on 12 July 1937: “the compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the projected Jewish State…. We have to stick to this conclusion the same way we grabbed the Balfour Declaration, more than that, the same way we grabbed at Zionism itself.” (Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p. 299)

Not really.. sad thing is, he’ll be nominated and the world will move on, just as we will after getting pissed off about these videos. The day after, we’ll be back at our jobs etc, and all will continue..

And yet that never happens! Our system is broken! Severely broken!

So I could construct a line of questioning about arming the contras, arming Saddam Hussein, arming Bin Laden, arming Hamas, arming ISIS, arming South American cartels and so long as it exemplified your ability to produce a truthful response, the line of questioning is irrelevant? I could concoct some LSAT quiz where you are being asked by an FBI informant to kidnap the governor of Michigan, contrasting your loyalty and duty to your friends to break the law vs your objective moral duty to resist peer pressure, and so long as you produce a truthful response the content of your response is irrelevant? I don't think you care about the truth (and know these lawmakers don't.) I think you know that they are trying to clarify his political attitudes which he has no duty to testify, especially if he believes he can conduct his official business without being affected by this bias. And I think they are trying to fundraise off a tragedy by sucking up in public hearings. We shouldn't have to endure Adam Schiff's McCarthyism only coming from Republicans instead. Americans have a right to say, think and feel that Israel should be a sheet of nuclear glass in the desert. We certainly do with dozens of other countries.

What is the point of asking an American judicial nominee how he feels about a foreign conflict? - Probably so the senator can get more $$ from AIPAC.

And in this case there is no legitimate answer!

Brilliant!!! Too funny!!!

And the stench of sulphur emanating from my pores. 👹

Lol

Not even I could come to that high level of humor as you and I consider myself to have a higher sense of humor than those good for nothing late night TV talk show hosts humor.

Nice one lol!

i guess he just felt thats a stupid question. waste time is this stupid arguments.

They are not giving him a choice. They want “yes” or “no”

On occupied territory and denying the indigenous of their rights. Would have to do to the Palestinians what America did to the native Indians to feel safe

@@seanrambarran2323 educate yourself - the land is Jewish land

While 10,000 Palestinian children are butchered?

He isn’t a senator, he’s a nominee for judge.

​@cdrone4066 thank god for that, the Kafirs better watch out though.

??????

@@cdrone4066shouldnt be a US judge then, send him back to Pakistan if he wants a job so bad

Well he's talking about his blood that's flowing through his body. That's like saying you're Irish or you're Mexican doesn't necessarily mean you're from Mexico or you're from Ireland and you believe that you are Irish and you have no loyalty to the United states. But I wouldn't doubt it in this guy's case because all these crooked corrupt politicians judges and school academics are corrupt

He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court?

@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoatExactly!

they dont

What fear? They run America....stop it.

@@wallytron2563 So in your opinion, Jews have no right for security and safety?

He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.

@@wallytron2563 EVIL PERIOD UR. ( TRUMP2024)

Or brave enough to answer

On the contrary, the senator is secure knowing that he has funding from AIPAC. Nothing brave about his question. I wish more people would confront the senator’s question and quote straight on as justice and humanity would be on their side .

The only thing Josh Jawley wants is a donation from AIPAC. He is looking at what Tom Cotton got and is drooling. This is an extremely complicated subject and I don't recommend taking a position without extensive research. Ask yourself why a nominee for a position that has to do with civil matters is being grilled about alleged positions on international affairs.

Anyone without the AIPAC boot on their throat would easily answer, yes, Israel is a settler colonial state as accurately described by numerous international organizations including Israeli ones!

Everyone knows which lobby supported these members of Congress

Like trump

All I have heard from Biden is lies.

Like Biden.

Or create a narrative to fit their agenda like the senator

You’re right there should be consequences for people, pretending like Israel is not a colonial apartheid state

Absolutely,but if he grew up in Pakistan it might as well be the middle east, they have been hiding terrorists for decades

Because they are foreign agents

Yeah because they are baugbt By Israel wow

Agree, they are so corrupt by your tribe

Who is “they”? Just curious

Try watching the lies told by the Trump nominees for the supreme court

You mean Hawley right???

Reason is that they're all retro bates

@@Larryputt1 , What exactly are retro bates? Was that a typo?

@@shatteredteethofgodNo idea what moon you are from, but I watched every second of it. Sorry Listened only.

No shit. But do make them do that. These are wisely cun*s of epic proportions.

They refuse to give direct answers because they under internal pressure from within the organizations they lead. It's a problem when you have polarized Arab students and lecturers along with radical left bullshit ideologists in the college you lead that will see any tiny bit of empathy towards Jews or the victims of Oct 7 or any tiny bit of maybe some tiny little bit of saying a glimpse of a shred of a comment slightly favoring Israel, as a justification for what they think is a Genocide in Gaza. They don't hate Jews, they are simply cowards.

It was Magni himself.

@@timothycrespyno it wasn’t, they were actually talking at the same time.

Best part.😂

That was amazing and my exact reaction.

​@timothycrespy no, it wasn't. He was actually responding at the time.

Adeel Chicken

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Burnt to a crisp.

Who is M. Mangi?

Since we are judging based on ethnicity what is yours?

Racist

Racist

Filth

You move to Europe first

An honest man may also use an effective pause to highlight how insane a particular question might be and perhaps choose to not even answer such a stupid question when the answer should already be obvious. Give me break. This is global insanity and it’s painful to watch these witch hunts while innocent people die just because Israel wants to rid themselves of amalek to expand their non inclusive and tribalistic agenda.

“Absolutely not” when the answer is shoved on him. Invalid question all along.

You are so right. There is no honesty in them. No truth and no honour.

Yeah, it's perfectly reasonable to not know the answer to that question. I don't know enough about Israel, its history, its leaders, its formation, who was supplanted and how etc. to answer a questions like that. It's perfectly possible to be against anti-Semitism and persecution of Jews in all forms, yet not know about the validity of the state of Israel. "Don't know" is the answer people give when they're wise enough to realise they don't have all the facts. Everyone running around saying Yes or No to questions like that when they have only the tiniest shred of understanding are much more problematic. If EVERYONE said "I don't know" when they don't know, the conversation-space would be much quieter and clearer for people who actually knew what they were talking about to make their informed points.

Honestly i would have had a problem answering this with a yes or no. The statement where strangely formulated from the letter so i wouldn't really know what to make of it. I do think israel opresses Palestinians. But that entire israle is a violent settler state is a bit much too...

He is traitor , he is another sadiq khan

Why is a pakistanian (foreigner) even being considered for this position?

​@@Bluecolou Not even 1 percent of Muslims support Israel

​@@holycrap0866 He is of Pakistani origin

Same with the jews, Israel comes first

It reminds me of that silly Supreme Court nominee (now judge) who couldn't answer what a woman was.

Yes. I recall the look on her face that said, 'Shit, this guy knows I'm an idiot and he's gonna' prove it!' when she was asked for the definition.@@MrHonk58

I don't see it as incompetence. I see anti-Americanism and anti-Semetism! He has NO business on a court, or even in America.

None are mutually exclusive of the others. Sometimes I type with my soft hands and sometimes my hard hands.@@joybeum7177

@@joybeum7177 Thank god you people aren't in any position to make those decisions.

Foreign allegiance - he should NOT be an employee of the Federal Government

Why should he have an opinion on this matter. Why fo iou have Israel as the center of the universe. It is of no essence.

But Israel is an occupying settlement. What has the USA got to do anything with that

Yes

Wrong. He will always make a decision and will always have an eternal bias against good and moral decisions.