ALMOST UNWATCHABLE: Kennedy Will Not Stop Listing Reversals Of Judicial Nom's Decisions To Her Face 

Is that Mark Zuckerburg's sister...?

If you are totally unqualified.....you are a Republican in the Supreme Court. Actually, if you're a Republican, you're totally unqualified to hold ANY office whatsoever. Fixed it for you.

People w/o eyebrows look strange

She badly needs a hair and makeup stylist. It’s as if she’s working very hard to hide anything appealing about her appearance.

Senator Kennedy should have cut this interview short by just asking which decisions she got right.

Makes you wonder what she did to become a judge, doesn’t it? 💅🏽

The fact she can be nominated for a higher position is even scarier!

Its. Not it's.

​@@pommiebearsfollowed the VP trail😅

@@yvonneplant9434 This is not a spelling be !………..

nanny piglousy

A democrat

Probably Biden or Obama.

Her daddy is an attorney

Scranton Joe. Who else? I don't think the guy is capable of nominating anyone actually qualified for a high-level government job. As long as there's a pulse, checks off a DEI identity box, and is a Democrat, that's good enough for Joe.

She’s reversed more often than Angel Hernandez!⚾️

@@chuckinhouston9952 and more than an Italian tank on the battlefield!

Hey, she's a woman. She'll get another chance. And another. And another...

She takes bribes

Why did Biden pick her? Is it because she is such a failure? like he is?

Let's just NOT give her another chance. Impeach, Impeach, Impeach.

She is a Democrat. So she is granted promotion due to loyalism to the Dem Party.

Kennedy looking like that kindly grandfather telling you he's tired of your bull.

Fabulous leftist activist pick by Bidens radicals. A totally unqualified radical who will do what the democrat party wants.

She looks like she could do with a hot shower to wake her up...😮

To be fair, I despise her and her ilk but; There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

Simply ask who nominated her. If it was a Democrat or a Bush then you know why she is a Judge.

Watch the video again...She remembered almost all of them

@@thomasandersen6719 yeah she just said she didn't remember them which is what i was commenting on....

It’s a dem thing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉

You people support the ULTIMATE activist judges aka the current right wing supreme court. Just don't think you have a leg to stand on here. Anyone who thinks that being a judge means conducting a seance to talk to the ghost of Jefferson in order to justify their current decisions shouldn't be voting let along judging anything. Originalism and textualism are abominations to the court and an embarrassment for the entire United States.

​@@tonij8322oh, Make no mistake! People suffered under her misrule. Not to mention justice itself.

perfect material for the Biden judiciary!

Amen, yes, she is an activists is she a SOROS BACKED, OR JUST INEPT?? OR BOTH!

@@tonij8322 She's just the kind of Judge the Bidens love ..............Sign 'er up !!! BE BE BA DE BA DEEEEE

She's a marxist (communist), and he's an actor hoping to become the next Matlock. Pure theater.

I wonder how many times it took her to pass the bar?

The obvious incompetence makes her fully qualified for the Democratic party. 😲

You are on point. She just let ‘em go to hurt more innocents. Why has she not been “de-lawyered”.

Sad. So sad.

agree---i thought the same....i think she knew she was done and then gave answers that were not bs

Well said! TRUE

@SRFArtlandAudio she's a woman in the western world. Par for the course.

​@@Vic_Chaos_ Stop 😂. It has zero to do with her being female and has everything to do with her bias opinions that she can not put aside

Also lack of knowledge of the law. When there are this many, you can't help but think it's intentional

A bit broad no? She seems borderline incompetent based on her track record, but nothing about her presentation suggested to me that she was arrogant or that she lacked accountability. Don't be like those liberal idiots who always rush to attach adjectives that don't necessarily apply.

Even more of a shame thay the Biden Admin would nominate her for a higher Judgeship. Nominating incompetent judges is a distinct pattern for the Biden admin.

That would be a great clause, but I do not believe there is such a rule.

That's why government should be small. They can do whatever they want on the taxpayer's dime.

I do wonder what's the norm is for judges getting reversal decisions, just so some context can be applied. It would probably be hard to build a database of ruling vs reversal percentage statistics, but would be very poignant information for these nomination processes.

@@ElementofKindness Why would building a database of rulings vs reversals be difficult? Everything that happens in the courts are documented and reported on. If it was easy for the Senator to list out her reversals, pretty sure they're all in writing in an official form. I think a more simpler way to do this is the 3 strike rule. 3 reversals in 1 year and you're out.

I don't think Sen. Kennedy is a legend at all. What judge---Republican OR Democrat---HASN'T had their decisions overturned repeatedly? Isn't that the function of the appellate system? What is the point he is trying to make? Is he trying to imply that, because he can show that the appellate courts are functioning well, that this means that judges are incompetent? Or only---somehow---that DEMOCRAT judges are incompetent? Either way, unless he presents data that shows that the number of her cases overturned far exceeds the average of ALL cases overturned by Republican AND Democrat judges, he hasn't made a case for anything at all. But then again, I am quite sure Sen. Kennedy knows this, whether he will admit it or not.

I can guarantee you that he does not go after Republicans! Didn't he vote to acquit Republican Trump's colluding with Putin? So, he is not for justice of red, white and blue, just red!

@@Chifan35you know she will be. God help us, oh wait he made the Earth. 🙃

My Senator!

@@Chifan35 That depends on whether Senator Feinstein is able to vote or not.

Are you suggesting this was a "diversity hire" nomination? Surely that's an unthinkable position in THIS administration! 🤣

The Epitome of professional incompetence....this is what the administration nominates....damn it man If she was black she d be nominated for the supreme court by this bogus regime

and Kavanaugh tells you everything about the previous administration. I guess it's not about party, they are all liars and thieves. BOTH sides.

Oh yes. The last administration was a beacon of competence! Just don’t include the ones outright fired or put in prison ;)

@@barnibussnaples6561 The only one that went to prison , did so due to the work he did for oblunder/podesta{ 2014}.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Stupidity is believing a long disproven Lie

🫡

Please do not take the lord’s name in vain.

@@stevecoyle1 God's name is hard to nail down, as he has many. Some are more holy than others, and some can't be written down and then erased without incurring great sin. Jehovah is a commonly acceptable name for the Abrahamic God. You'll notice I did not say "Oh my Jehovah," nor did I use one of the more offensive to write - not say - names of the Abrahamic God. I just said "God." God is not Jehovah's name, and your ignorance of this fact only deepens the commonly held mentality that Christians, Jews, and Muslims are blind sheep. I invite you to not only read scripture, as I am sure you have, but to analyze it. To truly understand the Word of Jehovah, and not to simply accept it as fact. Blind acceptance is nearly as bad as blasphemous rejection, my brother. Jehovah wishes us to understand Him, not to simply exist around within His works. Kind regards.

Ha! Thanks for the laugh. Yes, it should be a national hoiday.

I've been waiting for this moment for so long. At least this goes in her credit

The people that thought she was a good nomination should be reversed as well. Pathetic!

Her job as a judge NEEDS to be reversed!

When is the last time a Democrat nominee for anything was a qualified, white male?

We would have missed some pretty funny stuff without this nomination

We need to arrest the Commies that nominated her for this real insurrection against Americans.

Except that you don't have to be clerk to look up rulings. They are public and written in English. And thanks to the insipid, bad-faith questioning of so many GOP senators of Biden judicial nominees with extensive bench experience (and therefore an enormous number of rulings), their background have been widely reported. These are interpretations of law, not math problems. That is why our judicial system is so extensively tiered. What is truly shocking is that Trump was able to get so many judges approved who had NO judicial experience and even limited work done in criminal law.

@@gregchavez1534 A "clerk," in the sense I used it, is a lawyer who assists the judge in all aspects of his role as judge, including recommendations on matters before the court, legal research, and drafting (That means writing), the court's orders and opinions. Didn't anyone ever teach you that you shouldn't talk about things you don't understand? It makes you look silly and, in your case, foolish and mean-spirited.

@@peterplotts1238 I know what a law clerk is and in this case it doesn't give this person any ability to contribute any fine points which, incidentally, they did not offer. Furthermore, Kennedy's list of pearl-clutching partial reversals was just that: a list... you don't need to be a clerk to count. She had over 1500 rulings, less than 3% of which were overruled in any way. So I think I'll side with the judge with a proven track record, the law school professor who testified on her behalf (you know what a law school is, right? And that lawyers usually learn stuff there?) as well as the even more senior judge who recommended her over an anonymous law clerk with no receipts. Spare me your moralizing. And your petty insults.

It's well over the top

Just stay down Greg. Take the L. You don’t have to do this to yourself.

Being found in contempt of court is an honor these days. I was a witness in a case and almost got jailed because the rotten judge called basically every witness a liar, and we were not!

Letting child- abusers and sex-traffickers get away probably caught Biden's eye the most.

YUP! When they find a dirty cop, and review all of that cop's arrests. Maybe after three reversals in a year, or all their cases get reviewed annually.

It’s not incompetence, she’s an activist and all those cases are her activism at work.

I like Mr. Kennedy's fine way of advertising to the world of her record.

She would have a very long way to go to match the corrupt activist record of, by far, the most-reversed conservative U.S. District Judge Robert Clive Jones in Nevada. Yet this echo-chamber "news" outlet and comments section would be thrilled had Jones been nominated instead. The "new Republicans" care about the rule of law in the US almost as much as the Far Left does.

It is impossible ti have ' More OF Him' as he is only :: One in existence "" on this earth One is is unique One is the Cardinal number { That is why the correct word is " Every'One' " [ and NOT every'body } As a 'body is a DEAD entity "" However - we need more who are ' alike ' and think like him He is a Man of integrity - He is a Man with an unshakable belief that the system has to operate ethically.

Love him

He is the worlds most polite wrecking ball...... that is destruction of the first order.

​@@TheSlowoldmanExcellent response!😊

And they will still vote for her 😅😅😅

The nominees ALWAYS have one or two physical attributes in common.

She Released A PEDOPHILE!!! *This Woman* "Judge" *Karoline Mehlachick Is An Abomination To American JUSTICE* -Thank You Senator Kennedy🙏🏻

@@pektowanderlust Of course these meetings are mostly straight line voting

Don't judge until you pass the bar.

Oh, the Dems probably voted her in.

I wouldn't trust this person to judge an ugly dog competition.

Seems like the main requirement for being appointed by this current administration is: you must first be a total lunatic

How is Kennedy even elected as any damn thing?

@@gelynch52phPH Did you watch a different video. Just because you don't like the truth doesn't mean he isn't good at his job. I bet you believe Hunter is being persecuted.

?!?!?!

flavor of the month was more important than your principles or values or society or even if better talent was available, which they were busy throwing under a bus for the past decade. Today you have officials all very much corrupt and you wonder why the judges are broken hahahaha cmon add it up

And she is up for promotion...

Luckily for her, competency isn't a prerequisite for her job. Ideological commitment is.

Lately, (Think Biden, Fetterman) that (incompetence) seems to be a requirement for Dumbocratic office. The Democratic party is fully infiltrated, and the Puppeteers "in the basement" (that we DON"T see) need more puppets. She'd be a top choice for their purpose(s).

People and Judges are no longer hired based on their qualifications and this video proves it.

The real question is... Why is she being nominated...? Because she pushes an agenda from the bench, even if it is wrong?

Likely

OMG RIGHT?!! WOW GET HER OUT

She's not inept, she's an infiltrator,an enemy of America destroying it from within she is one of many,

This is why we need merit based admission to top universities. Too many unqualified people are getting in….

Not exactly it's alot to do with society

CALLING OUT THE DEEP STATE!!!!

Wherever there is no meritocracy there is no civilization.

@@laffybmonkey What society? The activists? The radicals? I can guarantee that an overwhelming majority of Americans do NOT want activism on the bench. They don't want it all the way to the other rail either.

He's not becoming one of mine;---------He already was !!

She was confirmed

A Southern ROCK STAR!

N he's always so polite n respectful about it! That's what makes it even better to watch him in action. Love him! 🙏🇱🇷

That’s not a career that’s a lie!

thats why she was nominated

Why does it not suprise me that democrat judge candidate let's off a pedophile in academia? I wish this was at least a tiny bit surprising, but it's not.

💯🏹🎯

Sadly, that is not the law. Procedural mistakes by prosecutors/cops/detectives have allowed many criminals to go free. Ex. Not reading Miranda Rights. Improper filings. ..... You may (or may not) recall the viral comments about Hillary Clinton getting the case of a "known to be guilty" adult rapist of a 13 yr old girl thrown out of court and 'laughing' about it. That was due to procedural mistakes by the prosecutor's office. Note: She didn't laugh about the result, though that is what all the anti-Hillary people said she did, but of the absurdity of how the law was able to be used to free a known rapist. Still, how she could find even that 'laughable' is just a example of who she is.

Nonsense. Defendants have very definite constitutional rights also, and are PRESUMED innocent until PROVEN guilty. You can't just take away potentially innocent defendant's rights unreasonably. Thank God this judge recognizes this. The entire tone of this hearing smacks of Monday morning quarterbacking. Our judicial system is deliberately stacked in favor of the accused, based on the premise that it's okay if 10 guilty women go free to prevent one innocent woman from being wrongly convicted and sentenced. I completely support this premise. The alternative---that we take away the rights of accused people just because they are accused--is unconscionably WRONG. This negates the entire reason for a trial buy a jury of one's peers. That is, if we are going to presume that people are guilty just because they are accused, why go through the time and expense of any sort of trial whatsoever? Just sentence them, whether they committed the crime or not. After all, that's what they do in China, which magically has a 99%+ conviction rate.

Because state bars are becoming more leftwing along with overall dumbing down of the system.

Clarence Thomas & co. just addressed this a few weeks back. 😂

Novel & wise recommendation….

She didn't commit crimes as Rudi Giuliani did f.e.

Obviously you have not dealt with a commonwealth. PA is the last bastion of this system. She probably doesn't even know she is owned by the big unions.

Ted Cruz is not as nice as Kennedy....

Add up every single one of Kennedys folksy, awe shucks, call me crazy quips and what do you get.....NOTHING!!!! Either do something or go home Republicans.

Wrong line of work???? She's been rewarded for her obvious incompetence by being nominated for a big promotion and larger influence potential.

I love John Kennedy, he sounds like he is reading you a bedtime story, as he torturers you

@@timothyslaughter476 You clearly don't have a clue about how any of this works. Maybe stick with CNN?

KREMLIN TROLL.

@@busterbiloxi3833 Proof?

I agree 💯

Where's your evidence for your unfounded allegations?@@busterbiloxi3833

​@@busterbiloxi3833all trolls are gone wih Prigoshzin.

Theres no need to publicly humiliate and berate another human being in front of their peers. He obviously did his homework. All he had to do was vote no. Typical…

I did notice the life draining deom her face thou. Lmao. I think she gave up after the third one.

@@georgeoffenberger1262He’s trying to make the point to his colleagues that they shouldn’t vote for her either. That’s called politics. Tell me if you would say the same thing about Brett Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett?

@@georgeoffenberger1262 Wrong and a BS point. His job is also to sway others by pointing out her disqualifications. Disingenuous Prck

@@januarysson5633 Yeah, the out-and-out lies about Kavanaugh were disgusting.

She "feels" she is a legislator and voting on a bill.. Ridiculous.

No, they want Judges who follow liberalism rather than law.

"Democrats WANT judges that don't know what they are doing." Complete nonsense. I am a Democrat, and the prospect of an incompetent judge is not only not at all what I want, it is absolutely abhorrent to me.

Maybe they can replace merrick garland at the doj with her lmao.....

And Republicans WANT judges that accept bribes in the form of millions in gifts.

Bingo!

People lie under oath all the time in these hearings. There's no consequences.

The fact you are dubious someone is being honest doesn't mean they are lying.

Don't ask questions! Consume product.

It is now "the Activists System".

✡️ don't pay attention to the names ✡️

You have to ask?

The justice system has been broken for decades.

But like a true leftist, she knows she was wrong to start with, but hey leftist play dumb and go to the next case to wreak havoc...

LOL You’re not lying!!!!

A normal judge will remember all the reversals... She just has too many to remember..

Kennedy kills with kindness....

The guy sitting right in the back behind her, his reaction when he realized what was happening 😂

@@purplemonkey649 Ha! I had to watch it again. Priceless.

If she was a truck, she would be a single-speed always in reverse truck.🎉😂

😂😂😂😂 The guy sitting behind the Dark haired man was making some hilarious faces, too.

I know, right?

To have NO SHAME (as she displays) shows how coddled she's been all her life...

@@y2ktube Just wait. She will be confirmed by our overlords, just as the diversity hire in SCOTUS.

What would be the point of showing embarrassment even if she felt it?

Of course she's not embarrassed. She's got that self-righteous mindset that she has no shame whatsoever about her irresponsible rulings as judge.

Absolutely man, imagined a truck driver with that many accidents! He'd be sweeping up movie theaters

If you let a child sexual predator go, you deserve nothing more than what he should be getting. The DP

She's only a pretend Judge. She's first and foremost a Leftist activist, like so many of her ilk. Many of whom funded by the ignobile Soros...

She does it on purpose.

How many times did she get it right? What's her batting average? Is it above average? I'm not saying this is a good candidate, but with zero details about any of these cases, no info on number of cases heard, and no info on what is typical this could be senator Kennedy being an absolute boss or him drumming up sound bites that don't hold up under scrutiny. No idea which this is.

You may be sure it won't.

Looks like she got in

Who doesn't get approved by the Senate, with 100% of Democrats voting for these subversive agents of terror?

@@njgrplr2007 Of course she did; she has the liberal left bias, tenuous grasp of the law, and clueless, muddle headed incompetence that's virtually a sine qua non to be a judge now.

@@njgrplr2007 of course she got in just like every other nominee except for one I believe was pushed through by the Senate Democrats. Because this is what they want total incompetence. She is an absolute disgraceful nomination. She doesn’t even deserve to be a judge.

Personally I would want to see the percentage of reversed decisions for her versus the average for judges in her circuit. Listing off a bunch of reversals for a judge could be very commonplace and without the statistics we can't say if she's good or bad.

@@beayn up to 20% of challenged cases are reversed. that is the national average. And I guess she did not just have 100 cases. You could make the same list about every judge, conservative or liberal. But my fellow conservatives grew lazy and just keep shouting what the mob leaders lead them to instead of checking some very simple facts...

Government and lawyers look after lawyers. It’s a club.

Her record makes weather forecasting look good by comparison...

She should have been a Weather-woman. This is the best career in the whole wide world. You are on television. You make a six-figure income. You wear nice clothes. And you can be wrong 99.5% of the time and still keep your job. One time, it snowed, and a Weatherman said, “See? We were right.” Just try being wrong at your job and see how long you last.

Everyone needs to be held accountable

20 yrs ago. I asked Who do judges answer to. I'm still asking the same question

@@Dilley_G45- Judges need to be held accountable more so than the general public because they have a power greater than your average citizen.

@@ravenzyblack @benwinter1527 - You are both correct!

including the supreme court.

She’s perfect for them that’s why she’s there

these are Biden's nominees for district courts!

Affirmative action is evil.

A body farm?

This pretty much exploded in her face, from the the looks of it its happened before.

They look for corruptible people

Yeah, but you're not an idiot. All these reversals have the same reason.

This is a crooked judge! Kennedy is CORRECT as usual!! Judge is wrong agsin!

Geese…. how is she still working!?!?!?

@@nancydiehl296 I am not a goose, but I will take a stab at this. Working? I'd say she has a "position." Sounds like she's never worked a day in her life.

​@@The_Real_Indiana_JoeYou're right, ALL THE REVERSALS have the same reason, her incompetence to apply the proper case law and/or appropriate rulings. You were spot on in your determination that she was the reason for all those reversals.

The more words and time spent wasting the 3 minutes limit the less crimes she did that can be listed . Thrn dhe can say only 30 or 40 reversals were mentioned

I would have liked for Senator Kennedy to answer in reply to her "I believe I was." with "I believe it, too."

'it was adopted in part' for example🤣

It's call pilpul. It's a semantics versed in lying and how to avoid questions.

😂😂😂

Because they have the media on their side. To make sure people don't know about this.

Friends of friends type of thing

You misunderstand. That is in fact exactly why they are allowed to stay judges. There are people who want the system torn up and will lie, cheat, and steal to do so

I think it's because we don't have information or stats on the rulings or do we, I don't know. If we do, where do we look. Or does a judge have to be nominated for a position that has to go through a Senator Kennedy questioning. I take it she will still be a judge in Pennsylvania. Maybe this list of reversals is common on both sides. How do we find out?

They’re letting the system and our country burn to the ground

Same here. And some dumb democrat ran against him and got humiliated 😂

He is very much like Columbo, the somewhat bumbling detective from the TV show that bears his name.

‘I’m just a simple country boy’ an accountant I knew used to say , before he ripped your numbers to shreds , and sent you back to check how many fingers and toes you had 😂

Love him!! Reminds me of Peter Falk's detective character named Columbo.

​@paultaylor7758 love that show! And Columbo was almost always the sharpest guy in the room. Everyone else was just pretending they were.

Columbo...🤔 That was back when they did the script writing before they did the filming, wasn't it?

That's easy. NONE

Exactly! She’s a train wreck.

Chances are he chooses to only bring reversed decisions because bringing both would paint a different picture. Ever heard of Judge Cannon?

😂 true!

Would be a much shorter list.

One word...Trump

@timmy707707: Trump helped to ensure SCOTUS respects the US Constitution by putting in 3 true Constitutionalists. The Liberals are left with 3 radical anti-Constitution judges.

That’s what happened when someone gets a job based on immutable characteristics rather than merit. She sound more incompetent than ideological.

Three words...Diversity. Inclusion. Equity.

Everyone needs an income.

This Canadian agrees with you.

He kinda reminds me of Columbo! He already knows the answer so it's best not to lie...

Kennedy is a great mind

​@@jackattack_8" Before i go i have one more question."

Windsor, Ontario REPRESENT ☝️

Ask Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor or Brown Jackson. Their reversal list are long and illustrious as well.

Good question!

If I'm not mistaken she got a " promotion ". Go figure!

Federal judges are appointed for life. She would have to be removed from the bench through impeachment proceeding.

She's a puppet. Doesn't matter if she's incompetent.

He needs to question Judge Eileen Cannon the same way.

She remembers everything up to her reversals 🤣

This is what they are doing to Trump!

That's all kinds of judges.

ruling by emotions only. she better not get this job. she needs to be disbarred

Dude that is about the most accurate description I have heard in a long time, respect.

Biden's administration if full to the eyeballs of people like this.

"Me woman, me strong" - right? We have allowed woman to run wild just because we're afraid to set bondaries. It's pathetic...

Yeah, it's called actually following the law; The thing he doesn't bring up is most those reversals were reversed themselves, because the higher courts were wrong, and being activist. It really shouldn't be shocking that a judge followed the law repeatedly, and that pissed off people who didn't.

It is possible she just does not have the intelligence quotient for it, and / or is a brazen activist.

✡️

@gigaus0 Provide some evidence for that statement will ya? Case names are in the video off you go. There's no evidence? It's your deluded opinion? Oh ok

How many people did she send to prison who could be innocent.

Only 2% of her rulings have been reversed, 2/3 of which were only partial reversals. That is a pretty good track record honestly. How about you learn to read and spend less time staring at the talky screen?

@@zechs5079 How about you look at the reasons for the reversals, which indicate a complete lack of understanding of some major legal principles?

@@jonb4020 Tell me, what are those reasons?

@@zechs5079 Try listening to the video and looking them up like everyone else has to!