I always picture the person frantically entering the moves into the engine breathing through their mouth while their clock ticks down. And then when Aman just flags them they sit back in their chair -"damn"- and take another bite of microwave mac and cheese.
Not really, cheater is just watching the game and computer does moves for him. Maybe the cheater wasnt even watching what is happening. Just came back and saw he lost. Aman is a legend 😂
Opponent somehow crafted an endgame where aman had three isolated pawns with light square promotion squares while they had a light square bishop and all connected pawns
@@R1ester always interesting to watch cheaters in the endgame. Any human would force trades to make the conversion easier. But the computer, wanting to maintain the highest possible evaluation, often ignores these moves in favor of the more surgical approach
I just love how it is always immediately obvious to GM's how "clinical" the computer moves are, and that instead of giving up, they sit there and try their damndest to beat stockfish
Stockfish used by a bad player* in the hands of a good player, stockfish moves can be almost as undetectable as anal beads if we're talking about only one game (trends can still be observed on the long run though
@@thememaster7 I guess the fact that your so naive about cheating is a good thing lol. The moves used by a good player are not the same as an obvious cheat. An engine gives many winning lines. A good chess player knows which ones they can use to win without making it seem bot like.
Yeah, 5 min game vs engine.. but i was watching and thinking like "no way Aman wins that with 15 seconds vs more than a minute from THAT.." lol I love your videos guys, keep it up!)
@@dpgsince85 actually the idea is very obvious. Just prophylaxis against bishop h3 check. The bizarreness of the move is that no human will consider this prophylaxis any useful at that position, because there is no obvious threat. But computers see more
It is not completely ridiculous-- black wants to play Ng4 to threaten e3 but then white has Bh3 pinning the knight. So move the king out of the way first. Still a very strong move though
@@Add9Sus4 That would make only sense to just boost your confidence by numbers for a short sec. Imagine having an overinflated Elo just to get absolutely humiliated and obliterated by a player seemingly on your level but actually being a few tiers above you. Well, no thanks... i rather loose a close battle against someone on my tier than having a higher elo and no chance in competing at all knowing that every game i will play without assistence will be a guranteed "L" for me.
lol that's not the part that is unhuman... the part that is unhuman is that how consistently strong she was apparently playing throughout the whole game, constantly pressuring a GM Aman with no hope at all, and giving him a terrible endgame... insane
@@Ken-gs6ie@Ken-gs6ie That is not what he is saying, he literally said "no human came up with it." He is clearly referring to this video, where there was clearly not a human who came up with that move. Many moves preceding be6 were highly sus, as was the time usage.
And the computer must have seen it before the e4 sack + queen trade, otherwise black's losing a pawn for minimal comp. That's what makes it especially dirty, since a 2000+ on a 5min game could luck out and see a nice tactic like that, but having the foresight to set it up and utilize it is almost superhuman
Whats so funny about this is that even I could've defeated Aman in that endgame with him having 10 seconds left, but the guy is appearantly so bad he needed help even for that endgame loool! I would've just flagged Aman by making bad moves quickly and giving him uncomfortable checks even if I couldnt
Love these videos Aman, you sound as excited and in awe of some of the tactics, ideas and intermezzos in this game as we are when we watch you pull off unreal tactics with ease. Especially at 8:28. Shame it's you playing stock fish, but hey, if it helps you fall in love with chess again and gives you fresh ideas for future games, then it's all good
insane... 7 seconds vs a minute with a horrible position and no increment... opponent is utter trash... all they had to do was more premoves or make random moves since aman was premoving, but of course one can't refer to stockfish that fast...
So guy plays 4 secs/move the entire game then starts premoving at the 6 second mark. You would think if he was oiling he would have better time management skillz. Also vary your move times bud. Don't make it so obvious.
It takes a special kind of loser to cheat in online chess. What are they after? Fake respect? I mean what does that actually accomplish? This guy didn’t even try to hide it.
I agree. What a pathetic sad kind of existence. I truly pity anyone who has to stoop to that level to glean any kind of meaningful emotion from their sad existence all the while trying to disguise it to themselves as "me a troll" or something. Oooof.
Some weirdos that like making other people angry, or just curious to see how long they can go without ban, or they're addicted to seeing an elo number go up even though it means jack shit
It was a mistake. But I think Aman saw the threat of black doubling rooks on the E file and so protected the e3 pawn. He wasn't looking to win material and attack because he knew he was playing against a cheater and couldn't win that way.
That exchange at 8:30 was a crazy tactic to recognise given the timer, I'm not qualified to call out a cheater. But being hit with that as a GM must be weird.
why is be6 is a sus move? attacks a pawn, very easy to see castles if rxb7? you wouldn't want to play bg4 because after some h3 you will eventually have to play be6 as the only move to not block the d file and castling with check is always an idea to gain tempo. bishop c5 also i do not understand why thats seen as a sus move, develops a piece with tempo, especially as the opponent is 2400 these are not particularly sus moves lol
Be6 is sus, because you first have to see e4 pawn sac for the whole idea to even work. Also, since his opponent already had to see Be6 beforehand, why did he take so long on the move?
In the end one of the two cheaters won, one of them using a chess engine and the other being a grandmaster and pretending to have much less ELO than his real ELO. Really entertaining.
I never considered that, but thats a good point. I dont think he's doing a series or anything, but it does feel off for a 2800 in Blitz to be playing a 2400
I mean Be6 was an easy find, but I found it for different reasons; I would just want the outside passed pawn that comes with a pawn trade of h for g.... I guess the e4 sac was the more sus part but still even that isn't so sus on it's own, it only really looked a sure thing when they repeatedly took the same amount of time on every move lol
I like watching GM's v cheaters because its like watching GM speed runs against normal players. They don't know what's hit them. Stick to playing players you're own elo isn't of bullying lower level players its not informative its soul destroying
