To paraphrase a quote about a plagiarised essay: "I found your Chess games to be both good and original. Unfortunately the moves that were good were not original and the moves that were original were not good."
Nah, at least in the second game he played some Stafford theory, engines normally don't suggest the h4 and ng4 moves because they are not actually that good if the other player plays properly.
I mean there could be gambit lines that people know like in the Mora that get them in a winning position then blunder the middle and endgames. The position Eric had in the middle game all but one of the guys moves I were moves I was thinking of making, of course I made the same blunders, idk what that says about me or the cheater. Amans game looked way more like a stockfish user with the Knight sac for activity was someone no one on that dudes level would do. Then they followed it up with constant pressure until the end when they stopped using it.
To get a player 1000Elo above you sweating when he is actually playing seriously is just impossible without cheating. Miracles do not happen in chess, luck does not make for such a big part of the game.
yeah thats the MO of cheaters, to play those gambit/off beat lines where there's inaccuracies to try and throw off anti cheating software but like you say some of the moves he played would never be played by a 1900. Also the typical way to beat a cheater is just flagging them and you can see how the quality of the moves instantly drops when there's time pressure. Eric seems to try and out think the cheater though LOL
It's so stupid. They lose because they get low on time, and have to play for themselves, then it's always "oh I choked, but I had you though, right?" I swear, it says a lot about the mentality of someone who cheats, and then proceeds to try and get praise for something they didn't do.
When you are so bad at chess that you can’t understand what the engine is doing. Then you stop using the engine and you can’t see the pin the engine had effortlessly created on the board. 🤣🤣🤣
@@frederikzinn5427 nah, he plays an opening, which is opening prep, then let's the engine decide the rest of his moves until he gets low on time. Then makes shit moves.
The Stafford Gambit is really losing if you just remember a couple prep moves. Like you have to play from more than 1.0 difference after the opening. If you are anywhere above 1500 this will have a hard time working.
Hahaha classic cheaters. He wanted an attention. Played like super computer moves then blundered n be like “owow we im suckk...wow we im terrible..” lmaooo 😂😂😂😂 glad he got banned.
HE LITERALLY set up that pin on the king early in the game, and couldn't "see" it when it was the most obvious lol. "I just ran out of ideas..." Sure buddy.
Truly, sincerely, actually, honestly, seriously, clearly, certainly, genuinely all words that can be used instead of literally. Might as well be a male using air quotes. If you’re 12 or younger or English is your second language, I apologize. Then it’s fine.
Funning thing about chess.com is that when chess youtubers or popular GMs report an account they immediately take action, when common people nevermind.😅...i reported someone having 97 to 98 accuracies in 10 games with 1600 rating never get banned. thats why lichess is better because they immediately take action regardless who reported popular or not
Eric: Oh, man, he almost got me, blundered in the end, unlucky. Aman: Woah, what the fuck is this guy doing with his insane lines? Two completely different mentalities and I fucking love both.
This is why lawyers ask you never to take the witness stand. Because most of the people in this thread conclude he was guilty on the basis of his own words.
Can’t believe there’s actually people who are as dumb as a sack of rocks. If you can’t tell when someone’s a blatant cheater, your head is unbelievably far up your ass
3:53 stockfish---> OFF, 600 rated player---> ON, It’s way too funny to see the difference from stockfish to a shitty player when they get low on time (im not insulting whoever is 600 rated, a shitty player is whoever cheat in this game, regarding his real rating)
Well, don’t think that on lichess there are 100% legit players, the other day i did 2 hourly bullet in a row, first one i met a 1300 who completely destroyed me and he was using 1 second on every move, i reported him and he got banned nearly instantly, he was using a sort of autobot, probably he let the engine plays for him, second tournament i met another 900 who destroyed everyone, even 2200+/2300+, reported and banned too...
I think after 3:19 on Erics game, the guys stopped using the engine and was playing his own moves because it took too long to check the engine and he was under 45 sec
"Black surpringsly manages to be winning". Nearly in all of my games i dominate,then i make i stupid mistake and loose and my engine chart looks nearly the same😂
1:56 free pawn Bxg7? If Bxg7 back then Rxc8+ Qxc8 Nxd6+ wins the queen. Am I missing something? Does the tactic not work or does he have smth better positionally?
That's acttualy a common thing a cheater do. They sometimes play strange moves in the openings, sacrifice a piece for nothing, but then they start playing all top moves and win.
I have beaten engine users before, simply flagging them. As soon as I notice perfect moves, along with the usual time delay between moves, I start playing bullet chess against them. I may end up with nothing but a king and 2 pawns left on the board, but I win. And then I offer a rematch, open up Stockfish, and beat them again by flagging them once we both hit around 20 seconds remaining. It is more fun beating engine users at their own game than having them banned. It means that they lose, even if they cheat. They usually log off immediately after this, thinking "I can't believe I lost, despite Stockfish playing my moves."
Here's a piece of advice, it is obvious when you cheat. Computers think completely differently from people and it shows. Like in some positions a person would play a move that generally improves their position but a computer will play some crazy move that manages to squeak out a slight advantage after a crazy, long sequence
how about white bishop takes h pawn when queen was in front of the king then rook to e1, if queen offers a check at f5 bishop just go back and white has an extra pawn
Woah buddy, opening file for just a pawn while ur king's weak like that aint really helping, plus playing againts engine prolly gonna get mated in 10 move
told ya, cheaters just play normal moves for most of the game and check the engine for critical moments and or tactical situations thus avoiding detection.
I’ve never understood cheating (unless there’s some monetary value in it). Out playing your opponent is one of the most satisfying feelings in the world, but cheating just so you can say, “I won,” seems pretty empty to me.