Americans React to Jordan Peterson's British GQ Interrogation 

Send prayers ? whats his address? also I think the fact that he's been been on a meat only diet for rather a long time has something to do with his ill health

milton1969able Nope nothing to do with it , it’s due to side affects of a drug he was taking

It was due to perverse effects from an anti-anxiety medication prescribed to him to help him cope with his wife’s diagnosis of cancer. Peterson is currently recovering at a rehabilitation center in Russia, he needs assistance to walk as there’s been neurological damage done to him due to the medication.

@@milton1969able I've been on the same diet for 10 years. Best shape and health in my life.

I think Jordan has gone through the worst and is now finally coming through the other side. Wish him all the best and look forward to seeing him back.

Old infant? That's a big self-conscious burden

@@manubishe I liked that analogy though, it shows that he is conscientious of his ignorance, which is far better than faking knowledge.

@@rodrigofernandez3544 conscious of his ignorance? I'll partially agree with that - self-consciousness is quite cumbersome to carry, and may be the vulnerability that is used by people who turned against the existence. But in no way I'll agree that it's material/physical ignorance on his part, seeing that I've had similar old-infant parts to develop, more like social unacceptable, or even disagreement, as was, and is, in my case.

@@rodrigofernandez3544 "The Oracle of Delphi considers Socrates of Athens to be the wisest man in the land, because "he knows, he knows nothing".

lmao

Best comment here.

She didn’t succeed

And got obliterated the same, cuz you can't fight reason with ideology. I'm not saying Jordan speaks truth, but at the very least he thinks before he speaks(and I picture him as thinking a lot) and he speaks with reason, instead of just regurgitating the same script over and over and over. That's why these interviews are nigh pointless, they throw that same stuff at him over and over and he has already figured out flaws in the arguments, the contradictions and whatnot, only they don't realize it. And I think he states this beautifully by saying: "I'm not hearing what you think, i'm hearing how you're able to represent the ideology you were taught." . That's about a civilized as you can say: "You have nothing of interest to tell me." "I could replace you with somebody else who thinks the same," is nothing less but an instant knockout...

@@rey_nemaattori Petersen is smart but also arrogant hence I have little or no time for him. Being a "clever dick" is all well and good but he lacks soul as far as I can make out. The Mr Spock of philosophy?

EricIrl don’t fully judge Peterson off of his political debates, his lectures (particularly his religious ones) are where you will find the soul you say he lacks

Very well put. She loves to hear her opinions said out loud.

accompanied by her smug and self satisfied face.

God, i felt the same thing. She came off extremely smug.

She was promoting her book

yes did that not come from our Viking ancestry as well - the right and legal identity was tied to the house whether male or female - people had to work together in very tough times

Art of Free Speech Agreed. No one’s forcing women to take their husband’s last name. If they change their name, it’s because they chose to do so.

Typical neo feminist crap that paints all men as evil oppressors of women children and others. Getting real tired of these people who've never seen a rough time in their lives that place blame on everyone for their issues but themselves

It took me a long time to recognize that the history of western civilization is the history of the systematic oppression of men by women and the subjugation of men to the needs and increasingly demands of women. Men have only begun to wake up and free themselves of the burden of women. It will destroy civilization in the process but men will enjoy a brief interval of peace and freedom just before the collapse which is something at least.

Latin American women could own property by Spanish law in the 1500's. Please look it up. They could also keep their dowries. And they could use ANY name they wanted within their own families. Mesoamerican women also had powerful roles. British women, very different story!

I agree. These interviewers never seem interested to hear his thoughts but to tell him what the meaning of his own thoughts are regardless if they aren't what he intends. And also, why the hell are feminists so offended that a man thinks it's important for a mother to be mothering and selfless to her children.

Antonio Bromelini facts are facts. Values are nowt to do with it. What facts/arguments did he twist in your opinion then?

@Antonio Bromelini He's agnostic. Even if he wasn't, what's that got to do with his opinions? Plenty of brainier people than you who believe.

@Antonio Bromelini who are you, his imaginary enemy??

@Antonio Bromelini Watch better. She kept insinuating bad behaviour through the interview except that during those last short questions at the end.

I know its been a year since you have commented this, but it is not analised, it is analyzed. VERY different things. I am saying this in good faith brother :)

@@senorpoopiedoggie oh I see, good to know - thank you very much brother

Iai fellow brazillian

He got sick?

He’s back!!!

Fatherhood relegates most guys from lover to provider.

You are correct, when my son was born (here in the US).. they call him baby..... (my wife's last name) instead of our family name, in Mexico is different than in the US.

Legally speaking, father's have zero rights to the child upon birth. Afterwards, they have to continue to fight for their rights. In order to gain full custodianship of the child, you have to prove the mother unfit. That's insanely difficult to do.

No wonder she advocates for easier divorce, she knows she's going to need it.

@Antonio Bromelini lol

@Antonio Bromelini i think the comment "married to that" is aimed at the interviewer.

Nope

Imagine being married to that. While holding a camera in the bedroom.

i have a standard response whenever i see discussion of the BBC. its flippant but heartfelt: "i dont get my news and current affairs from the BBC for the same reason i dont get my drinking water from the toilet bowl". I didnt come up with it. I first saw it said about CNN by an american. Ofc ozzies can equally apply it to ABC.

@@vkk8529 "these days it seems that what is considered Right Wing is what we used to consider as common sense". ive seen so many newly converted "conservatives", both US and UK, say "i didnt leave the left, they left me."

Absolutely agree...

Indeed!

HighHoe Kermit nicely reviewed and I couldn’t agree more. As far as I’m concerned , Jordan Peterson talks common sense and consequently manages to make this interviewer look petty.

Good points! A few years ago, I assisted my sister-in-law with peer review for a paper that she was writing. She is an administrator at one of the best public school districts in America (it's a public charter school). Her school district nearly has a 100% college acceptance rate. Of those who choose to attend college, the rate of graduation is nearly 100% too. Yet, interestingly, the school district is primarily filled with students from an otherwise "at-risk" demographic. The paper that she was writing focused on the major variables for success. She accessed quite a bit of data and grouped the variables together. The most interesting correlation was in the area of broken homes. Children from broken, single-parent homes are most likely to struggle in school. This is a major factor in certain demographic communities that struggle to keep up in schools. Whereas things like primary language and income levels were assumed to be the strongest correlation to poor academic performance, it wasn't the case in certain non-English demographics (e.g., Asian-American, European-American, etc. students). Poverty also played less of a role in those communities too. The catalyst, it seemed, was that "under-performing" children tended to come from a single-parent home. In fact, the single-parent homes where the father was the single parent did better than in single-mother homes. In every other primary variable used to find correlation, the children from a single-mother household variant performed significantly worse. In fact, when you cross-tabulated every other variable (e.g., low income, parents with criminal record, ESL [English Second Language] households, immigrants, parental education levels, etc.), the single-parent variable resulted in significant deficiency in a child's level of educational performance and/or achievement. What's more: The difference between a single-mother and a single-father home was stark. The single-father homes performed much closer to the overall average while single-mother homes performed the worst. Even in this particular public charter school district, the children from single-mother homes still lagged behind in test scores, grade point averages and even success in college. After her paper was completed, she was discouraged from submitting it for publication. Her district decided that it was "too controversial" and that it would "open a can of worms." However, the stats themselves were undeniable.

It's low resolution and typical of her cult. They profess to know the cause of all the world's ill's.... and of course it's men. Modern life in the West is relatively easy by my Grandparents standard so they now wish to correct their perceived injustices based on sex, race and sexuality. A Forrest is easy to see from a mile away but you can't navigate your way through it until you're up close and see the space between the tree trunks.

Well articulated and exactly right , if you look through history with a pre conceived agenda then you will always find and pick out the evidence to suit your premise, theres a lot of history to select from. As for the idea ' was it it a man's led world ' back in the day the answer is yes but not through some bullshit patriarchy! It was through an alpha type situation in which many men were dumped on too and quite often much worse than women . The Alpha in these older times was always going to be male that doesn't mean that there's a modern patriarchy and if there is then why do most men not know where to join it lol.

@@rayalbion9637 It's also hard to lead an army in battle on horseback to defend your kingdom while being pregnant to name a practical point. Women in those days had many children, most of them who wouldn't live to see adulthood. Having up to 10 children was quite common until WW2 as there were hardly any contraceptives, which means of your somewhat 50-60 years or so life, 15 were spend as a child, 10 as a senior unable to properly fight and 10 years being either pregnant or care for the infant. No wonder they sent men into battle, not only were they far stronger on average but also far more replaceable then women back in those days.

@@rey_nemaattori I think people forget how much the world progressed prior to the suffragette movement. The average lifespan dramatically improved due to more effective medication and treatments meaning married couples didnt need 8+ children to insure their family line. Before then, it was fairly common for 4 or 5 of your children to succumb to a myriad of diseases, at the turn of the 20th century that wasnt nearly as much of a threat. And i think thats where theres this disconnect modern feminism has with the past. Universal suffrage is their turning point, motherhood was at a diminished demand so they had excess time which led to women dabbling more into the workforce (which thanks to mechanization) competing with men. Though it would take ww2 to fully integrate women into the workforce, though despite the notion that 'women just grew to love working' is partially true, I think the real reason is that the economy adjusted to women in the workforce and going back to a single income household became increasingly untenable. Women of the 20th century could rely on technological innovation to compensate for their general physical shortcomings to men, therefore their dependency on men as hunter/gatherers diminished and the laws slowly changed to represent that.

Yeah, he said the difference was that Helen was openly hostile from the start and Cathy basically sandbagged him so he was more relaxed and friendly from the outset of that interview.

As an ideologue, you need every advantage you can get. Besides, you don't get friendly with racists, xenophobes, homophobes, transphobes, etc. Also known as "white people".

Having to process a phonic stream of nonsense when ever you have a conversation with a Feminist POS eventually becomes intolerable. These interviews are the equivilent of sonic Water boarding, nail pulling, or racking a person. Anyone would become "testy" dealing with this insanity.

Go to his joe rogan podcast interview, think it was the latest one were he explains the background to the interview.

What? Tell me more.

@@AJayAnswersYou she cheated on her husband

@@kevinkelley8056 no way

I’ve had a theory for a while now about women not wanting a second vagina for a partner. Can’t quite formulate it right but I know there’s something here

@@paulfolson7724 Think more, and come back then.

He's my surrogate father!

And if I was as rich as George Soros, I'd be richer than George Soros. I'd have a paper round on the side.

@@MrJonno85 haha!😂

Now that is funny, good one

Technically speaking I would say that a multilayered understanding of Motor Bike mechanisms and how they stack...what would you say...hierarchically, is of a far greater degree of difficulty and possibly utility than say, "Saving Western Civilization". Roughly speaking.......Yo🤘

mikey webb unfortunately She’s bought into an ideology. Hope this ‘interview’ is a wake up call for her. She’s obviously bright but not thinking!

Genius? Really?

No she's not smart, she has got her head so stuck up her own ass she's able to regurgitate her own beliefs inside out

virtualatheist Haha, exactly! What a genius.

I dont think she dared use 'intersected'

Although it can suggest what JP is accusing her of, i.e. repeating the same form endlessly!

I read somewhere they divorced, cant say i'm suprised

Im not sorry for him , once you meet a person you pretty much know what they , he saw she was toxic the same way we all saw her but still decided to sign a contract, he got what he deserved.

Thanks, Dries!

You may find this video very interesting. It allows JBP to elaborate, in detail, his beliefs on God. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-L47oJxwp6yg.html

@Urayis wish l God made us for eternity, only some receive that gift. It cant be earnt. I know very little about zen except this one thing. It has nothing to do with Christianity.

Said in the voice of the Templar knight in Last Crusade

haha awesome

🤣🤣🤣