An ALL WOOD Aircraft Kit! Dakota Hawk - CKD Aero and Fisher Flying Products

Подписаться 175 тыс.

Просмотров 36 тыс.

50% 1

👇🏼 👇🏼👇🏼 Click "SHOW MORE" to see the LINKS Below! ✈️✈️✈️
Check out all the WOOD AIRCRAFT options from CKD and Fisher Flying Products HERE: ckd.aero/wooden-aircraft/
Please follow us on Facebook where we post nearly daily:
/ experimentalaircraftch...
Check out our NEW WEBSITE!
experimentalaircraftchannel.com/
#experimentalaircraft #experimentalaircraftchannel #woodworking
***SUBSCRIBE Right Now to Experimental Aircraft Channel
(It's FREE) and get exclusive offers below!
Our "Sister" Podcast Channel on RU-vid: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
Please visit our Channel Sponsors here:
*Dynon Avionics (Avionics for Experimental, Certified and Light Sport Aircraft)
dynonavionics.com/
*Wide Open Door Company (Specializing in quality metal doors including Hangar Doors!) www.wideopendoorco.com/
*Warp Drive Propellers (Solid carbon fiber blades for your propeller needs in Ultralight, Light Sport, Experimental Aircraft) warpdriveinc.com/
*STOL-IT Aircraft (Builder assist center for Just Aircraft and many other brands of Experimental, Light Sport and Ultralight Aircraft)
www.stolitaircraft.com/
Please visit our Affiliates Here:
**Flying Eyes Optics - 10% Off Use Code: EXPERIMENTAL
flyingeyesoptics.com/eyewear/...
Join the NEW Facebook GROUP where we encourage "Say it With VIDEO" build updates on YOUR current project:
/ experimentalaircraftch...
And we are on INSTAGRAM too!
/ experimentalaircraftch...
WE HAVE A PODCAST! Audio only can be found on iTune, GooglePlay and Podbean. Fill VideoPodcast (V-Podcast) on RU-vid by searching "EAC Aviation Podcast" or click: / @eacaviationpodcast9668

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

9 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 98

@JesseOaks-ef9xn 2 месяца назад

My Dad who passed away in 1995 loved the magazines that advertised airplane plans as far back as the late 1950s. I remember the Fly Baby and the drawings in one of his magazines. This brings back a lot of memories, good memories, of wishing we could build them. He did buy a Stinson 108-1 in the 1980s. He never lost his love for flying.

@hadleymanmusic 2 месяца назад

yea my dad too. he built a toucan trike and flew it one time died a year later. he left it to me told me not let anyone get their hands on it and mom let someone steal it.

@user-my3ff5lj6m 2 месяца назад

Your cat needs a hug.

@johngriffiths118 2 месяца назад

How could he ignore that puss ?

@patm1669 Месяц назад

Cat brought a big smile to my face, rolling in the gravel like that. Lost my Lucy cat about a year ago. Interesting plane too, don't see too many wood-framed planes anymore.

@philipritson8821 Месяц назад

Lucy cat?

@patm1669 Месяц назад

My cat Lucy, sorry if I didnt state that clearly.

@markalton2809 2 месяца назад

One like for the cat, at least

@Crouse_Property_Maintenance 2 месяца назад

Cat for scale only. Not included in kit. You must supply your own cat.

@straightchad8059 2 месяца назад

The cat is a Quality Control inspector I think .

@philipgrice1026 2 месяца назад

Excellent video. I wish y'all success in the venture. It was great that you incorporated the cat, a real star of the video. The 'walk on' roles of the two dogs were unnecessary. The cat was the Star!

@Cee64E 2 месяца назад

I'd like to mention, in case someone hasn't yet, that Fisher Flying Products _started out_ as a model aircraft kit maker and the Dakota Hawk was one of their most popular models.

@philipritson8821 2 месяца назад

I love the Dakota Hawk. Thanks Bryan! Small, fun tail-dragger that gets you airborne to scratch your flying itch. It weighs about 600 pounds empty, has a gross weight of 1150 pounds, which gives a useful load of 550 pounds. That's enough to take two adults and sufficient fuel for a couple of hours fun. That puts this aircraft into into Sonex with a Jabiru 3300 or Zenith CH701 with a Rotax 912 territory. OK, the Dakota Hawk will not take off as short as a CH701 but then again few aircraft can match the 701 for STOL performance. A Dakota Hawk isn't as quick as a Sonex either. But in the sub-1320 pound category, the Dakota Hawk really is a very attractive proposition.

@tedmoss 2 месяца назад

I have been building all wood aircraft for 70 years, but mine are only 8 feet wingspan and smaller.

@guineapigzed 2 месяца назад

Cat approved.

@AzimuthAviation 2 месяца назад

Simply add a duck for IFR capability.

@MrChevyman962000 2 месяца назад

The supurrvisor is on duty!

@ikay2102 2 месяца назад

Seat is nice

@richardbrowne3641 2 месяца назад

I always like Fisher airplanes, but was sad when they were out of business. Then they were bought out and now reselling again which makes me happy. I just wish I had the money to build and own one. It's not easy living off a small disability check being in tons of debt.

@EllipsisAircraft 2 месяца назад

There are many opportunities to turn a small profit in experimental aviation. Maybe see about acquiring rights to a set of plans, list them online and sell printed copies for $200-$300. Maybe offer a digital download for half that price (and 10x the profit, due to no printing costs).

@richardbrowne3641 2 месяца назад

@@EllipsisAircraft There is not a whole lot of money to be made selling plans. I bought R.C. model aircraft plans and it cost a lot of money and I'm thinking it's the same with full size Experimental aircraft as well. I fail to build them due to lack of funds.

@thatairplaneguy 2 месяца назад

I need this. I’m far more comfortable with wood and already setup for wood than I am with/for metal.

@jorgecastorena5762 2 месяца назад

Dam that is a sweet cat. How much for it?

@flysport_tedder Месяц назад

9:45 any idea what this second metal plate is for? It seems like the right position for the trike mains but it looks different than the forward position.

@kevincaruthers5412 2 месяца назад

Looked at your web site. Love the look of the bi-wings. Didn't see any prices for kits though. Did notice the top engine is about $40K and using the rule of thumb that the engine half the plane, then kits would be about $40K?

@robertweekley5926 Месяц назад

Half of $40K would be $20K, me thinks! 😮

@kevincaruthers5412 Месяц назад

@@robertweekley5926 If the engine is half the price of the plane, then 2x engine price is the price of the plane WITH engine. Thus, the price of the airframe and all the bits would be the price of the engine, ie $40K. :) Of course, that is a rough ball park estimate. With enough avionics and other bells and whistles, you could make a crop duster cost many times the cost of the engine. :D

@AmericanPrideHB 15 дней назад

I like the Dakota Hawk but no pricing on the website?? I have to give all my information just to get pricing?

@hadleymanmusic 2 месяца назад

can I put motor glider wings on it?

@mhilderbrand7693 2 месяца назад

I have always had an interest in wood aircraft. I have been targeting fisher throughout the years... I have been drawn to the Celebrity. After watching this video, thought I would go and check it out again. Went to the website and I could not find anything showing the price breakdown of the kit? At least have a link, on the page displaying the aircraft, showing the plans price, the kit breakdown cost, and any other info relevant to the completed kit. Also, at least throw in a rudder kit, with the price of the plans. Sample part to build. I am not a business person, so take that for what its worth :) Good Luck.

@WingWalker1 2 месяца назад

This is great! I wonder what it would take to make this kit convertible from tricycle to tail wheel? If an owner wanted to change configuration for different conditions for whatever reasons. I have a lot of other questions but that was the first one I thought of as I watched the video. 😊

@EllipsisAircraft 2 месяца назад

"Small" changes often require serious design efforts. You have to reverse engineer the entire airplane, not just the structure but the performance and weight and balance data also, to deduce what loads to design for. Then everything has to be engineered for those new loads. And you end up putting a lot more structure into the fuselage that is otherwise not needed, adding weight, and possibly 5-10 hours of build time and several hundred dollars on materials and components. E.g. While re-designing the Quickie for personal use, I found one single ply of fiberglass added to the canard alone required a total re-design of the entire wing, which serves as landing gear spring, etc. But it now has a gross weight increase to the tune of 20+ hours of engineering effort on top of 100+ hours of CAD modeling and 50+ hrs of Airfoil design and analysis. Plus $1,300 in software and compute time. And still not finished, as Hotwire templates still need to be designed. Then the build starts (est. $12-$15k). This substantial cost and effort grants a 70lb increase in max allowable landing weight. That is all.

@philipritson8821 2 месяца назад

@@EllipsisAircraft Conversion from taildragger to tricycle is an option on this aircraft. The hard work has already been done.

@EllipsisAircraft 2 месяца назад

@@philipritson8821 that may be, but I did not investigate the designs web page to see what was available at that time. I assumed if the fellow was asking, that they had done the research and that it did not have this option as of yet. I do realize now that they have options so the question above was moot.

@hadleymanmusic 2 месяца назад

i dono it needs more stringers

@mlpython1089 2 месяца назад

Is cat included too?

@gregorydahl Месяц назад

At 3:10 there is a cat marking his territory

@ecomandurban7183 2 месяца назад

🤗🤗💯💯

@Artem16 2 месяца назад

😸

@sickvic3909 2 месяца назад

Good luck if u find kit prices

@danhubert-hx4ss 2 месяца назад

I like that cat, I really do. What`s his position in the company?

@grahammonk8013 2 месяца назад

@danhubert-hx4ss The owner. Duh!

@danhubert-hx4ss 2 месяца назад

@@grahammonk8013 Thought as much. Duh!

@zappatx 2 месяца назад

It may be nice if they were actually built here in the Dakotas..

@travispower2683 2 месяца назад

Does it include a cat?

@dburton7929 2 месяца назад

3 grand for plans? Good luck with that.

@goodcopbadcop9872 Месяц назад

Sorry to have to say but the construction on this demo airframe is quite poor. You can see daylight through some of the joints.

@normaal4663 12 дней назад

I noticed that also, like at 6:20 i was like ''what??''

@eebydeeby69420 2 месяца назад

Plans are on pirate bay

@outlawflyer7868 21 день назад

I want to build this plane. My engine choice would be a Verner big 5s, 83hp radial. Could they make a cowl and engine mount for that type of application? $300 to $3000 just for plans!!! You can keep that sh--

@buddyitzy9899 2 месяца назад

I've never looked at the hawk just because of size/cost of engine needed. Nothing against airplane. I have to look at engine cost 1st. Let that whittle down the selection.

@oneninerniner3427 2 месяца назад

I know wood works well and has been proven to do so forever. It just bothers me for some reason?...

@kevincaruthers5412 2 месяца назад

5% of 15,000 is 750.

@Ibrahimarm 2 месяца назад

The plans aren't even worth getting if the kit is less than $35,000; you'd be better off getting them 2nd hand for cheaper than they used to sell for. Same deal if you don't use one of the engines they offer.

@ConcreteBombDeep 2 месяца назад

Does anyone have a story of someone that got caught flying a plane without a license? Wondering how serious of a crime it is if someone that say built their own plane and got caught flying it and gave the "I didn't know" response.

@Ibrahimarm 2 месяца назад

You'll be slapped with a fine of up to $250,000 and 5y in prison. Same deal if you don't register the plane itself. They'll see that you posted this comment and that will immediately incriminate you. That argument doesn't really work when most things larger than a lawn mower require a license or certificate.

@ConcreteBombDeep 2 месяца назад

@@Ibrahimarm But has it happened?

@Ibrahimarm 2 месяца назад

@@ConcreteBombDeep Yes, people get caught for it. The fines escalate with repeate offenses, but it will eventually turn into a criminal offense so I wouldn't do it. The best that will happen the 1st time is the FAA forces you to get certificated.

@grahammonk8013 2 месяца назад

@ConcreteBombDeep On one occasion, a guy flying in the outback of Australia saw an odd aircraft taking off o a roadway, nearly colliding with a car. He reported this and someone went out to investigate. They found a very DIY aircraft made from a Piper and a Cessna. The guy had bought the parts from a scrapyard and somehow made them into a flyable plane. Not sure what charges if any were made, but the guy seriously didn't know it was illegal.

@dragon2knight 2 месяца назад

$3000....for PLANS? They have officially destroyed the Fisher lineup. That's what happens when a once great American company gets sold off overseas (or in this case Canada, then overseas....same difference really...). Ah well, onward to the next plane...sigh.....

@Ibrahimarm 2 месяца назад

Fisher is a Canadian brand, but I mostly agree with what you've said. This isn't that big of a deal for people planning to build from a kit but for scratch builders this is a big loss considering how affordable plans normally are. There aren't a lot of companies that sell plans for wooden planes. I'm sure you can still get them 2nd hand for a reasonable price, at least.

@chippyjohn1 2 месяца назад

Tell me about it. So many manufacturing companies that were great have been bought by the US, now they focus on quantity over quality. We need global sanctions against US made products. If we all stop buying US, the world will be a better place.

@Ibrahimarm 2 месяца назад

@@chippyjohn1 That is false. How will the world improve if we stop buying US products?

@mace41canuck 2 месяца назад

@@chippyjohn1you must have meant Chinese products?

@johannesgoetzen 2 месяца назад

It's not too hard to make an own plan though

@kennethwallace5168 2 месяца назад

Lol...I don't see them making it.

@DanFrederiksen 2 месяца назад

Yes everyone can work in wood but a sleek single piece carbon fiber fuselage is just better allround. Faster to make, much stronger, lighter, vastly better aerodynamics, it's just worth it. It requires the factor to make the mold but then you have an actual quality product people will pay for and something that will perform. But making the shape double curved teardrop like a glider it is naturally rigid as just a shell so you don't need framing, bulkheads etc as much or at all. Windshield can be polycarbonate thermoformed in a mold as well and polished to optical clarity.

@devonlove9095 2 месяца назад

Why comment on this build. When it's not your preference of building material?

@DanFrederiksen 2 месяца назад

@@devonlove9095 to better the world

@theresacaron4238 2 месяца назад

Carbon fiber is great if you're loaded with money like Mike Patey but of us are not and have to build on a budget making wood an affordable option.

@DanFrederiksen 2 месяца назад

@@theresacaron4238 I wouldn't be intelligent if I hadn't considered that. Fairly hefty brand name CF cloth is maybe 20$ per square meter/yard. You only need a few layers of that to make something impossibly strong so the simplicity and stiffness at low weight really pays for itself. Let's say you made a glider style 2 seater tandem, that double curved teardrop shape lends itself to natural rigidity unlike a box shape and let's say you needed 20 square meters of CF cloth for that, that's 400$. In aviation land that's not a deal breaker amount of money for an optimal building material. No? Especially if it saves you 800 hours of build time.

@chippyjohn1 2 месяца назад

Have you ever polished polycarbonate? You may be thinking of acrylic.

@Captndarty 2 месяца назад

Bringing the plans from the last century up to modern times, but not the materials🤦🏻‍♂️

@kr6dr 2 месяца назад

Natures composite materials are still relevant. The fastest bombers of World War Two were wooden. Also check out Bellanca aircraft. Wood is strong and resilient.

@Captndarty 2 месяца назад

@@kr6dr yes WW2….. if wood was still relevant for aircraft, everybody would be using it.

@jamesbrummett9530 2 месяца назад

@@kr6dr And wood is relatively easy to work with and if I decided to build a plans built this would definitely be my top 5 choice. Maybe you agree with me in that a wood structured aircraft must be hangered. I think this is the main negative with wood. It should probable NEVER be left out on a tie-down spot for extended periods of time. Unless priming the wood structure would help?

@Captndarty 2 месяца назад

@@jamesbrummett9530 and termites…