That still technically falls under "our assumptions were wrong". They assumed that nobody else entered the building ether before or during the time they were standing outside.
more like "aw fuck why did one of them duplicate; WHY I HAVENT EVEN WRITEN CODE FOR-, crap now they are glitching through the floor." then proceed to look for the bug for 10 hours
Very similar joke: “A pessimist sees a dark tunnel, An optimist sees light at the end of the tunnel, A realist sees a train, The guy driving the train sees 3 idiots standing on the tracks”
@@kiorst9190 the mathematician says that in the house there is - 1 person, so if you go in there this "Negative person" runs up to you an the both of you annihilate yourselves
An engineer, a physicist and a mathematician are each tasked to catch a lion. The engineer builds a cage uses it to trap the lion and declares "I've caught the lion". The physicist builds a fence around Africa and declares "I've caught the lion". The mathematician builds a cage, steps inside and declares "Where I am is outside".
@tyhudson8595let's say your average body temperature is 36°C. your freezer is -18°C. there is a 54°C difference between these two temperatures. if we heat an oven to 90°C, there is also a 54°C difference between the oven temperature and your body temperature. "statistically speaking" your temperature would be at an average of 36°C (optimal, in this example) if you placed your head in the oven and your feet in the freezer (provided they have the same mass n probably volume, i'm sure some physics people could tell you exactly what variables would need to be the same). moving on: the reason why we think hot things hurt more than cold things is because most surfaces can get hot much more easily than they can get cold. hot things tend to be much more hot (further away from average body temperature) than cold things tend to be cold. you can heat things in your oven more easily than you can cool things in your freezer. your oven goes up to 250°C (at least mine does), but your freezer only goes down to -18°C. tl;dr: you are correct, your oven can get much more hot than your freezer can get cold. but we don't necessarily get harmed more from touching a very warm object. if you could touch "equally" super hot and super cold objects, they would probably be pretty much equally unpleasant. i'm not sure if i did a very good job explaining this - but i hope i could help at least a little bit. have a lovely day! i'm sorry if you don't tend to use celsius to measure temperature where you're from - it's what i'm used to!
@@aficionado2960 i answered a question asked in response to op's joke. i don't understand how that decides my sense of humor. and if i already wasted so much of your precious time, why waste more of it on me by sending an unnecessarily rude comment?
I don't think that's it, it's probably a joke about set theory. If you assume the house with 1 person (or any number, the point is 1 person leaving and going back) inside is "empty", then once a person goes inside the house again, then it becomes "empty" again.
@@thesillynugget619 in a video vsauce shows that he brought candy packed like silica gel. He said it's the most irresponsible thing he owns because he could confuse it with the actual silica gel
A biologist, a physicist, and a statistician are hunting in the woods when they spot a deer. The physicist makes some calculations about the motion of the bullet and the deer, then fires. He misses about 4 feet to the left. The biologist analyzes the deer’s movements and behavior, uses this information to aim, then fires. He misses about 4 feet to the right. The statistician jumps up and shouts WE GOT IT!
@@bruciex4574 i thought probability Like in a competition between three contest if 2 loses then definitely 3rd will be the winner. Because all three can't lose
@@ilovemathsomuchithurts Actully my logic waz wrong 1st i was thinkinking its joke about how axiomatic math can be , but the LOGIC behind joke is : 2 people ENTER and 3 EXIT 2-3=-1 , now house has -1 value if someone enters again -1+1=0. So thats why awnser is 0.
@@ilovemathsomuchithurts Yes , saw your videos on proportanlties btw , you can be a PROFESSOR one day . And are you too from PAKISTAN?? , if you don't mind me asking.
A mathematician is presented with a hotel room, where the bed is on fire. To solve this problem, he retrieves a fire extinguisher and puts out the fire on the bed. He’s then presented with a second hotel room, where the garbage can is on fire. To solve this problem, he grabs the garbage can, and empties it onto the bed, thus reducing the problem to one he has already solved.
An engineer stands outside an empty house. He sees two people walk in. Some time later, three walk out. In the end he shrugs and says "eh close enough"
An Engineer, a Biologist and a Mathematician are asked to calculate the weight of a cow. The Engineer measures the hoof print, its depth, and the soil density, and estimates 800 kg. The Biologist looks at the cow and the pasture, estimates its age and health, and says it should weight about 900 kg. The Mathematician is deep in calculations, with pages filled with numbers. When asked after a while, of how much the cow weights, the Mathematician says "hang on... I'm almost proving that the cow exists!"
Meanwhile, the philosopher sits serenely in the corner. She laughs quietly at the mathematician's statement. When he indignantly asks if she knows the answer, she says "It is impossible, given only our subjective empirical perceptions, to prove that the cow exists, and therefore the point is moo-t." She is then kicked out of the fair, more for the pun than anything else.
An engineer, a physicist and a computer programmer are traveling cross country when they lose control of their vehicle while descending a mountain. They go careening down the mountainside, faster and faster, nearly plummeting to their deaths at every turn, but eventually reach the bottom, miraculously unharmed. Upon examining the car, the engineer declares, "we need to invent a redundant braking system to prevent this from happening again." The physicist remarks, "If we look at the brake pads, we could calculate precisely when the fault occurred." The programmer says, "Let's push the car back up to the top of the mountain and see if it happens again."
I’ve been a software engineer for 20 years… and a mechanical engineer for 6… they’re similar, and programming helps engineering for certain, but for sure not the same.
An engineer, a physicist and a mathematician live in the same apartment complex. One night, they're awoken by the smell of smoke. The engineer jumps from his bed, rushes out of his apartment and finds the nearest fire extinguisher. He is then able to suppress the flames and get put. The physicists springs from his bed just as quickly, gets a bucket, fills it with the required amount of water to cool down the flames and extinguishes them. The mathematician wakes up, looks around, sees a fire extinguisher and goes back to sleep - a real solution has been found.
@@OmarHyari2009 Nah. Clearly the problem will always exist and a found solution will always exist. Application of the solution is not within the mathematician's purview.
Basically the house has 0 people before the 2 people enter, 2 people when they're in it and -1 people when 3 people leave, so if one dude goes in, there would be 0
@@Mercy_of_the_Devil it looks like when someone you care about alot goes away forever and leaves a hole in your heart. Except the hole is in the house.
@@glynkeegan306og got them mixed up prolly... i dont blame him cause english isn't my first language and it took me some time to know the actual difference lol
I feel bad for the people who stereotype engineers in the aforementioned way, with no specifications of field, expertise, iq or specialisation. Especially a very hypo intellectual action to stereotype engineers.
Let me explain the mathematician's punchline: The house starts off with 0 people. It's empty. 2 people walk in, so now the house has 2 people. 3 people walk out, so 2 - 3 = -1, the house has -1 person inside So, if one person walks in, the house will have 0 people. A.K.A it'll be empty again.
@@1ronmad1nno, the tax guy would level the house and reclaim the land, then a week later their first warning letter would arrive in what’s left of the mailbox
An engineer, a physicist, and a mathematician are each asked to find the density of a red rubber ball. The mathematician uses the diameter, circumference, and weight to calculate the density. The physicist puts the ball in a tank of water and calculates the density using the displacement. The engineer pulls out his reference sheet of red rubber ball densities and looks up the serial number of the ball.💀
A mathematician, a physicist, and an engineer are driving through Scotland. The engineer sees a black sheep at the side of the road, and exclaims, "Hey! They've got black sheep in Scotland!" The physicist looks out the window and corrects the engineer, "Strictly speaking, all we know is that there's at least one black sheep in Scotland." The mathematician looks out the window and corrects the physicist, "Strictly speaking, all we know is that is that at least one side of one sheep is black in Scotland."
The other guy in the car wonders when hes getting to his house, why hes in someone elses car, where the other dudes came from and how the hell he's in Scotland
The quantum physicist hears the engineer's explanation and agrees that they can't be certain that the house was empty. He hears the biologist's explanation and wonders if there's a black hole nearby messing with time (unless they really stood there until the baby was born). He hears the mathematician's explanation and says "Ah, a person made of antimatter is now in the room"
An engineer, a physicist and a mathematician take a trip to Scotland. While on the bus, they can see a dark sheep out the window. The engineer says “Well, it appears Scottish sheep are black!” The physicist answers “No, this just shows _some_ sheep in Scotland are black.” To this, the mathematician declares “Guys, both of you are wrong; all we know at this stage is that there is at least one sheep in Scotland and at least one side of that sheep is black.”
This remains me of the theory of alien life on other planets 100% of the planets we've been on have had life but it has only been one I don't know to interpret that statistically. The joke was kind of ruined by the Mars rover
For those who don't get it. Took me a while too cause I'm brain dead: Say the house is just the house with 0 people in it. House value = 0 Then two people enter. So that means empty house plus 2 (0+2) people. The answer is 2. There are now two (2) people in the house. But when someone exits you minus one. So since 3 people exit, and there were two people in it before, it's two people (number of people in the house) minus three people (people leaving). 2-3 = -1. There are currently -1 people in the house. You probably get it by now, but then if one person enters. It's now again house value (-1) plus the one person entering. So... -1+1... Which is... 0. So if you enter the house, you die.
An assemblage of the most gifted minds in the world were all posed the following question: "What is 2 x 2?" The engineer whips out his slide rule and shuffles it back and forth, and finally announces "3.99". The physicist consults his technical references, sets up the problem on his computer, and announces "it lies between 3.98 and 4.02." The mathematician cogitates for a while, oblivious to the rest of the world, then announces: "I don't what the answer is, but I can tell you, an answer exists!" The philosopher says, "But what do you mean by 2 x 2?" The logician says, "Please define 2 x 2 more precisely." The accountant closes all the doors and windows, looks around carefully, then asks "What do you want the answer to be?"
3 logicians walk into a bar. The bartender asks, "Can I get you all a beer?" The 1st logician says, "I don't know." The 2nd logician says, "I don't know." The 3rd logician says, "Yes."
It also works logically because they would only say they didn’t know if they wanted a beer but didn’t know the others did. The first logician wants a beer and doesn’t know if they all do, the second knows the first one wanted one and that he also does but is unsure of the last one and the third one knows the other two want one and that he also wants one for himself, so he says yes Edit: Holy shit likes
@@troythemighty3683Because if the first two didn’t want a beer, they would have said no because then not all of them would have wanted a beer. The answer to “do all of you want a beer” would have been no. Since the first 2 said idk, they both wanted one but didn’t know if the others did. The last one was the only logician to have enough info to know if all 3 wanted a beer.
A horse is drinking at a bar and getting pretty drunk, so the barkeep asks if he'd like to close his tab. The horse belligerently yells "I think not!" then disappears out of existence. The bartender was the 17th century philosopher known for saying "I think, therefore I am". I would have lead with that, but I'd be putting Descartes before the horse.
