An Honest Protestant's Response to "Jon Adams Ministries" - The Cameron Bertuzzi Announcement 

Welcome home Cameron. I and my family are praying for you and yours

🙏🙏🙏

There is a glaring and obvious connection between the schism 500 years ago and the cultural schism today. Both are based on ego, a lack of humility, unwillingness to submit to truth and authority. 500 years ago this led to a divorce from church, and today a divorce from reality/humanity. Protestants need to wake up and get back in the game and protect/defend mother church from the modernist onslaughts.

welcome home Cameron, I told my hardcore evangelical brother-in-law about you

This is awesome! I feel like Lousy Protestant will be among the next to come home to Rome.

Working with an Army chaplain right now (he’s a friend) whose desire is to jump ship - for the record my handle “Lousy Protestant” derived from our conversations about our frustrations and desire for the ancient church.

@@ClassicalProtestant so you and the Army Chaplain are becoming Catholics??

@@crossbearer6453 no…he isn’t - I’ve made the commitment to read, evaluate, examine and pray 🙏🏼. I am starting with answering hard questions. I pose hard questions that expose our own inconsistencies - our contradictions and see if I can work through that with wisdom and honesty

@@ClassicalProtestant so you are still on the journey then I hope and pray God leads you to the right conclusion

@@crossbearer6453 thank you so far - it’s been eye opening and I have to come to some simple yet profound conclusions on a host of issues. So for instance - the conclusion last year was to return to a classical Protestantism and many make that pit stop. It’s closer to the ancient church but I’ve also seen many make that jump only to realize that wasn’t it either - so I am family man with professing children and well it’s complicated. God is at work for sure …I know this for certain. I do ask for prayer 🙏🏼. It’s almost as if I can’t keep up with our Lord and what I am seeing for the first time in the Bible - it’s like having new glasses.

😂

That's sad and divisive. We are all brothers in Christ, regardless of the path we take. Keep your eyes on the main prize.

@Zed Zee what's sad is that you seem incapable of understanding an obviously cheeky comment. However, Catholicism is the true orthodox Christianity, so my comment isn't wrong. Which is why it was also funny

@@thecloudtherapist what could be more divisive than this word: Protestant Protest Cameron is on the journey many of us have taken; that of ending his protest. That is the path to unity with the Church founded by Jesus.

@@thecloudtherapist if Christ said "i'm they way" then get that one way, turn catholic !

What a blessing I will pray for you. Not sure if you have discovered the Tradition Latin Catholic Mass. If you haven't . Will save U a lot of headache as the TLM is sound Doctrine without compromise God bless

Amen it’s our Church that He Jesus built on the rock 🪨

Praying for you! We were just brought into the church last Easter. We have been SO SO blessed! EVERYTHING has changed for us.

Jerry - We would love to have you be part of our community here: community.chnetwork.org And - more here: www.chnetwork.org

Praying for you friend! May God bless this journey

Come Home! 🙏🙂

I work there!! Check out the staff page. Peace!!

that's beautiful!! So many mothers out there are praying to St. Monica to help guide their kids back to Jesus. She had to be praying right beside you.

The Catholic Church has lots and lots and lots and lots of problems, not only today but throughout his entire history. If Jesus founded this church, then he isn't god. He's just an idiot.

Vive Christo Rey ❤

Thanks for the update. I understand. As you can see by the interaction here, your own reflections and summary of your experiences, observations, and the "landscape" of contemporary Protestantism resonates with many of us. It is what I saw (and what I participated in and even helped along) for 33 years until age 49 when this happened to me: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0SEFPa2CF6s.html As you can see here in the comments, YOU are also in our prayers. Would love a 100% confidential dialogue with ZERO risk of public discussion, leaks, etc. any time -- kenny@chnetwork.org Peace and all good!

That comment was wonderful. Too bad you felt you the need to delete it.

100% I love this comment. “Where charity and love prevail, there God is ever found”.

Yep!

You are very welcome

AWESOME!

Agreed, great addition to Matt/Ken show

True! That's what happened to me! I also pastored many ex-Catholics whose experiences in their local parishes were less than helpful, sadly. Many of them leave their Catholic faith before they truly understand it, and become "expert ex-Catholics and anti-Catholics" - discussed here - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TYH6Sjaig40.html

@morganse11111 it's okay. A detour before finally coming to the final destination of Catholicism. :P In all seriousness, I personally rejoice even if Protestants end up in the Orthodox church as they finally receive the body and blood of our Saviour. God bless.

It’s because they hate Catholicism more than they love Jesus Christ.

MacArthur in particular is flat out bloodthirsty when it comes to Catholicism

It really is strange and embarrassing

It certainly shook the core of their belief, meaning of those that reacted in such way, maybe even for the better, besides, Cameron did make his homework before making the decision to become Catholic, in Protestant logic, that would make little to no sense, but that's why I think it is certainly not an emotional thing, you have to be very humble and open especially knowing that there will be some backlash, maybe from friends and family, the pressure is also real but in the end when you embrace the fullness of the Truth that is founded in the Catholic Church, it all falls into place. I wish all the blessings in Christ to Cameron and his family who supports him on this way.

His thoughts on guns is pretty unintelligent.

@@micahwatz1148 we are looking at doctrine here He did his homework What are his views on guns anyway??

It’s interesting that they are calling him emotional seeing how much education you need to become a Catholic Protestantism is the emotional centered side of Christianity Catholicism puts faith and reason sided by side Something Martin Luther hated , hence SOLA SCRIPTURA AND SOLA FIDA

Mark are you still doing ministry?

@@KennyBurchard I am not. I left in March of this year and am prayerful that God has a plan for me. I have to believe the experiences I had and the things I learned will be of service somewhere in the future.

May our LORD JESUS CHRIST the good shepherd guide your steps. John 10:14 I am the good shepherd, and I know mine and mine know me,

Wow! What a great testament to your love for JESUS!! Welcome home.

Thanks, friend. Yes, I'm in favor of a RU-vid channel saying who owns it. For instance, mine says "Kenny Burchard." What I mean to say is adding the word "Ministries" after a person's name is a very Protestant thing to do (and, it always strikes me as funny, that "ministry" is in the plural -- "ministries.").

@@KennyBurchard thanks

@@KennyBurchard ah sorry. I get you good point. ☺️Never thought about that it is funny.

Email me and stay connected with others on the journey. Kenny@chnetwork.org community.chnetwork.org

Thanks! So glad!

Thanks! God is good.

🔥

I suppose you forgot that there was another schism about 1000-1300 years ago?

@@jonson856 east and west are in communion. And address the issues I raised. It’s sad to see so many protesters lose out on the good, true and beautiful and settle for less than the lord left because and due in large part to what amounts to ego, and lack of humility.

I would not say “in communion”.

Amen, “May his blood be upon us and our children”…at least that where I think you’re going🙂

Weeeeell, as a former Protestant I can see how Protestants are united in one thing: Protest against the Catholic Church. So it's pretty accurate ;)

James White will be the next to see the light.

@@johnflorio3576 🙏🏻

@@johnflorio3576 James White I stubborn as a rock

I just wonder how James reacted before, when his sister became Catholic .

Maybe this? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-99fmOmlcF0c.html

@@colmwhateveryoulike3240 Yes thats right thanks

OK. The Eucharist. Read Exodus 12. Then John 1:29-34. Jesus is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. That should be enough (let me know if you need more) to lead you to the idea that Jesus is amongst many other things, the new Moses leading a new exodus from slavery to sin. He is also the Passover Lamb who takes away the sins of the world, and as it says, we must eat the flesh. Read John 6:22-70. (Bread of life discourse followed by eternal life discourse) Read 1 Corinthians 10:14-22. You need to partake of the Body and the Blood (As Saint Paul says). Then read the 3 synoptic Gospel accounts of the Last Supper. This is My Body. This is My Blood. No where does it say symbol. Also see Saint Ignatius letter to the Smyrneans. Very clear about the real presence. Also, it isn't a new sacrifice but a representation of the original once for all sacrifice. Same is true with the Jewish Passover. On May, start with 1 Kings 2:19-20. It establishes that the Queen in the Davidic kingdom is the mother of the king, not his wife. This pattern is followed throughout the Davidic kings, of which Jesus is the final and ever lasting king. Also Mary is the Ark of the New Covenant. See What did the Ark of The Old Covenant contain? See Hebrews 9:4 having the golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant covered on all sides with gold, which contained a golden urn holding the manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant; So... it held the manna, food from Heaven for the journey out of the slavery of Egypt, A symbol of the priesthood and The Word of God. What did the Ark of The New Covenant (Mary, Mother of God) contain? She contained The Bread of Life (Jesus, see John 6) She contained the High Priest (Also Jesus) see Hebrews 4:14 "Since then we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. " And she contained The Word of God, made incarnate. (Also Jesus) see for example John 1:1-4 for example. The Ark of The Old Covenant was so Holy that when someone who was not a priest touched it they died. See 2 Samuel 6:6-7 And when they came to the threshing floor of Nacon, Uzzah put out his hand to the ark of God and took hold of it, for the oxen stumbled. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there because he put forth his hand to the ark;[e] and he died there beside the ark of God. Do you think something which only foreshadows the New Covenant and The Coming Of The Lord Our God in The Flesh is more or less Holy? From there a lot of your other questions have obvious answers and I shan't bother writing a full book in RU-vid comments. However you could buy Jesus and the Jewish roots of Mary by Dr Brant Pitre. Hope that all helps.

Great comment. Come see us. We would love for you to be in our community. Community.chnetwork.org www.chnetwork.org

Also... we made this for fun! But i think you will love it! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zsRw1FJUuzw.html

@@KennyBurchard Thank you! I’ve joined.

Can you share any info about this here with me in the comments? Links, etc.?

@@KennyBurchard Santiago Alarcon is an Argentinian RU-vidr who, a month ago, announced that he was becoming Catholic. He was protestant and explained Christian apologetics on his channel. He says the first thing that moved him in that direction was the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist and the miracles around the Eucharist. Here it's his announcement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-R0n_SMF2dDI.html

@@mariab.774 Awesome!!!

The DNA of Protestantism is divorce, fracture, splitting, dislocation, and protest. The impulse simply drives it to do what it is programmed to do over and over and over and over and over again. 500 years of history have proved that this approach to reformation is not, and never was the answer to the prayer of Jesus - "that they may be one." When you have more versions of Protestantism every day, there is no other way to see it; it is a war against the prayer of Jesus.

St. Vincent of Lerins “With great zeal and closest attention, therefore, I frequently inquired of many men, eminent for their holiness and doctrine, how I might, in a concise and, so to speak, general and ordinary way, distinguish the truth of the Catholic faith from the falsehood of heretical depravity. “I received almost always the same answer from all of them-that if I or anyone else wanted to expose the frauds and escape the snares of the heretics who rise up, and to remain intact and in sound faith, it would be necessary, with the help of the Lord, to fortify that faith in a twofold manner: first, of course, by the authority of divine law [Scripture] and then by the tradition of the Catholic Church. “Here, perhaps, someone may ask: ‘If the canon of the scriptures be perfect and in itself more than suffices for everything, why is it necessary that the authority of ecclesiastical interpretation be joined to it?’ Because, quite plainly, sacred Scripture, by reason of its own depth, is not accepted by everyone as having one and the same meaning. . . . “Thus, because of so many distortions of such various errors, it is highly necessary that the line of prophetic and apostolic interpretation be directed in accord with the norm of the ecclesiastical and Catholic meaning” (The Notebooks [A.D. 434]).

Yep! By swapping out Peter and His Successors with a book that every person is free (in actual practice, even if some Protestants disagree) to interpret 100% for him/herself, Protestantism has a mixed bag of remnants of the Church Jesus is building (with access to the Gospel), and manifold and ever-increasing and disparate versions of christianity. They have exchanged ONE shepherd (Peter) for shepherds-unending and ever-changing, and ever-contradicting one another with absolutely no way to stop the chaos. It is wired to self-destruct. And that is happening. We are watching it every day.

You are very welcome

@@DavidTextle Because there is really nothing to understand: that's why it's cringy.

Krystle: Actually, I think I can give a non-snarky, and hopefully positive, criticism, like you've asked for. These, I believe, are the things which Protestants, in general, could benefit from (other than "converting to Catholicism," as you say!): 1. Develop a Biblically-based objective principle for identifying the difference between non-negotiable doctrines (what Catholics call "dogmas") vs. things which are mere matters of indifference. Early Christianity clearly had the capacity to distinguish the two: They could tell mere disagreements about topics where God had been silent, from heretical rejection of things that God _had_ revealed. But what about us, today? We all agree that Protestants differ from one another in soteriology, ecclesiology, sacramentology, and sometimes even Theology and Christology! Well, that's bad enough; but, we don't know _how_ bad until we know which of the disagreements are on non-negotiables (dogmas), and which ones needn't prevent us being members of the same church. In fact, we could be more precise: There are some views which are required to be a part of Your Church; some which are not required but are commonly held. And then there are some views which make a member of Your Church "not in good standing"; some which are outright _heresies;_ and some which constitute de facto _apostasy._ To serve as a fully-functioning rule of faith, the Bible needs to give us a model for distinguishing between these levels of acceptability/unacceptability. But most Protestants don't even _try_ to define their church's non-negotiables by a Bible-based objective standard! Instead they just pick _whatever we already agree on_ and say, "That's the list of non-negotiables" ...or, sometimes they look at the denomination-name on their sign and say, "Well, X has to be non-negotiable since, if we allowed Y, we would have to change our sign." These are not, to say the least, well-founded, objective, Biblical standards. 2. Develop a procedure for Church Discipline which allows the Matthew 18 (or 1 Corinthians 5 ) system envisioned by Jesus (and used by Paul) to be more than a "dead letter" in the modern Protestant churches. Whenever there is a dispute between two Christians (especially if each is calling the other a heretic over some doctrine dispute; but also over more personal matters like adultery, marital strife, people refusing to care for parents, etc.), Jesus gives the responsibility to "the Church" to have the final say of adjudication. (In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul is even scandalized when Christians bring such matters before pagan judges in secular courts!) In modern Protestantism, this model is a "dead letter" because Protestants don't have a clear idea/process how to "take it to the Church." Who in the Church has the authority to adjudicate? Surely not just everyone. Surely not just the lead pastor. And if two Christians in two different churches have a dispute, mustn't both churches temporarily unite their judicial structures, to resolve the issue? (Let's presume, as Jesus Himself does, that not every dispute can be resolved at the "two or three witnesses" level.) I think these two items are absolutely critical. One cannot really claim to "be a church" unless one can do what Jesus clearly expects a church CAN do. That includes adjudicating with authority both about WHAT is/isn't Christianity (or, at least, orthodox Christianity, acceptable Christianity, sketchy Christianity, bad Christianity, and not-Christianity) ...and also about WHO is/isn't Christian (or, at least, a Christian we'd let teach Sunday School, a Christian who needs to be in Sunday School, a Christian who's really off-the-reservation, and a person who just isn't a Christian at all). Without those capabilities -- without, in short, doing what a church _oughta be able to do,_ not as a fluke but with well-ordered practicality -- we're just kidding ourselves calling ourselves "churches" and "Christians." I mean, yeah, maybe we are ...but how the heck can we know? When we have no principled basis for distinguishing the truth of the matter? It's notable that the Catholics _do_ have both of these features. They may be awfully lax, sometimes, about using them -- some U.S. politicians come to mind -- but the fact remains that _everyone knows_ certain things which Catholics _have to_ believe. (Does anybody doubt that Catholics are required to assent to the dogma of the Assumption of Mary? Nope!) ...and similarly, _everyone knows_ that a Catholic who gets too far off-the-reservation can be tried for a canonical crime (they call it a "delict") and have various punishments (I think they're called "interdicts") imposed, such as not being permitted to receive communion, not being able to teach their opinions, etc. Catholics even have marriage tribunals for discerning the truth of whether a marriage, as-originally-contracted, qualified as a real, valid Christian Matrimony by God's definition. I know people complain about procedural difficulties with these, but my point is: They _actually have a system_ for such things. That suggests that they're taking their obligation to _be a legit church_ seriously, by the Matthew 18 standard. So, those are some things Protestant churches should work on, IMHO. If the whole Protestant world finds them impossible to implement, we should be asking ourselves "Why is that?" I hope that's helpful. Respectfully, CW NOTE: Full Disclosure: I grew up in Baptist and Baptist-esque non-denom churches; I participated as a church musician in various evangelistic outreach efforts, and worked as a musician, bandleader, and arranger for Baptist, Methodist, and a few other conservative Protestant churches. Like some others here, I dug into church history to get some troublesome questions answered, and ended up convinced I should become Catholic. But I still speak Christianity "with an evangelical Protestant accent," so-to-speak, and am very thankful for the Baptist ministers and Sunday School teachers who taught me to love the Lord and the Scriptures. It is in _that_ sense -- that sense of camaraderie knowing my own roots -- that makes me say "we" in what I've written above, not "you," when referring to Protestants. (I didn't want anybody to think I was denying having become a Catholic; but I also didn't want anyone to think that I was taking potshots at my Protestant upbringing, for which I am endlessly thankful, or at Protestants, with whom I still feel a strong alliance and familial connection. I hope that makes sense.)

Well said.

Which national church did you join?

That isn't surprising. You kind of have to to remain Protestant

all protestants do is lie about catholicism, they're afraid that if people knew the truth they would cross the tiber, and they're right about that.

I pray for John MacArthur to follow Cameron Bertuzzi into the Catholic Church!

@@johnflorio3576 I doubt that he will. If he did, he would lose his very profitable career as a pastor of a very large church.

True! But I do wave my arms around a lot! I'll get better at it. :)

Thanks for the sub!

there are many Christians outside the visible Church that are not guilty of that situation - but that doesn't mean these people have access to the same saving gifts, especially to the Eucharist, the forgiveness/cleansing of sins through the sacrament of reconciliation etc... I advise you to simply check what you find impossible to accept: is it true that your beliefs have a clear biblical fundament? because, as I have verified again and again, every specific doctrine protestants sustain is not only false, but is also totally absent from Scripture

There is no biblical teaching that should ever lead to the idea of an invisible church. 100% visible with both faithful and unfaithful people within it. Jesus founded one Church. It is visible. It has visible pastor, the successor of St. Peter. This always has been and always will be true. He gave apostles, proohets, evangelists, pastors and teachers until we are all perfected in unity and a Jesus-conformed life. There is no such thing as an invisible Church. Not one verse of Scripture supports the idea. One field with wheat and tares growing in it.

@@silveriorebelo2920 What do you mean by every specific aspect? Sounds like they worship Buddha. Sorry if I'm being pedantic

@@KennyBurchard what would you call someone outside the CC church who believes in JESUS as their saviour?

@@wishyouthebest9222 if they are validly baptised I would call them a fellow and beloved brother or sister in Christ in imperfect or broken communion with His Church.

But, the question of God's desire for perfect unity once established necessitates that a person, then, asks where is that unity represented most perfectly.

What does John 17:21 say?

@@bradclifton5248 This is a valid point. Thank you for raising this. However my issue still hadn't been addressed. Is this unity necessarily in the catholic church because the church appears to be in unity...whatever unity means. Does unity imply truth is what I am asking

@@johnflorio3576 I've read it. Same question I have is does catholic unity imply truth? If I'm wrong,forgive me but you seem to presupposes truth is in the catholic church and then argue from that perspective

@@oadefisayo well the chur h was promised to be protected. That the holy spirit would guard us. Therefore, I believe, truth seekers will find the Catholic Church if they honestly pursue it.

I dont know how to link to a comment on another persons video.

@@KennyBurchard could you just link to the video?

@@jimmys6566 sure! Happy hunting! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ljLCSUJTKvQ.html

@@KennyBurchard Got it thanks - about 20 comments in

Hello Victor, I am going to give you a very quick and friendly response to your comments. To your first response. Catholics have 21 rites within the Church. Which does open us up to diversity. Even with all of our diversity, we have one thing that unites us all. All 21 rites are united by the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Your second response... You say that Cameron's decision to convert to the Catholic Church should be opened up to a more balanced audience in the comment section. May I remind you that Cameron's RU-vid channel is a Protestant channel. So if anything, you would expect the scale to weigh more to the Protestant side. My humble opinion... We all need to pray for Cameron and his family. I am sure that this decision wasn't easy. The most intimate part of our being is the love of our God, and how we are to properly honor Him, and worship Him. This decision not only affects Cameron, it also affects his family. Their whole world view has just changed. Cameron did not make this decision easily. He publicly did the hard work. You talk about conversions should be about theology, and not on emotions, well I totally agree with you. Cameron clearly followed where the theological evidence led him. He had access to some of the top thinkers from all of these camps. Again, everyone should be praying for him instead of judging him. We all need to stop acting like this is Catholics vs. Protestants. We are not on teams. This is much bigger. This is finding the true Church that our Lord started 2000 years ago, and for Cameron, that is the Catholic Church! God bless you my friend! ⚘️

@@rosiegirl2485 I appreciate your response but I hardly said anything expect: 1. Slamming protestants because they have diversity isn't an effective argument. So I wasn't addressing Catholism but just the poster's cheap shot at Protestantism. I did point out Catholism has diversity but I wasn't making that an issue to denigrate the Catholic church but to just show that the poster's argument wasn't legit (ie so the Protestant church has diversity and so does Catholism this doesn't negate either). 2. That Cameron's conversion doesn't have any significance in confirming Catholism over Protestantism. I just think the celebration of his conversion as a sign that Protestantism is wrong is foolish. My faith is in Christ alone. I don't base on faith in what other people may believe or disbelieve or do or don't do. So Cameron's personal beliefs and journey doesn't validate or invalidate what I believe. I'm not going down the road that Cameron's really smart so I have to agree with him. My faith in grounded in the Bible not him. No I can't support Cameron's conversion to Catholism. If he'd changed between Protestant denominations I'd still not support him. It's entirely between himself and G-d and his family. His new church family should support him. I won't reject him for it but no high fives either. It's not how changing from one's denomination to another works. I never condemned him over his decision though I don't agree with it either on theological grounds (I never addressed this later issue at all). I rewrote my reply to help you better understand where I was coming from. I feel like you read the first reply than made assumptions I never said or implied. I'm really not interested in having a rant about the Catholic church and it's theological differences from Protestantism. Brothers and sisters shouldn't fight about which room as better. We both have to be faithful to G-d and follow the Bible everything else pails in comparison. (Please apply grace - my grammar and spelling isn't perfect.)

@@Xymage Funny! I was just watching Catholic videos slamming the the Pope as the anti pope that sounds like disunity to me.

@@Xymage I think I'm just going to call it a day. I'm don't accept your statement as anything other than dribble. So feel free to declare victory and move on.

It’s not just one person making policy in the Catholic Church, the Pope makes policy with the cardinals, bishops and other Catholic theologians. While some in the Catholic Church are trying to distort its teaching the catechism is clear and has an answer for almost everything! Anything man touches will be corrupt the Mass and a personal relationship with God are at the center of catholic life! I don’t forget the Catholic Church complied the Bible before the Reformation and removal of several books !

The Pope spends most of his time doing anything but making policy. Most Popes serve their whole papacy without changing dogma.

@@danvankouwenberg7234 I consider him to be much like royalty basically a title only. He makes appearances like the queen of England but doesn’t do much else

@@lois2997 I could see that. He really shouldn't be placed too high above any of the other Bishops unless a dispute has to be settled.

It is not divisive to acknowlege the reality that Protestants have created (and continue to create) all kinds of new protestantisms every day because of Sola Scriptura. This incessant dislocation from the Catholic Church is the divisive thing. Catholic Christianity IS Christianity in its fulness. I was a Christian before I was Catholic. So is Cameron. He is doing the right thing by ending his protest (that is how to fix disunity) and coming into the fulness of the Faith by entering the Church Jesus founded.

Protestantism is the division in itself: it isn't one Protestant Faith vs. Catholicism; there are hundreds of different Protestant theologies that are antagonistic or contradictory vis à vis each other, let alone Catholic dogma and doctrine. *That's* the actual division.

@@LibertysetsquareJack, i couldn't agree more.👌

@@KennyBurchard, i couldn't agree more, Kenny!👌

Zed Zee, I coudn't agree more with Kenny Burchard's reply to you and with Set_Square_Jack's comment on your comment!🤟