Zegras does a little celly to himself right by the Jackets bench and they take offense to that? Seems like they can dish it out but absolutely cannot take it in return. Softer than 4-ply toilet paper.
I was so confused. Can someone explain why the jackets weren't given a chance to shoot again? Unbiased I'm neither a ducks or jackets fan, I was literally just confused as to why the jackets didn't get another shot after rakell's goal? If jackets missed on the next attempt than the ducks win? I'm confused, somebody please explain lol
@@threeweeler no, they didn't, CBJ elected to shoot first so after they missed the first two, they had to score the next one and hope the ducks didn't score after. Rakell's shot was the 3rd for the ducks.
I don't want to be a debbie downer or anything but they need to go back to the straight in method.. I get the side to side is the best way to score but taking a 20 second breakaway as good as these guys are is just kind like cheap... Skaters going all the way to the boards then cutting across the crease.. It just loses something. Straight in one on one keep it between the dots on the circles at least. That winning goal feels cheesy...
