"I took break, cooked, swimmed, meditated and did not even touch books for a month". Mate, I have been applying your research technique for many years but still no resul 😃 Good job btw👍
He did mention that he had spent a lot of time and burned the midnight oil in the library on trying to solve the problem before taking the break. Both, hard work and relaxation are required to be successful - one cannot just go with too much of one and expect positive results!
Please tell me what are it's applications in the computer world. How can teaching a computer 4,000 of panini's rules of Sanskrit language is beneficial
@@moneymaker3456 Currently, English is the intermediate language in every translation. If Sanskrit becomes the intermediate language, then it will be beneficial.
@Satish Gupta What is your problem? That he did his PhD in Cambridge? He got into the University through his own steam. Not through reservation, I am sure. He used his own intelligence to decipher a code of over 2500 years. He did not use British intelligence. Where is British supremacy here? Rather he would have received a token or generous stipend from the University which he would not have here. Isn't he still Indian? Don't you feel proud for a compatriot's achievement? What is your problem?
Stupid people don’t understand that the finding will written in the name of Cambridge. There is no proud in india. Your future generations will be laughed at by saying that we had the treasures but we did not find it. This is a academic war which is lost by India.
Lol do you expect a non indian to crack the code? lol. Indians themselves don't understand sanskrit and you expect non-indians to understand the sanskrit grammar problem and also solve it lol
Hi, I am from the Philippines! I want to ask a question. For years now I want to understand the relationship between Sanskrit to the Laguna copperplate inscription. We learn how Hinduism comes from the Philippines, we even have more than 100+ borrowed words from Sanskrit that we still use to this day. As a Sanskrit student, I want to know from your perspective the historicity of the Baybayin alphabet because we never learn in school how the Sanskrit language made a huge contribution to how our current language Tagalog formed. Thank you for your answer! I am a linguistic enthusiast from the Philippines. Nice to meet you!
I would first request you to make a video on what the algorithm is and how the traditional interpretation did not fit in and how your interpretation corrected it.
It is an eye opener. He had incisive thinking and thought outside the box to come up with this interpretation. Because we were taught the same thing by our teachers and we accepted it without questioning.
@@ricardoafonso7563 Hinduism even has a place for Nirishvarvaad and atheism. Ajivika, Charvaka, Buddhism and Jainism are the nastika schools of Sanatana thought.
विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् जब 'सपादसप्ताध्यायी ' के ऐसे दो सूत्र एक साथ एक ही स्थल पर कार्य करने के लिए उपस्थित हों , जिन्हें यदि हम एक जगह कार्य न करने दें , तो भी वे अन्यत्र कार्य कर सकें, इसे प्रतिषेध या तुल्य विरोध कहते हैं।और आप इसी सूत्र को गलत करने की चेष्टा कर रहे हैं। सर्वथा निन्दनीय है I
Panini's grammar (among other grammars of Sanskrit) is undoubtedly the most stunning example of structured (algorithmic) thinking and possibly the highest single human intellectual achievement of antiquity. It is delightful that this puzzle be solved by a student from a university that produced in the past the likes of Thomas Macaulay who had the wisdom to contend that "a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia." Cheers.
@@axed1176 that is why the commentator used the sentence "delightful to have student from the same university" as this student's discovery somehow contradicts Thomas's sayings
🙏Before pointing finger at great Karthyaayana,kindly introspect yourselves,interact with present great scholars in our country , like Dr.K Vishnu Namboothiri etc and understand where you do stand 🙏
The way he described how he got to the solution out of blue after taking some break and keeping his mind away from the problem in the meantime is just so relatable to me. When we get heavily involved in our studies, brain doesn't get the chance to establish links right away between tidbits of information until we give it some time to do so. Then you start to view everything more clearly in the bigger picture
Einstein had the same experience during his life. 😊 He went away in a summer vacation and when came back made a big discovery out of the blue in a few days. 👍😀
आचार्य परंपरा का खंडन। ऐसे कैसे आप कोई भी बात को सिद्ध मान लेते है। प्रमाण चाहिए आचार्यों को खंडन करने के लिए भी प्रमाण चाहिए किसी भी मूर्ख के कहने पर आप आचार्य परंपरा को बदल देंगे विदेशी क्या किसी को प्रमाण देंगे अथवा क्या किसी को रिजल्ट देंगे कि कौन सही है कौन गलत है जिनको हिंदी भी नहीं आती राम+सु से राम क्या बनाना आ गया तो आप अपने आप को पानि नीय न समझ रहे हैं ऐसे पाणिनी हमारे हमारे भारतवर्ष में प्रत्येक गगुरुकुलो में हजारों भरे पड़े हैं
ओम। क्या आप बहुलम चंदसी,पूर्वत्र सिद्धम सूत्रों को नही जानते!? पूर्वपरणित्यन्तरङ्गापवदानां उत्तरोत्तरं बलीय ... यह एक परिभाषा है।इस के अनुसार एक स्थान मे दो से ज्यादा सूत्र आयेंगे तो उन में कौनसा सूत्र बलवान होता है बताया गया। बहुवचन झल्येत सूत्र का अपवाद अतो भिस ऐस् है।इसलिए यहा भिस की स्थान में ऐस आदेश होके मन्त्रैः बन गया।वेद मन्त्रो मे दिखने वाले शभरूप मन्त्रेभि:,कर्णेभिः ....के सिद्धि बहुलं छन्दसि से कर सकते है।
Interestingly this is a similar issue that we see in the famous pacha-dhaatu.. there are other rules which say the successor and predecessor concept like we have in numbers... There are teachers who did figure this out but sadly no one bothered to document and no one dared to ask... Thank you, for formulating and adding here and spreading and publishing your knowledge... If we all were speaking Sanskrit the Natural Language Processing technology would have been way more advanced... I am happy and proud of you sir.
@@ExhaleYogaSchool you are righ. panini has compiled the grammar just like vyasa compiled vedas. For example vyasa and valmiki have done a large deal of literature way before panini. This timeline is because, there are scholars who propagated false info stating sanskrit is not older than Buddha. So this is a misinterpratation like Aryan theory..
Actually there is no such unsolved problem in the vyakarana sastra.The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view. Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
I just have gone through an "analysis of his paper" by another scholar based in India. Since this is related to Sanskrit, it seems that there are many wrong assumptions by Rishi.
Many congratulations to Dr. Rishi Rajpopat. His work has brought great pride to us Indians. May he comtinue these wonderful discoveries even after his PhD.
Congratulations brother!! You did a great job !! 👏👏👏👏 India is proud of u ...and i am feeling very very proud of my culture and ancient geniuses...👏👏👏👏👏
I would like to point out that there was no "puzzle" per se in the first place. All the solutions/ interpretations given by katyayana and patanjali fit perfectly for all the sutras and derivations of ashtadhyayi. Now, you should've at least stated that it is an alternate method confined in its application as you've left out "aagamaas" conveniently as your alternate method doesn't work for them. The alternate idea that you've given in your thesis doesn't work properly even within the area that you've claimed, for eg at रामेभ्यः । There are many other instances where your theory doesn't work. Then how is it that you're making such big claims! Now coming to its applicability in the computer world, it would produce incorrect results as the alternate solution is limited and doesn't apply 100% in the claimed domain either. While your interest in sanskrit and the hard work is worth appreciation it is completely inappropriate to denounce the rishis without coming up with a wholesome idea yourself.
He hasn’t published his thesis yet. It would be good to go through it in detail and then critique it. Until then it wouldn’t hurt us to commend the effort and the very initiative of trying to explore the topic on the face-value of it.
Congratulations on your achievement !!! It's a matter of pride for all of us wish this will inspire many to learn Sanskrit and remember our ancestors the great work they had done. 🙏🙏🙏🌸🌼🏵️❤️❤️❤️
This is such a big achievement and that too in such a simple way! impressive!! Your knowledge of the root language and logical interpretation have greatly helped.
Every single Sanskrit word been understood and accounted for as taught by Sage Panini. Only thing is those who study Ashtadhyaayi, though small in numbers, don't come out and beat their chest. This discovery is just a tall claim about a topic which people at large of unaware of. Just because one is from Cambridge doesn't mean he is great and others are fools.
@@akshaysharma8940 sure. But try and study Ashtadhyaayi atleast a bit and then you'll understand the truth of this half baked discovery. If anyone to be celebrated in this context, its Sage Panini and later Acharyas like Patanjali who wrote Mahabhashya on Ashtadhyaayi and other Acharyas who built upon Ashtadhyaayi. All of them were unimaginable intellectual giants. One will understand this only when you study atleast a bit. Then you'll see how hollow is this half baked reasearch claim is and how silly is the celebration around it. Start studying now instead of basking on validation from a white man. Free yourself from intellectual slavery.
This is an occasion to celebrate an achievement of a young Indian scientist in the contemporary academic arena, not to compare with quiet scholars who kept things to themselves or who never bothered to solve it in open through any of the Indian universities. Expected a little more large heartedness.
Panini was never wrong, it is just that, he was misinterpreted maybe due to one faulty explanation by Katyayana, and later people never raised fingers on it. Thanks for the renewed interpretation. Please share the Thesis PDF! And may I know, what was the explanation of Patanjali on this.
The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view. Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
Congratulations 🍾 This is exciting news! I understand the need for a break as a means to reset and attain clarity! Way to go, happy for you and this discovery!
Poor Panini has gone misunderstood for 2500 years.... He must be thinking "Arre yaar, why did I not make it crystal clear when I wrote my rulebook..." Until Dr. Rajpopat arrives on the scene and takes a one month holiday. Interesting how even Katyayana, who came after Panini, seems to have fallen for this misunderstanding. So the two probably never met. Or maybe Katyayana's mistake spilled on to everyone who followed?
@sudo2998 Panini Rishi was much more rich then you or any 21st century person in terms of Knowledge. And may be Katyayana intentionally misinterpret ate so that poor generations like us who don't know how to respect gurus and senior scholars should be misguided from the real knowledge of Panini Rishi. Because modern education only teaches how to exploit!!
खरे आहे. एक महत्वाचे म्हणजे I kept all my books away for more than a month. नंतर फक्त चिंतन केले तर मार्ग सापडतो. भाष्यकारांंते वाट पुसतु हे माउलिंचे बरोबरच आहे. पण अनेकदा फक्त अशाच पद्धतिने राहिले तर मुळे विचाराना नेमस्तपणा येतो. नविन सापडत नाही. म्हणून अभ्यासाच्या ठराविक पातळीनंतर कधितरि जुने जाऊ द्या मरणालागुनि .....असे केले तरच केशवसुतांना सापडली तशी नवि तुतारी सापडते. आइन्स्टिननेही कधि असे म्हटलेचः मी (ठराविक पठडीत) शिकलो नाहि हे जास्त चांगले झाले।
I think it is a wrong interpretation, Rama + bhyas (राम + भ्यस्) = ramebhyah (रामेभ्यः) There are two different possibilities 1. Supi cha (सुपि च) & 2 bahuvachane jhalyet (बहुवचने झल्येत्) . How it's solved by your interpretation... ?? Because you have interpreted the Para (पर) word as right side. ( 2.40 )
Correct, and the place where he is showing fault रामैः or मन्त्रैः, there it is a case of अपवादः as it is said that परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः, even बहुवचने झल्येत् is परशास्त्रम्, because अतो भिस ऐस् is apavaada, it will apply
@@viveksakhi9074 Kindly read his thesis available on DOI: 10.17863/CAM.80099. He has proved that परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः rule need not be used for astadhyayi and विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् is sifficient to solve all problems. Astadhyayi is self sufficient and can solve all conflicts of rules on its own. By his method you can get रामैः or मन्त्रैः without using परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः rule. If you find any fault in his thesis then you can challenge him and write correct version.
this is really awesome and the feeling that people were wrong about something for 2500 years, and now you discovered truth, so many possibilities opened
All the Shastra and ancient Indian knowledge needs a deep research and I'm pretty sure that it will gonna blow everyone's mind if we could understand all these ancient knowledge, Rishi hatts off to you for such amazing work you literally inspire many youths and other scholars too.
Finally - academic rigor instead of rhetoric is brought to the study of the ancient language. To be able to codify a language in 4000 rules shows the genius of Panini. And it took Dr.Rajpopat several years of hard work to put everything in place. A PhD from the University of Cambridge is no easy task - the thesis would be scrutinized, challenged and taken to pieces by the academicia before the PhD is granted. So congratulations to Dr.Rajpopat (understated). Unfortunately, we might have a lot of jealous folks trying to poke holes without even reading his paper...
It's the meaning of this paribhasa sutra as applied in the case of conflict of two vidhi sutras, Katyayana's interpretation that 'para' meaning the vidhi sutra number which is later in the serial order is chosen, this interpretation is found to be producing gaurava not laghava.
@@dhiren26 Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
Sanskrit is called as the language of Devta i.e.devine language. This breakthrough should be fruitfully utilised in computer language and be beneficially utilised.
Now when we can know the Root word by this Sutra.. i hope we will be able to accurately translate the Shlokas from Vedas and also will be able to track Sanskrit words which are being used in Different Languages around the world.. Proud of such youths like him🔥🔥🔥🔥
Can you please make a more detailed video with a simplified explanation of what the problem was, what you have achieved, and also one more thing. You said your solution solves the problem without exception. So, does that mean if you apply the older version, you come up with errors? a slightly detailed comparison will be great.
Please tell me what are it's applications in the computer world. How can teaching a computer 4,000 of panini's rules of Sanskrit language is beneficial
@@moneymaker3456 From what I understand, they want to build AI which can think clearly and sanskrutam is the perfect language because it never has double meaning of a particular sentence.. like english or any other language
@@moneymaker3456 sanskrit language and paninian grammatical structures are special in the fact that every word carries the contextual meta-data along with it. So there no ambiguity when extracting meaning. In English: we have two sentences "I am going to Bombay" and "I am going to eat". Only the last word changes, and changes entire context as bombay is a place while eat is an action. But in sanskrit every word carries in it, its tense, person, quantity, case, etc. So even if the word positions are changed in a sentence, the meaning doesnt change. What AI/ML NLP programs try to do, is to build context meta-data over other natural languages like english which lack such inbuild mechanism, and then further learn the rules to extract meaning.
First of all Heartiest Congrtulations for achievements. One question - The books you referred for the study were available in Cambridge or you got them from India?
नमस्कार आपके द्वारा दी गई जानकारी बहुत महत्वपूर्ण है। ख़ुशी हुई आपको सुनकर कि आप विदेश में रह कर भी भारतीय संस्कृति को आगे बढ़ाने का कार्य कर रहे हैं। क्या आप कैंब्रिज में मेरे लिए ऐसी जानकारी से सम्बन्ध रखती कोई किताब खोज सकते हैं जिसमे भारतीय गुण सूत्र व्यवस्था (Genetics marriages) के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया हो? कोशिश कीजिएगा अगर मिल जाये तो। भारत के प्राचीन इतिहास में Genetics improvement बहुत काम हुआ है।
Sanskrit is the oldest and most scientific language in the world But Indian secularism allows to learn Urdu But not Sanskrit Thats why we say 'Mera Bharat Mahan' 🇮🇳🇮🇳😡
Congratulations brother & I hope this brings the needed attention to the grandeur & greatness to the Sanskrit language that it so badly deserves. Even with such richness it has been vilified & demonized & has been accused of corrupting local Indian languages & the colonial rule also did it best to rest it in oblivion & ironically it's in their own backyard that a breakthrough has been achieved in it which makes it really special.
किसी भी शिष्य की योग्यता उसके गुरु के आधार पर मानी जाती है और हम सभी के आराध्य त्रि मुनि जिन्हे ये ऋषिकुमार गलत ठहरा रहा है और वो लोग क्या सहमति जता रहे है जिन्हे खुद एक अक्षर नही मालूम।
Pushpa Dikshit ma'am has declined your discovery , she is a very well known Sanskrit scholar and has given you an open challenge to debate with her on any forum ,face her and then only say something about padini or katyayan
@@devotion240 Sanskrit generally connotes several Old Indo-Aryan language varieties. The most archaic of these is the Vedic Sanskrit found in the Rig Veda, a collection of 1,028 hymns composed between 1500 BCE and 1200 BCE by Indo-Aryan tribes migrating east from what are today Afghanistan across northern Pakistan and into northwestern India. Vedic Sanskrit interacted with the preexisting ancient languages of the subcontinent, absorbing names of newly encountered plants and animals; in addition, the ancient Dravidian languages influenced Sanskrit's phonology and syntax. Sanskrit can also more narrowly refer to Classical Sanskrit, a refined and standardized grammatical form that emerged in the mid-1st millennium BCE and was codified in the most comprehensive of ancient grammars, the Aṣṭādhyāyī ('Eight chapters') of Pāṇini. The greatest dramatist in Sanskrit, Kālidāsa, wrote in classical Sanskrit, and the foundations of modern arithmetic were first described in classical Sanskrit. The two major Sanskrit epics, the Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyaṇa, however, were composed in a range of oral storytelling registers called Epic Sanskrit which was used in northern India between 400 BCE and 300 CE, and roughly contemporary with classical Sanskrit. In the following centuries, Sanskrit became tradition-bound, stopped being learned as a first language, and ultimately stopped developing as a living language. Try📚researching before🗣replying? 🇨🇦✌🏻📜♥️(+🇺🇦)✨🌎💫
@@rinalore The Native sanskrit speakers brahmins are just as nomadic in the past as the modern roma gypsies. As bramins were nomads and therefore the influence of the other dialect(European, Russian and Asian) on sanskrit. Sanskrit is a mixture of many dialect and it has developed words from other language and dialect to make itself better. Some religions originated in the indian subcontinent and were professionally marketed(practiced) by the sanskrit speaking brahmins. Once native sanskrit speakers brahmins are nomads and later brahmins are preachers they declared their mixed dialect divine and culture as vedic. Sanskrit spread religiously rather than as a better dialect. There are 300 variants of Ramayana in the world most of which are in written form except Valmiki Ramayana. Ramayana and Mahabharata have spread orally in many cultures and so has the Sanskrit Valmiki Ramayana, so there is nothing to emphasize.
@@rinalore These dates of 1500 BC etc. are all hogwash ... no scientific basis. These dates were decided by colonial historians of 19th century based on Biblical belief that the world was made in 4000 BC so anything cannot be older than that.
विदेशी यदि बताने लग जायेंगे की कौन संस्कृत का विद्वान है तो तो हद हो गई । इन महाशय को विद्वानों के सामने अपने तर्क रखने चाहिएं और फिर विद्वान सहमति प्रदान करे तब कोई सिद्धांत को माने।
